How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The inverse-square gravitational relative trajectory has the Kepler polar form: , , elliptic completeness and barycentric scaled ellipses
The Keplerian orbit classification of the two-label gravitational model with non-zero angular momentum: the polar conic with its eccentricity and focus at the force centre, the eccentricity-energy relation and the elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic branches, the centrifugal barrier that keeps the motion away from the collision, and - in the elliptic case - the completeness of the relative trajectory and reconstruction on the declared model time window, the closed periodic relative orbit with the ellipse geometry, and the scaled barycentric conics of both labels. The parabolic and hyperbolic clauses record only the orbit formula, the periapsis and the domain of the angle on the actual domain of the motion; no asymptotic extent, scattering or observational claim is made.
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Adopt the two-label gravitational model of Adopted two-label gravitational model: the inverse-square pair potential with coupling parameters, the empirical mass identification, and the measured value and uncertainty of the Newtonian constant clause (i): inertial masses , , reduced mass , gravitational couplings , , and the central pair potential on , and model time window . Let be a motion on a time interval with nonempty interior, with relative coordinate , attached angular momentum and energy (Two-body reduction of a static central pair-potential model: the relative coordinate is a central-force trajectory for the reduced mass, the centre of mass moves uniformly, and the reconstruction is a bijection, Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential), and suppose , , for an oriented orthonormal triad . Let be polar data for and put Then:
In the orbital plane , for a point , a line with , and , define the focus-directrix conic of eccentricity to be Here is a focus, is its directrix, and is the distance ratio in the definition. The types , , and are called ellipse, parabola, and hyperbola, respectively. The case is the circle of radius centered at , the circular ellipse with coincident foci at its centre. In this item, an unbounded conic is a conic locus that is unbounded, not an open subset of ; the periapsis distance is the minimum distance on the conic to its focus, and any point attaining it is a periapsis.
- (Conic and eccentricity.) There are and with on the interior of , and the energy satisfies ; consequently , and . The relative trajectory lies on a focus-directrix conic with the force centre as focus when : its directrix is , where . When , the relative trajectory lies on the circle of radius centered at the force centre.
- (Centrifugal barrier.) is the unique critical point of in and the unique minimum, with setting one has and for every . In particular the relative motion never reaches the collision , and is the periapsis distance of the conic of clause 1.
- (Elliptic case.) If , then and: (a) the relative trajectory extends uniquely to a central-force trajectory for defined on all of . Together with the unique affine extension of , this defines global coordinate curves , satisfying the same time-independent force equations; their restriction to is the unique extension of the model motion . They are a model motion on all of when . The relative motion is periodic, with for one full angular revolution; (b) is an ellipse with focus at the force centre, semiaxes and ; (c) each label's trajectory relative to the centre of mass is the conic of clause 1 scaled by : with , one has so both labels trace ellipses with the centre of mass at a focus, the same eccentricity and semimajor axes , .
- (Parabolic and hyperbolic cases on the domain of the motion.) If , then and with periapsis . If , then and the formula of clause 1 holds at every with , with periapsis . In both cases and the corresponding conic locus is unbounded; the extent of the trajectory, its asymptotes and its scattering interpretation are not claimed here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The gravitational two-label model with the data , the motion on the time interval , the relative coordinate , the polar data , and the constants , , of the statement.
The Axiom of Countable Choice is assumed (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Reduction and classification input (Two-body reduction of a static central pair-potential model: the relative coordinate is a central-force trajectory for the reduced mass, the centre of mass moves uniformly, and the reconstruction is a bijection clauses 3-4, Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential, Adopted central-force model class: static central pair potentials, the reduced one-label problem, the fixed-centre idealization, reading conventions and exclusions clauses (i)-(ii), Adopted two-label gravitational model: the inverse-square pair potential with coupling parameters, the empirical mass identification, and the measured value and uncertainty of the Newtonian constant clause (i)): is a central-force trajectory for with , constant and constant energy ; and with affine.
Mathematical orbit theory (Binet's equation for the attractive inverse-square field: for , The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: with , The subcritical Kepler conic is an ellipse with semiaxes , , focus at the origin and area ; its area is also , Completeness and periodicity of the negative-energy Kepler orbit, with and , Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation, Oriented orthonormal triads in : existence over any unit vector, and the orthonormal expansion with no fourth orthogonal direction): for the attractive inverse-square central-force trajectory with , , there are polar data with and a conic representation on , where , and the sign classification hold; if then the trajectory extends uniquely to all of with bounded in and is periodic with ; and the subcritical conic is an ellipse with semiaxes , , focus at the origin, and area .
Elementary computations (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The Euclidean inner product on , Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length): derivatives and algebraic identities of the displayed rational and trigonometric expressions; and .
Proof
Clause 1: by [L1] the curve is a central-force trajectory for with constant nonzero angular momentum and constant energy , so the hypotheses of the inverse-square orbit theory [L2] are met and its polar representation and eccentricity-energy relation give the displayed formula and sign equivalences, since . To verify the geometric description, for put and . For , set . The formula and its positive denominator give and , so and the force centre is a focus. If , the polar formula gives , so lies on the stated circle.
Clause 2: differentiating gives , which vanishes exactly at and is negative for and positive for ; for the difference identity has numerator at most , where the inequality uses and ; hence is strictly decreasing on and is its unique minimum. Direct substitution gives by multiplying by , clearing denominators with the definition of and using . Along the motion, the energy identity of [L2] gives , so ; if then strict decrease on forces , while if then because (its defining denominator is at least ). Hence throughout.
Clause 3: assume , so by step 1.1. Clause (a) is [L2] for the global relative trajectory . The affine curve has a unique affine extension to because has at least two points. Define and globally; the calculation in [L1] clause 4 shows that these satisfy the same time-independent equations. Their restriction to is a motion of the original model by that clause, and uniqueness follows from the unique relative and affine extensions. A global coordinate curve is a model motion on all of only when the model time window is . Clause (b) is the ellipse clause of [L2], including and the bound on . Clause (c): by [L1] and [L2], and , so substituting the conic of clause 1 gives the two displayed conic formulas; their semimajor axes are with the same eccentricity and the focus at the origin of , which is the centre of mass.
Clause 4 and endpoints: [L2] gives on . Equivalently, the continuous functions and agree on , so they agree on its closure in , which is all of ; since and , this identity gives and the conic formula also holds at every included endpoint of . If then by step 1.1; the periapsis is by step 2.1. The conic locus is unbounded because as through values below . If then ; the periapsis is by step 2.1. With , the denominator is positive for and tends to as , so this conic locus is unbounded as well. These statements concern the full conic loci; no assertion is made that the actual time domain covers every point of either locus, or about asymptotic directions or scattering.
Remarks
-
Which items use the elliptic hypotheses. The completeness, closure and periodicity statements of clause 3(a) and the bounds of clause 3(b) hold only for ; the conic formula of clause 1 and the barrier of clause 2 hold for every nonzero angular momentum and every energy reached by the trajectory.
-
The force centre and barycentre. In the reduced coordinate the focus is , the force centre in relative-coordinate space. Clause 3(c) separately shows that each scaled coordinate has its focus at the centre of mass .
-
What is deliberately absent. No claim is made that the parabolic and hyperbolic branches have straight asymptotes, a deflection angle or a scattering cross-section on this page; those belong to the scattering development. No observation, measurement or empirical comparison appears here.
Depends on
Adopted central-force model class: static central pair potentials, the reduced one-label problem, the fixed-centre idealization, reading conventions and exclusions
Adopted two-label gravitational model: the inverse-square pair potential with coupling parameters, the empirical mass identification, and the measured value and uncertainty of the Newtonian constant
Two-body reduction of a static central pair-potential model: the relative coordinate is a central-force trajectory for the reduced mass, the centre of mass moves uniformly, and the reconstruction is a bijection
Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential
Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation
Binet's equation for the attractive inverse-square field: for
The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: with
The subcritical Kepler conic is an ellipse with semiaxes , , focus at the origin and area ; its area is also
Completeness and periodicity of the negative-energy Kepler orbit, with and
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Oriented orthonormal triads in : existence over any unit vector, and the orthonormal expansion with no fourth orthogonal direction
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms
The Euclidean inner product on
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics (title page last edited September 1, 2026), Section 3.4, Eqs. (3.57)-(3.65), chapter pages 13-15 (PDF pages 46-48): the conic $r=p/(1+e\cos\varphi)$, the eccentricity-energy relation, the elliptic parameters $a,b$, the first Kepler law and the parabolic/hyperbolic branches for $E\ge0$
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), Section 2.5.4, printed pp. 32-33 (PDF pp. 38-39), Eq. (2.90) and Figure 15: the inverse-square potential $V=-Gm_1m_2/r$ with elliptic orbits for $E<0$ and hyperbolic orbits for $E>0$
- Iain Stewart, Advanced Classical Mechanics (MIT 8.09/8.309 Fall 2014 course text), Section 4.5, printed pp. 80-81 (PDF pp. 83-84), Eqs. (4.155)-(4.156) and Figure 4.2: the orbit $1/r=(mk/\ell^2)(1+\varepsilon\cos(\psi-\psi'))$ with $\varepsilon=\sqrt{1+2E\ell^2/(mk^2)}$ and the circular, elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic cases