Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Spherical scalar waves in regular extremal RN coordinates

Definition

Fix real parameters m>0 and qe,qm with qe2+qm2=m2, and use the selected ingoing dyonic Reissner–Nordström metric on Min=Rv×(0,∞)r×S2 with signature (−,+,+,+):

g=−D(r) dv2+2 dv dr+r2γS2,D(r)=(1−mr)2.

Here γS2 is the metric induced on the unit sphere S2⊂R3 by the Euclidean metric, and ωS2 is its outward area form. The coordinates v,r and parameters m,qe,qm have units of metres; angular coordinates are dimensionless. The displayed Maxwell two-form uses the supplied geometric normalization, with no additional SI normalization: its vr coordinate component has units m−1 and its angular components have units m. In the supplied ingoing RN background with mass parameter M=m, the fixed Maxwell two-form is

Fin=−qer−2 dv∧dr+qmωS2.

Use the unique torsion-free, g-compatible connection; in every smooth chart its coefficients are Γabc=12gad(∂bgdc+∂cgbd−∂dgbc) and are smooth. For the horizon-data result, set M=m, Q2=qe2+qm2=M2 and f(r):=1−2M/r+Q2/r2=D(r). It states that ξ=∂v obeys Lξg=0 and is normalized by g(ξ,ξ)→−1 as r→∞; at r=M, g−1(dr,dr)=f(M)=0, ξ♭=dr, and ξ is tangent to the level. Thus r=m is the local Killing horizon generated by ξ, with signed surface gravity fixed by d(g(ξ,ξ))=−2κHξ♭ and equal to κH=f′(M)/2=0 (units m−1). No maximal-extension or global event-horizon assertion is included. The metric and displayed Maxwell field are fixed. A neutral test scalar has no electromagnetic gauge coupling or scalar coupling to that field, and does not source either background.

A reduced spherical scalar profile is a real function ψ:Rv×(0,∞)r→R whose coordinate partial derivatives through total order three are continuous. Its full scalar on Min is the spherical lift ψ~(v,r,ω):=ψ(v,r); in radial formulas we use ψ(v,r) for the reduced profile, and the notation □gψ=0 means □gψ~=0. For a C3 scalar lift, define the extension of the smooth-scalar wave operator by the trace of its C1 scalar Hessian,

□gψ~:=gab(∂a∂bψ~−Γcab∂cψ~).

The second-order chain rule and the connection-coefficient transformation law make these components a covariant 2-tensor, so the trace is chart independent and C1. This agrees with the supplied smooth-scalar definition when the lift is smooth. In every smooth chart, with w=∣det⁡(gab)∣, metric compatibility and the density formula give

□gψ~=1w∂a(wgab∂bψ~).

For the spherical lift in an angular chart, w=r2det⁡(γAB) and this becomes

□gψ~=1r2[∂v(r2∂rψ)+∂r ⁣(r2(∂vψ+D∂rψ))].

The density identity used here is stated for smooth vector fields, but its coordinate proof uses only first derivatives of their components and the product rule; it therefore holds for C1 vector fields as well. Here gab∂bψ~ is C2, so the formula is defined and □gψ~ is C1. In particular the wave equation can be differentiated once in r for a C3 profile. Set ϕ(v,r)=rψ(v,r) and take every ∂r derivative in this regular ingoing chart. If [ψ] denotes the arbitrary scalar-field unit, then [ϕ]=[ψ] m.

Remarks

This is a neutral test-field definition on a fixed exact background. Its regularity is imposed in the ingoing chart that crosses r=m; a static-coordinate radial derivative is not substituted for ∂r without transforming the vector field. The canonical smooth tangent-bundle structure of the geometric suppliers assumes only ACω from The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω); no stronger choice principle is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources