How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Em Wave Equation Prerequisites
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Em Elementary Mathematical Prerequisites
- Em Expanded Analysis Prerequisites
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Harmonic Functions and Mean Values in Rn
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Densities and Radon Volume on Manifolds
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partial Differential Equations and Characteristics
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Divergence Theorem and Classical Stokes
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Wave Energy, Finite Propagation and Huygens' Principle
- Wave Equation Representation Formulas
2 · Summary
This page supplies the mathematical wave-Cauchy layer that the electromagnetism
track consumes: the whole-space three-dimensional wave problem in the
normalisation , so that is the wave
operator of speed . Everything on it carries domain: mathematics and
depends only on mathematical suppliers; no physical postulate, observation or
empirical claim is made, and the physical reading of , of the data and of the
source remains with the consuming electromagnetism pages.
The page opens with Joint smoothness of the spherical-mean family of a smooth spacetime function, which fixes the conventions of the spherical-mean family of a smooth spacetime function , proves its joint smoothness in with every differentiated-integral formula, and records the composed family , near the closed triangle . The statement is local: no decay, boundedness or compact support of is assumed, only uniform bounds on compact parameter sets, and the Axiom of Countable Choice is declared where the surface integral and the parameter differentiation use it.
The three-dimensional wave Cauchy problem: Kirchhoff representation, uniqueness, domain of dependence and compact support then states and proves the wave Cauchy problem for with smooth data and smooth source on a closed time slab: the displayed solution , with , is in the extension sense and attains the data; it is the unique solution in that class; it depends only on data in the closed backward -cone; and compactly supported data propagate with the explicit bound . No finite-domain boundary condition, no finite-total-energy hypothesis and no decay at spatial infinity is assumed or asserted. The homogeneous identity , , is supplied by The spherical mean identity behind the wave equation on the prerequisite page em-expanded-analysis-prerequisites; is carried from the published suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The companion page em-wave-equation-prerequisites-examples records explicit worked checks of the source-support and energy hypotheses of the Cauchy theorem.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
Joint smoothness of the spherical-mean family of a smooth spacetime function
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (), declared by the surface-integral and parameter-integral conventions below. Let and let in the extension sense: is the restriction of a function on for some open interval ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms). Let be the surface measure on the unit sphere of total mass (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, The Euclidean inner product on ), and define the spherical-mean family Then is of class on in the same extension sense, and for every multi-index in and all integers where the right-hand integrand is the corresponding iterated partial derivative of the composed map ; in particular , where is the spatial gradient at fixed , so the -derivatives are directional derivatives along . Consequently, for every the map is on in the extension sense, and for every fixed the map is on an open neighbourhood of the closed triangle . Nothing here assumes decay, compact support or boundedness of ; the statement is local in and uses uniform bounds only on compact parameter sets.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice ; times ; a function on an open set with ; and the surface measure on the unit sphere of total mass .
A map is of class when every word iterated coordinate partial derivative of order at most exists and is continuous, and of class when it is for every ; is the canonical-order multi-index derivative, and for a coordinate word write , with the empty word denoting the identity, and let denote appending the coordinate , so ; partial derivatives are the one-variable derivatives along coordinate lines ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).
Chain rule: if is totally differentiable at and at , then (The chain rule for total derivatives: ).
Finite sums, scalar multiples and products of Euclidean maps are , and composites of composable maps are , for every ( Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition); sums, scalar multiples and products of differentiable real functions differentiate by the sum, scalar-multiple and product rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
If all first partial derivatives of exist on a neighbourhood of and are continuous at , then is totally differentiable at with total derivative the Jacobian matrix; if is totally differentiable at , then for every direction the directional derivative exists and , which for scalar is with the gradient of The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian, The Euclidean inner product on ).
Parameter integrals: if is compact, measurable and of finite Lebesgue measure, , and and are continuous on a neighbourhood of , then is differentiable on with derivative ; the same conclusion holds, under the convention of Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, with surface measure on a fixed compact hypersurface in place of ; nothing is asserted for moving parameter sets or singularities crossing the integration set (Differentiation under the integral sign over a compact measurable set and over a compact surface).
On a compact embedded hypersurface the surface integral is defined by the finite chart formula with Gram density; for signed functions with it is the difference of the integrals of the positive and negative parts; the notation of this item fixes for the unit sphere (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, The Euclidean inner product on ).
For nonnegative measurable one has , and for (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
Mean value theorem: if is continuous on and differentiable at every point of , then there is with (The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with ).
Closed boxes in are compact in the Euclidean metric, and a continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space attains a maximum and a minimum (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).
Cauchy-Schwarz: for real vectors, the right-hand factors being Euclidean norms (Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation, The Euclidean inner product on ).
The Axiom of Countable Choice : every at most countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
The setting and the reduction to the open set . Let also denote the function on the open set whose restriction to is the of the statement, put , an open subset of , and let carry the surface measure of total mass of [F6]. Define for ; its restriction to the closed set is the family of the statement, so every assertion proved below on , or on an open neighbourhood of a closed subset of , restricts to the corresponding extension-sense assertion of the statement. All surface integrals are read under the convention carried by [F5] and [F6].
The composed integrand. Define by . Each component of is a finite sum of products of coordinate functions, so is on the open set by [F3], and takes values in . Hence is on by the composition clause of [F3], so every word iterated partial derivative exists and is continuous on by [F1]. At and , the chain rule [F2], total differentiability of [F4] and give , the directional derivative of at in direction [F4]; applying the same computation to the already differentiated integrands shows that the iterated derivatives are the corresponding iterated partial derivatives of the composed map , which is itself, and in particular that is the -th iterated derivative at of .
Local bounds on compact boxes. Let be a nonempty closed box contained in . Then is a nonempty closed box in , hence compact by [F9], and by step 1.2 every is continuous on the open set , which contains ; so by [F9] each attains a maximum there and is a finite nonnegative real number with for all , because .
Continuity of parameter sphere integrals. Claim: if is continuous with continuous first partial derivatives, is a nonempty closed box and for all and all , then for all , where . Indeed, for fixed the function , , is defined on because the box is convex, and the affine map has constant partial derivatives, hence is totally differentiable by [F4]; the chain rule [F2] with total differentiability of [F4] therefore gives at every , and the mean value theorem [F8] bounds by Cauchy-Schwarz [F10] and the local bounds. Integrating this pointwise bound against : the signed surface integral is the difference of the integrals of the positive and negative parts [F6], so , where the chart formula of [F6] with the monotonicity and scalar rules of [F7] gives monotonicity, the bound for constants , and from the normalisation of [F6].
Induction: every word derivative of exists with the differentiated-integral formula, continuously. Claim: for every word in the five coordinate directions of , the iterated derivative exists on and equals , and this integral is continuous on . Prove the claim by induction on the length of the word. For it is the definition of in step 1.1 together with , and continuity is step 2.2 applied with , whose partial derivatives are continuous with bounds on by steps 1.2 and 2.1. Assume the claim for all words of length ; let be such a word and a coordinate direction, and fix , a nonempty closed box with in its interior and coordinate intervals . For fixed coordinates other than the -th and , put , where is the point of the -th coordinate line with -th coordinate ; then both and are continuous on an open neighbourhood of in , being restrictions of the continuous and of step 1.2. By the surface clause of [F5], is differentiable on with derivative ; multiplying by the constant (the scalar multiple rule for one-variable derivatives, [F3]) gives on the line through ; with the induction hypothesis this shows on that line, hence on all of since and are arbitrary, and this integral is continuous on by step 2.2 applied to , whose partial derivatives are continuous by step 1.2 with bounds on by step 2.1. This closes the induction.
is and satisfies the displayed formula. By step 3.1 every word iterated partial derivative of exists and is continuous on the open set , so is of class on by [F1]; in particular its restriction to is in the extension sense of the statement. Every canonical-order derivative is one of the word derivatives covered by step 3.1, so it equals the sphere integral of the corresponding word derivative of the composed map, and step 1.2 identifies those integrands as the corresponding iterated partial derivatives of ; the asserted -derivative statements are those of step 1.2.
The composed map and the local nature of the argument. Let and define on the open set . The map has components that are finite sums of products of coordinate functions, so it is by [F3] and takes values in ; hence is by composition [F3] with step 4.1, and multiplying by the function gives that is on by [F3]. Since and the closed triangle is contained in , the restriction shows that is on in the extension sense, and for each fixed the map is on the open neighbourhood of . The whole argument used only the bounds of step 2.1 on compact parameter boxes and the compactness of ; no boundedness, decay or compact spatial support of was assumed or used.
The three-dimensional wave Cauchy problem: Kirchhoff representation, uniqueness, domain of dependence and compact support
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (), used through the cited published suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , , , let and let in the extension sense that is the restriction of a function on for some open interval ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms). Write , so that is the wave operator of speed (The Laplacian of a function and of a vector field, Wave equation, Cauchy data and wave speed). For and let , where is the spherical mean of The spherical mean identity behind the wave equation. Define, with , where denotes the map and is the partial derivative of in its second argument, evaluated at . Then:
(a) is of class on in the extension sense, on (indeed on the open neighbourhood of the closed time interval on which the extension of is defined), and .
(b) Uniqueness: every in the extension sense with on , and equals .
(c) Domain of dependence: let , and let be the corresponding solution. If and on the closed ball and on the closed backward cone (Forward and backward wave cones, domain of dependence and influence), then for every and .
(d) Compact support: if vanishes off a compact , vanishes off a compact , and vanishes off a fixed compact for every , then for every the function has compact spatial support: if for some (which exists, Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line), then whenever .
No boundary condition on a finite spatial domain, no finite-total-energy hypothesis, and no decay of at infinity is assumed or asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice ; a speed ; times ; data ; a function of class on in the extension sense, that is, the restriction of a function on for some open interval ; the operators and ; and the surface measure on the unit sphere of total mass .
A map is of class when every word iterated coordinate partial derivative of order at most exists and is continuous, and of class when it is for every ; the Laplacian is ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The Laplacian of a function and of a vector field).
Finite sums, scalar multiples and products of maps are and composites of composable maps are ( Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition); the chain rule holds for total derivatives and continuous first partial derivatives imply total differentiability (The chain rule for total derivatives: , If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative); mixed second partials of a function commute (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives); and sums, scalar multiples and products of differentiable real functions differentiate by the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Spherical-mean family of a smooth spacetime function: with as given and of total mass , the family is of class on in the extension sense, and every word iterated partial derivative is obtained by differentiating the composed integrand under the sphere integral; the statement is local, assumes no decay, compact support or boundedness of , and uses uniform bounds only on compact parameter sets (Joint smoothness of the spherical-mean family of a smooth spacetime function).
Spherical means of a fixed smooth datum: for and , , the map is smooth for and satisfies the Euler-Poisson-Darboux identity for , and , , satisfies , and ; all identities are local and assume no decay of (The spherical mean identity behind the wave equation).
Parameter integrals: if is compact, measurable and of finite Lebesgue measure, , and are continuous on a neighbourhood of , then is differentiable on with derivative ; the same holds, under the convention of Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, with surface measure on a fixed compact hypersurface in place of ; moving parameter sets and singularities crossing the integration set are excluded (Differentiation under the integral sign over a compact measurable set and over a compact surface).
Differentiating an integral with moving endpoints: if is an open interval, with , is an open interval containing the closures of the intervals and is continuous with continuous , then is on with (Differentiating an integral with moving endpoints). Continuous integrands on nondegenerate compact intervals are Riemann integrable and, under , their Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree (Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in is Riemann integrable, Borel Darboux integrands in finite dimension); thus this rule applies to the continuous Lebesgue integrands used here.
A continuous function on a compact metric space is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous). For integrable functions, the Lebesgue integral is linear and (The Lebesgue integral is linear on , The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus); the nonnegative integral is monotone (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral) and under (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included). Consequently for continuous .
Closed boxes in are compact in the Euclidean metric (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line), and a continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space attains a maximum and a minimum (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).
The reflection of preserves the surface measure and ; orthogonal transformations of preserve the surface measure (Reflection invariance and vanishing first moment of the sphere measure, Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure).
For the Euclidean norm on , and , so also ; and , are the open and closed Euclidean balls (Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation, The Euclidean inner product on ).
Wave operator and Cauchy data: and , so ; a classical solution on a time slab is on the open slab and satisfies the equation there, and Cauchy data are the limits as ; the closed backward cone with vertex and speed is with base ball (Wave equation, Cauchy data and wave speed, Forward and backward wave cones, domain of dependence and influence).
Local uniqueness and domain of dependence: under , if solve and on a neighbourhood of the closed backward cone with , if on the cone and , on the base ball , then on (Domain of dependence and local uniqueness).
The Axiom of Countable Choice : every at most countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
The setting. Let also denote its extension to , put , and let carry the surface measure of total mass with normalised probability of [F9]. For a fixed datum put (independent of ), so that for any fixed is the of the statement; for the datum put on , so that for the spacetime datum . Define, for and , and, for , and ; here is the derivative of in its second argument at . All surface integrals are read under the convention carried by [F3] and [F5].
Properties of the family. By [F3] applied to and to each , the families and are of class on their domains in the extension sense, and every word iterated partial derivative equals the sphere integral of the corresponding derivative of the composed integrand. In particular and , because the sphere integral of the constant is ; consequently and by the product rule [F2]. The reflection substitution with [F9] gives and : both families are even in . Hence the Euler-Poisson-Darboux identity holds on and likewise with in place of : for it is [F4] applied to the fixed smooth datum (respectively ), and for it follows from the evenness just proved, since for an even function of the derivative is odd and is even while differentiates only the -variable.
The homogeneous blocks solve the wave equation with the prescribed data. Fix . By [F2] the function is on . Differentiating in and using the identity of step 1.2 at , one has and for ; at both sides vanish, since gives and by evenness. Hence on . Differentiating this equation in and commuting with through [F2] gives the homogeneous equation also for ; its data are by step 1.2 and .
Smoothness of the source term and its extension to a neighbourhood. Put and, for in an open interval containing and small enough that for all , define By step 1.2 and [F2] the integrand extends to a function on whose word derivatives are continuous there. Iterating [F5] in the parameter directions and over the fixed compact set shows that every word derivative in of exists and equals ; each of these integrals is jointly continuous in : on a closed spatial-time box inside the parameter domain, is continuous on the compact product , so [F7] gives uniform continuity there and Every parameter point has such a box with that point in its interior by openness, and compactness is [F8]. Hence is on , and so is by [F2]. For the substitution , , in the defining integral of gives , while ; hence is a extension of to the open neighbourhood of the closed slab, and is of class on in the extension sense.
The Duhamel identity for a smooth datum. Let be smooth on with an open interval containing , and let be its signed-radius spherical-mean family. Set and, for with , The equality follows by . For each fixed , step 2.1 applied to gives , and . At fixed , the integrand is smooth on by [F3] and [F2], including negative . Locally at each admissible , choose an open interval about with and ; thus [F6] applies on a genuine rectangular neighbourhood with endpoints and . Two applications give and . At each fixed , [F5] permits two spatial derivatives through the fixed -integral, hence . The positive-radius interval was arbitrary; no time derivative of the source is needed for these two endpoint differentiations.
The initial data. At one has , since and by step 2.1, while by step 2.2. Likewise : here and by step 2.1, and by the product rule [F2] applied to at in step 2.2. This proves the initial-data clause of (a).
The wave equation on the whole neighbourhood. Let denote the extension of to and let be the extension of step 2.2, and put on ; is continuous there by step 2.2 and [F2]. For , [F5] gives and step 3.1 with and gives on ; the homogeneous part satisfies on all of by step 2.1 and [F2], so on . For put and , an extension-sense smooth datum on an interval around , with family ; the substitution , , together with the evenness of step 1.2 gives , so step 3.1 applied to gives on , while the homogeneous part satisfies the homogeneous equation there by step 2.1; hence on . The two open pieces cover every time except ; continuity gives as well, so , that is , on the open neighbourhood ; restricting gives on and indeed on the open neighbourhood of the closed time interval on which the extension of is defined.
Uniqueness. Let be of class on in the extension sense with on , and , and form the function equal to for and to for : the pieces agree in value and in all derivatives through order two at : their spatial derivatives are those of , their time derivatives equal , and their mixed derivatives equal ; the second time derivative there being by the equation of step 4.1 and the data, and each second partial derivative is continuous on its side and has the stated common value, so is on a neighbourhood of the closed slab; then is on that neighbourhood, satisfies on each of the open half-slabs (where both and solve ) and (where the two pieces coincide), and since is continuous it vanishes at as well, so on for some ; no equation for an arbitrary extension of beyond is used; also and on all of . Fix with and apply [F12] in the translated time coordinates to the pair on the closed backward cone with vertex : the vertex time is , both functions are on a neighbourhood of the closed cone (contained in the neighbourhood of the closed slab on which is defined), the sources agree on the cone, and the Cauchy data agree on the base ball ; hence on the cone, so . Since is arbitrary in , this gives on the open slab. The initial data already give equality at , and continuity at gives equality there by taking at each fixed . Thus on the whole closed slab, which is clause (b).
Domain of dependence. Let , let be of class on in the extension sense, and let be the solution produced by the construction of steps 2.2 and 4.1 applied to ; by those steps is on in the extension sense, satisfies on an open neighbourhood of the closed slab and has data at . Suppose and on the closed ball and on the closed cone of [F11]. If , the base ball is and the initial values give . Now assume . Then is on a neighbourhood of the closed slab with on each open half-slab, hence on the whole neighbourhood because both sides are continuous, it vanishes together with its time derivative at on the base ball, and on the cone; applying [F12] in translated time coordinates to the pair therefore gives on the closed backward cone, and in particular . This is clause (c).
Compact support. Assume that vanishes off a compact , that vanishes off a compact , that vanishes off a fixed compact for every , and that for some , which exists because every compact subset of is bounded by [F8]. Fix and with and compare with the solution of the construction for the data , , namely . Every satisfies by the reverse triangle inequality [F10], so and ; similarly every satisfies , so and . The hypotheses of clause (c), proved in step 5.2, are therefore met at the vertex and give . This is clause (d).
Conclusion. Steps 2.2 and 4.1 show that is of class on in the extension sense and that on , indeed on the open neighbourhood of the closed time interval on which the extension of is defined; step 3.2 gives and , completing clause (a); clause (b) is step 5.1, clause (c) is step 5.2 and clause (d) is step 6.1. The argument assumed no boundary condition on a finite spatial domain, no finite-total-energy hypothesis and no spatial decay or compact support of the data; only local bounds on compact parameter sets were used.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
None yet.