Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scalar derivative operator reduction at fixed EFT order

Physical scope

Conditional scalar action-level reduction in a finite-order local EFT with compact-support boundary conditions; it does not identify off-shell Green functions, define a quantum measure, assert LSZ equivalence, or describe measured data.

Example

Assume countable choice ACω, meaning that every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function, for the supplied gauge datum. Use M=R1,3, coordinates x0=ct, metric η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), and natural units c=ℏ=1. Let SU(2)={u∈GL2(C):u†u=I,det⁡u=1} act on the trivial right principal bundle P=M×SU(2) with projection (x,u)↦x and right action (x,u)v=(x,uv). Supply Σ={[P]} and P as its representative, with product connection ω(x,u)(v,W)=u−1W and global section x↦(x,I2). Let ϕ∈Cc∞(M,R) be an even real Lorentz-scalar of engineering weight one in the trivial SU(2) representation. Let the global group Z2={1,−1} act by ϕ↦−ϕ. The finite-jet module is the complexification of this real scalar field with conjugation fixing ϕ.

For the finite-jet quotient use Galg=SO(η,C)×SL(2,C)×μ2, where SO(η,C)={L∈GL4(C):LTηL=η,det⁡L=1}, SL(2,C)={g∈GL2(C):det⁡g=1}, and μ2={z∈C:z2=1}. The Lorentz factor acts on derivative indices, SL(2,C) acts trivially on ϕ, and μ2 acts by sign. Here SO+(1,3)={L∈GL4(R):LTηL=η,det⁡L=1,L00≥1}. At the finite field-representation level, the physical group SO+(1,3)×SU(2)×Z2 maps to Galg by (L,u,σ)↦(L,I2,σ), where L is included as the same real matrix in SO(η,C), the gauge factor maps trivially, and σ=±1 is included as the same element of μ2. Thus each scalar jet transforms by the Lorentz action on its derivative indices, trivially under SU(2), and by sign under Z2.

Let m≥0 be a fixed physical mass of mass dimension one, let C∈R be a fixed dimensionless scalar parameter, and let Λop>0 be a fixed coefficient-suppression scale of engineering weight one. Treat m,C,Λop as constant Lorentz scalars and SU(2) gauge singlets that transform trivially under the physical Z2 and under the full Galg-action. Define □=ημν∂μ∂ν and adopt the base action

S0[ϕ]=−12∫M(∂μϕ ∂μϕ+m2ϕ2) d4x

and add the dimension-six correction

S6[ϕ]=CΛop2∫Mϕ2∂μϕ ∂μϕ d4x.

For compactly supported h, define the leading Euler derivative by DS0[ϕ](h)=∫MhE0(ϕ) d4x; the calculation below verifies E0(ϕ)=(□−m2)ϕ. For the graded quotient, adjoin an even central indeterminate m to the complex scalar jet algebra, with engineering weight one, trivial Galg-action, and horizontal derivatives ∂μm=0. It is a formal mass insertion, not a complex coefficient. Take derivative cutoff r=2, maximum dynamical-field degree four, maximum total polynomial degree q=6 including m, retained engineering dimension Dmax⁡=6, and loop order Lmax⁡=0. Define E0gr=(□−m2)ϕ. In the weight-six invariant subspace of this extended finite polynomial space, declare the relation subspace to be the complex span of ∂μ(ϕ3∂μϕ) and ϕ3E0gr. Evaluation ev⁡m fixes every field jet and sends m to the numerical mass m; it maps this relation space into its evaluated relation space and hence induces a map of quotients. It need not preserve engineering grading after specialization. This quotient is a formal algebraic selection only; no equality with the invariant subspace for the specified physical group is asserted. All fields and variations have compact support, so the displayed integrations by parts have no boundary term. Retain terms through formal order Λop−2, with O(Λop−4) denoting terms at least quadratic in the formal bookkeeping parameter Λop−2, not a numerical error bound. Then ϕ2∂μϕ ∂μϕ represents −m23ϕ4 in the graded quotient; applying ev⁡m gives the corresponding numerical-mass relation, and the local field substitution ϕold=ϕ+C3Λop2ϕ3 changes S0+S6 to S0−Cm23Λop2∫Mϕ4 d4x+O(Λop−4). This is an action-level statement at the retained order only.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The compact-support scalar model, its stated S0, the formal Λop−2 truncation, and the declared dimension-six relation subspace.

[A1]

The action S0 is an adopted classical model functional for this example. No quantum functional measure or physical realization is assumed.

[A2]

Every admitted field, variation, and current in the displayed integrations has compact support in M; thus the integral of the divergence of the current ϕ3∂μϕ is zero.

[A3]

The bookkeeping is formal through first order in ϵ=Λop−2. Terms quadratic in ϵ are denoted O(Λop−4); this notation asserts no analytic convergence or numerical error estimate.

[A4]

ACω is countable choice inherited through the supplied non-Abelian gauge-data construction; no full Axiom of Choice is assumed. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Physical EFT operator data and power-counting contract: the contract fixes field weights, symmetry representations, coefficient units, the finite retained operator quotient, and the rule that a field-redefinition relation must retain induced higher-order terms.

[F2]

Finite-jet local operators and engineering dimension: local operators are homogeneous finite-jet polynomials with assigned engineering weights; derivatives have weight one and four-dimensional coefficient factors follow the declared power convention.

[F3]

Finite-order invariant operator-basis quotient: the quotient is by the explicitly declared invariant relation subspace and makes no claim about undeclared relations.

[F4]

Non-Abelian gauge data and bundle sectors: the fixed gauge group is compact SU(2) and the scalar field uses its trivial representation; the finite scalar computation invokes no gauge-field equation.

