How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Wave Equation Representation Formulas
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Solutions Newtonian Potentials and Green Functions
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Harmonic Functions and Mean Values in Rn
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partial Differential Equations and Characteristics
- Poisson Problems and Interior Harmonic Estimates
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Divergence Theorem and Classical Stokes
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Gamma Function
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Real Gamma and Beta Functions
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Volumes of Elementary Solids and Solids of Revolution
2 · Summary
This page develops the classical representation formulas for the Cauchy problem of the wave equation in . After fixing the vocabulary of wave operator, Cauchy data and wave speed, together with the unit-speed rescaling convention that transfers the unit-speed formulas of the sources to general speed, the page builds the one-dimensional theory: factorisation of the operator, the general solution as a sum of a right- and a left-travelling wave, d'Alembert's formula with uniqueness and data attainment, the domain of dependence, the forced formula over the characteristic triangle. The companion examples page contains a counterexample showing that data on one characteristic line do not determine the solution. In parallel it develops spherical means: their smooth signed-radius extension and parity, the vanishing first moment of the sphere measure, the ball–sphere radial identity, the Euler–Poisson–Darboux equation, the projection of sphere integrals of cylindrical functions onto weighted ball integrals, and the two iterated radial-derivative lemmas behind the odd-dimensional reduction. These tools yield Kirchhoff's formula in three dimensions, Poisson's formula in two dimensions by descent, the odd-dimensional formula by iterated spherical means, the even-dimensional formula by descent, the attainment of the Cauchy data, the support dichotomy between sphere-supported odd-dimensional kernels and interior even-dimensional kernels, time-reversal invariance, Duhamel's principle with the forced three-dimensional retarded potential, local determination by the Cauchy data, and a remark separating the wave Poisson formula from the harmonic Poisson kernel.
All statements of the page are read under the Axiom of Countable Choice, which supplies the polar surface measure and the sphere integrals; the one-dimensional construction is choice-free. Uniqueness of classical solutions in dimensions is deliberately deferred to the energy page that consumes this one.
For odd dimensions, sphere dependence means dependence on the data and finitely many transverse derivatives along the sphere; agreement on an open neighbourhood suffices, while bare equality of values on the sphere generally does not. Duhamel's principle assumes joint continuity of the source's spatial derivatives through order , without requiring time derivatives.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Wave equation, Cauchy data and wave speed
Definition
Let , and , let be the partial derivatives of Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map and let be the Laplacian of The Laplacian of a function and of a vector field. The wave operator of speed is and the wave equation with source is the equation on a slab ; the equation is homogeneous when . A classical solution on the time slab is a function of class on in the sense of maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space which satisfies the equation at every point of . This is the classical-solution and Cauchy-data vocabulary of Scalar partial differential equations, order, and classical solutions, and is a linear second-order operator in the sense of Linear, semilinear, quasilinear, and fully nonlinear partial differential equations.
The Cauchy problem for prescribes a displacement and a velocity and asks for a classical solution attaining them as in the pointwise sense: and for every as . Only the limits are part of the data, so need not be defined at a priori.
Unit-speed rescaling convention. A function solves on with data if and only if solves on with data ; equivalently . Indeed continuous coordinate partial derivatives imply total differentiability (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative), so the chain rule (The chain rule for total derivatives: ) gives and while spatial derivatives are unchanged, so evaluated at , and the initial displacement limits agree, while the initial velocity limit of is times that of . The cited treatments state their formulas at unit speed, and this convention is the only place where the general speed enters those formulas.
Sphere normalisation. Let be the polar surface measure on the unit sphere (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere). Write for the unit ball and for the total polar measure of the unit sphere (Sphere and ball measures scale in Rn); thus the boundary sphere of a ball in has total measure . For an integer put and , so that and is defined for every odd . All sphere and weighted-ball integrals on this page are read under the Axiom of Countable Choice of The Axiom of Countable Choice (), under which the polar measure and its integrals are supplied.
The iterated radial-derivative identity behind the odd-dimensional reduction
Statement
Let and let be the radial derivative on . For every , on . Both sides are finite combinations of derivatives of computed by the product and quotient rules; no integral and no differential equation for is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: an integer , a function , and the operator acting on functions on .
Sums, products, quotients of differentiable functions are differentiable, with the usual sum, product, quotient rules; nonnegative integer powers are differentiated by repeated product rules, and reciprocals by the quotient rule on nonzero domains (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
Put , so that and . The left-hand side is , and for the right-hand side the product rule gives , hence ; since , the right-hand side is . It therefore suffices to prove for every , which is what the following steps do.
On the operators satisfy , hence ; and for every and every one has . The last identity is proved by induction on : for , ; and if it holds for , then .
Fix . If , then directly; if , the second identity of the previous step with and gives the same equality. Also by the first identity of the previous step, so . Moreover , so .
Adding the two pieces of the previous step gives , and by the first identity of the second step this last quantity is . This proves the equivalent identity for and hence, by the substitution of the first step, the identity of the statement.
Radial-derivative expansion of the Euler–Poisson–Darboux transform and its zero-radius limit
Statement
Let and let on . For every there are real constants , , such that Consequently, if the finite limit exists and each derivative with is bounded on (an empty condition when ) — in particular if extends to a function on — then Every coefficient is nonzero, so the transformed average recovers the value at with the exact dimensional constant. The limit assumption is needed even for , when is bounded but has no limit. Boundedness of the higher derivatives is also substantive: for the function , which is continuous at , has unbounded, and then does not tend to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: an integer , a function , and the operator on .
Sums, products, quotients of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules, and polynomial and reciprocal functions are differentiable on their domains (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
Base case. For and one has with ; under the limit hypothesis, as .
Induction hypothesis. Fix and assume that for every there are real constants such that and .
Shape of the -st transform. Let and put , so that and . The induction hypothesis gives , and the product rule gives for , where the last two terms are read as for and .
Applying once to the finitely many resulting terms, and using , produces a finite sum with constants independent of : the term contributes and ; the term contributes and ; and the term contributes and . Every displayed monomial has with , and negative powers do not occur because the terms with have one or both of the last two summands read as zero.
Leading coefficient. Evaluating the identity of the previous step at the constant function , which lies in , gives : indeed , each further application of lowers the exponent by and multiplies the coefficient by the previous exponent, and applications leave the exponent . Hence , and setting for extends the conclusion of the induction hypothesis from to .
Conclusion. By the base case and the induction step, the expansion with holds for every and every . If is finite and each with is bounded on , then dividing by gives as : the term converges by the assumed limit, and each term with is bounded by .
Reflection invariance and vanishing first moment of the sphere measure
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let and let be the polar surface measure on the unit sphere (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere). Then the reflection preserves , and the first moment vanishes: The integrals are finite because is a finite Borel measure.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Countable Choice, an integer and the polar surface measure on .
for Borel (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere).
For an invertible linear with matrix and every Lebesgue measurable , ; in particular (A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not).
Under Countable Choice, is a finite Borel measure on (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
Proof
Reflection invariance. For Borel the set is Borel and , so [F1] and [F2] give .
Vanishing of the moment. Each coordinate function is Borel and bounded by on , so is a finite real number by [F3]. Because is invariant under the bijection , the substitution formula for a measure-preserving bijection — valid for indicators by definition, for simple functions by linearity, and for bounded Borel functions by the supremum definition of the integral — gives ; hence for every , that is .
For , linearity of the integral in the integrand gives .
Differentiating an integral with moving endpoints
Statement
Let be an open interval, let with for , let be an open interval containing the closure of the union of the intervals over , and let be continuous with continuous partial derivative . Then is on and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: open intervals , functions with , and a continuous whose partial derivative exists and is continuous on , with containing the closure of the union of the intervals .
If is order-convex with at least two elements and is continuous, then for , is a primitive of and for every primitive of and in (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive ).
Let , and let be continuous with differentiable on and derivative for every fixed . Then is differentiable on with (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral).
If is totally differentiable at and is totally differentiable at , then is totally differentiable at with (The chain rule for total derivatives: ). The required total differentiability follows from continuous coordinate partial derivatives (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).
Sums and differences of differentiable functions are differentiable, with derivative the sum respectively difference of the derivatives (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
Localisation. Fix . Choose a compact interval with in its interior . The endpoint functions are bounded on by A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, so choose in with for , and choose with . Define on . By [F1], .
The primitive is on an open neighbourhood of the endpoint curves. By [F1], ; by [F2] on compact rectangles inside , . This last expression is jointly continuous: on a fixed compact rectangle, uniform continuity of (Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous) bounds the change in by the interval length times a uniform error, and boundedness bounds the change in by a constant times . Thus both partial derivatives are continuous, and If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative makes totally differentiable.
Apply [F3] to the curves and in the open domain of , and subtract using [F4]. Evaluation of the primitive gives . The same uniform estimate as in step 1.2 shows this derivative is continuous. Since was arbitrary, the formula holds throughout .
Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let , let be continuous, let be the polar surface measure on (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere) and let , where (Sphere and ball measures scale in Rn). The spherical mean of is the average of over the sphere of centre and radius with respect to the polar measure; this is the mean of Spherical averages and local ball means in Rn with , restricted to continuous data. One sets ; that value is a convention whose consistency as a limit is proved later on this page, not assumed here. The unnormalised sphere integral is For even and put where and is the volume of the unit ball (Sphere and ball measures scale in Rn); for this is the weighted disk integral appearing in the two-dimensional Poisson formula below. The integral defining is absolutely convergent and hence well defined: the weight is integrable over — by translation invariance (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation) and the polar formula its integral is (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma) — while is bounded on the closed ball because that ball is compact (For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact) and a continuous function is bounded on a compact set (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value); the product of an integrable function and a bounded function is Lebesgue integrable. The ball average used on this page is the normalised mean of The average of a locally integrable function over a Euclidean ball, and every sphere or ball integral below is read under the Axiom of Countable Choice of The Axiom of Countable Choice (), which supplies the polar measure and its integrals.
Factorisation of the one-dimensional wave operator
Statement
Let and let be on an open subset of (Wave equation, Cauchy data and wave speed). Then In the characteristic coordinates , one has so solves the homogeneous one-dimensional wave equation exactly on the open set where .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a speed and a function on an open subset of , with coordinates and characteristic coordinates , .
If is on an open subset of , then for every pair of coordinate indices (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives).
If is totally differentiable at and is totally differentiable at , then is totally differentiable at with (The chain rule for total derivatives: ). The required total differentiability follows from continuous coordinate partial derivatives (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).
Sums, constant multiples of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
Expanding the two compositions and using [F1] for the mixed terms, , and ; hence both factorisations equal the operator applied to .
Write with , . By [F2] the chain rule for the substitution gives and , with the right-hand sides evaluated at , hence and as operators on ; composing, .
Since the factor is nonzero, so at a point if and only if there; this proves the claimed equivalence and completes the factorisation identities.
The radial recursion between dimensions n and n+2
Statement
Let , and let be a function of on a domain with . Write for the radial -dimensional wave operator and for the radial Laplacian, in the sign convention of the wave operator of Wave equation, Cauchy data and wave speed. Then Consequently maps radial classical solutions of the -dimensional homogeneous wave equation to radial classical solutions of the -dimensional one; at this is the correspondence between one-dimensional waves and radial three-dimensional waves. It is the mechanism by which the kernels in dimension are radial derivatives of the kernels in dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a speed , an integer , and a function of on a domain with .
Sums, products, quotients of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual product, quotient rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
If is on an open subset of , then for every pair of coordinate indices (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives).
Proof
Put . Differentiating the product and quotient, and , so the radial -dimensional Laplacian of is .
On the other hand , whence and , the same expression as the radial Laplacian of the previous step.
Since is , [F2] gives , so time differentiation commutes with : . Subtracting times the identity from this equality gives ; if in particular then , which is the stated mapping of radial solutions.
Ball means and sphere means are related by a radial derivative
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice, let , let , and for , let be the ball average of The average of a locally integrable function over a Euclidean ball and the spherical mean of Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data. Then for every
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , and the means and of the statement.
Under Countable Choice, for every Borel measurable (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
A continuous function on a compact metric space is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous); Euclidean closed balls are compact (For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact, in the sense of Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space).
If is order-convex with at least two elements and is continuous on , then for , is a primitive of on (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive ).
Proof
Polar coordinates applied to the positive and negative parts of the function give, using translation invariance (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation) to set , , where the inner integral is by the definition of the spherical mean; dividing by gives the first identity.
The function is continuous on : for with one has , and the two points and lie in the compact ball at distance ; since is uniformly continuous on that ball by [F4], the supremum tends to as .
Hence is continuous on , so locally at any split the integral at a fixed ; the first part is constant and [F5] differentiates the second part. Thus is a primitive of , and the first identity gives for .
Differentiating the product gives , so equating with the previous display and dividing by yields , the second identity.
Sphere integrals of a cylindrical function project to weighted ball integrals
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let and , and let be the extension of to independent of the last coordinate. For and , with the sphere of radius in and its total polar measure (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere), and the spherical mean of over equals . In particular, for even , every and , with the weighted ball integral of Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data, where is the -dimensional spherical mean of with centre . The connecting constant identity is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , the cylindrical extension , and , .
Surface measure is chart-independent; in graph coordinates its density is (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, Chart and partition independence of surface measure). On spheres it agrees with polar measure and scales by the appropriate radius power (Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure).
Under Countable Choice, for every Borel (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
and , so in particular for the sphere in and for the unit sphere (Sphere and ball measures scale in Rn).
for every (The closed form for the volume of the unit -ball).
for with (The real Gamma functional equation ); ( from the Gaussian integral); for every integer (Gamma at the positive integers).
Proof
Graph sheets. The upper and lower open hemispheres of are the graphs over . Their graph density is by [F1]. The equator has zero surface measure: near each of its points choose a sphere graph omitting a nonzero one of the first coordinates. Its parameter set for the equator lies in the coordinate hyperplane , which has Lebesgue measure zero (for , it is a singleton, null because it lies in intervals of arbitrarily small length); Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product applied to its indicator proves nullity, and the continuous graph density preserves it. A finite chart cover suffices by compactness of the sphere (For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact).
Integrating the two sheets gives . These integrals are absolutely convergent: is bounded on the closed ball by A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, and [F2] reduces the weight integral to , bounded by . Thus the graph computation applies separately to positive and negative parts.
The mean. By [F3], , so the spherical mean of over is .
The even-dimensional form. Let be even, , and . Substituting in the mean identity, by the definition of . For the constant: by [F4]; the functional equation and give by induction , so with one gets and .
Substituting the constant gives , which together with the two integral identities proves all assertions.
General solution of the one-dimensional wave equation
Statement
Let and let be a nonempty open rectangle. If satisfies on , then there are intervals and functions , with where and are the projections of onto the - and the -axis under , . Conversely, every such sum is a solution of on . The pair is unique up to the replacement , with , and no other freedom remains.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a speed , a nonempty open rectangle , and a function on .
On the domain of , where and , (Factorisation of the one-dimensional wave operator).
If is totally differentiable at and at , then is totally differentiable at with (The chain rule for total derivatives: ). The required total differentiability follows from continuous coordinate partial derivatives (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).
Let be order-convex and continuous and differentiable at every interior point with there. Then is constant; if moreover are continuous with at every interior point then is constant (A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant).
Let be order-convex with at least two elements and continuous. Fix ; then is a primitive of on , and primitives differ by constants (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive ).
Sums, constant multiples of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
The affine change of variables is a bijection of with inverse , , and the image of the rectangle is a nonempty open convex affine image of (a parallelogram when is bounded); the projections of onto the -axis and onto the -axis are nonempty open intervals, and every section and is a nonempty open interval. By [F2] the function is on , and [F1] gives on .
Suppose solves on ; since , on . For fixed the section is a nonempty open interval and there, so by [F3] the value is independent of in that section; call it . To see is , fix and choose with ; openness gives an interval about on which , so on . Since is , this local representative is , and hence . Choose a primitive of on by [F4]; since , . Then on , and the same section argument in the -direction gives that is independent of : there is with for all . To see is , fix and choose with ; openness gives a neighbourhood on which , a function. Thus and on .
Conversely, if and , then is on by [F2] and [F5], and two applications of the chain rule give ; hence every such sum solves the wave equation.
Uniqueness of the pair. If for all , then vanishes on . For fixed the section in is a nonempty interval, so on , and for fixed similarly on ; hence and are the same constant by [F3], that is and .
Therefore every solution of the one-dimensional homogeneous wave equation on a nonempty open rectangle has the form with of class on the projections, every such sum is a solution, and the decomposition is unique up to the additive shift , .
Smoothness, parity and zero-radius limits of spherical means
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice of Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data. Let , and , and let be the spherical mean with the convention . Then: (i) is on , and every derivative is obtained by differentiating under the sphere integral: for every multi-index and every with , where is the -th -derivative of the composed function . (ii) extends to a continuous function on with , and as , uniformly for in compact subsets of . (iii) The signed-radius integral for is an even extension of to . Its differentiated-integral formula holds also at ; in particular every available odd-order radial derivative vanishes there. (iv) for every and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , , and the spherical mean with .
The spherical mean is integration against the finite measure of total mass one (Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data).
The mean value theorem bounds a difference quotient by the corresponding derivative on its segment (The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with ). Continuous partial derivatives imply total differentiability (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative), so the chain rule applies to data composed with affine maps (The chain rule for total derivatives: ).
A continuous map from a compact metric space to a metric space is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous); Euclidean closed balls are compact (For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact, in the sense of Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space); a continuous real function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains its bounds (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).
Under Countable Choice reflection preserves the polar measure, and its first moment vanishes: (Reflection invariance and vanishing first moment of the sphere measure).
Proof
Differentiation, including signed radii. Put for all real . On a bounded parameter neighbourhood, all points lie in a fixed compact ball. For a coordinate parameter and a continuous derivative integrand with continuous , [F2] gives . Uniform continuity on the compact ball makes this bound tend to zero uniformly in ; integration against the probability measure [F1] preserves the bound. Iterating through total order therefore gives every stated derivative under the integral, with continuity again following from the same uniform estimate. This works for as well, since it requires only a finite measure, not positive-dimensional surface charts.
Part (ii), continuity at . Let be compact and choose with ; the ball is compact, so by [F3] is bounded there and uniformly continuous on it. Given choose such that whenever and . For , and one has and , so . Hence as uniformly on compact subsets, and the extension by is continuous because is.
Part (ii), the derivative limit. By part (i) with , , for , so adding and subtracting inside the integral gives , where the second term vanishes by [F4]; the first is bounded by , which tends to as uniformly for in a fixed compact set by uniform continuity of the continuous function on a large compact ball, again by [F3]. Hence uniformly on compact subsets of .
Parity and the bound. Reflection preserves by [F4], hence the substitution gives . Since is by step 1.1, its odd-order radial derivatives at zero vanish whenever their orders are at most . For (iv), . By continuity, each boundary value of is at most , and integration gives the stated bound.
Thus has the differentiated-integral formula, the stated uniform zero-radius limits and gradient bound, and an even signed-radius extension.
The Euler–Poisson–Darboux equation for spherical means
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice, let , let and let be the spherical mean of Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data. Then for every and The right-hand side extends continuously to with value : with one has and as . If is a classical solution of on an interval , then its space-time mean satisfies . No equation for is needed for the identity itself.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , the spherical mean with , and, when stated, a solution of on .
For and , is on with all derivatives obtained by differentiating under the sphere integral; it extends continuously to with , and its radial derivative tends to uniformly on compacta (Smoothness, parity and zero-radius limits of spherical means).
If and , then , where is the ball average (Radial derivative of a spherical average, The average of a locally integrable function over a Euclidean ball).
For one has for all (Ball means and sphere means are related by a radial derivative).
A continuous real function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded; Euclidean closed balls are compact (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact).
Proof
The spatial Laplacian passes under the sphere integral: by [F1] the map is , and differentiating the defining integral twice in , for every .
Radial identities. Put . Applying [F2] only to gives . Since is continuous, [F3] applied to gives . Differentiating the first identity in gives ; therefore . The radial-derivative formula is used only with the function ; no differentiability of is assumed.
The limits at . For the bound holds, the supremum being finite by [F4]; hence . Moreover the identity just proved gives . Since is continuous at , as .
The space-time version. If solves , applying the differentiation-under-the-sphere-integral computation of [F1] to the function yields and for all and . Since , this gives ; and the identity of the first two steps applied to the spatial function gives . Substituting, .
Collecting: the Euler–Poisson–Darboux identity holds for every datum, its right-hand side has the stated continuous extension at with value , and the space-time means of solutions satisfy the same radial equation with two time derivatives on the left.
d'Alembert's formula and uniqueness in one dimension
Statement
Let , and . Then is a function on and is the unique classical solution of the homogeneous Cauchy problem Its value depends on only through the two endpoints and on only through its integral over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a speed , data , , and the displayed function .
A continuous function on an interval has the primitive when the interval is ; since , this primitive is , and (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive ).
If is totally differentiable at and at , then is totally differentiable at with (The chain rule for total derivatives: ). The required total differentiability follows from continuous coordinate partial derivatives (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).
Sums, constant multiples, products of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Every solution of on a nonempty open rectangle has the form with of class on the projections, and conversely; the pair is unique up to , (General solution of the one-dimensional wave equation).
Proof
Regularity and the equation. The first summand is because , and the integral term is with by [F1], so it is even across by [F2]: and . Differentiating once more by [F2] and [F3], and , so on .
Both data are attained. At the displacement terms give , and the velocity formula of the previous step gives .
Uniqueness. Let be any classical solution with the same pointwise displacement and velocity limits at zero and put . Apply [F4] to the open rectangle , where is arbitrary. Both characteristic projections are all of , so with . At each fixed , letting gives and . Differentiating the first identity and combining with the second yields everywhere; their sum is zero, so throughout this rectangle. As is arbitrary, uniqueness holds on the whole time slab.
The display of therefore defines the unique classical solution, and its value at involves only through the endpoint values and only through the integral over .
The d'Alembert expression attains both initial data
Statement
Let , , and let be the d'Alembert expression of d'Alembert's formula and uniqueness in one dimension, Then , for every , and so . The orientation of the velocity integral is the sign in the second bracket: both ends of the characteristic base are traversed with speed , and the two endpoint contributions add.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a speed , data , , and the expression of the statement.
Let with and let be continuous on with continuous , where contains the closure of the union of the intervals . Then is with (Differentiating an integral with moving endpoints).
Sums, constant multiples of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
If is totally differentiable at and at , then is totally differentiable at with (The chain rule for total derivatives: ). The required total differentiability follows from continuous coordinate partial derivatives (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).
Proof
Displacement at . At the two displacement terms are both and the integral has equal endpoints, so for every .
Velocity. For , by [F1] applied to the integral term with , , , and inner integrand , ; the displacement term is differentiated by [F2] and [F3]. Continuity of the data and the regularity supplied by d'Alembert's formula and uniqueness in one dimension extend this derivative formula to .
Setting in the velocity formula gives ; the regularity is established in d'Alembert's formula and uniqueness in one dimension. Hence attains both initial data, and the two endpoint contributions of the velocity integral add with a sign as displayed.
The one-dimensional value depends on the characteristic interval
Statement
Let and let be the solution of d'Alembert's formula and uniqueness in one dimension for data , . For every , the value is determined by the restrictions of and to the closed interval : if are admissible data agreeing with there, then the corresponding solution satisfies . In particular, changing the data outside does not change the value at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a speed , data , , a point , and admissible data with and on .
The d'Alembert formula of d'Alembert's formula and uniqueness in one dimension reads .
The d'Alembert expression attains both initial data and defines the unique classical solution of the corresponding Cauchy problem (The d'Alembert expression attains both initial data, d'Alembert's formula and uniqueness in one dimension).
Proof
The formula of [F1] evaluates only at the two endpoints and of the interval and integrates only over that interval; hence replacing by any admissible pair with the same restrictions to leaves the right-hand side unchanged, so the d'Alembert expression of the new data equals at the given point.
By [F2] both expressions are the solutions of their respective Cauchy problems, so the solution of the data satisfies ; in particular the value at is unchanged by altering the data off .
The forced one-dimensional wave formula over the characteristic triangle
Statement
Let , , and let be of class on , so that , and are continuous. Then is the unique classical solution of with , . The source integral is over the backward characteristic triangle with vertex : , , and its coefficient is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a speed , data , , a source , and the displayed function .
Let with and let be continuous on with continuous , where contains the closure of the union of the intervals . Then is with (Differentiating an integral with moving endpoints).
For continuous , the function has derivative ; more generally the primitive of a continuous function is recovered by evaluation at the endpoints (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive ).
With data the homogeneous d'Alembert expression is the unique solution of with those data (d'Alembert's formula and uniqueness in one dimension).
Sums, products, constant multiples of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , The chain rule for total derivatives: , If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).
Proof
The source term. Extend to by ; its value and first spatial derivative remain continuous. Define as an oriented integral, also when . Primitives [F2] give and on an open rectangle in , including . Since , [F1] gives for . The compact-rectangle theorem Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral permits spatial differentiation under this fixed -integral. Thus and .
Equation and regularity. Differentiating by [F1] gives . The chain rule The chain rule for total derivatives: gives the displayed integrand derivatives; differentiation of in gives , also equal to by differentiating . All these derivatives are continuous because their integrands are continuous on local compact rectangles. At zero, tend to zero and locally uniformly, proving the asserted regularity up to the initial time.
Data and uniqueness. At the source integral vanishes, so and are exactly the statements of [F3] for the homogeneous part. If is any classical solution of the forced problem with the same data, then is with and zero data, so by the uniqueness clause of [F3]; hence is the unique classical solution.
The double integral runs over and , the backward characteristic triangle with vertex , and its coefficient is ; this completes the identification of the displayed solution.
Kirchhoff's formula in three dimensions
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , , and let be the spherical mean of Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data. Then defines a function on solving . Equivalently, for , the sphere integral being the unnormalised form of the mean because (Sphere and ball measures scale in Rn). The formula uses the values of and the normal derivative of on ; pointwise agreement of the two data only on that sphere need not give the same solution value.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , , and the means , .
For and , the spherical mean is on , every derivative being obtained by differentiating under the sphere integral (Smoothness, parity and zero-radius limits of spherical means).
For one has for (The Euler–Poisson–Darboux equation for spherical means).
If is totally differentiable at and at , then is totally differentiable at with (The chain rule for total derivatives: ). The required total differentiability follows from continuous coordinate partial derivatives (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).
Sums, products, constant multiples of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
If is on an open set of , then (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives).
with , and the map multiplies surface measure by : (Sphere and ball measures scale in Rn, Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure).
Proof
Time derivatives of the candidate. Write . By [F1] the means are respectively on , so [F3] and [F4] give , and on , all derivatives being evaluated at .
Spatial derivatives. By [F2] applied to and to , and ; since is and commutes with the -derivatives by [F5], . Hence at .
The unnormalised form. Since by [F6] and [F7], , and likewise for ; also by [F1], [F3] and the scaling in [F6]. Substituting into and collecting the common factor gives .
Comparison. Multiplying step 1.2 by and substituting gives . This equals from step 1.1, proving the equation. The and regularity of and gives .
Both displays define the same solution. The unnormalised display uses the data values and the normal derivative of on the sphere, or equivalently the data on an open neighbourhood of that sphere.
Poisson's formula in two dimensions by descent
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , , and let be the weighted ball integral of Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data. Then defines a function on solving ; here the first differentiates the function , which is legitimate by the projection identity, not by termwise differentiation of a singular integrand. Equivalently, for , The extension to the initial time and the attainment of the data are treated later on this page.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , , the weighted ball integral of Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data, and the extension of to .
In three dimensions the Kirchhoff expression is a solution of (Kirchhoff's formula in three dimensions).
For even , for the cylindrical extension , where is the -dimensional spherical mean (Sphere integrals of a cylindrical function project to weighted ball integrals).
for even , with and the unit-ball volume (Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data); in particular, the weight is integrable on by the polar-coordinate integrability statement in that definition.
If measurable functions converge pointwise almost everywhere and are dominated by one nonnegative integrable function, their integrals converge (Dominated convergence).
If is totally differentiable at and at then (The chain rule for total derivatives: ); for an invertible linear with matrix , (A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not); sums and products are differentiated by the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ). The required total differentiability follows from continuous coordinate partial derivatives (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).
A continuous function on a compact metric space is bounded, and closed Euclidean balls are compact (For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).
A real function continuous on a closed interval and differentiable on its interior has a difference quotient equal to a derivative at an interior point (The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with ).
Proof
Descent. Extend to on by ; these are respectively . By [F1] the function is on with . Since does not depend on , the sphere means of at centre are independent of ; hence is independent of , so , , and the restriction is a function on with .
The weighted-ball form. By [F2] with and , ; therefore . With , , [F3] reads , so is the displayed Poisson expression; the derivative acts on the function , since by [F2], and the spherical mean is , and not by differentiating a singular integrand.
The integrated equivalent form. For fixed put on and . By [F3], . To differentiate in , fix compact sets and for and . Choose a closed ball containing for , , sufficiently small and . By [F6], . The difference quotients of in , for these parameters and sufficiently small increments , are bounded in absolute value by by [F7]. After multiplication by they are dominated by the locally uniform integrable function . They converge pointwise to , so [F4] gives . The same argument for spatial difference quotients, and dominated convergence applied to convergent parameter sequences with the same compact-set majorant, shows that these first derivatives are continuous locally; in particular is in . Now [F5] gives , hence . The same change of variables gives . Therefore , which is the equivalent form.
Both displays therefore define the same solution of the two-dimensional homogeneous wave equation on ; the limit at and the attainment of the data are the subject of the data-attainment lemma below.
The odd-dimensional wave formula by iterated spherical means
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be odd, , , , put , and let be the spherical mean of Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data. Then defines a function on solving ; each is applied to the -dependent function . For () this is exactly Kirchhoff's formula Kirchhoff's formula in three dimensions, and the displayed constant is the one required by the leading coefficient of Radial-derivative expansion of the Euler–Poisson–Darboux transform and its zero-radius limit.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , , , and the spherical means .
For and every , on , where (The iterated radial-derivative identity behind the odd-dimensional reduction).
For and , is on with all derivatives obtained by differentiating under the sphere integral (Smoothness, parity and zero-radius limits of spherical means).
For the Euler–Poisson–Darboux identity holds for every (The Euler–Poisson–Darboux equation for spherical means).
If is totally differentiable at and at , then is totally differentiable at with (The chain rule for total derivatives: ); sums, products and quotients of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules on their domains (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ). The required total differentiability follows from continuous coordinate partial derivatives (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).
If is on an open subset of , then (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives).
Proof
Fix and put , where . Applying [F1] with and — admissible for each fixed because by [F2] — gives .
The inner expression. By [F4], and , so with and , , the last equality because by [F3].
Hence . The operator acts only on the -variables while and multiplication by act only on , and the mixed partials involved commute by [F5] since is ; therefore , that is on .
Regularity and superposition. For the function is by [F2], so is ; for similarly is . Hence is on and .
For , that is , the formula reads with , which is Kirchhoff's expression of Kirchhoff's formula in three dimensions. The prefactor is the leading coefficient of by Radial-derivative expansion of the Euler–Poisson–Darboux transform and its zero-radius limit: with and with the evenness of the means, which kills the first-order term, that expansion makes the normalised combination the data-carrying normalisation; the precise attainment of and is proved by the data-attainment lemma below.
The even-dimensional wave formula by descent
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be even, , , , let be the weighted ball integral of Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data and put . Then defines a function on solving . For () this is exactly Poisson's formula Poisson's formula in two dimensions by descent, and the factor is the exact rescaling of the unit-speed formula obtained by substituting in the -dimensional odd-dimensional formula.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , , , and the cylindrical extensions to .
For odd and data in respectively , the formula of The odd-dimensional wave formula by iterated spherical means with defines a solution of on .
For even , for the cylindrical extension of , where is the spherical mean in variables (Sphere integrals of a cylindrical function project to weighted ball integrals).
For and the formula reduces to Poisson's formula Poisson's formula in two dimensions by descent with (Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data).
Sums, products, constant multiples of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules, and constants commute with differentiation (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
Descent. The number is odd, and , , so [F1] applies in dimension with the same : is on with . Since is independent of , the means of at centre do not depend on ; hence does not depend on , so , , and the restriction is a function on with .
Rewriting with the weighted ball integral. By [F2] with the cylindrical extensions, for ; substituting into the definition of and using [F4] to move the constant and the factor through the -derivatives gives .
The two-dimensional case. For , and , so the formula reads , which by [F3] is exactly the Poisson expression of Poisson's formula in two dimensions by descent.
Therefore the displayed even-dimensional formula defines a solution of the homogeneous wave equation, it reduces to Poisson's formula when , and its prefactor is the one produced by substituting in the -dimensional odd formula.
The dimension formulas attain the Cauchy data
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , and let be one of the functions constructed from data of the regularity required by the corresponding formula: Kirchhoff (, Kirchhoff's formula in three dimensions), Poisson (, Poisson's formula in two dimensions by descent), the odd-dimensional formula (The odd-dimensional wave formula by iterated spherical means) or the even-dimensional formula (The even-dimensional wave formula by descent). Then, as , for every and the extension is continuous on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , and one of the four representation formulas with its data classes.
For and every , with (Radial-derivative expansion of the Euler–Poisson–Darboux transform and its zero-radius limit).
For and , the spherical mean is on with obtained by differentiating under the sphere integral, and is even (Smoothness, parity and zero-radius limits of spherical means).
The odd- and even-dimensional formulas define solutions of on (The odd-dimensional wave formula by iterated spherical means, The even-dimensional wave formula by descent); for the odd formula is Kirchhoff's expression and for the even formula is Poisson's expression (Kirchhoff's formula in three dimensions, Poisson's formula in two dimensions by descent).
Sums, products and quotients are differentiated by the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
Differentiated finite expansion. Suppose and put , using the signed-radius extension of [F2]. This is and even when , so and . By [F1], , where . Differentiate this finite sum itself: and , with the first summand omitted for . Every derivative used has order at most . Continuity and give , and , uniformly for in compact sets. For , the only terms without a positive power of are constant multiples of , which vanish at zero. These formulas never differentiate an unspecified error term.
Odd-dimensional data. The odd formula is and . Step 1.1 applies to both data, since their classes are at least . It follows that and , locally uniformly in . The even smooth signed-radius means in step 1.1 also show that and its first two derivatives extend continuously through zero.
Even-dimensional data by descent. For , extend the data cylindrically to . Their differentiability classes are exactly those of the odd formula in dimension . The construction in The even-dimensional wave formula by descent identifies the even solution with the restriction of that odd solution to the last coordinate zero. The limits of step 2.1 therefore apply without differentiating a singular ball weight.
The locally uniform displacement limit and continuity of give joint continuity of the extension . The velocity limit holds as stated. The cases and are Kirchhoff and Poisson by [F3].
Duhamel's principle for the wave equation
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , , and let be continuous, compactly supported in for each fixed , with all spatial derivatives through order existing and jointly continuous on . Thus every slice is in the velocity-data class, and the additional derivatives needed to differentiate the launched solution twice are jointly continuous. No time derivative of is required. For an admissible velocity datum let be the homogeneous solution constructed from the formulas above with zero displacement and velocity datum , so that, by The dimension formulas attain the Cauchy data, and . Then is a function with and on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , a source of the stated class, and for each admissible the launched solution with , .
The formulas of the page define solutions of the homogeneous equation on for admissible data, and the data are attained in the limit sense (The dimension formulas attain the Cauchy data).
Let with and let be continuous on with continuous , where contains the closure of the union of the intervals . Then is with (Differentiating an integral with moving endpoints).
In odd dimension , a zero-displacement launch is , , by Radial-derivative expansion of the Euler–Poisson–Darboux transform and its zero-radius limit. The signed-radius mean is (Smoothness, parity and zero-radius limits of spherical means). Differentiating this finite sum through total order two involves at most spatial derivatives of and nonnegative powers of . For , the uniform integral estimate in the smoothness lemma applies also with the continuous parameter : the assumed joint continuity on compact spatial-time sets makes and its first two derivatives jointly continuous, including at . In even dimension use the cylindrical launch in dimension from The even-dimensional wave formula by descent, with the same derivative order .
Proof
First derivative. The launched solutions vanish at and have velocity there by [F1]: and . Applying [F2] to the moving-endpoint integral in the form with — defined also for negative by the signed-radius finite sum in [F3]; extend the source slices constantly for and . Then and its first two -derivatives are continuous on a rectangular neighbourhood of the integration region by [F3] — gives , since ; in particular and .
Second derivative. Differentiating once more with [F2], , where the last equality uses and the homogeneous equation for every launched solution from [F1]. To justify moving through the integral, fix any compact set of -values and a compact time interval . By [F3], the integrand and its first two -derivatives are jointly continuous on the resulting compact parameter set; applying [F2] twice with the fixed -interval endpoints therefore permits differentiating under the -integral locally in . The mixed derivative is obtained similarly from the integral formula for . These derivative integrals and their boundary terms are continuous; their bounds on local compact sets give continuous one-sided derivatives also at . No common compact support of all source slices is needed.
Hence is with zero Cauchy data and on ; the constructed is a classical solution of the forced problem.
The forced three-dimensional version as a retarded potential
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let and let be continuous on with and compactly supported in for each . Assume that and every second spatial partial derivative are jointly continuous in ; no time derivatives of are required. Then the Duhamel construction gives a classical solution of with zero Cauchy data, namely the retarded potential over the backward light cone of . In particular the value uses only on , and the radius factor is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , a source of the stated class, and the launched Kirchhoff solutions with zero displacement.
For admissible sources the Duhamel principle gives the forced solution as , where is the homogeneous solution with zero displacement and velocity datum (Duhamel's principle for the wave equation).
In three dimensions , and the mean is the normalised sphere integral with : , where follows from and the Gamma values (Kirchhoff's formula in three dimensions, The dimension formulas attain the Cauchy data, Sphere and ball measures scale in Rn, The closed form for the volume of the unit -ball, The real Gamma functional equation , from the Gaussian integral).
Under Countable Choice, for every Borel (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
Sums, products, constant multiples of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ); the substitution is an orientation-reversing change of the integration variable.
Proof
Duhamel form. By [F1] the solution is , and by [F2] the launched solution is ; substituting gives .
Sphere-integral form. Writing the mean over as the normalised integral with from [F2], ; substituting , so , and , gives .
Ball form. The source is bounded on the compact backward cone by A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value and For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact. The weight is integrable on , since [F3] gives its integral as . Give the integrand any value at , a null singleton. Apply [F3] separately to the positive and negative parts after translating by (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation). This gives . Multiplication by identifies this with step 1.2.
The integrand is evaluated at with , that is on the backward light cone of , and the coefficient is ; this is the retarded potential.
Sphere-supported versus interior-supported free wave kernels
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let and let be the free solution assigned to admissible data by the formulas of the page (Kirchhoff, Poisson, odd- and even-dimensional formulas). (i) If is odd and , the value depends on the displacement and velocity data only through their restrictions to a neighbourhood of the sphere : if two admissible data pairs agree on such a neighbourhood, their solutions agree at . Pointwise agreement only on the sphere is not asserted. (ii) If is even, and is supported in a compact subset of the open ball , then the velocity contribution has the kernel form for , where is smooth on that region and with (read for ); consequently some data supported strictly inside give a nonzero velocity contribution, so the kernel fills the interior of the ball rather than sitting on the sphere. For displacement data also supported in a compact subset of the open ball, the displacement term has the corresponding kernel .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , even , and velocity data supported in a compact subset of .
The odd-dimensional formula expresses as a finite combination of -derivatives of and (The odd-dimensional wave formula by iterated spherical means).
For and , is with all derivatives obtained by differentiating under the sphere integral (Smoothness, parity and zero-radius limits of spherical means).
The even-dimensional formula reads , with (The even-dimensional wave formula by descent, Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data).
If is continuous with continuous on a compact rectangle, then is with derivative ; iterating gives the higher derivatives when they are continuous (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral).
Sums, constant multiples of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
Part (i). By [F1] the value is computed from the functions and and their -derivatives at , and by [F2] these are obtained by differentiating the defining sphere integrals. For in a neighbourhood of , is the average of over , a sphere contained in the chosen neighbourhood of ; hence all these quantities depend on only through its restriction to that neighbourhood, and so does .
Part (ii), kernel form. Fix and let vanish on a neighbourhood of ; the assumed compact support lies inside the open ball, so there is with . For the integrand and all its -derivatives are continuous on a fixed box containing the support, with the product integrand extended by zero where , for , so by [F4] applied successively in each coordinate of the box, with Fubini (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product), the derivative passes under the integral sign: with . For displacement data with the same compact-interior support condition, one additional time differentiation under the fixed-box integral gives the kernel .
The interior kernel. The identity gives by induction , where and for . Thus has a fixed nonzero sign throughout . In particular , the stated value.
Admissible interior data. Choose and, by A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls translated to centre , choose with and on . This is admissible in every dimension here. The actual contribution is , including the transition annulus. By step 1.3 its integrand has one sign and is strictly of that sign on the inner ball, of positive volume, so the contribution is nonzero. The same construction around any point strictly inside the ball shows that the interior kernel is nonzero throughout, rather than just at the centre.
Collecting: in odd dimensions the value depends only on data near the sphere (a statement about open neighbourhoods, not about pointwise traces), while in even dimensions the velocity kernel is the explicitly displayed smooth function of , nonzero at the centre, so interior data contribute.
The constructed classical solutions are locally determined by the Cauchy data
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let and let be a free solution constructed by the formulas of Kirchhoff's formula in three dimensions, Poisson's formula in two dimensions by descent, The odd-dimensional wave formula by iterated spherical means or The even-dimensional wave formula by descent from compactly supported admissible data. Then for every with the value is determined by the data restricted to : two admissible data pairs agreeing there produce the same value at . For the forced solution of The forced three-dimensional version as a retarded potential, the value is determined by the source on the backward cone ; two sources agreeing there produce the same value at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , a point with , and two admissible configurations agreeing on the stated set.
The four free formulas express through the spherical means and their -derivatives (odd case) or through and its -derivatives with the substitution (even case), and the forced solution is the retarded potential (The odd-dimensional wave formula by iterated spherical means, The even-dimensional wave formula by descent, Kirchhoff's formula in three dimensions, Poisson's formula in two dimensions by descent, The forced three-dimensional version as a retarded potential).
For and , the spherical mean and its derivatives are obtained by differentiating under the sphere integral (Smoothness, parity and zero-radius limits of spherical means).
For even , writing on gives , and is integrable (Spherical means and the weighted ball integral of space-dependent data, A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not, Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation).
Difference quotients converging pointwise almost everywhere under one integrable majorant have convergent integrals (Dominated convergence).
A scalar function continuous on a closed interval and differentiable on its interior has a difference quotient equal to one of its derivatives on the interior (The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with ).
Continuous derivatives are bounded on compact Euclidean balls (For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).
Proof
Free case. Let and be admissible data agreeing on and put . Each vanishes on the open ball, so all its derivatives through the orders in the formulas vanish on the closed ball by continuity. In the odd-dimensional formula, every sphere-average ingredient is an average of a derivative of evaluated on , hence is zero by [F1, F2]. For even , put . Fix a compact interval about and a closed ball containing all for , . For each derivative order , the difference quotients in of are bounded by on , where bounds the next derivative on that ball by [F5, F6]. This is an integrable majorant independent of ; [F4] therefore justifies differentiating under the integral successively through order . At , all integrand derivatives vanish because , so for . By [F3] the even-formula terms are finite combinations of these derivatives and hence vanish. Thus replacing the data by changes no term of the formula and leaves unchanged.
Forced case and conclusion. The retarded potential of the forced three-dimensional formula is an integral of the source over the backward cone , ; sources agreeing there give equal integrals, hence equal values at . This proves the local determination of the constructed solutions by the stated data or source; no uniqueness claim for arbitrary solutions is made, that being the energy statement of the wave-energy page.
Time reversal of the homogeneous wave equation
Statement
Let , let be an open interval and let satisfy on . For define for . Then on , and Thus the homogeneous wave flow is reversible: the same equation propagates the time-reversed state, and the velocity is negated.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: an open interval , a parameter , a function on with , and on .
If is totally differentiable at and at , then is totally differentiable at with (The chain rule for total derivatives: ). The required total differentiability follows from continuous coordinate partial derivatives (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).
Sums, products, constant multiples of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules and derivatives; in particular the affine map has derivative (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
Apply [F1] to the composition : the inner map is affine with differential , so ; applying the same rule once more, . In the spatial directions the inner map is the identity, so for each and hence .
Therefore for every with , , while at the substitutions give and . This is the reversibility of the homogeneous wave flow.
Two different objects are called Poisson's formula
Remark
The name "Poisson's formula" denotes two different objects that should not be conflated. The two-dimensional wave formula of Poisson's formula in two dimensions by descent is the weighted disk integral whose kernel is an interior singular weight on the expanding disk, while the harmonic Poisson kernel of Poisson kernel of a Euclidean ball integrates boundary data against a positive density on the sphere. The two solve different problems — an initial-value (Cauchy) problem in space-time versus the Dirichlet boundary-value problem — use respectively a time parameter and a fixed radius . The shared name does not identify their kernels or transfer estimates between these problems.
The wave formula is stated for the speed- convention of Wave equation, Cauchy data and wave speed; the harmonic kernel is the ball boundary-value kernel of the Poisson-problem page. The remark asserts no new mathematics: it isolates the naming collision so that no consumer imports a boundary-value estimate into the wave representation.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (revised 18 June 2014, UC Davis)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2025 archived author manuscript, AMS Graduate Studies in Mathematics)
- Jared Speck, MIT 18.152 Introduction to Partial Differential Equations, Class Meeting #10: Introduction to the Wave Equation (Fall 2011)
- Victor Ivrii, Partial Differential Equations (University of Toronto, 2018, CC BY-SA)
- Per Kristen Jakobsen, An Introduction to Partial Differential Equations (arXiv:1901.03022)
- Jared Speck, MIT 18.152 Introduction to Partial Differential Equations, Class Meeting #12: Kirchhoff's Formula and Minkowskian Geometry (Fall 2011)
- Sung-Jin Oh, Lecture Notes for Math 222A (UC Berkeley, 19 March 2024)