How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Retarded fields and radiation — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach-Space Differential Calculus and Banach Manifolds
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Causal kernels, gauge and point fields after wave existence
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Complete retarded point fields
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Electrostatic multipoles
- Electrostatics in vacuum
- Em Causal Response And Radiation Prerequisites
- Em Elementary Mathematical Prerequisites
- Em Expanded Analysis Prerequisites
- Em Minkowski Mathematical Prerequisites
- Em Wave Equation Prerequisites
- Energy Momentum
- Energy momentum angular balance
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Forces and Continuum
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Further Trigonometric Identities and Inverse Functions
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Harmonic Functions and Mean Values in Rn
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Integral Maxwell and constraints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Algebra Methods in Combinatorics
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Lorentz Transformations
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Densities and Radon Volume on Manifolds
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partial Differential Equations and Characteristics
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Potentials and gauge
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Primitives and postulates
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Retarded fields and radiation
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Spacetime Primitives
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Divergence Theorem and Classical Stokes
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Real Gamma and Beta Functions
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Volumes of Elementary Solids and Solids of Revolution
- Wave Energy, Finite Propagation and Huygens' Principle
- Wave Equation Representation Formulas
- Worldlines And Clocks
2 · Summary
Objective. The companion collects the pair's worked examples: the sharp counterexample delimiting the retarded-root hypothesis, the harmonic dipole antenna computed inside the exact dipole law with its explicit errors, and the reduced slowly-orbiting-charge model whose finite-time collapse is retained strictly as a property of its adopted premise. Every computation is conditional on its stated hypotheses; no coupled self-force dynamics and no empirical claim is supplied.
Where the retarded root can fail. On the smooth curve with one has at every , yet as , so no uniform bound exists; at the event the retarded equation has no solution, since squaring would force (A smooth pointwise subluminal curve with no retarded root at an event). The example lies outside the hypotheses of Global existence, uniqueness and differentiability of the retarded root and contradicts no theorem; it shows that the uniform bound, or an explicit cone-intersection hypothesis, in Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline cannot be dropped. The curve is a mathematical object, not a claimed physical worldline, and no measurement is reported.
Harmonic dipole antenna. For the prescribed moment the leading far fields of Controlled electric-dipole far field and retarded-time radiated power of a compact smooth source are with , so the amplitude pattern is with zeros on the dipole axis; the retarded-time angular density integrates over the sphere to and averages over one period to (Harmonic dipole pattern and period-averaged power in the exact dipole law). The example also builds an actual compact window source whose moment is the truncated harmonic waveform on a selected period and exhibits the full finite-radius and flux errors of the dipole theorem; it shows explicitly that the transverse-moment condition is sufficient for the ideal leading field but not equivalent to . Antenna feed, material and matching models, radiation resistance, effective area and measurements are excluded.
Conditional orbit instability. Adopt the reduced quasistatic premise (H) of a prescribed slowly orbiting charge with the Larmor emitted power as its instantaneous energy-loss rate; then the radius obeys with and the cubic reaches at the finite reduced-model time (Conditional radius loss of a prescribed slowly orbiting charge in a reduced quasistatic model). The low-speed premise necessarily fails as , so the computation is not a proof that a physical orbit reaches the centre, is not a derivation of atomic lifetimes and is not a coupled point-particle calculation; the finite-time collapse is retained strictly as a mathematical property of (H), and no measurement, dataset, statistical model or uncertainty is introduced.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
A smooth pointwise subluminal curve with no retarded root at an event
Mathematical example delimiting the kinematic hypothesis of the retarded point geometry: a smooth curve with pointwise but no uniform bound, for which the retarded root equation fails at one event. Excluded: any claim about physical charges, any contradiction with theorems (the curve lies outside their hypotheses) and every empirical statement.
Example
Let and , and define by (The Euclidean inner product on , Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ). Then: (a) is of class on and for every ; nevertheless there is no constant with for all , because as ; (b) at the event the retarded equation of Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline has no solution in : the equation reads , whose right-hand side is at least , and squaring both sides would give , i.e. , contrary to . Hence pointwise subluminality of a smooth curve does not by itself produce the retarded root, and the uniform bound of Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline, or an explicit cone-intersection hypothesis, cannot be dropped; the supplier Global existence, uniqueness and differentiability of the retarded root indeed assumes such a uniform bound. (c) [Scope] This is a mathematical example about the prescribed curve and the root equation. The curve is future timelike pointwise ( for every ) but not uniformly subluminal; it is not asserted to be the worldline of any physical charge, and no measurement is reported. The example contradicts no theorem: it exhibits a curve lying outside the hypotheses of the root lemma.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: constants , and the curve ; the Euclidean norm of The Euclidean inner product on and the absolute value of Absolute value in an ordered field.
for every , and is continuous and differentiable on with ; general power derivatives and continuity are as in Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers. (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are , Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers)
Chain rule and algebra of derivatives for composites of differentiable maps, and the notion of the derivative of a vector-valued curve with its componentwise computation. (The chain rule for total derivatives: , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms)
Monotonicity of squares and square roots on nonnegative reals: for , if and only if . (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives, Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are )
The retarded equation and the uniform-bound hypothesis are those of Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline; the cited root lemma states its existence and uniqueness result for curves with for all . (Uniformly subluminal prescribed worldline, retarded root and retarded geometric data off the worldline, Global existence, uniqueness and differentiability of the retarded root)
Verification
Smoothness and speed (a). The map is a polynomial, hence , with values in ; by [L1] the square root is on , so the composite is and is into [L2]. Its derivative is by the chain rule [L1, L2], so [L2]. If this is ; if , dividing numerator and denominator by gives because [L3]. Hence for every .
No uniform bound (a, continued). For , as , since and the square root and reciprocal are continuous on their domains [L1]; the same limit holds as by symmetry. Consequently, for every there is with : choose so large that , possible because the values approach from below and ; thus no bounds on all of .
No retarded root at (b) and scope. At the equation of [L4] reads , and the right-hand side is ; hence any solution would satisfy , so both sides are nonnegative and squaring is equivalent. Squaring gives , that is and then , contradicting ; therefore no solution exists at this event. Since is pointwise subluminal by step 1.1 but carries no uniform bound by step 2.1, this exhibits a smooth curve outside the hypotheses of the root lemma [L4] for which the retarded equation fails: the uniform bound cannot be dropped, and no theorem is contradicted because the curve is not in its hypothesis class. Clause (c) records that the curve is a mathematical object, not the worldline of a physical charge, and that no measurement is reported.
Harmonic dipole pattern and period-averaged power in the exact dipole law
Deterministic model computation in the exact electric-dipole law for declared parameters: the angular pattern and period-averaged power of a prescribed harmonic dipole moment, together with an actual compact-window source realization carrying the dipole theorem's explicit finite-radius and flux errors. Excluded: antenna feed, material and matching models, radiation resistance, measurements and every empirical statement.
Example
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the surface and finite-source branches. Adopt the electric-dipole radiation-law idealization whose leading far fields and angular flux are the dipole expressions of Controlled electric-dipole far field and retarded-time radiated power of a compact smooth source, evaluated for the prescribed smooth waveform with and . This is an explicit ideal radiation-law model, not an eternal compact-time source claimed to satisfy that theorem with . Here , , carries C m, carries s, and are the standard orthonormal spatial basis. The waveform is an explicitly prescribed time-dependent dipole moment as defined in Controlled electric-dipole far field and retarded-time radiated power of a compact smooth source, not measured data; Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution supplies only the static moment convention. All exact quantities below refer to that ideal leading radiation law. Then:
(a) [Fields] With , , , the ideal leading far fields are with , so the amplitude pattern is and vanishes on the dipole axis .
(b) [Angular power density] The retarded-time angular power density of Controlled electric-dipole far field and retarded-time radiated power of a compact smooth source is the pattern with zeros along and maximum in the equatorial plane when ; at times with the density vanishes in every direction; its integral over the sphere is using from Zonal and quadratic sphere moments for the polar surface measure on (a).
(c) [Period average] The mean of the total power over one retarded-time period is
(d) [Scope] The computation is the exact dipole law of the model; a finite prescribed source realizes it only within the absolute error bound of Controlled electric-dipole far field and retarded-time radiated power of a compact smooth source with its , and a physical antenna's feed, current distribution and material realization are additional source models not supplied here. The average in (c) is taken in the retarded-time variable, not in observation time; no measurement, radiation resistance, matching condition or effective area is reported, and no empirical claim is made.
(e) [Actual compact-window realization] Choose a compact smooth time cutoff near one selected period, a nonnegative bump supported in with integral , and . Define , . These are smooth compact spacetime sources, satisfy continuity, carry zero total charge and have moment . On the chosen period the moment equals the harmonic waveform, while the actual retarded field has the full , and errors of the dipole theorem. Its asymptotic total-power deviation from the ideal law is bounded by that theorem's explicit ; its period-averaged deviation is bounded by the average of . The condition is a sufficient ideal transverse-moment condition; it is not equivalent to . No eternal nonzero harmonic moment is asserted for a compact-time source.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()); the dipole theorem Controlled electric-dipole far field and retarded-time radiated power of a compact smooth source with its source class and constants; the waveform , , ; the construction data of clause (e).
Dipole theorem: for a source of the compact smooth conserved class, with , with ; the leading far fields are , with errors and , and the angular power density limit is with total error . (Controlled electric-dipole far field and retarded-time radiated power of a compact smooth source (a)-(d))
Sphere integrals: , so , and . (Zonal and quadratic sphere moments for the polar surface measure on (a),(d))
Sine and cosine derivatives and identities: , , parity, , and the addition formulas imply ; , sine is nonnegative on , and its zeros there are exactly , while . (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, The addition formulas for sine and cosine, The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi)
Fundamental theorem and derivative algebra for the one-variable computations below. (The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when )
Constructions and integration by parts in Euclidean space: a nonnegative bump of unit mass supported in a prescribed ball exists; a smooth compact time cutoff equal to near a chosen period exists; for compactly supported fields the divergence theorem gives , hence . (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions, The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump, Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization, Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain, If are differentiable on with integrable, then )
Conventions: is a unit vector, the moment convention is that of Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution, and the dipole theorem's source class is the compact smooth conserved one whose retarded fields are constructed by Retarded potentials, Lorenz gauge and Maxwell fields of a compactly supported conserved smooth source. (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution, Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values, Retarded potentials, Lorenz gauge and Maxwell fields of a compactly supported conserved smooth source)
The integral triangle inequality and nonnegative integral order rules bound an averaged difference by the average of its absolute value; fixed compact parameter integrals of smooth functions are continuous, so the source flux and are finite and continuous on the selected period. (The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, Differentiation under the integral sign over a compact measurable set and over a compact surface, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions)
Verification
Leading fields (a). By [L3], and ; hence and [L4]. Substituting into the leading field of [L1] with gives and . For a unit vector , , which vanishes exactly when , i.e. , and is maximal for [L3, L6]. This is (a).
Angular power density (b). By [L1] the angular density limit of the dipole law is ; substituting gives [step 1.1, L3]. Hence , which vanishes on the axis and is maximal in the equatorial plane. Integrating with [L2], , so . This is (b).
Period average (c). By [L3], , whose antiderivative has endpoint increment over ; hence by [L4]. Multiplying the total power of step 2.1 by gives the period mean , the average being taken in the retarded-time variable as stated. This is (c).
Realization, scope and error control (d),(e). Choose by the compact cutoff lemma of [L5], and choose a nonnegative spatial cutoff equal to one near the origin and supported in . Its integral is positive (it is one on a ball) and finite (it is bounded with compact support); dividing by that integral gives the smooth unit-mass of [L5]. With these , the functions and are and compactly supported in a set , and ; the total charge is , and the moment is by [L5]. On the selected period , so that source realizes the harmonic moment there, while by [L1] its actual retarded fields are those of the compact smooth branch constructed in [L6] and carry the full , and errors around the ideal dipole expressions; the asymptotic total-power deviation from the ideal law is bounded by of [L1] and its period-averaged absolute deviation is at most the average of , by the integral triangle inequality [L7]. To prove the non-equivalence in (e), use a separate compact-source witness. Choose a nonnegative even smooth unit-mass bump supported in : symmetrize any such bump as , so substitution gives . Choose a compact time cutoff on a neighbourhood of , vectors with (in C m s and C m s respectively), and . Set and . The same continuity and integration-by-parts computation gives moment . At , on the whole retarded window, and . Hence for every , This is a compact smooth conserved counterexample to , independent of the harmonic realization. Conversely follows from [L1]. Clause (d) records the scope: no feed, matching, radiation-resistance, measurement or observation-time power statement is made, and no eternal nonzero harmonic moment is asserted for the compact-time source.
Conditional radius loss of a prescribed slowly orbiting charge in a reduced quasistatic model
Reduced quasistatic circular-orbit model with an adopted Larmor energy-balance premise (H): the radius ODE , the cubic solution and the formal finite-time collapse limit as a property of (H). Excluded: any claim that a physical orbit reaches the centre or an atom decays in finite time; coupled self-force dynamics; derivation of lifetimes; measurements, statistical models and every empirical claim.
Statement
When invoking the cited point-source emitted-power theorem as an established interpretation, retain its Countable Choice premise (, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). The reduced loss-rate formula in (H) below is independently adopted as a modelling hypothesis; the conditional finite-calculus orbit computation from (H) uses no choice.
Adopt the following idealized, hypothetical setup of a prescribed slowly orbiting charge; it is a thought experiment with explicit premises, not a reported measurement. (H) Let be an externally supplied rest mass and a charge parameter (Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values, The Lorentz coupling: external force on a test charge and the continuum force and power densities), let carry J m, and let be a nonempty open interval, , and be , with . The reduced model assigns to each radius the circular-orbit values about a fixed laboratory centre (Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields) for the attractive potential : the circular-orbit energy is and the circular orbit with speed satisfies , with centripetal acceleration . These are instantaneous circular reference values, not the exact kinematics of a curve with varying radius. To specify the intended validity window, choose dimensionless bounds and require and , where and ; the second ratio measures fractional radius change in one reference period. Independently adopt that the electromagnetic energy emitted per unit time is instantaneously taken to be the Larmor value of Instantaneous-rest Larmor power and uniform low-speed comparison for a prescribed point charge evaluated at the instantaneous centripetal acceleration, so that the adopted energy balance of the reduced model reads
Then, with :
(a) the reduced model implies for all where the model applies, and the circular orbit radius in the reduced model obeys on any interval containing on which ;
(b) is strictly decreasing on . The scalar balance ODE, considered without the validity-window inequalities, has the unique maximal positive continuation on , where . It restricts to on and satisfies as ; assigning zero at is only a continuous endpoint extension, not a positive-radius solution;
(c) [Scope and qualifications] the deduction is conditional on (H). The low-speed premise necessarily fails as , so the model's own hypotheses break down near the collapse time and the computation is not a proof that a physical orbit reaches ; it is not a derivation of atomic lifetimes, not a coupled point-particle self-force calculation (that dynamics is not available in this framework), and it supplies no empirical evidence. The reduced-model finite-time collapse is retained as a mathematical property of (H), while all conclusions about nature remain conditional on (H) and on its regime of validity. No measurement, dataset, statistical model or uncertainty is introduced.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the hypothetical setup (H), including the map on a nonempty open time interval, and : external parameters , , ; a circular orbit of radius about a fixed centre in the laboratory chart with , and centripetal acceleration ; the adopted energy balance ; ; (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Units and model reading: the parameters carry the SI meanings of Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values and The Lorentz coupling: external force on a test charge and the continuum force and power densities, while has the independently declared unit J m, and the orbit is read in the laboratory chart of Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields. (Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values, The Lorentz coupling: external force on a test charge and the continuum force and power densities, Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields)
The Larmor value of Instantaneous-rest Larmor power and uniform low-speed comparison for a prescribed point charge is the exact instantaneous-rest emitted power of the point-source model; in (H) it is adopted as the instantaneous loss rate of the reduced model, an additional modelling assumption. (Instantaneous-rest Larmor power and uniform low-speed comparison for a prescribed point charge)
One-variable calculus on intervals: the power rule for and the chain rule, the algebra of derivatives, the fundamental theorem for a continuous derivative, and the interval conventions of Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length. (For a natural the function is differentiable everywhere with derivative ; for it is the constant , with derivative ; for a natural the function is differentiable at every with derivative ; consequently every polynomial function is differentiable at every real, with the derivative computed term by term, The chain rule for total derivatives: , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers, The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then , Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length)
Proof
The radius ODE (a, first part). Along , the orbital energy satisfies by the power rule and the chain rule [F3]. Equating this to the adopted balance in (H), , and substituting the centripetal acceleration gives , hence , which is the displayed ODE; here and legitimize the divisions [F1].
The cubic (a, second part). Multiplying the ODE of step 1.1 by gives , a constant right-hand side; applying the fundamental theorem on any interval containing on which [F3] yields , that is the displayed cubic. Conversely, differentiating the cubic on that interval recovers the ODE, so the two descriptions are equivalent within the reduced model. This is (a).
Monotone decrease and formal maximal continuation (b). Since and , . For in , step 2.1 gives , and positivity implies . Put , which is positive exactly for . The positive real-power function is on by [F3] and has derivative . The cubic identity forces and there: positive cubes are injective since and the second factor is positive. Every positive solution through satisfies the same cubic by step 2.1, so this is the unique maximal positive solution of the scalar balance ODE; it cannot extend positively across where . As , given , eventually, whence . This formal limit belongs to the extended scalar ODE, not to an arbitrary original validity interval, and no negative radius or positive solution at is asserted.
Scope and qualifications (c). The deduction is conditional on (H) throughout: the balance is the adopted premise, and the Larmor expression is only the prescribed-source rest-event emitted power of [F2], converted into a mechanical loss rate solely by the assumption (H) and not by any derived equation of motion. The quantified low-speed bound in (H) fails along the formal continuation as because with , so the model's own regime of validity excludes the collapse point: is a formal finite-time limit of the reduced model, not the predicted time at which a physical orbit reaches the centre. No coupled self-force dynamics, no lifetime derivation, no measurement, dataset, statistical model or uncertainty is introduced, and nothing here contradicts a theorem: the scalar balance is an independent hypothesis, and the prescribed-field radiation theorems supply no mechanical balance or coupled motion law. This is (c), and with steps 1.1-3.1 it completes the conditional deduction from (H).
Sources
- N. Beisert, Elektrodynamik, ETH Zurich 2024 FS (author-hosted 176-page script)
- David Tong, Electromagnetism, University of Cambridge Part II Mathematical Tripos lecture notes (author-hosted 236-page PDF, title page dated Lent Term 2015)
- R. Fitzpatrick, Classical Electromagnetism: An intermediate level course, University of Texas at Austin (complete author-hosted HTML lecture notes, document dated 2006-02-02)