Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adapted
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Barycentric orbits of two unequal masses on declared model data: p1=(m2/M)p, p2=(m1/M)p, semiaxes in the ratio 3:1 and areal rates in the ratio 9:1

Physical scope

A numerical check of the barycentric reconstruction on declared model data with unequal masses: the two labels' conic parameters and semimajor axes, the common eccentricity and focus at the centre of mass, the ratio of the areal rates (m2/m1)2 and the common period about the centre of mass. Every number is declared model data or an exact consequence of the cited items; no observation or measurement is used.

Example

Declare the gravitational two-label model of Adopted two-label gravitational model: the inverse-square pair potential with coupling parameters, the empirical mass identification, and the measured value and uncertainty of the Newtonian constant with time window I0=R, unequal inertial masses and a declared value of the constant, m1=2×1024 kg,m2=6×1024 kg,M=8×1024 kg,μ=m1m2M=32×1024 kg, GN=10−24 m3 kg−1 s−2,κ=GNm1m2=1.2×1025 kg m3 s−2, with the couplings identified with the inertial masses, and suppose a motion has relative conic data J=6×1027 kg m2 s−1,p=J2μκ=2×106 m,e=12. Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), as in the cited conic and period items. Then the cited items give:

  1. the relative semiaxes a=p/(1−e2)=83×106 m and b=a1−e2=433×106 m, energy E=−κ/(2a)=−94×1018 J, and period T=2πμa3/κ=16π33×109 s;
  2. each label's orbit about the centre of mass is the scaled ellipse with parameters p1=m2Mp=32×106 m,p2=m1Mp=12×106 m, the same eccentricity e=12, focus at the centre of mass and semimajor axes a1=34a=2×106 m, a2=14a=23×106 m;
  3. the areal-velocity magnitudes about the centre of mass are in the ratio (m2/m1)2=9: (m2M)2J2μ=1125 m2 s−1,(m1M)2J2μ=125 m2 s−1;
  4. both labels are periodic about the centre of mass with the common period T.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The declared data m1=2×1024, m2=6×1024, M=8×1024, μ=32×1024, κ=1.2×1025, J=6×1027, p=2×106 and e=12. Bare numbers in the arithmetic below are numerical values in the SI units declared in the Example; any explicitly unit-bearing equality is an equality of quantities.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice is assumed (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[L1]
[L2]

Period, area law and curves (Kepler's third law for the gravitational two-label model: the relative period is T=2πμab/J=2πμ/κ a3/2, so T2=4π2a3/(GNM) under the mass identification, and both labels are periodic relative to the centre of mass clauses 1 and 3, Planarity of the reduced orbit and the area law: the areal-velocity vector is the constant j/(2μ), the swept-area rate is J/(2μ), and both labels sweep equal areas in equal times about the centre of mass clauses 2 and 4, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn): T=2πμab/J=2πμ/κ a3/2; the relative areal-velocity vector is j/(2μ) with magnitude J/(2μ); and the label i's areal-velocity vector about the centre of mass is (mjM)2ω, of magnitude (mjM)2J/(2μ), with both labels T-periodic about the centre of mass.

[L3]

Arithmetic: κ/(2a)=(1.2×1025)/(163×106)=94×1018; μ/κ=3/21.2×10−1 s2 m−3=18 s2 m−3; μa3/κ=3/21.2×10−1⋅51227×1018 s2=6427×1018 s2; 2π64/27×109=16π33×109; (m2/M)2=9/16, (m1/M)2=1/16 and J/(2μ)=2000 m2 s−1 (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenA1L1L3algebra

Relative conic data: 1−e2=34, so a=p/(1−e2)=2×106⋅43=83×106 m and b=83×106⋅32=433×106 m; the energy identity of [L1] gives E=−κ/(2a)=−(65×1025)/(163×106)=−94×1018 J; and the period is T=2πμa3/κ=2π6427×1018=16π33×109 s.

2.1step 1.1L1L3algebra

Barycentric scaling: m2/M=34 and m1/M=14, so [L1] gives p1=34⋅2×106=32×106 m, p2=14⋅2×106=12×106 m, a1=34⋅83×106=2×106 m and a2=14⋅83×106=23×106 m, with eccentricity e=12 and the focus at the centre of mass for both.

3.1step 2.1L2L3algebra

Areal rates: by [L2] the label-1 areal-velocity magnitude is (34)2J/(2μ)=916⋅2000=1125 m2 s−1 and that of label 2 is (14)2⋅2000=125 m2 s−1; their ratio is 9=(m2/m1)2.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1L2L3algebra∎

Periods: by [L2] both labels are T-periodic about the centre of mass with the common period T=16π33×109 s from step 1.1; equivalently T2=4π2μa3/κ=256π227×1018 s2 with the arithmetic of [L3].

Remarks

  • The focus is the centre of mass, not the heavier body. Both barycentric conics have the centre of mass at a focus; the lighter label 1 has the larger orbit, in the ratio m2:m1=3:1 of the parameters and semiaxes.

  • Declared data only. The masses, J, p, e and the declared GN are model data chosen for exact arithmetic; no measured constant or observation is used, and no real system is modelled.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources