How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A smooth pointwise subluminal curve with no retarded root at an event
Mathematical example delimiting the kinematic hypothesis of the retarded point geometry: a smooth curve with pointwise but no uniform bound, for which the retarded root equation fails at one event. Excluded: any claim about physical charges, any contradiction with theorems (the curve lies outside their hypotheses) and every empirical statement.
Example
Let and , and define by (The Euclidean inner product on , Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ). Then: (a) is of class on and for every ; nevertheless there is no constant with for all , because as ; (b) at the event the retarded equation of Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline has no solution in : the equation reads , whose right-hand side is at least , and squaring both sides would give , i.e. , contrary to . Hence pointwise subluminality of a smooth curve does not by itself produce the retarded root, and the uniform bound of Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline, or an explicit cone-intersection hypothesis, cannot be dropped; the supplier Global existence, uniqueness and differentiability of the retarded root indeed assumes such a uniform bound. (c) [Scope] This is a mathematical example about the prescribed curve and the root equation. The curve is future timelike pointwise ( for every ) but not uniformly subluminal; it is not asserted to be the worldline of any physical charge, and no measurement is reported. The example contradicts no theorem: it exhibits a curve lying outside the hypotheses of the root lemma.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: constants , and the curve ; the Euclidean norm of The Euclidean inner product on and the absolute value of Absolute value in an ordered field.
for every , and is continuous and differentiable on with ; general power derivatives and continuity are as in Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers. (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are , Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers)
Chain rule and algebra of derivatives for composites of differentiable maps, and the notion of the derivative of a vector-valued curve with its componentwise computation. (The chain rule for total derivatives: , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms)
Monotonicity of squares and square roots on nonnegative reals: for , if and only if . (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives, Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are )
The retarded equation and the uniform-bound hypothesis are those of Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline; the cited root lemma states its existence and uniqueness result for curves with for all . (Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline, Global existence, uniqueness and differentiability of the retarded root)
Verification
Smoothness and speed (a). The map is a polynomial, hence , with values in ; by [L1] the square root is on , so the composite is and is into [L2]. Its derivative is by the chain rule [L1, L2], so [L2]. If this is ; if , dividing numerator and denominator by gives because [L3]. Hence for every .
No uniform bound (a, continued). For , as , since and the square root and reciprocal are continuous on their domains [L1]; the same limit holds as by symmetry. Consequently, for every there is with : choose so large that , possible because the values approach from below and ; thus no bounds on all of .
No retarded root at (b) and scope. At the equation of [L4] reads , and the right-hand side is ; hence any solution would satisfy , so both sides are nonnegative and squaring is equivalent. Squaring gives , that is and then , contradicting ; therefore no solution exists at this event. Since is pointwise subluminal by step 1.1 but carries no uniform bound by step 2.1, this exhibits a smooth curve outside the hypotheses of the root lemma [L4] for which the retarded equation fails: the uniform bound cannot be dropped, and no theorem is contradicted because the curve is not in its hypothesis class. Clause (c) records that the curve is a mathematical object, not the worldline of a physical charge, and that no measurement is reported.
Depends on
Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline
Global existence, uniqueness and differentiability of the retarded root
Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms
The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral
Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are
Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives
Absolute value in an ordered field
The Euclidean inner product on
Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers
The chain rule for total derivatives:
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when