Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adapted
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An elliptic gravitational relative orbit checked on declared model data: p=106 m, e=3/5, a=25⋅106/16 m, b=5⋅106/4 m, E=−3.2⋅1017 J and T=125π⋅109/32 s, with T2=4π2a3/(GNM)

Physical scope

A numerical consistency check of the elliptic-branch formulas of the adopted gravitational two-label model on declared model data: the conic parameter, semiaxes, energy, period by two routes, the third-law form T2=4π2a3/(GNM) under the declared mass identification, the areal rate and the barycentric semiaxes. Every number is a declared model datum or an exact consequence of the cited items; the example asserts no observation, no measurement and no applicability of the model to any real system.

Example

Declare the gravitational two-label model of Adopted two-label gravitational model: the inverse-square pair potential with coupling parameters, the empirical mass identification, and the measured value and uncertainty of the Newtonian constant clause (i) with time window I0=R and the following model data (decimal numbers declared for this computation; GN=2.5×10−25 m3 kg−1 s−2 is a declared datum of the example, not the measured value of clause (iii), and the couplings are identified with the inertial masses as in clause (ii)): m1=m2=2×1024 kg,M=4×1024 kg,μ=m1m2M=1024 kg,κ=GNm1m2=1024 kg m3 s−2. Suppose a motion x of this model has a relative orbit with angular momentum magnitude J=1027 kg m2 s−1, conic parameter p=J2μκ=106 m, and eccentricity e=35 (the conic data of The inverse-square gravitational relative trajectory has the Kepler polar form: ρ=p/(1+ecos⁡(θ−θ0)), E=(μκ2/2J2)(e2−1), elliptic completeness and barycentric scaled ellipses clause 1). Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), as in the cited conic and period items. Then the cited items predict, as exact consequences of these data:

  1. the energy E=μκ22J2(e2−1)=−825×1018 J=−3.2×1017 J, and E<0 with e<1, consistent with the elliptic branch;
  2. the semiaxes a=p1−e2=2516×106 m and b=a1−e2=54×106 m, with a=−κ/(2E);
  3. the relative period T=2πμa3κ=2πμabJ=125π32×109 s, so T2=4π2μa3κ;
  4. the third-law form T2=4π2a3GNM of Kepler's third law for the gravitational two-label model: the relative period is T=2πμab/J=2πμ/κ a3/2, so T2=4π2a3/(GNM) under the mass identification, and both labels are periodic relative to the centre of mass clause 2 under the declared identification;
  5. the areal rate J/(2μ)=500 m2 s−1 and the identity πab/T=J/(2μ);
  6. both labels trace ellipses with the centre of mass at a focus, the same eccentricity e, and semimajor axes a1=a2=12a=2532×106 m (equal masses), each periodic about the centre of mass with period T.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The declared model data m1=m2=2×1024, M=4×1024, μ=1024, GN=2.5×10−25, κ=1024, J=1027, p=106 and e=35. Bare numbers in the arithmetic below are numerical values in the SI units declared in the Example; explicitly unit-bearing equalities are equalities of quantities.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice is assumed (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[L1]

Model and conic data (Adopted two-label gravitational model: the inverse-square pair potential with coupling parameters, the empirical mass identification, and the measured value and uncertainty of the Newtonian constant clauses (i)-(ii), Adopted central-force model class: static central pair potentials, the reduced one-label problem, the fixed-centre idealization, reading conventions and exclusions clauses (i)-(ii), The inverse-square gravitational relative trajectory has the Kepler polar form: ρ=p/(1+ecos⁡(θ−θ0)), E=(μκ2/2J2)(e2−1), elliptic completeness and barycentric scaled ellipses clauses 1 and 3, Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential): with the identification mig=mi, κ=GNm1m2, μ=m1m2/M; for a motion with the stated conic data, E=(μκ2/2J2)(e2−1), a=p/(1−e2)=−κ/(2E), b=a1−e2, and each label's orbit about the centre of mass is the scaled conic with parameters pi=mjMp and ai=mjMa and the same eccentricity.

[L3]

Arithmetic: decimal multiplication and powers; (2516)3=156254096, (54)2=2516, 1−925=45, 2516⋅54=12564 and 12564⋅32125=12; exact fractions are used throughout (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length for the real-arithmetic conventions, Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework for the SI reading of the dimensions).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenA1L1L3algebra

Energy: the coefficient is μκ2/(2J2)=(1024)(1048)2×1054 J=12×1018 J; e2−1=925−1=−1625, so E=−825×1018 J=−3.2×1017 J, and e<1 corresponds to E<0 as The inverse-square gravitational relative trajectory has the Kepler polar form: ρ=p/(1+ecos⁡(θ−θ0)), E=(μκ2/2J2)(e2−1), elliptic completeness and barycentric scaled ellipses clause 1 states.

2.1step 1.1L1L3algebra

Semiaxes: 1−e2=1625, so a=p/(1−e2)=106⋅2516=2516×106 m and b=a1−e2=2516×106⋅45=54×106 m; and −κ/(2E)=−1024−1625×1018=2516×106 m, so a=−κ/(2E) holds.

3.1step 2.1L2L3algebra

Period: a3=(2516)3×1018 m3=156254096×1018 m3, while μ/κ=1 s2 m−3, hence μa3/κ=156254096×1018 s2. Thus T=2πμa3/κ=2π12564×109 s=125π32×109 s. The second route gives μab/J=1024⋅(25/16)106⋅(5/4)1061027 s=12564×109 s, so T=2πμab/J and T2=156251024π2×1018 s2=4π2μa3/κ.

4.1step 3.1L2L3algebra

Third law with the declared identification: GNM=(52×10−25 m3 kg−1 s−2)(4×1024 kg)=1 m3 s−2. Therefore 4π2a3GNM=4π2(15625/4096)1018 m31 m3 s−2=156251024π2×1018 s2, equal to T2 from step 3.1.

4.2step 3.1L2L3algebra

Areal rate: J/(2μ)=10272×1024=500 m2 s−1, and πabT=π⋅2516×106⋅54×106125π32×109=12564⋅32125⋅103=500 m2 s−1, so πab/T=J/(2μ).

5.1step 2.1step 3.1L1L2algebra∎

Barycentric orbits: by [L1] each label's conic has parameter pi=12p=5×105 m, eccentricity e=35 and semimajor axis ai=12a=2532×106 m; the periods about the centre of mass are T by Kepler's third law for the gravitational two-label model: the relative period is T=2πμab/J=2πμ/κ a3/2, so T2=4π2a3/(GNM) under the mass identification, and both labels are periodic relative to the centre of mass clause 3, and with equal masses both semiaxes are equal.

Remarks

  • Conditional on the existence of the motion. The check verifies the numerical consequences of the cited items for any motion with these conic data; it does not construct the motion, and the existence of the elliptic branch is not part of the computation.

  • Declared data only. The numbers m1,m2,J,p,e and the declared GN are model data chosen for exact arithmetic; no measured constant is used, and no real system is modelled.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources