How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Joint smoothness of the spherical-mean family of a smooth spacetime function
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (), declared by the surface-integral and parameter-integral conventions below. Let and let in the extension sense: is the restriction of a function on for some open interval ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms). Let be the surface measure on the unit sphere of total mass (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, The Euclidean inner product on ), and define the spherical-mean family Then is of class on in the same extension sense, and for every multi-index in and all integers where the right-hand integrand is the corresponding iterated partial derivative of the composed map ; in particular , where is the spatial gradient at fixed , so the -derivatives are directional derivatives along . Consequently, for every the map is on in the extension sense, and for every fixed the map is on an open neighbourhood of the closed triangle . Nothing here assumes decay, compact support or boundedness of ; the statement is local in and uses uniform bounds only on compact parameter sets.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice ; times ; a function on an open set with ; and the surface measure on the unit sphere of total mass .
A map is of class when every word iterated coordinate partial derivative of order at most exists and is continuous, and of class when it is for every ; is the canonical-order multi-index derivative, and for a coordinate word write , with the empty word denoting the identity, and let denote appending the coordinate , so ; partial derivatives are the one-variable derivatives along coordinate lines ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).
Chain rule: if is totally differentiable at and at , then (The chain rule for total derivatives: ).
Finite sums, scalar multiples and products of Euclidean maps are , and composites of composable maps are , for every ( Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition); sums, scalar multiples and products of differentiable real functions differentiate by the sum, scalar-multiple and product rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
If all first partial derivatives of exist on a neighbourhood of and are continuous at , then is totally differentiable at with total derivative the Jacobian matrix; if is totally differentiable at , then for every direction the directional derivative exists and , which for scalar is with the gradient of The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian, The Euclidean inner product on ).
Parameter integrals: if is compact, measurable and of finite Lebesgue measure, , and and are continuous on a neighbourhood of , then is differentiable on with derivative ; the same conclusion holds, under the convention of Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, with surface measure on a fixed compact hypersurface in place of ; nothing is asserted for moving parameter sets or singularities crossing the integration set (Differentiation under the integral sign over a compact measurable set and over a compact surface).
On a compact embedded hypersurface the surface integral is defined by the finite chart formula with Gram density; for signed functions with it is the difference of the integrals of the positive and negative parts; the notation of this item fixes for the unit sphere (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, The Euclidean inner product on ).
For nonnegative measurable one has , and for (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
Mean value theorem: if is continuous on and differentiable at every point of , then there is with (The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with ).
Closed boxes in are compact in the Euclidean metric, and a continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space attains a maximum and a minimum (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).
Cauchy-Schwarz: for real vectors, the right-hand factors being Euclidean norms (Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation, The Euclidean inner product on ).
The Axiom of Countable Choice : every at most countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
The setting and the reduction to the open set . Let also denote the function on the open set whose restriction to is the of the statement, put , an open subset of , and let carry the surface measure of total mass of [F6]. Define for ; its restriction to the closed set is the family of the statement, so every assertion proved below on , or on an open neighbourhood of a closed subset of , restricts to the corresponding extension-sense assertion of the statement. All surface integrals are read under the convention carried by [F5] and [F6].
The composed integrand. Define by . Each component of is a finite sum of products of coordinate functions, so is on the open set by [F3], and takes values in . Hence is on by the composition clause of [F3], so every word iterated partial derivative exists and is continuous on by [F1]. At and , the chain rule [F2], total differentiability of [F4] and give , the directional derivative of at in direction [F4]; applying the same computation to the already differentiated integrands shows that the iterated derivatives are the corresponding iterated partial derivatives of the composed map , which is itself, and in particular that is the -th iterated derivative at of .
Local bounds on compact boxes. Let be a nonempty closed box contained in . Then is a nonempty closed box in , hence compact by [F9], and by step 1.2 every is continuous on the open set , which contains ; so by [F9] each attains a maximum there and is a finite nonnegative real number with for all , because .
Continuity of parameter sphere integrals. Claim: if is continuous with continuous first partial derivatives, is a nonempty closed box and for all and all , then for all , where . Indeed, for fixed the function , , is defined on because the box is convex, and the affine map has constant partial derivatives, hence is totally differentiable by [F4]; the chain rule [F2] with total differentiability of [F4] therefore gives at every , and the mean value theorem [F8] bounds by Cauchy-Schwarz [F10] and the local bounds. Integrating this pointwise bound against : the signed surface integral is the difference of the integrals of the positive and negative parts [F6], so , where the chart formula of [F6] with the monotonicity and scalar rules of [F7] gives monotonicity, the bound for constants , and from the normalisation of [F6].
Induction: every word derivative of exists with the differentiated-integral formula, continuously. Claim: for every word in the five coordinate directions of , the iterated derivative exists on and equals , and this integral is continuous on . Prove the claim by induction on the length of the word. For it is the definition of in step 1.1 together with , and continuity is step 2.2 applied with , whose partial derivatives are continuous with bounds on by steps 1.2 and 2.1. Assume the claim for all words of length ; let be such a word and a coordinate direction, and fix , a nonempty closed box with in its interior and coordinate intervals . For fixed coordinates other than the -th and , put , where is the point of the -th coordinate line with -th coordinate ; then both and are continuous on an open neighbourhood of in , being restrictions of the continuous and of step 1.2. By the surface clause of [F5], is differentiable on with derivative ; multiplying by the constant (the scalar multiple rule for one-variable derivatives, [F3]) gives on the line through ; with the induction hypothesis this shows on that line, hence on all of since and are arbitrary, and this integral is continuous on by step 2.2 applied to , whose partial derivatives are continuous by step 1.2 with bounds on by step 2.1. This closes the induction.
is and satisfies the displayed formula. By step 3.1 every word iterated partial derivative of exists and is continuous on the open set , so is of class on by [F1]; in particular its restriction to is in the extension sense of the statement. Every canonical-order derivative is one of the word derivatives covered by step 3.1, so it equals the sphere integral of the corresponding word derivative of the composed map, and step 1.2 identifies those integrands as the corresponding iterated partial derivatives of ; the asserted -derivative statements are those of step 1.2.
The composed map and the local nature of the argument. Let and define on the open set . The map has components that are finite sums of products of coordinate functions, so it is by [F3] and takes values in ; hence is by composition [F3] with step 4.1, and multiplying by the function gives that is on by [F3]. Since and the closed triangle is contained in , the restriction shows that is on in the extension sense, and for each fixed the map is on the open neighbourhood of . The whole argument used only the bounds of step 2.1 on compact parameter boxes and the compactness of ; no boundedness, decay or compact spatial support of was assumed or used.
Depends on
The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with
maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space
Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The Euclidean inner product on
The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case
Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces
Differentiation under the integral sign over a compact measurable set and over a compact surface
Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation
The chain rule for total derivatives:
Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition
If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative
A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value
Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian