Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Shifted momentum from a total-derivative modification: p′=p+Fx, H′=H−Ft and unchanged motion on explicit data

Physical scope

A worked check of the momentum shift produced by a total-derivative modification of a declared potential presentation: for a one-label model with mass m and a smooth gauge function F(t,x) = alpha t x_1 on the full chart projection, the modified chart Lagrangian has fibre derivative p' = p + alpha t e_1, shifted Hamiltonian H' = H - alpha x_1 read at the shifted momentum, and Hamilton system equivalent to the original one; an explicit free-particle computation shows H' differs from the mechanical energy while the motion is unchanged. All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.

Example

Declare the one-label model of the force branch of Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with N=1, mass m>0, time window I0=R, configuration domain Q=R3, a C2 potential U:R×Q→R and no residual forces; write L(t,x,v)=12m∣v∣22−U(t,x) for its mechanical Lagrangian (Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions). Fix a real parameter α and the smooth function F(t,x):=α t x1 on the full time-configuration projection R×Q, and define

L′(t,x,v):=L(t,x,v)+Ft(t,x)+Fx(t,x)⋅v=L(t,x,v)+αx1+αt v1.

The units are [m]=μ, [x]=ℓ, [t]=τ, [α]=μℓτ−2 (force, newtons), and [F]=μℓ2τ−1 (action). The free initial speed q below has dimension ℓτ−1 and is read in metres per second. Then:

  1. L′ is a fibre-full C2 time-dependent Lagrangian chart with velocity gradient Lv′(t,x,v)=mv+αt e1, e1=(1,0,0); the fibre map v↦Lv′(t,x,v) is a C2 bijection of R3 onto itself with inverse v=(p′−αt e1)/m, so L′ is hyperregular on its generic time-dependent chart (The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity) and its fibre derivative is the shifted momentum p′=p+αt e1,p=mv, which differs from the mechanical momentum mv whenever αt≠0.
  2. the Hamiltonian of the branch of L′ is H′(t,x,p′)=∣p′−αt e1∣222m+U(t,x)−αx1=H(t,x,p′−αt e1)−αx1, where H is the Hamiltonian of the presentation (The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions, Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch v=M−1p (or G(q)−1p) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian);
  3. the Hamilton systems of H and H′ are equivalent under the shift p′=p+αt e1: x˙=Hp′′=(p′−αt e1)/m and p˙′=−Hx′=−∇xU+αe1 hold exactly when x˙=p/m and p˙=−∇xU hold, so both systems have the same x-curves, namely the motions of the model (Hamilton's equations of the mechanical presentation are equivalent to the model's equation of motion, with residual forces as momentum sources and the coordinate form on every chart, Total-derivative Lagrangians, the potential representative and scaling: invariant stationary curves with endpoint terms); the Euler-Lagrange expressions coincide, EL′(x)=EL(x), and the actions differ by the endpoint value α(b x1(b)−a x1(a));
  4. on free data U≡0, with m>0, α≠0, initial position x(0)=0 and initial velocity v(0)=(q,0,0) with q>0, the curves x(t)=(qt,0,0),p′(t)=(mq+αt,0,0) solve the shifted Hamilton system, and along them H′(t,x(t),p′(t))=12mq2−αqt,K(t)+U(t,x(t))=12mq2. Thus H′ differs from the mechanical energy for t≠0 while the motion is unchanged. For the numerical instance m=1 kg and α=1 N the same dimensionally explicit formulas apply.

All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-label model with its potential, the mechanical Lagrangian L, the gauge function F(t,x)=αtx1, the modified chart Lagrangian L′, and the momentum curves p=mv, p′=Lv′.

[F3]

Gauge behaviour (Total-derivative Lagrangians, the potential representative and scaling: invariant stationary curves with endpoint terms): for a C3 function F defined on the full time-configuration projection of the chart, the modified Lagrangian L+Ft+Fx⋅v is C2, has the same Euler-Lagrange expression as L on every admissible curve, and its action differs from that of L by F(b,x(b))−F(a,x(a)); consequently the stationary curves and the model's equation of motion are unchanged. The present polynomial F=αtx1 is smooth on all of R×Q, so it meets both this regularity and domain requirement.

[F4]

Equivalence theorem (Hamilton's equations of the mechanical presentation are equivalent to the model's equation of motion, with residual forces as momentum sources and the coordinate form on every chart): on the global potential branch the motions of the model are exactly the curves whose momentum pairs satisfy Hamilton's equations of the branch Hamiltonian.

[F5]

Initial-value theory and calculus (The associated first-order system, motions, maximal motions and the Newtonian flow of a force model, Local existence and uniqueness for the Newtonian initial-value problem, with the quantitative Picard-Lindelöf cylinder, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn, The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0, The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral, The derivative f′(c)=lim⁡x→cf(x)−f(c)x−c of f:A→R at a point c∈A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set, Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length): differentiability classes are closed under the displayed algebra, linear and quadratic functions have their standard gradients, and every initial datum of the model has a unique maximal motion.

Verification

technique · direct; compute the modified velocity gradient and its inverse, evaluate the branch Hamiltonian, compare the two Hamilton systems under the momentum shift, and evaluate the free solution
1.1F1F2F5algebra

The function F(t,x)=αtx1 has Ft=αx1 and Fx=αt e1, so L′=L+αx1+αtv1 is C2 by [F5]; its velocity gradient is Lv′=mv+αt e1, which for fixed (t,x) is the affine bijection v↦mv+αte1 of R3 with C2 inverse v=(p′−αte1)/m; by [F2] this is exactly hyperregularity of the fibre-full chart L′ and identifies the fibre derivative p′=mv+αte1=p+αte1 as the shifted momentum.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

With v=(p′−αte1)/m one has p′⋅v−L′(t,x,v)=12m∣v∣22+U(t,x)−αx1=∣p′−αte1∣22/(2m)+U(t,x)−αx1, because the terms αtv1 of L′ and p′⋅v differ by (αte1)⋅v; hence H′(t,x,p′)=H(t,x,p′−αte1)−αx1, which is clause 2.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra

From step 2.1 the partial derivatives are Hp′′=(p′−αte1)/m and Hx′=∇xU−αe1; substituting p′=p+αte1 gives Hp′′=p/m and −Hx′=−∇xU+αe1, so the system x˙=Hp′′, p˙′=−Hx′ is equivalent to x˙=p/m, p˙=−∇xU+αe1−αe1=−∇xU, because p˙′=p˙+αe1; this is the equivalence of clause 3 and it exhibits the same x-curves.

4.1F3F4step 3.1

By [F3] the Euler-Lagrange expression of L′ equals that of L on every admissible curve and the actions differ by the displayed endpoint value; hence the stationary curves of L′ and the model's equation of motion are unchanged, and by [F4] both Hamilton systems of step 3.1 describe exactly the model's motions.

4.2F5step 3.1algebra

On the free data of clause 4 the system of step 3.1 is x˙=(p′−αte1)/m, p˙′=αe1. For x(t)=(qt,0,0) and p′(t)=(mq+αt,0,0) these equalities hold with x(0)=0 and p′(0)=(mq,0,0), corresponding to initial velocity (q,0,0). Along them H′=∣(mq+αt−αt)e1∣2/(2m)−αqt=12mq2−αqt, whereas K+U=12m∣x˙∣2=12mq2. Every sum and energy term has its declared dimension.

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 4.2∎

Conclusion: clauses 1-4 are verified on the declared data; the shifted momentum and Hamiltonian describe the same model motion, and the explicit data show that the chart Hamiltonian need not be the mechanical energy once a velocity-linear term is present.

Remarks

  • The shift is exactly the gauge derivative. The general pattern is p′=p+Fx(t,x) and H′(t,x,p′)=H(t,x,p′−Fx(t,x))−Ft(t,x): the momentum is translated by the gradient of the added function and the Hamiltonian is corrected by its time derivative. The modified Lagrangian is hyperregular but is not the mechanical Lagrangian of the presentation, and p′ is not the momentum Mv of The momentum of a potential presentation: the fibre derivative of the mechanical Lagrangian, the Cartesian momentum Mv and generalized momenta; it is the fibre derivative of the modified chart, which is why the Hamiltonian of the modified chart is not the mechanical energy.

  • Source check. Tong's Section 2.5.7 records the invariance of the equations under addition of a total derivative, and his Section 4.1.3 electromagnetic example exhibits a canonical momentum differing from the mechanical one by a gradient term; Stewart's Section 1.2 moving-cart computation exhibits the same pattern with a constant gradient and shows that the shifted Hamiltonian can be conserved while the mechanical energy is not. The computation above is the model instance of those statements; no electromagnetic interpretation of the parameter α is claimed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources