Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite-order SU(2) scalar operator contract

Physical scope

Formal finite-order scalar operator counting for an SU(2) gauge representation and its complex-algebraic invariant model; no complete basis, matching coefficient, truncation error, continuum construction, or empirical claim.

Example

Assume countable choice ACω, meaning that every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function, for the supplied gauge datum. Use M=R1,3 with η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) and c=ℏ=1. Let SU(2)={u∈GL2(C):u†u=I,det⁡u=1}. Use the trivial right principal bundle P=M×SU(2) with projection π(x,g)=x and right action (x,g)h=(x,gh). Admit exactly Σ={[P]}, where [P] is the minimum-rank set code for bundles isomorphic over M to P in the non-Abelian gauge-data definition; thus [P]∈Σ. Its product connection has horizontal spaces H(x,g)=TxM×{0g}⊂TxM×TgSU(2), complementary to the vertical spaces {0x}×TgSU(2) and invariant under the right action. The associated su(2)-valued connection form ω has kernel H; for the global section s(x)=(x,e) its potential is A=s∗ω=0, hence Aμ=0. Identify the associated standard and dual bundles with their product bundles using this chosen global section; the maps H and H~ are their components in this fixed trivialization. Gauge transformations are smooth maps u:M→SU(2) acting by H(x)↦u(x)H(x) and H~(x)↦H~(x)u(x)−1. Take one even Lorentz-scalar complex doublet H∈C∞(M,C2) in the standard unitary representation. Before imposing the real-action condition, treat an independent dual field H~∈C∞(M,(C2)∗) as a smooth field variable. In the complex-algebraic polynomial model, use Galg=SO(η,C)×SL(2,C), with SO(η,C)={L∈GL4(C):LTηL=η,det⁡L=1} and SL(2,C)={g∈GL2(C):det⁡g=1}. The orthogonal factor acts trivially on these Lorentz-scalar fields, and the special-linear factor acts by the standard and dual representations. Here SO+(1,3)={L∈GL4(R):LTηL=η,det⁡L=1,L00≥1}, and the physical Lorentz and gauge groups map to Galg by (L,u)↦(L,u), viewing L as a complex matrix and u∈SU(2) as a matrix in SL(2,C); the standard and dual actions restrict to the specified physical actions. Impose H~=H† for the real action. Take no flavor symmetry, field weight one, derivative cutoff r=0, maximum field degree q=6, retained engineering dimension Dmax⁡=6, loop order Lmax⁡=0, and a positive scalar coefficient scale Λop of mass dimension one as assigned by the physical EFT operator contract. For this illustration the declared relation subspace is zero. The quotient uses Galg as a formal algebraic selection only; no equality with the full invariant subspace for the specified physical symmetry group is asserted. Then O2=H~H, O4=(H~H)2, and O6=(H~H)3 are gauge-invariant scalar polynomials of engineering dimensions 2, 4, and 6. With real dimensionless C6, the term C6O6/Λop2 has Lagrangian density dimension 4 and belongs to this dimension-six truncation. For a,b∈{1,2}, define ε12=1, ε21=−1, and ε11=ε22=0; then the antisymmetric polynomial εabHaHb vanishes because the even field components commute. This is a finite scalar-sector illustration, not a complete SU(2) EFT basis or a claim that these coefficients describe nature.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite scalar field, the standard SU(2) representation, the dual algebraic representation, the physical conjugation condition H~=H†, and the fixed truncation data in the Example.

[A1]

Adopted model data: the local gauge action is H(x)↦u(x)H(x) for smooth u:M→SU(2) on the trivial bundle, and the action is restricted to its real slice H~=H†. This is a formal model choice, not an observed physical sector.

[F1]

Physical EFT operator data and power-counting contract: the contract fixes field representations, engineering weights, finite jet and field-degree cutoffs, symmetry compatibility, and a finite canonical-dimension and loop truncation; it does not identify the operator scale with regulator scales.

[F2]

Non-Abelian gauge data and bundle sectors: the physical group is the actual compact noncommutative group SU(2), and its standard representation is unitary; the algebraic polynomial model records the standard and dual representations separately.

[F3]

Finite-jet local operators and engineering dimension: local operators are weight-homogeneous polynomials in a finite field-jet representation, with even generators commuting and odd generators anticommuting; a dimensionless coefficient multiplies OD/ΛopD−4 in four dimensions.

[F4]

Finite-order invariant operator-basis quotient: a finite-order basis quotient is by its explicitly declared invariant relation subspace and asserts no omitted-relation completeness.

[F5]

For the nondegenerate quadratic form η on C4, SO(η,C) is connected semisimple because 4>3; SL(2,C) is also connected semisimple. These are reductive over C under the complex algebraic-group definition stated in the local-operator contract (Conrad, Definition 1.1.11 and Example 1.1.12).

[A2]

In natural units, each scalar component of H and H~ has engineering weight one, Λop has weight one, and the selected terms are evaluated without derivatives.

[A3]

ACω is countable choice inherited through the supplied non-Abelian gauge-data construction; no full Axiom of Choice is assumed. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

Verification

Given: The facts and model data above.

1.1givenA1A3F2F3algebra

For every u(x)∈SU(2), unitarity gives u(x)†u(x)=I. Therefore (uH)†(uH)=H†u†uH=H†H pointwise. Equivalently, for g∈SL(2,C) the dual transformation is H~↦H~g−1 while H↦gH, so H~H is invariant under the algebraic action as well. Since the expressions contain no derivatives, allowing u to depend on x introduces no derivative-of-u term. Each power (H~H)n is thus a local gauge-invariant scalar polynomial.

1.2givenF3algebra

The two doublet components are even commuting variables, so εabHaHb=H1H2−H2H1=0. This is an algebraic identity, not an additional nonzero invariant or an assumption about an operator basis.

1.3givenA2F1F3algebra

Each factor H~H has engineering weight 1+1=2. Hence O2,O4,O6 have weights 2,4,6, respectively. Since Λop has weight one, O6/Λop2 has weight 6−2=4, so its real coefficient C6 is dimensionless and the term lies within Dmax⁡=6, q=6, and Lmax⁡=0. No coefficient value or omitted-order bound follows from this counting.

2.1givenF4step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

The relation space in this example is not used to eliminate or identify further operators; the displayed singlet is an allowed representative and the antisymmetric polynomial is zero before quotienting. Thus the calculation establishes membership and dimensions only, not a complete basis.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources