Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The planar pendulum as an ideal holonomic model: the multiplier, the tension and the vanishing reaction power of a scleronomic constraint

Physical scope

A worked model check of the holonomic ideal-constraint branch: a mass point constrained without friction to a circle of radius l in a vertical plane about a fixed pivot under a declared uniform downward field, realized as a bead on a smooth circular wire, with the explicit two-component multiplier (the component tied to the constraining plane vanishing along the motion), the reaction read as the tension along the link, the standard pendulum equation obtained by projecting the constrained equation, the identically vanishing reaction power of the scleronomic constraint, and the conservation of the mechanical energy on explicit model data. The example is a model computation with the declared idealizations (smooth massless wire, equivalently a rigid link or a taut string while it stays taut; frictionless pivot; uniform field); every number is a model value, not a measurement, and the empirical status of a string that can go slack (or of a link that can buckle) is recorded as a limitation of the model.

Example

Declare a one-label model of the force branch of Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with N=1, mass m>0, time window I0=R, configuration domain Q=R3 (coordinates (x,y,z), dimensions of Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework) and force map F:I0×Q×R3⟶R3,F(t,x,v):=(0, −mg, 0), where [m]=μ and the constant g>0 has dimension ℓτ−2. Let l>0 have dimension ℓ, and use a dimensionless angle θ in radians. Constrain the label, without friction, to the circle of radius l>0 about the origin in the plane z=0 --- the ideal pendulum realized as a bead threaded on a smooth circular wire in a vertical plane --- by the regular holonomic-constraint datum O:={(t,x,y,z)∈R4:(x,y)≠(0,0)},k:=2,G(t,x,y,z):=(x2+y2−l2, z) of Holonomic-constraint models of the force branch: constraint data, the constrained equation, virtual displacements and the scleronomic/rheonomic distinction, and adopt the ideal-reaction law of Adopted ideal-reaction law for holonomic constraints: the d'Alembert condition, its scope and its limits. The two constraint components have dimensions ℓ2 and ℓ. The locus is Σ={(t,lsin⁡θ,−lcos⁡θ,0):t,θ∈R}; write X(θ):=(lsin⁡θ, −lcos⁡θ, 0),Xθ(θ):=∂θX(θ)=(lcos⁡θ, lsin⁡θ, 0),u(θ):=(sin⁡θ, −cos⁡θ, 0),X(θ)=l u(θ).

Then:

  1. the datum is regular and scleronomic, the tangent vector Xθ(θ) is permitted for every θ, and the virtual displacements at X(θ) are the line R Xθ(θ);
  2. along any constrained motion the multiplier is λ(θ,θ′)=(−m2l(gcos⁡θ+l θ′2), 0)∈R2 evaluated at the motion's data, the second component --- tied to the plane constraint z=0 --- vanishing along the motion, and the reaction is R=−T u(θ),T=m(gcos⁡θ+l θ′2), a force of magnitude ∣T∣ along the line of the link, toward the pivot when T>0 (the tension of the model); the projection of the constrained equation on the tangent gives ml2θ′′+mglsin⁡θ=0, and the projections on u and on the normal e3 of the constraining plane give the displayed tension and the vanishing of the second multiplier component;
  3. conversely, for every C2 function θ:J→R with ml2θ′′+mglsin⁡θ=0 on an interval J with nonempty interior, the curve x(t):=X(θ(t)) is a constrained motion of the model with multiplier and reaction as in clause 2;
  4. the reaction power vanishes identically, R⋅x′≡0, in agreement with the scleronomic case of the rheonomic-power theorem, and the mechanical energy E=12ml2θ′2−mglcos⁡θ is constant along the motion; expressed through the energy, T=3mgcos⁡θ+2E/l, and through the initial data (θ0,θ0′), T=mg(3cos⁡θ−2cos⁡θ0)+ml θ0′2;
  5. for a motion with initial data at t0=0 given by m=1 kg, l=1 m, g=10 m s−2, θ0=π/3, θ0′=0, the initial energy is E=−5 J and the tension is T=30cos⁡θ−10 N, with T=20 N at θ=0 and T=5 N at θ=π/3, positive on the reachable arc ∣θ∣≤π/3.

All values are model values under the declared idealizations; the model is the ideal pendulum realized by a smooth rigid wire (equivalently a massless link, or a taut string while it stays taut), and the empirical qualifications are recorded in the remarks.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The constants m,l,g>0, the model data of the Example, the datum (O,2,G), and a C2 function θ:J→R on an interval J with nonempty interior.

[F2]

The holonomic-constraint branch (Holonomic-constraint models of the force branch: constraint data, the constrained equation, virtual displacements and the scleronomic/rheonomic distinction): G is smooth with DxG=(2x2y0001) of rank 2 on O; virtual displacements are ker⁡DxG; the datum is scleronomic exactly when there is N⊆R3 with Σ={(t,x)∈O:x∈N} (equivalently when (t,x)∈Σ and (t′,x)∈O imply (t′,x)∈Σ), and then Gt=0 on Σ; a constrained motion satisfies Mx′′=F+R with a continuous ideal reaction.

[F3]

The ideal-reaction law and the balance theorem (Adopted ideal-reaction law for holonomic constraints: the d'Alembert condition, its scope and its limits, Ideal holonomic constraints determine the reaction: multiplier form, explicit acceleration, unique constrained motions and the reaction-power identity, A regular holonomic constraint, its virtual displacements and the ideal-reaction law): R=DxGTλ with the unique continuous multiplier λ=Λ(t,x,x′)∈R2; hypotheses (h1)-(h2) of the balance theorem hold here because G is smooth with DxG of rank 2 on all of O by [F2] and F is constant; with consistent data the constrained motions are the solutions of the first-order system and have a unique maximal one through each datum; the power identity R⋅x′=−λ⋅Gt holds.

[F4]

The rheonomic-power theorem (Reaction work and mechanical-energy balance for ideal holonomic constraints: vanishing power for scleronomic constraints and the rheonomic work term): for a scleronomic constraint the reaction power vanishes identically, and if also ∂tU≡0 and the residual forces vanish then E=K+U is constant along the motion.

Verification

technique · direct; compute the multiplier matrix and the datum quantities, verify the equation of motion on the parametrized curves, and read off the tension, the reaction power and the conserved energy
1.1F2F5algebra

The datum is regular and scleronomic and its virtual displacements are the tangent line: DxG(t,x,y,z)=(2x2y0001) has rank 2 at every point of O, the first row being nonzero because (x,y)≠(0,0) there and the two rows being orthogonal; the locus is Σ=R×N with N={(x,y,z):x2+y2=l2, z=0}, so it is time-independent and the datum is scleronomic by [F2] (and then Gt=0 on Σ); and δ∈ker⁡DxG means 2xδx+2yδy=0 and δz=0, which at X(θ)=l(sin⁡θ,−cos⁡θ,0) is the line orthogonal to u(θ), that is, R Xθ(θ). Moreover G(X(θ))=(l2sin⁡2θ+l2cos⁡2θ−l2, 0)=(0,0) and DxG(X(θ))Xθ(θ)=(2l2(sin⁡θcos⁡θ−cos⁡θsin⁡θ), 0)=(0,0), so Xθ(θ) is permitted for every θ.

1.2F2F5F6F7algebra

Every constrained C2 motion admits a C2 angular presentation on its interval J. Write its first two coordinates as (a,b), so a2+b2=l2, and set ω=(ab′−ba′)/l2, a C1 function. Differentiating the circle identity gives (a′,b′)=ω(−b,a). Choose t∗∈J and θ∗∈R with (a(t∗),b(t∗))=l(sin⁡θ∗,−cos⁡θ∗) by [F7], and put θ(t)=θ∗+∫t∗tω(s)ds. The oriented FTC gives θ′=ω and θ∈C2, with domain-relative endpoint derivatives where present. Both (a,b) and l(sin⁡θ,−cos⁡θ) satisfy w′=ω(−w2,w1). Their difference has squared norm with derivative zero and value zero at t∗, so [F6] makes it zero on the interval. The third coordinate is zero by the constraint. Thus the motion is X∘θ; the following calculations apply to every constrained motion.

1.3F2F3F5algebra

The multiplier of the balance theorem on this datum: with M=mI3 one has C=DxG M−1DxGT=1mdiag⁡((2x,2y,0)⋅(2x,2y,0), 1)=1mdiag⁡(4(x2+y2),1)=1mdiag⁡(4l2,1) on the locus, DxG M−1F=1m(−2mgy, 0)=(−2gy, 0), Gtt=0, Gtq=0 and Gqq[v,v]=(2(vx2+vy2), 0); along x(t)=X(θ(t)) the velocity is x˙=lθ′(cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ,0), so vx2+vy2=l2θ′2, and hence Λ=−C−1[(−2gy, 0)+(2l2θ′2, 0)]=(m4l2(2gy−2l2θ′2), 0)=(−m2l(gcos⁡θ+lθ′2), 0) at y=−lcos⁡θ; this is the displayed multiplier.

2.1F1F2F3F5step 1.1step 1.3algebra

Conversely, a solution of the pendulum equation gives an ideal constrained motion: let θ:J→R be C2 with ml2θ′′+mglsin⁡θ=0 and put x:=X(θ), with the model data and potential of [F1]; then x is C2 and constraint-preserving by step 1.1, and x˙=lθ′(cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ,0), x¨=lθ′′(cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ,0)+lθ′2(−sin⁡θ,cos⁡θ,0). Set λ:=(−m2l(gcos⁡θ+lθ′2), 0) and R:=DxG(x)Tλ=(2xλ1, 2yλ1, λ2)=−m(gcos⁡θ+lθ′2)u(θ); the triple (cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ,0), u(θ), e3 is an orthonormal basis of R3, and comparing components of mx¨ and F+R in it: the tangent components are mlθ′′ and −mgsin⁡θ, equal by the equation; the u-components are −mlθ′2 and mgcos⁡θ−T=−mlθ′2 with T=m(gcos⁡θ+lθ′2); and the e3-components are 0 and λ2=0. Hence Mx¨=F+R with R=DxGTλ annihilating the kernel, so x is a constrained motion with ideal reaction and multiplier λ.

2.2F3F5step 1.1step 1.3algebra

The tension and the reduced equation along a motion presented as x=X(θ): projecting Mx′′=F+R with R=DxGTλ of step 1.3 onto the tangent direction (cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ,0) gives mlθ′′=−mgsin⁡θ, that is ml2θ′′+mglsin⁡θ=0; projecting onto u(θ) gives −mlθ′2=mgcos⁡θ−T with T:=−R⋅u, that is T=m(gcos⁡θ+lθ′2), the displayed tension; and projecting onto e3 gives 0=λ2, so the plane constraint z=0 exerts no normal force on any constrained motion, whose motion and applied force already lie in the plane. The reaction on the bead is therefore R=−Tu(θ), a force along the radial line toward the origin when T>0. A load on any support requires additional assumptions about the support and force transmission; the one-particle equation determines only R.

3.1F4F5F6step 2.2algebra

Reaction power and energy: by step 2.2, R=−Tu with T∈R, and x′=lθ′(cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ,0) is orthogonal to u, so R⋅x′=0 identically, in agreement with the scleronomic case of the power identity R⋅x′=−λGt of [F3] because Gt=0; with U=mgy=−mglcos⁡θ static and no residual forces, [F4] gives E=12ml2θ′2−mglcos⁡θ constant along the motion; independently, ddtE=ml2θ′θ′′+mglsin⁡θ θ′=lθ′(mlθ′′+mgsin⁡θ)=0 by the equation of step 2.2.

4.1F5F6step 3.1algebra

Energy expression of the tension and finite model data: substituting lθ′2=2E/(ml)+2gcos⁡θ (equivalent to the definition of E) into T=m(gcos⁡θ+lθ′2) gives T=3mgcos⁡θ+2E/l; with E=12ml2θ0′2−mglcos⁡θ0 this is T=mg(3cos⁡θ−2cos⁡θ0)+mlθ0′2. For m=1, l=1, g=10, θ0=π/3 and θ0′=0 at t0=0, one has E=−mglcos⁡θ0=−5 J and T(θ)=30cos⁡θ−10 N, so T(θ0)=5 N and T(0)=20 N. Along this solution, conservation of E from step 3.1 gives θ′(t)2=(20cos⁡θ(t)−10) s−2≥0, hence cos⁡θ(t)≥12 and θ(t)∈⋃k∈Z[2πk−π/3,2πk+π/3] for every t in its interval J∋0. Since J is connected and θ is continuous, θ(J) is connected; it contains θ(0)=π/3, so it lies in the component [−π/3,π/3]. Therefore T≥5 N>0 throughout this motion. The reaction power is zero at every point of the motion.

5.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1∎

Clauses 1-5 of the Example are proved: the datum is a regular scleronomic holonomic constraint realizing the circle x2+y2=l2 in the plane z=0, the multiplier has the displayed two components with the second vanishing along every constrained motion, the reaction is the displayed tension, the pendulum equation is the tangential projection of the constrained equation, the ideal reaction performs no work, the mechanical energy is conserved, and the finite data give a positive tension on the reachable arc.

Remarks

  • Rod versus string. The ideal model supplies the reaction R=−Tu with no sign restriction; a smooth wire — the realization declared in the example — and a light rigid link can transmit both tension (T>0) and compression (T<0), while a taut string can pull only. Where the model's formula gives T<0 — for instance for motion near the inverted position — the string assumption fails, the constraint is released, and a slackening model (a different, unilateral model) is required; that regime is outside this example.

  • Model limits. The pivot is fixed and frictionless, the wire or link is smooth and massless, the field is uniform, and the bob is a point mass; drag, pivot friction, wire or link elasticity, the finite size of the bob and the nonuniformity of a real field are separate model corrections. The example is a conditional computation inside the declared idealizations and reports no measured tension.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources