Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adapted
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The inverse-square gravitational relative trajectory has the Kepler polar form: ρ=p/(1+ecos⁡(θ−θ0)), E=(μκ2/2J2)(e2−1), elliptic completeness and barycentric scaled ellipses

Physical scope

The Keplerian orbit classification of the two-label gravitational model with non-zero angular momentum: the polar conic with its eccentricity and focus at the force centre, the eccentricity-energy relation and the elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic branches, the centrifugal barrier that keeps the motion away from the collision, and - in the elliptic case - the completeness of the relative trajectory and reconstruction on the declared model time window, the closed periodic relative orbit with the ellipse geometry, and the scaled barycentric conics of both labels. The parabolic and hyperbolic clauses record only the orbit formula, the periapsis and the domain of the angle on the actual domain of the motion; no asymptotic extent, scattering or observational claim is made.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Adopt the two-label gravitational model of Adopted two-label gravitational model: the inverse-square pair potential with coupling parameters, the empirical mass identification, and the measured value and uncertainty of the Newtonian constant clause (i): inertial masses m1,m2>0, M=m1+m2, reduced mass μ=m1m2/M, gravitational couplings m1g,m2g>0, κ=GNm1gm2g>0, and the central pair potential u(ρ)=−κ/ρ on J0=(0,∞), and model time window I0. Let x:I→Q be a motion on a time interval I with nonempty interior, with relative coordinate r, attached angular momentum j=μ r×r′ and energy E=12μ∥r′∥22−κ/∣r∣ (Two-body reduction of a static central pair-potential model: the relative coordinate is a central-force trajectory for the reduced mass, the centre of mass moves uniformly, and the reconstruction is a bijection, Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential), and suppose j=Je3, J>0, for an oriented orthonormal triad (e1,e2,e3). Let (ρ,θ) be polar data for r and put p:=J2μκ,UJeff(ρ):=−κρ+J22μρ2,ρ∗:=J2μκ=p. Then:

In the orbital plane Π:=span⁡(e1,e2), for a point F∈Π, a line D⊆Π with F∉D, and e>0, define the focus-directrix conic of eccentricity e to be C(F,D,e):={y∈Π:∥y−F∥2=e dΠ(y,D)},dΠ(y,D):=inf⁡z∈D∥y−z∥2. Here F is a focus, D is its directrix, and e is the distance ratio in the definition. The types 0<e<1, e=1, and e>1 are called ellipse, parabola, and hyperbola, respectively. The case e=0 is the circle of radius p centered at F, the circular ellipse with coincident foci at its centre. In this item, an unbounded conic is a conic locus that is unbounded, not an open subset of Π; the periapsis distance is the minimum distance on the conic to its focus, and any point attaining it is a periapsis.

  1. (Conic and eccentricity.) There are e≥0 and θ0∈R with ρ=p1+ecos⁡(θ−θ0) on the interior of I, and the energy satisfies E=μκ22J2(e2−1); consequently E<0  ⟺  e<1, E=0  ⟺  e=1 and E>0  ⟺  e>1. The relative trajectory lies on a focus-directrix conic with the force centre as focus when e>0: its directrix is D={y∈Π:⟨y,n0⟩=p/e}, where n0:=cos⁡θ0e1+sin⁡θ0e2. When e=0, the relative trajectory lies on the circle of radius p centered at the force centre.
  2. (Centrifugal barrier.) ρ∗ is the unique critical point of UJeff in (0,∞) and the unique minimum, with UJeff(ρ∗)=−μκ22J2; setting ρmin⁡(E):=J2μκ+μ2κ2+2μEJ2>0, one has UJeff(ρmin⁡(E))=E and ρ(t)≥ρmin⁡(E) for every t∈I. In particular the relative motion never reaches the collision r=0, and ρmin⁡(E)=p/(1+e) is the periapsis distance of the conic of clause 1.
  3. (Elliptic case.) If E<0, then e<1 and: (a) the relative trajectory extends uniquely to a central-force trajectory for (μ,u) defined on all of R. Together with the unique affine extension of X, this defines global coordinate curves xˉ1=Xˉ+(m2/M)rˉ, xˉ2=Xˉ−(m1/M)rˉ satisfying the same time-independent force equations; their restriction to I0 is the unique extension of the model motion x. They are a model motion on all of R when I0=R. The relative motion is periodic, with θ(t+T)=θ(t)+2π for one full angular revolution; (b) r is an ellipse with focus at the force centre, semiaxes a=p1−e2=−κ2E,b=a1−e2, and p/(1+e)≤ρ≤p/(1−e); (c) each label's trajectory relative to the centre of mass is the conic of clause 1 scaled by mj/M: with p1:=m2Mp, p2:=m1Mp one has ∣x1−X∣=p11+ecos⁡(θ−θ0),∣x2−X∣=p21+ecos⁡(θ−θ0), so both labels trace ellipses with the centre of mass at a focus, the same eccentricity e and semimajor axes a1=m2Ma, a2=m1Ma.
  4. (Parabolic and hyperbolic cases on the domain of the motion.) If E=0, then e=1 and ρ=p/(1+cos⁡(θ−θ0)) with periapsis ρmin⁡(0)=p/2. If E>0, then e>1 and the formula of clause 1 holds at every t with 1+ecos⁡(θ−θ0)>0, with periapsis ρmin⁡(E)=p/(1+e). In both cases e≥1 and the corresponding conic locus is unbounded; the extent of the trajectory, its asymptotes and its scattering interpretation are not claimed here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The gravitational two-label model with the data μ,κ,J>0, the motion x:I→Q on the time interval I, the relative coordinate r, the polar data (ρ,θ), and the constants p, ρ∗, UJeff of the statement.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice is assumed (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[L2]

Mathematical orbit theory (Binet's equation for the attractive inverse-square field: d2u/dφ2+u=μκ/J2 for u=1/ρ, The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: u=c(1+ecos⁡(φ−θ0)) with E=(μκ2/2J2)(e2−1), The subcritical Kepler conic is an ellipse with semiaxes a=p/(1−e2), b=a1−e2, focus at the origin and area πab; its area is also 12∫02πϱ2, Completeness and periodicity of the negative-energy Kepler orbit, with T=2πμab/J and T2=4π2μa3/κ, Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: ρ2θ′=J/μ, the effective-potential equation and energy conservation, Oriented orthonormal triads in R3: existence over any unit vector, and the orthonormal expansion with no fourth orthogonal direction): for the attractive inverse-square central-force trajectory with j=Je3, J>0, there are polar data with ρ2θ′=J/μ and a conic representation ρ=p/(1+ecos⁡(θ−θ0)) on I∘, where p=J2/(μκ), E=(μκ2/2J2)(e2−1) and the sign classification hold; if E<0 then the trajectory extends uniquely to all of R with ρ bounded in [p/(1+e),p/(1−e)] and is periodic with θ(t+T)=θ(t)+2π; and the subcritical conic is an ellipse with semiaxes a=p/(1−e2), b=a1−e2, focus at the origin, and area πab.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenA1L1L2algebra

Clause 1: by [L1] the curve r is a central-force trajectory for (μ,u) with constant nonzero angular momentum Je3 and constant energy E, so the hypotheses of the inverse-square orbit theory [L2] are met and its polar representation and eccentricity-energy relation give the displayed formula and sign equivalences, since μκ2/(2J2)>0. To verify the geometric description, for e>0 put n0:=cos⁡θ0e1+sin⁡θ0e2 and D:={y∈Π:⟨y,n0⟩=p/e}. For t∈I∘, set ϕ:=θ(t)−θ0. The formula and its positive denominator give ρ(t)cos⁡ϕ<p/e and e dΠ(r(t),D)=e(p/e−ρ(t)cos⁡ϕ)=p−eρ(t)cos⁡ϕ=ρ(t)=∥r(t)∥2, so r(t)∈C(0,D,e) and the force centre is a focus. If e=0, the polar formula gives ρ(t)=p, so r(t) lies on the stated circle.

2.1step 1.1L2L3algebra

Clause 2: differentiating UJeff gives (UJeff)′(ρ)=(κρ−J2/μ)/ρ3, which vanishes exactly at ρ∗ and is negative for ρ<ρ∗ and positive for ρ>ρ∗; for 0<ρ<ρ′≤ρ∗ the difference identity UJeff(ρ′)−UJeff(ρ)=(ρ′−ρ)[2μκρρ′−J2(ρ′+ρ)]2μρ2(ρ′)2 has numerator at most (ρ′−ρ)[2J2ρ−J2(ρ′+ρ)]=−J2(ρ′−ρ)2<0, where the inequality uses ρ≤ρ′ and ρ′≤ρ∗=J2/(μκ); hence UJeff is strictly decreasing on (0,ρ∗] and ρ∗ is its unique minimum. Direct substitution gives −κρmin⁡(E)+J22μρmin⁡(E)2=E, by multiplying by ρmin⁡2, clearing denominators with the definition of ρmin⁡ and using (μκ+μ2κ2+2μEJ2)(−μκ+μ2κ2+2μEJ2)=2μEJ2. Along the motion, the energy identity of [L2] gives 12μ(ρ′)2+UJeff(ρ)=E, so UJeff(ρ(t))≤E=UJeff(ρmin⁡(E)); if ρ(t)≤ρ∗ then strict decrease on (0,ρ∗] forces ρ(t)≥ρmin⁡(E), while if ρ(t)>ρ∗ then ρ(t)>ρ∗≥ρmin⁡(E) because ρmin⁡(E)≤ρ∗ (its defining denominator is at least μκ). Hence ρ≥ρmin⁡(E)>0 throughout.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L1L2algebra

Clause 3: assume E<0, so e<1 by step 1.1. Clause (a) is [L2] for the global relative trajectory rˉ. The affine curve X has a unique affine extension Xˉ to R because I has at least two points. Define xˉ1=Xˉ+(m2/M)rˉ and xˉ2=Xˉ−(m1/M)rˉ globally; the calculation in [L1] clause 4 shows that these satisfy the same time-independent equations. Their restriction to I0 is a motion of the original model by that clause, and uniqueness follows from the unique relative and affine extensions. A global coordinate curve is a model motion on all of R only when the model time window is I0=R. Clause (b) is the ellipse clause of [L2], including a=p/(1−e2)=−κ/(2E) and the bound on ρ. Clause (c): by [L1] and [L2], ∣x1−X∣=m2M∣r∣=m2Mρ and ∣x2−X∣=m1Mρ, so substituting the conic of clause 1 gives the two displayed conic formulas; their semimajor axes are pj/(1−e2)=mjMa with the same eccentricity and the focus at the origin of xi−X, which is the centre of mass.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1L1L2algebra∎

Clause 4 and endpoints: [L2] gives ρ=p/(1+ecos⁡(θ−θ0)) on I∘. Equivalently, the continuous functions t↦ρ(t)(1+ecos⁡(θ(t)−θ0)) and t↦p agree on I∘, so they agree on its closure in I, which is all of I; since ρ(t)>0 and p>0, this identity gives 1+ecos⁡(θ(t)−θ0)=p/ρ(t)>0 and the conic formula also holds at every included endpoint of I. If E=0 then e=1 by step 1.1; the periapsis is p/2=ρmin⁡(0) by step 2.1. The conic locus is unbounded because 1+cos⁡ϕ↓0 as ϕ↑π through values below π. If E>0 then e>1; the periapsis is ρmin⁡(E)=p/(1+e) by step 2.1. With ϕ∗:=arccos⁡(−1/e)∈(0,π), the denominator 1+ecos⁡ϕ is positive for 0≤ϕ<ϕ∗ and tends to 0 as ϕ↑ϕ∗, so this conic locus is unbounded as well. These statements concern the full conic loci; no assertion is made that the actual time domain I covers every point of either locus, or about asymptotic directions or scattering.

Remarks

  • Which items use the elliptic hypotheses. The completeness, closure and periodicity statements of clause 3(a) and the bounds of clause 3(b) hold only for E<0; the conic formula of clause 1 and the barrier of clause 2 hold for every nonzero angular momentum and every energy reached by the trajectory.

  • The force centre and barycentre. In the reduced coordinate r the focus is r=0, the force centre in relative-coordinate space. Clause 3(c) separately shows that each scaled coordinate xi−X has its focus at the centre of mass X.

  • What is deliberately absent. No claim is made that the parabolic and hyperbolic branches have straight asymptotes, a deflection angle or a scattering cross-section on this page; those belong to the scattering development. No observation, measurement or empirical comparison appears here.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources