How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Scalar derivative operator reduction at fixed EFT order
Conditional scalar action-level reduction in a finite-order local EFT with compact-support boundary conditions; it does not identify off-shell Green functions, define a quantum measure, assert LSZ equivalence, or describe measured data.
Example
Assume countable choice , meaning that every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function, for the supplied gauge datum. Use , coordinates , metric , and natural units . Let act on the trivial right principal bundle with projection and right action . Supply and as its representative, with product connection and global section . Let be an even real Lorentz-scalar of engineering weight one in the trivial representation. Let the global group act by . The finite-jet module is the complexification of this real scalar field with conjugation fixing .
For the finite-jet quotient use , where , , and . The Lorentz factor acts on derivative indices, acts trivially on , and acts by sign. Here . At the finite field-representation level, the physical group maps to by , where is included as the same real matrix in , the gauge factor maps trivially, and is included as the same element of . Thus each scalar jet transforms by the Lorentz action on its derivative indices, trivially under , and by sign under .
Let be a fixed physical mass of mass dimension one, let be a fixed dimensionless scalar parameter, and let be a fixed coefficient-suppression scale of engineering weight one. Treat as constant Lorentz scalars and gauge singlets that transform trivially under the physical and under the full -action. Define and adopt the base action
and add the dimension-six correction
For compactly supported , define the leading Euler derivative by ; the calculation below verifies . For the graded quotient, adjoin an even central indeterminate to the complex scalar jet algebra, with engineering weight one, trivial -action, and horizontal derivatives . It is a formal mass insertion, not a complex coefficient. Take derivative cutoff , maximum dynamical-field degree four, maximum total polynomial degree including , retained engineering dimension , and loop order . Define . In the weight-six invariant subspace of this extended finite polynomial space, declare the relation subspace to be the complex span of and . Evaluation fixes every field jet and sends to the numerical mass ; it maps this relation space into its evaluated relation space and hence induces a map of quotients. It need not preserve engineering grading after specialization. This quotient is a formal algebraic selection only; no equality with the invariant subspace for the specified physical group is asserted. All fields and variations have compact support, so the displayed integrations by parts have no boundary term. Retain terms through formal order , with denoting terms at least quadratic in the formal bookkeeping parameter , not a numerical error bound. Then represents in the graded quotient; applying gives the corresponding numerical-mass relation, and the local field substitution changes to . This is an action-level statement at the retained order only.
Example references
C. P. Burgess, Introduction to Effective Field Theory, §2.1, equations (21)–(26)
Brian Conrad, Reductive Group Schemes, Definition 1.1.11 and Example 1.1.12
Physical EFT operator data and power-counting contract
Countable-choice assumption inherited by the non-Abelian gauge datum
Compact non-Abelian gauge datum with its specified bundle and representation
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The compact-support scalar model, its stated , the formal truncation, and the declared dimension-six relation subspace.
The action is an adopted classical model functional for this example. No quantum functional measure or physical realization is assumed.
Every admitted field, variation, and current in the displayed integrations has compact support in ; thus the integral of the divergence of the current is zero.
The bookkeeping is formal through first order in . Terms quadratic in are denoted ; this notation asserts no analytic convergence or numerical error estimate.
is countable choice inherited through the supplied non-Abelian gauge-data construction; no full Axiom of Choice is assumed. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Physical EFT operator data and power-counting contract: the contract fixes field weights, symmetry representations, coefficient units, the finite retained operator quotient, and the rule that a field-redefinition relation must retain induced higher-order terms.
Finite-jet local operators and engineering dimension: local operators are homogeneous finite-jet polynomials with assigned engineering weights; derivatives have weight one and four-dimensional coefficient factors follow the declared power convention.
Finite-order invariant operator-basis quotient: the quotient is by the explicitly declared invariant relation subspace and makes no claim about undeclared relations.
Non-Abelian gauge data and bundle sectors: the fixed gauge group is compact and the scalar field uses its trivial representation; the finite scalar computation invokes no gauge-field equation.
The central formal insertion has weight one and zero horizontal derivatives; . It and the fixed parameters are symmetry singlets. The numerical parameters have physical mass dimensions ; nonzero complex coefficients do not acquire positive degree in the polynomial grading.
For the nondegenerate quadratic form on , is connected semisimple because ; is also connected semisimple. These factors are reductive over (Conrad, Definition 1.1.11 and Example 1.1.12). The factor is reductive under the fixed-vector definition: its sign representation has no nonzero fixed vector, so is not unipotent. The product is reductive because the projections of any normal unipotent subgroup are normal unipotent subgroups of the reductive factors and therefore trivial under the fixed-vector definition stated in the local-operator contract.
Verification
Given: The facts and assumptions above.
The transformation sends , so , , the current , and the density are even. The current is a Lorentz vector, and its divergence is a Lorentz scalar. Every other spacetime index in the action densities and relation generators is contracted with the invariant metric , so these are Lorentz scalars under . The parameters are invariant, acts trivially on the scalar field and parameters, and the action is trivial; hence all listed expressions are also gauge- and algebraic-group invariant. The density has weight , as does . The divergence generator has weight six because its current has weight five, and has weight six because has weight three. Thus the declared relation generators are invariant and homogeneous in the dimension-six sector; this step does not yet equate the two operator classes.
For a compactly supported variation , differentiating at gives . Integration by parts, with no boundary term by A2, yields , so the leading Euler derivative is .
Put , define , and define . These local polynomial maps send to itself because they vanish when the field vanishes, and preserve . Expanding the cubic terms through first order in gives ; the same expansion gives . Thus is a two-sided inverse through the retained order.
The product rule gives the local polynomial identity . Integrating it over and using compact support from A2 makes the divergence integral zero, so .
Put as in step 1.3. Since is quadratic, its exact substitution is . Also and , so the exact substitution is . These formulas list every induced term beyond first order: the quadratic contributes only the displayed term, and the polynomial contributes the displayed terms; each has order at least and lies in the declared formal remainder.
In the extended algebra, , so the product identity of step 1.4 gives . The two declared generators lie in the weight-six invariant space, so F3 applied to this extended finite space yields . The algebra homomorphism sends both generators to the numerical divergence and leading-equation generators. It therefore induces the stated numerical-mass relation on the evaluated quotient. This is equality of classes, not pointwise equality of the representatives for arbitrary fields; A2 separately gives the corresponding action-integral identity.
By step 2.2, the sum of the order- contributions in step 2.1 is . The derivative operator cancels, leaving the stated quartic coefficient shift. If , the map is the identity; if , the induced quartic shift vanishes; no division by is used. This establishes only the finite-order action relation and implies no off-shell, quantum-measure, or scattering equivalence.