[A5]

The central formal insertion m has weight one and zero horizontal derivatives; ev⁡m(m)=m. It and the fixed parameters m,C,Λop are symmetry singlets. The numerical parameters have physical mass dimensions 1,0,1; nonzero complex coefficients do not acquire positive degree in the polynomial grading.

[F5]

For the nondegenerate quadratic form η on C4, SO(η,C) is connected semisimple because 4>3; SL(2,C) is also connected semisimple. These factors are reductive over C (Conrad, Definition 1.1.11 and Example 1.1.12). The factor μ2 is reductive under the fixed-vector definition: its sign representation has no nonzero fixed vector, so μ2 is not unipotent. The product is reductive because the projections of any normal unipotent subgroup are normal unipotent subgroups of the reductive factors and therefore trivial under the fixed-vector definition stated in the local-operator contract.

Verification

Given: The facts and assumptions above.

1.1givenA1A4A5F1F2F3F4algebra

The transformation ϕ↦−ϕ sends ∂μϕ↦−∂μϕ, so S0, S6, the current Jμ:=ϕ3∂μϕ, and the density ϕ3(□−m2)ϕ are even. The current Jμ is a Lorentz vector, and its divergence ∂μJμ is a Lorentz scalar. Every other spacetime index in the action densities and relation generators is contracted with the invariant metric η, so these are Lorentz scalars under SO(η,C). The parameters are invariant, SL(2,C) acts trivially on the scalar field and parameters, and the SU(2) action is trivial; hence all listed expressions are also gauge- and algebraic-group invariant. The density ϕ2∂μϕ ∂μϕ has weight 2+2+2=6, as does m2ϕ4. The divergence generator has weight six because its current has weight five, and ϕ3E0gr has weight six because E0gr=(□−m2)ϕ has weight three. Thus the declared relation generators are invariant and homogeneous in the dimension-six sector; this step does not yet equate the two operator classes.

1.2givenA1A2algebra

For a compactly supported variation h, differentiating S0[ϕ+τh] at τ=0 gives DS0[ϕ](h)=−∫M(∂μϕ ∂μh+m2ϕh) d4x. Integration by parts, with no boundary term by A2, yields DS0[ϕ](h)=∫Mh(□−m2)ϕ d4x, so the leading Euler derivative is E0=(□−m2)ϕ.

1.3givenA3F1algebra

Put a=C/(3Λop2), define F(ϕ)=ϕ+aϕ3, and define G(Φ)=Φ−aΦ3. These local polynomial maps send Cc∞(M,R) to itself because they vanish when the field vanishes, and preserve Z2. Expanding the cubic terms through first order in a gives F(G(Φ))=Φ−aΦ3+a(Φ−aΦ3)3=Φ+O(Λop−4); the same expansion gives G(F(ϕ))=ϕ+O(Λop−4). Thus G is a two-sided inverse through the retained order.

1.4givenA2algebra

The product rule gives the local polynomial identity ∂μ(ϕ3∂μϕ)=3ϕ2∂μϕ ∂μϕ+ϕ3□ϕ. Integrating it over M and using compact support from A2 makes the divergence integral zero, so ∫Mϕ2∂μϕ ∂μϕ d4x=−13∫Mϕ3□ϕ d4x.

2.1givenA3step 1.2step 1.3algebra

Put a=C/(3Λop2) as in step 1.3. Since S0 is quadratic, its exact substitution is S0[F(ϕ)]=S0[ϕ]+a∫Mϕ3E0 d4x−a22∫M(9ϕ4∂μϕ ∂μϕ+m2ϕ6) d4x. Also F(ϕ)2=ϕ2(1+aϕ2)2 and ∂μF(ϕ)=(1+3aϕ2)∂μϕ, so the exact substitution is S6[F(ϕ)]=S6[ϕ]+CΛop2∫Mϕ2∂μϕ ∂μϕ(8aϕ2+22a2ϕ4+24a3ϕ6+9a4ϕ8) d4x. These formulas list every induced term beyond first order: the quadratic S0 contributes only the displayed a2 term, and the polynomial S6 contributes the displayed a,…,a4 terms; each has order at least Λop−4 and lies in the declared formal remainder.

2.2givenA2F1F2F3step 1.4step 1.2algebra

In the extended algebra, □ϕ=m2ϕ+E0gr, so the product identity of step 1.4 gives 3ϕ2∂μϕ ∂μϕ=∂μ(ϕ3∂μϕ)−m2ϕ4−ϕ3E0gr. The two declared generators lie in the weight-six invariant space, so F3 applied to this extended finite space yields [ϕ2∂μϕ ∂μϕ]=[−m2ϕ4/3]. The algebra homomorphism ev⁡m sends both generators to the numerical divergence and leading-equation generators. It therefore induces the stated numerical-mass relation on the evaluated quotient. This is equality of classes, not pointwise equality of the representatives for arbitrary fields; A2 separately gives the corresponding action-integral identity.

3.1givenA3step 2.2step 1.3step 2.1algebra∎

By step 2.2, the sum of the order-Λop−2 contributions in step 2.1 is C3Λop2∫Mϕ3E0 d4x+CΛop2∫Mϕ2∂μϕ ∂μϕ d4x=−Cm23Λop2∫Mϕ4 d4x. The derivative operator cancels, leaving the stated quartic coefficient shift. If C=0, the map is the identity; if m=0, the induced quartic shift vanishes; no division by m is used. This establishes only the finite-order action relation and implies no off-shell, quantum-measure, or scattering equivalence.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources