Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A smooth pointwise subluminal curve with no retarded root at an event

Physical scope

Mathematical example delimiting the kinematic hypothesis of the retarded point geometry: a smooth curve with ∣z′∣<c pointwise but no uniform bound, for which the retarded root equation fails at one event. Excluded: any claim about physical charges, any contradiction with theorems (the curve lies outside their hypotheses) and every empirical statement.

Example

Let c>0 and a>0, and define z:R→R3 by z(s):=(c2s2+a2,0,0) (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}). Then: (a) z is of class C∞ on R and ∣z′(s)∣<c for every s∈R; nevertheless there is no constant v∗<c with ∣z′(s)∣≤v∗ for all s, because ∣z′(s)∣→c as s→±∞; (b) at the event (x,t)=(0,0) the retarded equation t−s=∣x−z(s)∣/c of Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline has no solution in R: the equation reads −s=c2s2+a2/c, whose right-hand side is at least a/c>0, and squaring both sides would give c2s2+a2=c2s2, i.e. a2=0, contrary to a>0. Hence pointwise subluminality of a smooth curve does not by itself produce the retarded root, and the uniform bound v∗<c of Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline, or an explicit cone-intersection hypothesis, cannot be dropped; the supplier Global existence, uniqueness and differentiability of the retarded root indeed assumes such a uniform bound. (c) [Scope] This is a mathematical example about the prescribed curve and the root equation. The curve is future timelike pointwise (∣z′(s)∣<c for every s) but not uniformly subluminal; it is not asserted to be the worldline of any physical charge, and no measurement is reported. The example contradicts no theorem: it exhibits a curve lying outside the hypotheses of the root lemma.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: constants c>0, a>0 and the curve z(s)=(c2s2+a2,0,0); the Euclidean norm of The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn and the absolute value of Absolute value in an ordered field.

[L1]

c2s2+a2≥a2>0 for every s, and ⋅ is continuous and differentiable on (0,∞) with ddtt=12t=12t−1/2; general power derivatives and continuity are as in Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers. (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}, Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers)

[L3]

Monotonicity of squares and square roots on nonnegative reals: for p,q≥0, p<q if and only if p2<q2. (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives, Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0})

[L4]

The retarded equation and the uniform-bound hypothesis are those of Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline; the cited root lemma states its existence and uniqueness result for curves with ∣z′(s)∣≤v∗<c for all s. (Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline, Global existence, uniqueness and differentiability of the retarded root)

Verification

technique · direct computation and contradiction
1.1givenL1L2L3algebra

Smoothness and speed (a). The map s↦c2s2+a2 is a polynomial, hence C∞, with values in [a2,∞)⊆(0,∞); by [L1] the square root is C∞ on (0,∞), so the composite s↦c2s2+a2 is C∞ and z is C∞ into R3 [L2]. Its derivative is z′(s)=(c2s/c2s2+a2,0,0) by the chain rule [L1, L2], so ∣z′(s)∣=c2∣s∣/c2s2+a2 [L2]. If s=0 this is 0<c; if s≠0, dividing numerator and denominator by c∣s∣>0 gives ∣z′(s)∣=c/1+a2/(c2s2)<c because a2/(c2s2)>0 [L3]. Hence ∣z′(s)∣<c for every s.

2.1step 1.1L1L3algebra

No uniform bound (a, continued). For s>0, ∣z′(s)∣=c/1+a2/(c2s2)→c as s→∞, since a2/(c2s2)→0 and the square root and reciprocal are continuous on their domains [L1]; the same limit holds as s→−∞ by symmetry. Consequently, for every v∗<c there is s with ∣z′(s)∣>v∗: choose s so large that ∣z′(s)∣>v∗, possible because the values approach c from below and v∗<c; thus no v∗<c bounds ∣z′∣ on all of R.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L3L4algebra∎

No retarded root at (0,0) (b) and scope. At (x,t)=(0,0) the equation t−s=∣x−z(s)∣/c of [L4] reads −s=∣z(s)∣/c=c2s2+a2/c, and the right-hand side is ≥a/c>0; hence any solution would satisfy s<0, so both sides are nonnegative and squaring is equivalent. Squaring gives s2=(c2s2+a2)/c2, that is c2s2=c2s2+a2 and then a2=0, contradicting a>0; therefore no solution s∈R exists at this event. Since z is pointwise subluminal by step 1.1 but carries no uniform bound by step 2.1, this exhibits a smooth curve outside the hypotheses of the root lemma [L4] for which the retarded equation fails: the uniform bound cannot be dropped, and no theorem is contradicted because the curve is not in its hypothesis class. Clause (c) records that the curve is a mathematical object, not the worldline of a physical charge, and that no measurement is reported.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources