Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The radial recursion between dimensions n and n+2

Statement

Let c>0, n≥1 and let w be a C3 function of (r,t) on a domain with r>0. Write Lmw:=wtt−c2(wrr+m−1rwr) for the radial m-dimensional wave operator and Δmg:=grr+m−1rgr for the radial Laplacian, in the sign convention of the wave operator of Wave equation, Cauchy data and wave speed. Then Ln+2[1r∂rw]=1r∂r[Lnw](r>0). Consequently w↦r−1∂rw maps radial classical solutions of the m-dimensional homogeneous wave equation to radial classical solutions of the (m+2)-dimensional one; at m=1 this is the correspondence between one-dimensional waves and radial three-dimensional waves. It is the mechanism by which the kernels in dimension n+2 are radial derivatives of the kernels in dimension n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a speed c>0, an integer n≥1, and a C3 function w of (r,t) on a domain with r>0.

[F2]

If f is C2 on an open subset of Rm, then ∂i∂jf=∂j∂if for every pair of coordinate indices (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives).

Proof

1.1F1algebra

Put h:=r−1wr. Differentiating the product and quotient, hr=r−1wrr−r−2wr and hrr=r−1wrrr−2r−2wrr+2r−3wr, so the radial (n+2)-dimensional Laplacian of h is Δn+2h=hrr+n+1rhr=r−1wrrr+n−1r2wrr−n−1r3wr.

1.2F1algebra

On the other hand Δnw=wrr+n−1rwr, whence ∂r(Δnw)=wrrr+n−1rwrr−n−1r2wr and r−1∂r(Δnw)=r−1wrrr+n−1r2wrr−n−1r3wr, the same expression as the radial Laplacian of the previous step.

2.1F2algebra∎

Since w is C3, [F2] gives wrtt=wttr, so time differentiation commutes with r−1∂r: htt=(r−1wr)tt=r−1∂r(wtt). Subtracting c2 times the identity Δn+2h=r−1∂r(Δnw) from this equality gives Ln+2h=htt−c2Δn+2h=r−1∂r(wtt)−c2r−1∂r(Δnw)=r−1∂r(wtt−c2Δnw)=r−1∂r(Lnw); if in particular Lnw=0 then Ln+2(r−1wr)=0, which is the stated mapping of radial solutions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources