Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Joint smoothness of the spherical-mean family of a smooth spacetime function

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), declared by the surface-integral and parameter-integral conventions below. Let t0<T and let h∈C∞(R3×[t0,T]) in the extension sense: h is the restriction of a C∞ function on R3×J for some open interval J⊃[t0,T] (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms). Let dΩ be the surface measure on the unit sphere S2⊂R3 of total mass ∫S2dΩ=4π (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn), and define the spherical-mean family M(x,s,v):=14π∫S2h(x+sn,v) dΩ(n),(x,s,v)∈R3×R×[t0,T]. Then M is of class C∞ on R3×R×[t0,T] in the same extension sense, and for every multi-index α in x and all integers m,l≥0 Dxα∂sm∂vlM(x,s,v)=14π∫S2Dxα∂sm∂vl[h(x+sn,v)] dΩ(n), where the right-hand integrand is the corresponding iterated partial derivative of the composed map (x,s,v)↦h(x+sn,v); in particular ∂s[h(x+sn,v)]=∇xh(x+sn,v)⋅n, where ∇xh(y,v):=(∂y0h(y,v),∂y1h(y,v),∂y2h(y,v))∈R3 is the spatial gradient at fixed v, so the s-derivatives are directional derivatives along n. Consequently, for every c>0 the map H~(x,t,v):=(t−v) M(x,c(t−v),v) is C∞ on R3×[t0,T]×[t0,T] in the extension sense, and for every fixed x∈R3 the map (t,v)↦H~(x,t,v) is C∞ on an open neighbourhood of the closed triangle {(t,v):t0≤v≤t≤T}. Nothing here assumes decay, compact support or boundedness of h; the statement is local in (x,s,v) and uses uniform bounds only on compact parameter sets.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice ACω; times t0<T; a C∞ function h on an open set R3×J with [t0,T]⊂J; and the surface measure dΩ on the unit sphere S2⊂R3 of total mass ∫S2dΩ=4π.

[F1]

A map is of class Ck when every word iterated coordinate partial derivative of order at most k exists and is continuous, and of class C∞ when it is Ck for every k; Dαf=∂0α0⋯∂m−1αm−1f is the canonical-order multi-index derivative, and for a coordinate word w=(i1,…,ir) write Dw:=∂ir⋯∂i1, with the empty word denoting the identity, and let w⋅j denote appending the coordinate j, so Dw⋅j=∂jDw; partial derivatives are the one-variable derivatives along coordinate lines (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).

[F2]

Chain rule: if f is totally differentiable at a and g at f(a), then D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a) (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)).

[F3]

Finite sums, scalar multiples and products of Ck Euclidean maps are Ck, and composites of composable Ck maps are Ck, for every k∈N (Ck Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition); sums, scalar multiples and products of differentiable real functions differentiate by the sum, scalar-multiple and product rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0).

[F4]

If all first partial derivatives of q exist on a neighbourhood of a and are continuous at a, then q is totally differentiable at a with total derivative the Jacobian matrix; if q is totally differentiable at a, then for every direction u the directional derivative exists and Duq(a)=Dq(a)u=∑j∂jq(a)uj, which for scalar q is ⟨∇q(a),u⟩ with the gradient ∇q of The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn).

[F5]

Parameter integrals: if K⊆Rn is compact, measurable and of finite Lebesgue measure, a<b, and f and ∂tf are continuous on a neighbourhood of K×[a,b], then t↦∫Kf(x,t) dx is differentiable on [a,b] with derivative ∫K∂tf(x,t) dx; the same conclusion holds, under the ACω convention of Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, with surface measure on a fixed compact C1 hypersurface in place of K; nothing is asserted for moving parameter sets or singularities crossing the integration set (Differentiation under the integral sign over a compact measurable set and over a compact C1 surface).

[F6]

On a compact embedded C1 hypersurface S the surface integral is defined by the finite chart formula with Gram density; for signed functions with ∫S∣f∣ dS<∞ it is the difference of the integrals of the positive and negative parts; the notation of this item fixes ∫S21 dΩ=4π for the unit sphere S2={n∈R3:⟨n,n⟩=1} (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn).

[F7]

For nonnegative measurable f≤g one has ∫f≤∫g, and ∫cf=c∫f for c≥0 (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

[F8]

Mean value theorem: if f:[a,b]→R is continuous on [a,b] and differentiable at every point of (a,b), then there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a) (The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a)).

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice ACω: every at most countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenA1F5F6

The setting and the reduction to the open set Ω. Let h also denote the C∞ function on the open set R3×J whose restriction to R3×[t0,T] is the h of the statement, put Ω:=R3×R×J, an open subset of R5, and let S2={n∈R3:⟨n,n⟩=1} carry the surface measure dΩ of total mass 4π of [F6]. Define M(x,s,v):=14π∫S2h(x+sn,v) dΩ(n) for (x,s,v)∈Ω; its restriction to the closed set R3×R×[t0,T] is the family of the statement, so every assertion proved below on Ω, or on an open neighbourhood of a closed subset of Ω, restricts to the corresponding extension-sense assertion of the statement. All surface integrals are read under the ACω convention carried by [F5] and [F6].

1.2givenF1F2F3F4

The composed integrand. Define Φ:Ω×R3→R4 by Φ(x,s,v,n):=(x+sn,v). Each component of Φ is a finite sum of products of coordinate functions, so Φ is C∞ on the open set Ω×R3 by [F3], and Φ takes values in R3×J. Hence H:=h∘Φ is C∞ on Ω×R3 by the composition clause of [F3], so every word iterated partial derivative DvH exists and is continuous on Ω×R3 by [F1]. At p=(x,s,v)∈Ω and n∈S2, the chain rule [F2], total differentiability of h [F4] and ∂sΦ(p,n)=(n,0) give ∂sH(p,n)=Dh(x+sn,v)(n,0)=∑j<3∂jh(x+sn,v) nj=⟨∇xh(x+sn,v),n⟩, the directional derivative of h at (x+sn,v) in direction (n,0) [F4]; applying the same computation to the already differentiated integrands shows that the iterated derivatives Dxα∂sm∂vlH(p,n) are the corresponding iterated partial derivatives of the composed map (x,s,v)↦h(x+sn,v), which is H itself, and in particular that ∂smH(p,n) is the m-th iterated derivative at λ=s of λ↦h(x+λn,v).

2.1givenstep 1.2F9

Local bounds on compact boxes. Let K=∏j<5[aj,bj] be a nonempty closed box contained in Ω. Then K×[−1,1]3 is a nonempty closed box in R8, hence compact by [F9], and by step 1.2 every ∣DvH∣ is continuous on the open set Ω×R3, which contains K×[−1,1]3; so by [F9] each ∣DvH∣ attains a maximum there and Cv:=max⁡K×[−1,1]3∣DvH∣ is a finite nonnegative real number with ∣DvH(p,n)∣≤Cv for all (p,n)∈K×S2, because S2⊆[−1,1]3.

2.2givenstep 1.2F2F4F6F7F8F10

Continuity of parameter sphere integrals. Claim: if q:Ω×R3→R is continuous with continuous first partial derivatives, K⊆Ω is a nonempty closed box and ∣∂pjq(p,n)∣≤Cj for all (p,n)∈K×S2 and all j<5, then ∣∫S2q(p,n) dν(n)−∫S2q(p0,n) dν(n)∣≤(∑j<5Cj2)1/2∣p−p0∣ for all p,p0∈K, where ν:=dΩ/4π. Indeed, for fixed n∈S2 the function g(λ):=q(p0+λu,n), u:=p−p0, is defined on [0,1] because the box is convex, and the affine map λ↦(p0+λu,n) has constant partial derivatives, hence is totally differentiable by [F4]; the chain rule [F2] with total differentiability of q [F4] therefore gives g′(λ)=Dq(p0+λu,n)(u,0)=∑j<5∂pjq(p0+λu,n) uj at every λ∈(0,1), and the mean value theorem [F8] bounds ∣q(p,n)−q(p0,n)∣≤sup⁡λ∣∑j∂pjq(p0+λu,n) uj∣≤(∑jCj2)1/2∣u∣ by Cauchy-Schwarz [F10] and the local bounds. Integrating this pointwise bound against ν: the signed surface integral is the difference of the integrals of the positive and negative parts [F6], so ∣∫S2q(p,⋅) dν−∫S2q(p0,⋅) dν∣≤∫S2∣q(p,n)−q(p0,n)∣ dν(n)≤(∑jCj2)1/2∣u∣∫S2dν=(∑jCj2)1/2∣u∣, where the chart formula of [F6] with the monotonicity and scalar rules of [F7] gives monotonicity, the bound ∫S2c dν=c for constants c≥0, and ∫S2dν=1 from the normalisation ∫S2dΩ=4π of [F6].

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2F1F3F5

Induction: every word derivative of M exists with the differentiated-integral formula, continuously. Claim: for every word v in the five coordinate directions of Ω, the iterated derivative DvM exists on Ω and equals ∫S2DvH(p,n) dν(n), and this integral is continuous on Ω. Prove the claim by induction on the length r of the word. For r=0 it is the definition of M in step 1.1 together with ν=dΩ/4π, and continuity is step 2.2 applied with q:=H, whose partial derivatives D(j)H are continuous with bounds C(j) on K×S2 by steps 1.2 and 2.1. Assume the claim for all words of length r; let v be such a word and j a coordinate direction, and fix p0∈Ω, a nonempty closed box K⊆Ω with p0 in its interior and coordinate intervals [aj,bj]. For fixed coordinates other than the j-th and t∈[aj,bj], put Q(n,t):=DvH(p(t),n), where p(t) is the point of the j-th coordinate line with j-th coordinate t; then both Q and ∂tQ=Dv⋅jH(p(t),n) are continuous on an open neighbourhood of S2×[aj,bj] in R3×R, being restrictions of the continuous DvH and Dv⋅jH of step 1.2. By the surface clause of [F5], t↦∫S2Q(n,t) dΩ(n) is differentiable on [aj,bj] with derivative ∫S2∂tQ(n,t) dΩ(n); multiplying by the constant 1/4π (the scalar multiple rule for one-variable derivatives, [F3]) gives ∂j∫S2DvH dν=∫S2Dv⋅jH dν on the line through p0; with the induction hypothesis this shows Dv⋅jM=∫S2Dv⋅jH dν on that line, hence on all of Ω since p0 and j are arbitrary, and this integral is continuous on Ω by step 2.2 applied to q:=Dv⋅jH, whose partial derivatives D(v⋅j)⋅iH are continuous by step 1.2 with bounds C(v⋅j)⋅i on K×S2 by step 2.1. This closes the induction.

4.1step 1.2step 3.1F1

M is C∞ and satisfies the displayed formula. By step 3.1 every word iterated partial derivative of M exists and is continuous on the open set Ω, so M is of class C∞ on Ω by [F1]; in particular its restriction to R3×R×[t0,T] is C∞ in the extension sense of the statement. Every canonical-order derivative Dxα∂sm∂vlM is one of the word derivatives covered by step 3.1, so it equals the sphere integral of the corresponding word derivative Dxα∂sm∂vlH of the composed map, and step 1.2 identifies those integrands as the corresponding iterated partial derivatives of (x,s,v)↦h(x+sn,v); the asserted s-derivative statements are those of step 1.2.

5.1step 2.1step 4.1F3∎

The composed map H~ and the local nature of the argument. Let c>0 and define H~(x,t,v):=(t−v)M(x,c(t−v),v) on the open set R3×R×J. The map Ψ(x,t,v):=(x,c(t−v),v) has components that are finite sums of products of coordinate functions, so it is C∞ by [F3] and takes values in Ω; hence (x,t,v)↦M(Ψ(x,t,v)) is C∞ by composition [F3] with step 4.1, and multiplying by the C∞ function t−v gives that H~ is C∞ on R3×R×J by [F3]. Since [t0,T]⊂J and the closed triangle Δ={(t,v):t0≤v≤t≤T} is contained in [t0,T]×[t0,T]⊂J×J, the restriction shows that H~ is C∞ on R3×[t0,T]×[t0,T] in the extension sense, and for each fixed x the map (t,v)↦H~(x,t,v) is C∞ on the open neighbourhood J×J of Δ. The whole argument used only the bounds of step 2.1 on compact parameter boxes and the compactness of S2; no boundedness, decay or compact spatial support of h was assumed or used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources