Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Electrostatic multipoles

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Objective. This page develops the source moments of a prescribed static charge distribution in one laboratory frame, their exact transformation under a change of reference point, the exterior multipole expansion of the electrostatic potential of a compactly supported density, and the external force and torque on a small prescribed distribution in a slowly varying external field.

Source moments are defined for three branches: an absolutely continuous compactly supported L1 density, a general locally integrable density with a finite absolute weighted moment, and a finite system of stationary point charges (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution). The definition fixes the total charge, the dipole moment, the Cartesian moments and the symmetric traceless quadrupole about the chart origin, with their units and their absolute convergence established clause by clause. The origin-shift theorem then computes every moment about an arbitrary reference point: the total charge is invariant, the dipole transforms as p−Qb, the Cartesian moments obey the finite subset expansion, and the traceless quadrupole is reference-point independent exactly for a neutral, non-dipolar distribution (Origin shift of the source moments: Q, the dipole p - Qb, the Cartesian expansion and the traceless quadrupole).

For a compactly supported L1 density the exterior potential splits into its monopole and dipole terms plus an explicit remainder bounded by 16a2∥ρ∥1/(4πε0∣x∣3) for ∣x∣≥2a (Uniform Coulomb dipole expansion of a compactly supported charge density with an explicit remainder); the all-order spherical expansion refines this with spherical moments, a geometric tail bound, termwise differentiation on exterior compact sets, and the degree-two traceless-quadrupole term niQijnj/(8πε0r3), together with a separate source-free ball branch for L2 angular data (Convergent all-order spherical multipole expansion with monopole, dipole and quadrupole terms). Finally, under an explicitly adopted external force model for broad charge data and Lipschitz external fields, the total external force and torque are expanded about the ideal-dipole values with explicit bounds, the reference-point shift is exact, and the exact Lorentz coupling is instantiated only under its own hypotheses (External force and torque of prescribed charge data in a Lipschitz external field).

Every statement is a conditional identity or bound for prescribed sources in the fixed-time reading of the static regime, with the stated regularity, support and model assumptions; worked configurations are collected on the companion examples page.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableprecheck passOpen item page →

Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution

Physical scope

Source moments (total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments, traceless quadrupole) of a prescribed static charge distribution read at fixed time in one named inertial frame: an absolutely continuous compactly supported L1 density, a locally integrable density with a finite absolute moment of the stated order, or a finite system of stationary point charges. These are kinematic source characteristics: no field, force, dynamics, self-energy, stability or empirical content is asserted, and the static regime is an adopted idealisation. In the noncompact locally integrable branch a finite weighted absolute moment may have any real exponent L≥0 and supplies every integer Cartesian degree ≤L by the local unit-ball and outer weighted estimate; L1 is a conclusion, not an added hypothesis. Finite moment-sum algebra is choice-free.

Definition

For the Lebesgue branches (a) and (b) assume Countable Choice (ACω), inherited from the exact measure interface (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)); the finite sums in branch (c) are defined and computed without Choice. Let the laboratory region, its chart, its spatial Euclidean structure and its units be those of Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields and Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values, and let δij be the Kronecker symbol in the δ-orthonormal basis (e1,e2,e3) of the frame, with ∣y∣ the Euclidean norm of The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn. This definition assigns source moments to a static charge distribution in the fixed-time reading of The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading (d) and (e). Three branches are declared.

(a) [Absolutely continuous branch] Let a>0 and let ρ∈L1(R3) be real (The class L1(μ) of integrable functions) and vanish λ3-almost everywhere outside the closed ball B‾a(0)={y:∣y∣≤a} (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure). The total charge Q, the dipole moment p, the degree-l Cartesian moments Mi1…il and the traceless quadrupole Qij are

Q:=∫R3ρ dλ3,pi:=∫R3yi ρ(y) dλ3(y),Mi1…il:=∫R3yi1⋯yil ρ(y) dλ3(y) (l≥1),

M(0):=Q,Mi:=pi,Qij:=∫R3(3yiyj−∣y∣2δij)ρ(y) dλ3(y),

with l≥1 and indices in {1,2,3}; units are C for Q, C m for p, C ml for the degree-l Cartesian moment and C m2 for Qij, and all integrals are in the sense of Integral over a measurable subset and Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals. Each integral is absolutely convergent: since ρ=0 λ3-a.e. off B‾a(0), and the maps y↦yi1⋯yil and y↦3yiyj−∣y∣2δij are bounded λ3-a.e. on that ball by al and by 4a2 respectively, the integrands are dominated λ3-a.e. by al∣ρ∣ and 4a2∣ρ∣, which lie in L1 (The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral). The traceless quadrupole is traceless,

∑i=13Qii=0,

because ∑i=13(3yi2−∣y∣2)=0 pointwise, and summing the three integrable functions 3yi2ρ−∣y∣2ρ and applying finite linearity of the integral on L1 (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)) evaluates the sum as the integral of the pointwise-zero function; replacing ρ by an equal λ3-a.e. density changes no moment (Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree).

(b) [General locally integrable branch] If instead ρ∈Lloc1(R3) is real and ∫R3∣y∣l∣ρ(y)∣ dλ3(y)<∞ for a given integer l≥0, then the degree-l Cartesian moments of the same formula are absolutely convergent and defined; if the absolute weighted moment ∫R3∣y∣L∣ρ(y)∣ dλ3(y) is finite for some real L≥0, then every integer Cartesian degree 0≤l≤L is defined, and in particular Q=∫ρ dλ3 is absolutely convergent, so that ρ∈L1(R3) is a conclusion of this branch and not an added hypothesis. Here ρ is restricted to the closed unit ball, where it is integrable by local integrability, and outside it ∣y∣l≤∣y∣L; splitting the nonnegative integral over these two measurable sets and applying monotonicity and additivity of the integral gives ∫∣y∣l∣ρ∣≤∫B‾1(0)∣ρ∣+∫{∣y∣>1}∣y∣L∣ρ∣<∞ (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space). The convention ∣y∣0=1 includes the origin, no compact support and no L1-membership is assumed in this branch, and Cartesian monomials of degree l have modulus at most ∣y∣l, so all lower moments, including Q, exist together with the degree-l moment.

(c) [Finite system of stationary point charges] Let N≥0, let x1,…,xN∈R3 and let q1,…,qN∈R be charge parameters (Charge parameter, frame charge and current densities, volume charge and flux, and the four-current (a)), read as the stationary point charges qkδxk in the fixed-time reading of The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading (e); for N=0 the lists are empty and every sum below is the empty sum 0. Define

Q:=∑k=1Nqk,p:=∑k=1Nqkxk,Mi1…il:=∑k=1Nqk xk,i1⋯xk,il (l≥1),M(0):=Q,

Qij:=∑k=1Nqk(3xk,ixk,j−∣xk∣2δij),

finite sums in the sense of Finite sums and finite products, by recursion (Laws of finite sums and finite products); again

∑i=13Qii=0,

by finite distributivity. The points need not be distinct; charges at a common point add in every sum.

(d) [Reference point and scope] Every moment of (a)-(c) is computed about the chart origin of Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields; this origin is part of the definition. These are source moments of a prescribed static distribution, not momenta, rest masses, intrinsic spins, self-energies or dynamical quantities, and no field, force, equation of motion, equilibrium or empirical claim is made here; the static regime in which the source is read is the adopted idealisation of The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading (f). Every Cartesian degree l in this definition is a nonnegative integer (the number of Cartesian indices); only the absolute weighted exponent L in (b) may be any nonnegative real number.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Origin shift of the source moments: Q, the dipole p - Qb, the Cartesian expansion and the traceless quadrupole

Physical scope

The exact reference-point dependence of the source moments of a static charge distribution: the total charge is reference-point independent, the dipole moment shifts by −Qb, every Cartesian moment has the displayed subset expansion, and the traceless quadrupole is reference-point independent exactly when the total charge and dipole vanish. The claim is a moment identity, not a statement about fields, forces, dynamics or empirical fact.

Statement

For the density-integral branch assume Countable Choice (ACω) through the Lebesgue interface (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)); the finite-point branch of all identities below is choice-free. Let a>0 and let ρ∈L1(R3) be real and vanish λ3-a.e. outside B‾a(0) (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space), or let (xk,qk)k=1N be a finite system of stationary point charges, with the source moments of Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution branches (a) and (c) respectively. For b∈R3 define the moments about the reference point b by replacing, in each integrand of Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution (a) and in each summand of (c), the vector y by y−b (respectively xk by xk−b):

Q(b):=∫R3ρ dλ3,p(b):=∫R3(y−b) ρ(y) dλ3(y),

Mi1…il(b):=∫R3∏r=1l(y−b)ir ρ(y) dλ3(y)(l≥1),M(b,0):=Q(b),

Qij(b):=∫R3(3(y−b)i(y−b)j−∣y−b∣2δij)ρ(y) dλ3(y),

and analogously with the finite sums Mi1…il(b)=∑k=1Nqk∏r=1l(xk−b)ir (l≥1) and Qij(b)=∑k=1Nqk(3(xk−b)i(xk−b)j−∣xk−b∣2δij) in the point-charge branch; for N=0 the sums are the empty sum 0. Every displayed integral is absolutely convergent: since ρ=0 λ3-a.e. off B‾a(0), the estimates ∣(y−b)i1⋯(y−b)il∣≤(∣y∣+∣b∣)l≤(a+∣b∣)l and ∣3(y−b)i(y−b)j−∣y−b∣2δij∣≤4(∣y∣+∣b∣)2≤4(a+∣b∣)2 hold λ3-a.e. on the support, so each integrand is dominated λ3-a.e. by a finite constant times ∣ρ∣∈L1 (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution (a), The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn). Then:

(a) Q(b)=Q for every b;

(b) p(b)=p−Qb, so the dipole moment is independent of the reference point exactly when Q=0;

(c) for every l≥0,

Mi1…il(b)=∑S⊆{1,…,l}(−1)∣S∣(∏r∈Sbir)MSc,

where for a subset S⊆{1,…,l} we write Sc:={1,…,l}∖S and MSc for the Cartesian moment whose index list is (ir)r∈Sc in increasing order of r, with the empty index list read as M∅:=Q; in particular

Mij(b)=Mij−bipj−bjpi+bibjQ;

(d) Qij(b)=Qij−3(bipj+bjpi)+2(b⋅p)δij+(3bibj−∣b∣2δij)Q; consequently Qij(b)=Qij for every b and all i,j if and only if Q=0 and p=0;

(e) [Scope] this is an exact identity between the declared source moments of Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution; it asserts nothing about fields, forces, dynamics or nature, and the reference point is a choice of coordinate origin, not an operation performed on the source.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω for the density branch, let a>0, b∈R3, and let either a real ρ∈L1(R3) vanishing λ3-a.e. off B‾a(0), with source moments as in Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution (a), or a finite system (xk,qk)k=1N of stationary point charges with source moments as in Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution (c), be given. All moments are read about the chart origin of the laboratory frame.

[F1]

For ρ∈L1(R3) vanishing λ3-a.e. outside B‾a(0), the moments Q=∫ρ, p=∫y ρ(y) dλ3(y), Mi1…il=∫yi1⋯yilρ dλ3 and Qij=∫(3yiyj−∣y∣2δij)ρ dλ3 are absolutely convergent, dominated λ3-a.e. by al∣ρ∣ and 4a2∣ρ∣ on the support, with ∑iQii=0 (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution).

[F2]

For a finite system of stationary point charges the moments Q=∑kqk, p=∑kqkxk, Mi1…il=∑kqkxk,i1⋯xk,il and Qij=∑kqk(3xk,ixk,j−∣xk∣2δij) are finite sums with ∑iQii=0, defined without Choice, and empty sums are 0 (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution).

[F3]

If f,g∈L1 and α,β∈R, then ∫(αf+βg) dλ3=α∫f dλ3+β∫g dλ3; this extends to finite linear combinations (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

[F4]

If f,g∈L1(λ3) agree λ3-a.e. then ∫f dλ3=∫g dλ3 (Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree).

[F5]

∣∫f dλ3∣≤∫∣f∣ dλ3, and for measurable 0≤u≤w one has ∫u dλ3≤∫w dλ3 (The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

[F6]

Finite sums are distributive, may be reindexed over a bijection of their index set, and the empty sum is 0 (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).

[F8]

A polynomial identity between the coordinate functions of R3 that holds pointwise may be integrated and differentiated with the usual polynomial calculus; the coordinate maps of R3 are smooth in the componentwise sense (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).

[F9]

B‾a(0)={y∈R3:∣y∣≤a} (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F5F7F9given

Establish that every integral in the definition of the b-moments is absolutely convergent. For λ3-a.e. y outside B‾a(0) the integrands vanish, and for y∈B‾a(0) one has ∣y∣≤a by [F9], so ∣(y−b)i1⋯(y−b)il∣≤(∣y∣+∣b∣)l≤(a+∣b∣)l and ∣3(y−b)i(y−b)j−∣y−b∣2δij∣≤3∣y−b∣2+∣y−b∣2≤4(a+∣b∣)2 by [F7]; hence each integrand is bounded λ3-a.e. on the support by a finite constant times ∣ρ∣∈L1, and the triangle and monotonicity rules [F5] give absolute convergence.

1.2F6F8algebra

Prove the polynomial expansion identity: for every l≥0, all indices i1,…,il∈{1,2,3} and every y∈R3, ∏r=1l(y−b)ir=∑S⊆{1,…,l}(−1)∣S∣(∏r∈Sbir)(∏r∈Scyir), where empty products are 1 and Sc={1,…,l}∖S. The case l=0 is 1=1, the unique subset being S=∅; for l≥1 write the product as (∏r=1l−1(y−b)ir)(yil−bil), apply the induction hypothesis to the first factor and distribute: the subsets S of {1,…,l−1} that avoid l and the subsets to which l is adjoined are in bijection and reindex the same finite sum, giving the displayed identity.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F1F3F4F7

In the density branch, substitute step 1.2 into the definition of Mi1…il(b) and integrate term by term. Each summand is a real constant (−1)∣S∣∏r∈Sbir times the L1 function y↦(∏r∈Scyir)ρ(y), which is dominated λ3-a.e. by ∣b∣∣S∣al−∣S∣∣ρ∣ by [F1] and [F7]; finite linearity [F3] and the a.e. support convention [F4] therefore give Mi1…il(b)=∑S(−1)∣S∣(∏r∈Sbir)MSc with M∅:=Q. Specialising to l=0 gives Q(b)=Q, which is (a). Specialising to l=1 gives pi(b)=pi−biQ, which is (b): if Q=0 then p(b)=p for every b; conversely, if p(b)=p for every b∈R3, then Qb=0 for every b, and taking b=e1 gives Qe1=0, whose first coordinate is Q, so Q=0, and the dipole moment is independent of the reference point exactly when Q=0.

3.1step 2.1F3F7

Evaluate the l=2 instance of step 2.1: Mij(b)=Mij−bipj−bjpi+bibjQ. Summing over i=j and using finite linearity [F3] gives ∑k=13Mkk(b)=∑k=13Mkk−2b⋅p+∣b∣2Q, where b⋅p=∑kbkpk is the Euclidean inner product [F7].

4.1step 3.1F1F3algebra

Compute the traceless quadrupole about b. By [F1], Qij(b)=3Mij(b)−δij∑kMkk(b) and Qij=3Mij−δij∑kMkk, so substituting step 3.1 into the first identity gives Qij(b)=Qij−3(bipj+bjpi)+2(b⋅p)δij+(3bibj−∣b∣2δij)Q, which is the displayed identity of (d); every step is a finite algebraic rearrangement [F3].

5.1step 4.1F7algebra

If Q=0 and p=0, the b-dependent terms of step 4.1 vanish, so every quadrupole component is reference-point independent. Conversely, suppose Qij(b)=Qij for all b,i,j. The 11 components of step 4.1 at b=e1 and b=−e1 give −4p1+2Q=0 and 4p1+2Q=0; adding gives Q=0. With Q=0, the ii component at b=ei is −4pi=0 for each i, hence p=0. This proves the equivalence in (d).

6.1step 1.2step 5.1F2F6

Repeat the argument in the finite point-charge branch and complete the choice accounting. The same expansion identity of step 1.2 is substituted into the finite sums of [F2]; finite distributivity, reindexing and the empty-sum convention [F6] produce the identical identities (a)-(d) with sums in place of integrals, without any convergence hypothesis, and the case N=0 makes both sides 0 at every step. The identities are therefore choice-free in this branch, while the density branch used only the declared Countable Choice of the measure interface.

7.1step 6.1F4∎

Combine the branches and record the scope. Replacing ρ by an equal λ3-a.e. density leaves every b-moment unchanged by [F4], so (a)-(d) hold as stated for the declared representatives; the density branch is established in steps 2.1, 4.1 and 5.1, the finite-point branch in step 6.1, and the identities are those of the source moments of Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution about the chart origin, the reference point b being a choice of coordinate origin only; no field, force or dynamical content is asserted, which is clause (e).

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Uniform Coulomb dipole expansion of a compactly supported charge density with an explicit remainder

Physical scope

The exterior potential of a compactly supported L1 charge density in classical electrostatics: for ∣x∣≥2a the localised Newtonian potential equals the monopole term plus the dipole term plus an explicit remainder bounded by 16a2∥ρ∥1/(4πε0∣x∣3), uniformly in the exterior region. Only the potential is expanded; no derivative estimate of the remainder, no field expansion and no value on or inside the support are claimed.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), inherited from the cited Lebesgue and Newtonian interfaces (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let a>0, let ρ∈L1(R3) be real and vanish λ3-a.e. outside the closed ball B‾a(0) (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure), let Q and p be the total charge and dipole moment of ρ about the chart origin (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution (a)), let ∥ρ∥1:=∫R3∣ρ∣ dλ3, and let φ:=ε0−1Nρ, where Nρ is the Newtonian potential of Newtonian potential of compactly supported data and ε0 is the constant of Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values. Then:

(a) [Uniform monopole-dipole expansion] for every x with r:=∣x∣≥2a the integral ∫R3ρ(y)∣x−y∣−1 dλ3(y) is absolutely convergent and equals 4πNρ(x), and

φ(x)=Q4πε0r+p⋅x4πε0r3+R(x),∣R(x)∣≤16 a2∥ρ∥14πε0r3,

the bound being uniform over the whole exterior region {x:∣x∣≥2a};

(b) [Leading-term form] consequently, for r≥2a,

∣φ(x)−Q4πε0r∣≤∣p∣4πε0r2+16 a2∥ρ∥14πε0r3,

and if Q=0 and p≠0, then for every unit direction n∈R3, ∣n∣=1, with p⋅n≠0 and every r≥max⁡(2a, 32a2∥ρ∥1/∣p⋅n∣) the dipole term is the leading term in the sense that φ(rn)=p⋅n4πε0r2(1+δ) with ∣δ∣≤12, so ∣φ(rn)∣≥∣p⋅n∣8πε0r2 and the remainder bound decays one power of r faster than the dipole term;

(c) [Physical reading] by The localized Newtonian potential and the ideal point-charge Coulomb field (c) the function φ is finite λ3-a.e., locally integrable, of class C∞ and harmonic off B‾a(0), and satisfies −ΔTφ=Tρ/ε0 in D′(R3); the displayed expansion is therefore the exterior expansion of the potential of the compactly supported source ρ in the fixed-time reading of The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading (e), and in the smooth branch (The localized Newtonian potential and the ideal point-charge Coulomb field (a)) the field E:=−∇φ of The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields realises the pure electrostatic regime of The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading (c) with source ρ;

(d) [Scope and exclusions] the hypotheses are a real compactly supported L1 density, the region r≥2a, and the framework's constants; ρ need not be continuous or bounded; the statement concerns φ itself, and no derivative estimate for R, no expansion of the field E, and no assertion on ∣x∣<2a or on the support of ρ is claimed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω; let a>0, let ρ∈L1(R3) be real and vanish λ3-a.e. outside B‾a(0), and put φ:=ε0−1Nρ with ε0>0 as in Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values.

[F1]

For a measurable compactly supported f, the Newtonian potential is Nf(x)=∫RnΦ(x−y)f(y) dy at each x where the integral is absolutely finite (Newtonian potential of compactly supported data).

[F2]

With the positive-minus-Laplacian normalisation in dimension three, the fundamental solution is Φ(z)=1/(4π∣z∣) away from the pole (The localized Newtonian potential and the ideal point-charge Coulomb field).

[F3]

If ρ∈L1(R3) is real and compactly supported, then Nρ is finite λ3-a.e., belongs to Lloc1(R3), is C∞ and harmonic off the support of ρ, and −ΔTε0−1Nρ=Tρ/ε0 in D′(R3); if in addition ρ is C1 with compact support in B‾R, then φ=ε0−1Nρ∈C2(R3) satisfies −Δφ=ρ/ε0, div⁡E=ρ/ε0 and curl⁡E=0 for E=−∇φ (The localized Newtonian potential and the ideal point-charge Coulomb field).

[F4]

The framework's electric constant is ε0:=(μ0c2)−1>0 with μ0>0 measured and c>0; the potential carries the volt (Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values).

[F5]

For ρ∈L1(R3) vanishing λ3-a.e. outside B‾a(0), the total charge Q=∫ρ dλ3 and dipole moment p=∫y ρ(y) dλ3(y) about the chart origin are absolutely convergent (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution).

[F6]

If ρ∈L1(R3) vanishes λ3-a.e. outside {y:∣y∣≤a} and r=∣x∣≥2a>0, then ∫R3ρ(y)∣x−y∣−1 dy=Q/r+p⋅x/r3+R0(x) with ∣R0(x)∣≤16a2∥ρ∥1/r3 (Monopole-dipole expansion with an explicit remainder for compactly supported L1 densities).

[F7]

If f∈L1 and α∈R, then ∫αf dλ3=α∫f dλ3 (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

[F8]

∣⟨u,w⟩∣≤∣u∣ ∣w∣ for the Euclidean inner product, and ∣u+w∣≤∣u∣+∣w∣ for the Euclidean norm (Cauchy-Schwarz ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥2∥y∥2 with its equality case, the triangle inequality for ∥⋅∥2, the parallelogram law and polarisation).

[F9]

B‾a(0)={y:∣y∣≤a}; and if N is a norm on a real vector space V, then ∣N(u)−N(w)∣≤N(u−w) for all u,w∈V (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for n≥1 every norm N on Rn satisfies N(x)≤C∥x∥1 and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for d2).

[F10]

If f,g∈L1(λ3) agree λ3-a.e., their Lebesgue integrals agree, and ∣∫f∣≤∫∣f∣ (Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree, The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus).

[F11]

In the static regime with J=0 and B=0 the smooth Maxwell equations reduce to div⁡E=ρ/ε0, curl⁡E=0, and the fixed-time dictionary identifies the spatial equations with the four-dimensional weak reading (The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F8F9F10given

Fix x with r=∣x∣≥2a and establish the absolute convergence and the Coulomb identification. For λ3-a.e. y, either ρ(y)=0 or y∈B‾a(0); in the latter case ∣y∣≤a by [F9], so ∣x−y∣≥∣x∣−∣y∣≥r−a≥r/2>0 by the reverse triangle inequality for the Euclidean norm [F9] and [F8], and hence ∣x−y∣−1≤2/r; the integrand is therefore dominated λ3-a.e. by 2∣ρ∣/r∈L1, which gives absolute convergence by [F10]. Since ρ vanishes a.e. off B‾a(0) and the kernel y↦∣x−y∣−1 is continuous on that ball, replacing ρ by its a.e.-equal representative that is zero off B‾a(0) does not change the integral [F10], and the defining formula of the Newtonian potential Nρ(x)=∫Φ(x−y)ρ(y) dy together with Φ(z)=1/(4π∣z∣) for n=3 gives ∫ρ(y)∣x−y∣−1 dλ3(y)=4πNρ(x) for every admissible x [F1, F2].

2.1step 1.1F4F5F6F7

Apply the monopole-dipole remainder lemma and scale to obtain (a). By [F6] with the same a and the same a.e.-support hypothesis, ∫ρ(y)∣x−y∣−1 dλ3(y)=Q/r+p⋅x/r3+R0(x) with ∣R0(x)∣≤16a2∥ρ∥1/r3 for r≥2a, where Q and p are the moments of [F5]; multiplying the identity by the constant (4πε0)−1, which factors out of the integral by [F7] and is finite and positive by [F4], gives φ(x)=Q/(4πε0r)+p⋅x/(4πε0r3)+R(x) with R:=(4πε0)−1R0 and the displayed uniform bound.

3.1step 2.1F8F10algebra

Prove the leading-term estimate (b). By Cauchy-Schwarz and ∣x∣=r [F8], ∣p⋅x∣≤∣p∣r, so ∣p⋅x∣/(4πε0r3)≤∣p∣/(4πε0r2), and the triangle inequality [F10] applied to step 2.1 gives the displayed bound. If Q=0 and p≠0, fix n∈R3 with ∣n∣=1 and p⋅n≠0 and r≥max⁡(2a,32a2∥ρ∥1/∣p⋅n∣); then the dipole term equals p⋅n/(4πε0r2) and the remainder obeys ∣R∣≤16a2∥ρ∥1/(4πε0r3)≤12∣p⋅n∣/(4πε0r2), so writing δ:=R/(p⋅n/(4πε0r2)) gives ∣δ∣≤12 and φ(rn)=p⋅n4πε0r2(1+δ) with ∣φ(rn)∣≥∣p⋅n∣8πε0r2.

4.1step 3.1F3F10F11

Read the physical content (c). By [F3], applied to the representative that vanishes off B‾a(0), the function Nρ is finite λ3-a.e., locally integrable, C∞ and harmonic off the support of that representative, hence off B‾a(0), and −ΔTε0−1Nρ=Tρ/ε0 in D′(R3); these properties are unchanged by the a.e. choice of representative [F10], and φ=ε0−1Nρ is related to ρ exactly as in the fixed-time dictionary of [F11]. In the smooth case of [F3], φ is C2 on R3 with −Δφ=ρ/ε0, and E=−∇φ satisfies div⁡E=ρ/ε0 and curl⁡E=0, which is the pure electrostatic regime of [F11] with source ρ.

5.1step 4.1F4∎

Record the scope (d) and complete the proof. The hypotheses used were exactly the real L1 density vanishing λ3-a.e. off B‾a(0), the exterior region r≥2a and the framework's constants [F4]; no continuity or boundedness of ρ was assumed, the argument differentiates no remainder and expands no field, and no assertion inside ∣x∣<2a or on the support of ρ was made, so the exclusions of (d) are respected.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

External force and torque of prescribed charge data in a Lipschitz external field

Physical scope

Prescribed external force and torque for broad compact L1 charge data and a Lipschitz external vector-field datum under an explicitly additional ρE force model, with full force/torque/origin-shift bounds. A separate finite point-force assignment needs only external values (continuity for the stated field datum); its Lipschitz bounds are retained. Exact Lorentz-postulate instantiation is restricted explicitly to its smooth-source matter branch or C1 prescribed tensor and massive C2 test-worldline hypotheses at an instant of rest. No self-force, trajectory existence, permanent rest, equilibrium, stability or empirical assertion is supplied.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), inherited from the Lebesgue interface (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let a>0 and let ρ∈L1(R3) be real and vanish λ3-a.e. outside B‾a(0); let Eext:R3→R3 be a prescribed external vector-field datum, with electric-field units of Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values, that is continuous on B‾a(0) and Lipschitz there with constant L≥0, i.e. ∣Eext(x)−Eext(x′)∣≤L∣x−x′∣ for all x,x′∈B‾a(0). Consider the matter model in which the prescribed static distribution ρ is carried by a body at rest in the laboratory frame and adopt additionally the prescribed external force model fext=ρEext. This is a declared extension to these locally integrable charge data and Lipschitz fields, motivated by the smooth continuum coupling of The Lorentz coupling: external force on a test charge and the continuum force and power densities (ii); that postulate covers smooth sources and does not itself establish this extension. The only force counted by the present model is fext; the self-field of ρ, all other fields, mechanical support and back-reaction are excluded by this model. Define the total external force and the total external torque about the origin by the componentwise Lebesgue integrals

F:=∫R3ρ(y) Eext(y) dλ3(y)∈R3,τ:=∫R3ρ(y) (y×Eext(y)) dλ3(y)∈R3,

with units N and N m respectively; L has units V m−2. The integrands are interpreted through their a.e.-equal measurable zero extensions from the closed ball: continuity of Eext there gives Borel factors, and null modifications remain Lebesgue measurable by L(Rn) is exactly the completion of the restriction of λn to the Borel sets. They are absolutely convergent because a.e. on the support ∣Eext∣≤∣Eext(0)∣+La and ∣y×Eext∣≤a(∣Eext(0)∣+La), so each component is dominated by a constant times ∣ρ∣∈L1 (Integral over a measurable subset, Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals, The cross product in R3, The squared cross-product norm is the Gram determinant of two vectors, The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral). Then:

(a) [Uniform force and torque expansions]

F=Q Eext(0)+RF,∣RF∣≤L a ∥ρ∥1,τ=p×Eext(0)+Rτ,∣Rτ∣≤L a2∥ρ∥1,

where Q and p are the total charge and dipole moment of Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution (a) and ∥ρ∥1=∫∣ρ∣ dλ3;

(b) [Neutral distribution] if Q=0 then the leading force term vanishes, F=RF with ∣RF∣≤La∥ρ∥1, and the torque is the ideal-dipole torque p×Eext(0) up to the bound ∣Rτ∣≤La2∥ρ∥1; in this sense a neutral distribution of size a in a field with Lipschitz constant L carries the dipole torque p×Eext(0) with an explicit remainder;

(c) [Reference-point shift] for any reference point o∈R3, the torque about o, τo:=∫R3ρ(y) (y−o)×Eext(y) dλ3(y), equals τ−o×F exactly;

(d) [Ideal pair of test charges at rest] let q∈R and d∈R3∖{0}, put a=∣d∣/2, and consider the two stationary point charges +q at d/2 and −q at −d/2 (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution (c)), each treated as a test charge at rest in the laboratory chart in the same prescribed external field Eext, with the mutual interaction and the self-field of each charge excluded by the model. Adopt for this finite prescribed-charge branch the external force assignment Fk=qkEext(xk) and torque xk×Fk. It is defined for merely continuous external field values at the two points, independently of a worldline equation. For the same Lipschitz bound as above, finite summation gives the expansions of (a),(b), with Q=0, p=qd, and total variation 2∣q∣: ∣RF∣≤2∣q∣La, ∣Rτ∣≤2∣q∣La2. More generally the exact finite force/torque sum requires only the specified field values; no Lipschitz estimate is asserted without its hypothesis.

(d1) [Covariant sufficient specialization] If, in addition, an actual prescribed electromagnetic tensor F of The electromagnetic two-form, its observer decomposition and the four-current is C1 on a neighbourhood of the graph of each massive future-timelike C2 test worldline with constant charge q′ and supplied rest mass m>0, and the external-field coupling The Lorentz coupling: external force on a test charge and the continuum force and power densities (i) applies, then at an instant with zero coordinate velocity U=(c,0,0,0) its coordinate three-force f=dp/dt is q′Eext: the four-force is γ(f⋅v/c,f) with γ=1 at rest (Energy, momentum, invariant mass and four-force of relativistic particles, and necessary collision thresholds (b)), and U0=−c and Fi0=−Ei/c. This reproduces the prescribed point-force assignment at that instant. Similarly the smooth-source J=0 matter-coupling branch of postulate (ii) reproduces the continuum force assignment when its own source/field/matter hypotheses hold. No C1 tensor or worldline is inferred from merely continuous E data, and no two-charge trajectory existence or permanent rest is claimed.

(e) [Scope] the statement is conditional on the explicitly stated matter model: only the prescribed external field acts on the distribution, the distribution is prescribed and at rest, and no self-force, back-reaction, mechanical equilibrium, stability or dynamics of the body is asserted; the external field is a datum, not solved for. Clause (d) is an instantaneous idealisation of two ideal point test charges with mutual interaction excluded; it is not a two-body dynamics, a bound-state or a stability statement. No radiation, medium response or empirical claim is made. The prescribed finite force assignment and finite moment algebra in (d) are choice-free; the volume integrals in (a)-(c) carry their explicit measure premise, while (d1) is a separate conditional instantiation of the exact physical coupling.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω; let a>0, let ρ∈L1(R3) be real and vanish λ3-a.e. outside B‾a(0), let Eext:R3→R3 be continuous on B‾a(0) and Lipschitz there with constant L≥0, and adopt the prescribed external force model fext=ρEext on the prescribed distribution at rest in the laboratory frame.

[F1]

For ρ∈L1(R3) vanishing λ3-a.e. outside B‾a(0), the total charge Q=∫ρ dλ3 and the dipole moment p=∫y ρ(y) dλ3(y) about the chart origin are absolutely convergent, and in the finite system of stationary point charges (xk,qk)k=1N one has Q=∑kqk and p=∑kqkxk as finite sums (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution).

[F2]

The electric field carries V m−1, a force carries the newton, and ε0=(μ0c2)−1>0; the laboratory structure is that of Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields (Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values).

[F3]

An electric field of class Ck is a map E:Ω×I→R3, and at fixed t the map E(⋅,t):Ω→R3 is a real spatial vector field read in the frame basis; no value at a point of singular source support is asserted (The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields).

[F4]

The postulate's external-field coupling (i) is m dU/dτ=q Φ(U) with Φ the raised-index operator η(Φ(u),w)=F(w,u) of the field, equivalently m dUμ/dτ=qFμνUν, for a constant charge, a supplied rest mass m>0 and a future timelike C2 worldline, with the particle's own field excluded; clause (ii) adopts the continuum force density ρE+J×B for a smooth source interacting through a matter model to which the coupling applies (The Lorentz coupling: external force on a test charge and the continuum force and power densities).

[F5]

In the chart the electromagnetic two-form has F0i=−Ei/c and Fi0=−Ei/c for the field pair (E,B) (The electromagnetic two-form, its observer decomposition and the four-current).

[F6]

A massive worldline is a Ck future timelike curve, k≥1, with everywhere nonzero future timelike tangent; its four-velocity satisfies η(U,U)=−c2; and a massive C2 worldline with laboratory reading t↦r(t) satisfies ∣r′(t)∣<c with four-velocity U=γ(c,r′) and Lorentz factor γ=(1−∣r′∣2/c2)−1/2, so that at a parameter with r′=0 one has γ=1 and U=(c,0,0,0) (Worldlines, four-velocity, chart readings and the frame/observer distinction).

[F7]

On R3 the cross product is bilinear and alternating, and ∣w×z∣2=∣w∣2∣z∣2−⟨w,z⟩2, so ∣w×z∣≤∣w∣ ∣z∣ (The cross product in R3, The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors, The squared cross-product norm is the Gram determinant of two vectors).

[F9]

If f,g∈L1 and α,β∈R, then ∫(αf+βg)=α∫f+β∫g; if f and g agree a.e. their integrals agree; and ∣∫f∣≤∫∣f∣ with monotonicity for nonnegative integrands (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ), Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree, The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

[F10]

Finite sums are distributive and may be reindexed, and the empty sum is 0 (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).

[F12]

Lebesgue measure is the completion of Borel Lebesgue measure under Countable Choice; any finite modification of a measurable function on a subset of a null set remains measurable (L(Rn) is exactly the completion of the restriction of λn to the Borel sets). For example, each preimage differs from its old measurable preimage only by subsets of that null set.

[F13]

For a massive constant-mass C2 worldline, the coordinate spatial momentum is p=mγv, the coordinate three-force is f=dp/dt, and the four-force m dU/dτ is γ(f⋅v/c,f) (Energy, momentum, invariant mass and four-force of relativistic particles, and necessary collision thresholds (a),(b)).

[F11]

B‾a(0)={y:∣y∣≤a} and ∣y∣≤a holds λ3-a.e. on the support of ρ; the Euclidean norm obeys the reverse triangle inequality ∣ ∣u∣−∣w∣ ∣≤∣u−w∣ (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for n≥1 every norm N on Rn satisfies N(x)≤C∥x∥1 and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for d2).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F7F8F9F11F12given

Establish that F and τ are well defined. Their integrands on the closed ball are measurable products of ρ with continuous coordinate functions; the zero extensions are measurable, and the displayed full-space integrands differ from them only on the null exceptional set where ρ fails to vanish outside the ball, so [F12] supplies measurability of those integrands as well. For λ3-a.e. y either ρ(y)=0 or y∈B‾a(0), and then ∣y∣≤a by [F11]; the Lipschitz property gives ∣Eext(y)∣≤∣Eext(0)∣+L∣y∣≤∣Eext(0)∣+La and hence ∣y×Eext(y)∣≤∣y∣ ∣Eext(y)∣≤a(∣Eext(0)∣+La) by [F7] and [F8]. Each component of the integrands is therefore dominated λ3-a.e. by a finite constant times ∣ρ∣∈L1, so the componentwise integrals converge absolutely by the triangle and monotonicity rules, and no value of Eext on a null set matters [F9].

2.1step 1.1F1F8F9F11

Expand the force and bound its remainder. Write Eext(y)=Eext(0)+(Eext(y)−Eext(0)) and integrate: by finite linearity of the componentwise integral [F9], F=(∫ρ dλ3)Eext(0)+∫ρ(y)(Eext(y)−Eext(0))dλ3(y)=QEext(0)+RF with Q as in [F1]. If RF≠0, test against the unit vector u:=RF/∣RF∣: ∣RF∣=u⋅RF=∫ρ(y) u⋅(Eext(y)−Eext(0))dλ3(y)≤∫∣ρ(y)∣ ∣Eext(y)−Eext(0)∣ dλ3(y)≤L∫∣y∣ ∣ρ(y)∣ dλ3(y)≤La∥ρ∥1, using [F8] for u⋅v≤∣v∣, the Lipschitz hypothesis, the monotonicity rule, and ∣y∣≤a λ3-a.e. on the support [F11]; the case RF=0 is trivial. This is the force statement of (a).

3.1step 2.1F1F7F9F11

Expand the torque and bound its remainder. Since y×Eext(y)=y×Eext(0)+y×(Eext(y)−Eext(0)), finite linearity of the componentwise integral and the bilinearity of the cross product [F7] give ∫ρ(y) y×Eext(0) dλ3(y)=(∫y ρ(y) dλ3(y))×Eext(0)=p×Eext(0) with p as in [F1], so τ=p×Eext(0)+Rτ with Rτ:=∫ρ(y) y×(Eext(y)−Eext(0))dλ3(y). For the bound, apply the unit-vector pairing argument of step 2.1 to Rτ (with the zero case immediate): ∣Rτ∣≤∫∣ρ(y)∣ ∣y∣ ∣Eext(y)−Eext(0)∣ dλ3(y)≤L∫∣y∣2∣ρ∣ dλ3≤La2∥ρ∥1 by [F7], [F9] and [F11]. This is the torque statement of (a).

4.1step 3.1

Specialise to the neutral case (b): if Q=0, the leading force term QEext(0) vanishes and step 2.1 leaves F=RF with ∣RF∣≤La∥ρ∥1, while step 3.1 gives the torque as the ideal-dipole torque plus the stated bound.

5.1step 4.1F7F9

Prove the reference-point shift (c). For any o∈R3, (y−o)×Eext(y)=y×Eext(y)−o×Eext(y) by bilinearity [F7]; integrating, o is a constant vector and ∫ρ(y)Eext(y) dλ3(y)=F, so finite linearity [F9] gives τo=τ−o×F exactly.

6.1step 5.1F1F7F10

Treat the ideal pair of test charges (d). Under the explicitly adopted finite force assignment Fk=qkEext(xk), the total force is F=qEext(d/2)−qEext(−d/2)=q(Eext(d/2)−Eext(−d/2)), and inserting ±Eext(0) gives F=RF with RF=q[(Eext(d/2)−Eext(0))−(Eext(−d/2)−Eext(0))] and ∣RF∣≤∣q∣(L∣d/2∣+L∣d/2∣)=2∣q∣La; the total torque is τ=(d/2)×qEext(d/2)+(−d/2)×(−q)Eext(−d/2)=q(d/2)×(Eext(d/2)+Eext(−d/2))=q d×Eext(0)+Rτ with Rτ=q(d/2)×[(Eext(d/2)−Eext(0))+(Eext(−d/2)−Eext(0))] and ∣Rτ∣≤∣q∣a⋅2La=2∣q∣La2, using [F7], the Lipschitz hypothesis and [F10]; the finite-branch moments are Q=0 and p=qd by [F1], and no convergence or Lipschitz hypothesis is needed for the bare finite sums themselves. All these sums are finite and choice-free.

7.1step 6.1F4F5F6F13

Instantiate the exact coupling at an instant of rest, proving (d1). Under the additional hypotheses of (d1) the postulate gives m dUi/dτ=q′Φ(U)i=q′FiνUν [F4]; at an instant with r′=0 the chart reading of the four-velocity is U=(c,0,0,0) by [F6], so the spatial components Uj vanish, U0=η00U0=−c, and only the term q′Fi0U0 survives; with Fi0=−Ei/c from [F5] this equals q′(−Ei/c)(−c)=q′Ei. By [F13], m dUi/dτ=γfi; since γ=1 at rest, the computed spatial four-force is exactly the coordinate three-force. Hence the covariant equation reproduces the prescribed assignment Fk=qkEext(xk) at that instant and nothing more: no C1 tensor or massive worldline is inferred from the continuous datum Eext, and no trajectory or permanent-rest claim is made. In the same way the smooth source branch of the postulate reproduces the continuum density ρE only when its own stated smoothness and matter hypotheses hold [F4].

8.1step 7.1F2F3given

Record the scope (e) and close the argument. The prescribed data carry the field units and laboratory conventions of [F2]; only the prescribed external field acts in the model, the self-field, other fields, mechanical support and back-reaction are excluded by hypothesis, the external field is a datum rather than a solution of any field equation, and clauses (a)-(c) concern the declared source moments of a prescribed distribution without asserting force dynamics, equilibrium or stability; clause (d) is an instantaneous idealisation with mutual interaction and self-fields excluded, and clause (d1) is a conditional instantiation of the exact coupling, so no empirical, radiative or medium-response content is introduced. The volume integrals used the declared Countable Choice through the Lebesgue interface, while the finite-point algebra of (d) is choice-free.

9.1step 8.1∎

Combine the clauses: step 2.1 and step 3.1 give (a) with the stated bounds, step 4.1 gives (b), step 5.1 gives the exact reference-point shift (c), step 6.1 gives the finite two-charge expansions and their choice-free status (d), and step 7.1 gives the conditional covariant specialization (d1), all under the model assumptions of the statement and with the exclusions of step 8.1, which is (e).

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Convergent all-order spherical multipole expansion with monopole, dipole and quadrupole terms

Physical scope

The full exterior compact-L1 spherical multipole potential theory, its exact monopole/dipole/quadrupole terms, geometric tails and every-order compact derivative convergence, plus a separate source-free radius-R ball-potential branch for independent real L2 angular boundary data: bounded radial L2 norm, L2 boundary convergence and uniqueness, interior smooth Maxwell completion, and continuous-data Poisson representation/continuous boundary extension. No exterior source-radius trace, singular-source expansion, boundary-field trace or empirical assertion is inferred.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), inherited from the cited Lebesgue, spherical-harmonic and Newtonian interfaces (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let a>0 and let ρ∈L1(R3) be real and vanish λ3-a.e. outside B‾a(0) (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure); let Q, p and Qij be the total charge, dipole moment and traceless quadrupole of ρ about the chart origin (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution (a)); let φ:=ε0−1Nρ be the potential of The localized Newtonian potential and the ideal point-charge Coulomb field (c) with the constants of Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values (Newtonian potential of compactly supported data); and let {Ylm:l≥0, m=1,…,2l+1} be a real orthonormal basis of spherical harmonics of L2(S2,dσ) of degree l, with dσ the surface measure of total mass 4π and the addition theorem of Spherical harmonics: orthogonal decomposition, complete basis and addition theorem (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn). For every l,m define the spherical multipole moment of degree l

qlm:=∫R3∣y∣l Ylm(y/∣y∣) ρ(y) dλ3(y),

absolutely convergent because ∣Ylm∣≤((2l+1)/(4π))1/2 on S2 by the addition theorem and ∣y∣≤a λ3-a.e. on the support, so the integrand is dominated by al((2l+1)/(4π))1/2∣ρ∣ (The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral). In every coefficient integral the factor ∣y∣lYlm(y/∣y∣) is defined at y=0 by its homogeneous polynomial extension: zero for l≥1 and the constant degree-zero harmonic for l=0; this is a finite assignment at a null singleton and changes no integral. Write x=rn with r=∣x∣ and n∈S2. Then:

(a) [Exterior spherical multipole expansion] for every x with r>a,

φ(x)=14πε0∑l=0∞∑m=12l+14π2l+1 Ylm(n)rl+1 qlm,

the series converging absolutely and uniformly on {∣x∣≥r0} for every r0>a, with the tail after degree N bounded by

∥ φ−14πε0∑l=0N∑m=12l+14π2l+1Ylm(n)rl+1qlm∥∞,{∣x∣≥r0}≤∥ρ∥1 aN+14πε0 r0N+2 (1−a/r0);

(b) [Monopole, dipole and quadrupole terms] the degree-0 and degree-1 terms of (a) are the monopole and dipole terms Q/(4πε0r) and p⋅x/(4πε0r3), and for r≥2a the difference between φ and the truncation after degree 1 obeys the remainder bound of Uniform Coulomb dipole expansion of a compactly supported charge density with an explicit remainder; the degree-2 term equals the traceless-quadrupole term

18πε0r3 niQijnj;

(c) [Regularity and termwise differentiation] φ is of class C∞ on {∣x∣>a}, the series in (a) may be differentiated termwise to every order, the differentiated series converging uniformly on every compact subset of {∣x∣>a}; in particular the field E:=−∇φ of The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields equals −14πε0∑l,m4π2l+1∇x(Ylm(n)r−l−1)qlm on {∣x∣>a}, with the same uniform convergence on compact subsets;

(d) [Scope of exterior clauses (a)-(c)] those clauses concern a real compactly supported L1 density and the exterior region r>a; they make no claim on or inside B‾a(0), no convergence at r=a is asserted, the exterior-density expansion is not asserted for point or singular sources, and no empirical content is involved. The expansion is the exterior expansion of the potential of the static source ρ read in the fixed-time dictionary of The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading (e);

(e) [Separate source-free ball boundary branch] let R>0 be a radius and let real f∈L2(S2,dσ) be prescribed scalar-potential boundary data (unit V) on the sphere x=Rn, with flm=∫S2fYlm dσ. Independently of the exterior density ρ, define on ∣x∣<R

φf(rn)=∑l=0∞∑m=12l+1(r/R)lflmYlm(n),

with the constant degree-zero value at r=0. Then this is smooth and harmonic in the ball; its series and every derivative converge uniformly on every smaller closed ball, sup⁡0≤t<1∥φf(Rt ⋅)∥2≤∥f∥2, and φf(Rt ⋅)→f in L2 as t↑1; it is the unique harmonic scalar potential in the class with bounded radial L2 norm and that L2 boundary limit. With Ef=−∇φf, B=0, ρ=J=0 and time-independent fields, this gives a full source-free electrostatic Maxwell model inside the ball under The microscopic vacuum Maxwell equations: smooth and weak branches. For continuous f the same potential is

φf(x)=∫S21−∣x∣2/R24π∣x/R−n′∣3f(n′) dσ(n′),

and it extends continuously to the closed ball with value f(n) at Rn; the angular Poisson kernel is positive of mass one. No boundary value or boundary electric-field trace for the exterior arbitrary-L1 density is inferred, and no derivative boundary regularity for arbitrary f is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω; let a>0, let ρ∈L1(R3) be real and vanish λ3-a.e. outside B‾a(0), let Q, p, Qij be its source moments about the chart origin, let φ=ε0−1Nρ be the potential of the Coulomb solution with the n=3 kernel, and let {Ylm} be a real orthonormal basis of spherical harmonics of degree l for the surface measure dσ of total mass 4π, with addition theorem as in Spherical harmonics: orthogonal decomposition, complete basis and addition theorem.

[F1]

For ρ∈L1(R3) vanishing λ3-a.e. outside B‾a(0), the moments Q=∫ρ dλ3, p=∫y ρ(y) dλ3(y) and Qij=∫(3yiyj−∣y∣2δij)ρ dλ3 are absolutely convergent and ∑iQii=0 (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution).

[F2]

Let Nf be the Newtonian potential of a measurable compactly supported f, defined by Nf(x)=∫Φ(x−y)f(y) dy at each x where the integral is absolutely finite; the kernel Φ may be assigned an arbitrary finite value at 0, which changes no integral (Newtonian potential of compactly supported data).

[F3]

In dimension three the fundamental solution is Φ(z)=1/(4π∣z∣) away from the pole; for compactly supported real L1 data ρ the potential Nρ is finite λ3-a.e., locally integrable, C∞ and harmonic off the support, and −ΔTε0−1Nρ=Tρ/ε0 in D′(R3) (The localized Newtonian potential and the ideal point-charge Coulomb field).

[F4]

The framework's constants satisfy ε0=(μ0c2)−1>0 with μ0>0 and c>0 (Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values).

[F5]

In the pure electrostatic regime the smooth Maxwell equations reduce to the spatial pair and the fixed-time dictionary identifies spatial and four-dimensional weak readings (The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading).

[F6]

At fixed time an electric field is the map E(⋅,t):Ω→R3, read in the frame basis; the field E:=−∇φ of a smooth potential is of this type (The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields).

[F7]

Let a>0 and let ρ∈L1(R3;R) vanish outside B‾a(0); with the orthonormal spherical-harmonic basis and addition theorem of Spherical harmonics: orthogonal decomposition, complete basis and addition theorem, for every x=rn with r>a the exterior multipole expansion of the integral ∫ρ(y)∣x−y∣−1dy holds with coefficients ∫∣y∣lYlm(y/∣y∣)ρ dy, converges absolutely and uniformly on {∣x∣≥r0} for r0>a with tail after degree N bounded by ∥ρ∥1aN+1/(r0N+2(1−a/r0)), has degree-zero and degree-one terms equal to the Coulomb and dipole terms with the remainder bound of Monopole-dipole expansion with an explicit remainder for compactly supported L1 densities, may be differentiated termwise to every order with uniform convergence on compact sets with inf⁡K∣x∣>a, and its degree-l coefficient function is the L2(S2,dσ) angular projection of the potential on the sphere r∗>a (Exterior spherical multipole expansion and the ball boundary series).

[F8]

The union over l of the spaces of degree-l spherical harmonics admits a complete orthonormal basis of L2(S2,dσ); for any real orthonormal degree-l basis the addition theorem ∑m=12l+1Ylm(n)Ylm(n′)=2l+14πPl(n⋅n′) holds (Spherical harmonics: orthogonal decomposition, complete basis and addition theorem).

[F9]

For z∈[−1,1] the polynomials Pl(z)=π−1∫0π[z+i1−z2cos⁡θ]l dθ satisfy ∣Pl(z)∣≤1, Pl(1)=1, and (1−2qz+q2)−1/2=∑l≥0qlPl(z) for ∣q∣<1 (Legendre polynomials from a convergent zonal kernel: generating function and exterior expansion).

[F10]

Taylor coefficients of a real function at a point are unique: if a function has a Taylor polynomial of order k with remainder, the coefficient of qk is fixed by the derivatives at the base point (Taylor polynomials and their remainders, Taylor polynomials match the prescribed derivatives at the centre). A smooth generating function has an order-two Taylor remainder O(q3) on a sufficiently small compact interval (A uniform derivative bound gives a uniform Taylor remainder bound); two degree-two polynomials differing by o(q2) as q→0 have identical coefficients, successively by division by 1,q,q2.

[F11]

For f∈L2(S2,dσ) the ball series u(rn)=∑l,mrlflmYlm(n) and all its derivatives converge uniformly on every closed smaller ball, u is harmonic there, u(r ⋅)→f in L2 as r↑1, u is the unique harmonic function on the unit ball with finite sup⁡r<1∥u(r ⋅)∥2 and that boundary limit, and for continuous f it equals the Poisson integral and extends continuously to the boundary (Ball Poisson series: interior convergence, boundary data and the Poisson kernel).

[F12]

If f∈L1 and α∈R, then ∫αf=α∫f; if f,g∈L1 agree a.e. their integrals agree; ∣∫f∣≤∫∣f∣ and nonnegative domination gives monotonicity of the integral (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ), Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree, The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

[F13]

B‾a(0)={y:∣y∣≤a}, and for x=rn the unit vector is n=x/∣x∣ with ∣x∣=r in the Euclidean structure (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn).

[F14]

For φ of class C2, −Δφ=div⁡(−∇φ) and curl⁡∇φ=0; the smooth vacuum Maxwell equations are div⁡E=ρ/ε0, div⁡B=0, curl⁡E=−∂tB, curl⁡B=μ0J+c−2∂tE for jointly C1 fields with the additional derivatives required by each equation (The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field, The curl of the gradient of a C2 function vanishes, The microscopic vacuum Maxwell equations: smooth and weak branches).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F8F12F13given

Establish the absolute convergence of the coefficients and the null-singleton convention. On S2 the diagonal addition theorem gives ∑m=12l+1Ylm(n)2=(2l+1)/(4π) [F8], so ∣Ylm(n)∣≤((2l+1)/(4π))1/2 for every n; for λ3-a.e. y with ρ(y)≠0 one has y∈B‾a(0) and ∣y∣≤a [F13], so the integrand of qlm is dominated λ3-a.e. by al((2l+1)/(4π))1/2∣ρ∣∈L1, and qlm is absolutely convergent by [F12]; the definition at y=0 affects a null singleton only and changes no integral by [F12].

2.1step 1.1F2F3F4F7F12

Prove the exterior expansion and its tail bound (a). By [F3] and [F2] the potential satisfies φ(x)=ε0−1Nρ(x)=(4πε0)−1∫R3ρ(y)∣x−y∣−1 dλ3(y) for r>a, and [F7] gives ∫ρ(y)∣x−y∣−1dy=∑l,m4π2l+1Ylm(n)rl+1∫∣y∣lYlm(y/∣y∣)ρ dy with absolute and uniform convergence on {∣x∣≥r0} for every r0>a and the stated tail bound; multiplying the identity and its tail bound by the finite positive constant (4πε0)−1 [F4] and using scaling [F12] gives (a), with the coefficients exactly the qlm of step 1.1.

3.1step 2.1F1F7

Identify the degree-zero and degree-one terms and the exterior remainder, proving the first part of (b). By [F7] the degree-zero and degree-one terms of the parenthesised series are the Coulomb and dipole terms with the explicit remainder bound of Monopole-dipole expansion with an explicit remainder for compactly supported L1 densities, namely Q/r+p⋅x/r3 with ∣R0(x)∣≤16a2∥ρ∥1/r3 for r≥2a; scaling by (4πε0)−1 as in step 2.1 turns the degree-zero term into Q/(4πε0r), the degree-one term into p⋅x/(4πε0r3), and the remainder bound into the bound of Uniform Coulomb dipole expansion of a compactly supported charge density with an explicit remainder (a), which is therefore reproduced.

4.1step 3.1F1F8F9F10F12

Identify the degree-two term with the traceless quadrupole, completing (b). Apply the addition theorem [F8] at l=2: ∑m=15Y2m(n)Y2m(y/∣y∣)=54πP2(n⋅y/∣y∣), so by finite linearity [F12] ∑m=15Y2m(n)q2m=54π∫∣y∣2P2(n⋅y/∣y∣)ρ(y) dλ3(y). By [F9] the generating identity (1−2qz+q2)−1/2=∑lqlPl(z) holds, and the bound ∣Pl(z)∣≤1 in [F9] gives a tail after degree two of modulus at most ∣q∣3/(1−∣q∣)=o(q2) as real q→0. Thus the degree-two partial sum is the Taylor polynomial of the generating function; by [F10] its coefficient of q2 is both P2(z) and, by the chain rule applied to the power function, 12d2dq2(1−2qz+q2)−1/2∣q=0=3z2−12; hence P2(z)=(3z2−1)/2 and ∣y∣2P2(n⋅y/∣y∣)=(3(n⋅y)2−∣y∣2)/2 wherever y≠0. Therefore ∑mY2m(n)q2m=58π∫(3(n⋅y)2−∣y∣2)ρ dλ3=58πniQijnj by [F1] and [F12], and the degree-two term of (a) is 14πε0⋅4π5⋅1r3⋅58πniQijnj=niQijnj8πε0r3.

5.1step 4.1F4F6F7F12

Prove the regularity and termwise differentiation (c). By [F7] the series may be differentiated termwise to every order with uniform convergence on every compact K with inf⁡K∣x∣>a, and the potential is C∞ on {∣x∣>a}; scaling by the constant (4πε0)−1 preserves termwise differentiation and uniform convergence [F4, F12]. The field E:=−∇φ of [F6] is therefore the termwise gradient −14πε0∑l,m4π2l+1∇x(Ylm(n)r−l−1)qlm on {∣x∣>a}, with the same uniform convergence on compact subsets.

6.1step 5.1F4F5

Record the scope of the exterior clauses (d). Steps 2.1, 3.1, 4.1 and 5.1 used only the real L1 density vanishing λ3-a.e. off B‾a(0), the region r>a (with the quantitative bounds on r≥r0>a and r≥2a), and the framework constants [F4]; no claim on or inside B‾a(0), no convergence at r=a and no point-source or empirical assertion was made, and the potential is the fixed-time reading of the static source through [F5].

7.1step 6.1F4F11F14

Prove the ball boundary branch (e). Write g(un):=∑l,mulflmYlm(n) for u∈[0,1) and n∈S2 as in [F11] with u=r/R and n=x/∣x∣; then φf(rn)=g((r/R)n) is smooth and harmonic on ∣x∣<R, its series and every derivative converge uniformly on every smaller closed ball because the substitution x=Rz multiplies a derivative of order α by the finite factor R−∣α∣, and the bounds sup⁡0≤t<1∥φf(Rt ⋅)∥2=sup⁡t<1∥g(t ⋅)∥2≤∥f∥2 and φf(Rt ⋅)→f in L2(S2) as t↑1 are exactly [F11] in the unit variable; the uniqueness statement carries over because any competitor v on ∣x∣<R gives the competitor u(z):=v(Rz) on the unit ball with the same finite radial L2 bound and boundary limit, so [F11] forces u=g and hence v=φf. For continuous f the Poisson integral of [F11] with r=∣x∣/R is the displayed formula, and the kernel is positive of mass one. Finally, define Ef:=−∇φf, B:=0, ρ:=J:=0 and time-independent fields on the open ball; then φf is C∞, so Ef is a C1 field and B,ρ,J are continuous, and [F14] gives div⁡Ef=−Δφf=0 and curl⁡Ef=−curl⁡∇φf=0, while div⁡B=0 and curl⁡B=0; all four adopted smooth vacuum Maxwell equations of The microscopic vacuum Maxwell equations: smooth and weak branches hold pointwise with vanishing sources and time derivatives, so this is a full source-free electrostatic Maxwell model inside the ball. No boundary trace for the exterior density and no derivative boundary regularity for arbitrary f is used or claimed.

8.1step 7.1∎

Assemble the theorem and close. Step 2.1 gives (a), steps 3.1 and 4.1 give (b), step 5.1 gives (c), step 6.1 records the scope (d), and step 7.1 gives the independent ball boundary branch (e) with its source-free Maxwell completion; the only nonconstructive assumptions are the declared Countable Choice inherited from the Lebesgue, spherical-harmonic and ball-series interfaces, and no exterior trace, singular-source expansion or empirical content is asserted.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources