Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ball Poisson series: interior convergence, boundary data and the Poisson kernel

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (ACω), with the exact meaning of The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). Let f∈L2(S2,dΩ) with harmonic coefficients flm in an orthonormal basis of the spherical-harmonic lemma (Spherical harmonics: orthogonal decomposition, complete basis and addition theorem), and for 0≤r<1 set u(rn)=∑l,mrlflmYlm(n) (the l=0 term being the constant value at r=0). Then the series and all its derivatives converge uniformly on every closed smaller ball, u is harmonic there (The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field), u(r ⋅)→f in L2(S2) as r↑1, and u is the unique harmonic function on the unit ball with sup⁡r<1∥u(r ⋅)∥L2<∞ and L2 boundary limit f. For continuous f the same function is

u(rn)=∫S21−r24π∣rn−n′∣3f(n′) dΩ(n′),

it extends continuously to the closed ball with boundary value f, and the kernel is positive of total mass one. This is the stated ball boundary branch; generic smooth-domain classical regularity remains a separate obligation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, f∈L2(S2,dΩ), the canonical orthonormal bases {Ylm:m=1,…,2l+1} of the harmonic lemma, the coefficients flm=∫S2fYlm dΩ, the partial sums SN=∑l≤N,mflmYlm, and the series u.

[F1]

Spherical harmonics. The Ylm are orthonormal in L2(S2,dΩ), each Ylm is the restriction of a homogeneous harmonic polynomial of degree l, harmonics of distinct degrees are orthogonal, and the family is complete; the addition theorem gives ∑mYlm(n)Ylm(n′)=2l+14πPl(n⋅n′) and, on the diagonal, ∑m∣Ylm(n)∣2=2l+14π (Spherical harmonics: orthogonal decomposition, complete basis and addition theorem, Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases).

[F2]

L2 Hilbert space and Cauchy-Schwarz. Under the stated Countable Choice, real L2(S2,dΩ) has inner product ⟨g,h⟩=∫gh dΩ and complex L2 has ⟨g,h⟩=∫gh‾ dΩ, linear in the first argument; both induce the L2 norm and are Hilbert spaces (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space). The integral inequality ∫∣gh∣ dμ≤∥g∥2∥h∥2 holds, in particular on each finite counting-measure space (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2). Bessel and Parseval are derived locally in step 1.1.

[F3]

Harmonic estimates. For harmonic v near x, ∣Dαv(x)∣≤C3,αr−3−∣α∣∫Br(x)∣v∣ whenever Br(x) lies in the domain (Interior derivative estimates for harmonic functions).

[F4]

Ball Dirichlet theorem and Poisson kernel. For continuous data on ∂BR(a) in R3 the Poisson integral Ug(x)=∫PR,a(x,y)g(y)dSy with PR,a(x,y)=(R2−∣x−a∣2)/(4πR∣x−y∣3) is smooth harmonic in the ball, extends continuously with trace g, and is the unique C2∩C(BR(a)‾) harmonic solution with that trace (Continuous Dirichlet problem on a ball).

[F5]

Generating function and series calculus. ∑l≥0qlPl(z)=(1−2qz+q2)−1/2 for ∣q∣<1 (Legendre polynomials from a convergent zonal kernel: generating function and exterior expansion), and real power series are smooth inside their disc of convergence with termwise differentiation (A power-series sum is infinitely differentiable inside its radius and satisfies an=f(n)(c)/ι(n!) at its centre).

[F6]

Integration rules. The sphere integral is that of Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, linear and monotone with the nonnegative-integral rules (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ), Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral), and dominated convergence applies to dominated pointwise-convergent families (Dominated convergence); uniform derivative limits are identified along coordinate segments by the FTC (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2algebra

Finite projection, density and Parseval. For any g∈L2(S2) put alm=⟨g,Ylm⟩ and QNg=∑l≤N,malmYlm, with finite-dimensional span VN. Because the Ylm are real, these coefficients are ∫gYlm dΩ also for complex g. Finite inner-product algebra [F1, F2] gives ⟨g−QNg,Ylm⟩=0 for l≤N, ∥QNg∥22=∑l≤N,m∣alm∣2, and the Pythagorean identity ∥g∥22=∥g−QNg∥22+∑l≤N,m∣alm∣2. Thus the finite coefficient sums are bounded by ∥g∥22 (Bessel). For every h∈VN, the same orthogonality yields ∥g−h∥22=∥g−QNg∥22+∥QNg−h∥22, hence ∥g−QNg∥2≤∥g−h∥2. Completeness in [F1] means that the finite linear span is dense. For each fixed ε>0, choose one finite combination h with ∥g−h∥2<ε and let N0 contain all its degrees (take N0=0 for empty support). Then h∈VN for all N≥N0, so QNg→g in norm. In the complex case the same density follows by separately approximating the real and imaginary parts by finite real combinations. This epsilon argument selects no sequence of approximants and introduces no new Choice. Taking limits in the finite Pythagorean identity proves ∑l,m∣alm∣2=∥g∥22 (Parseval); subtracting its finite sum gives ∥g−QNg∥22=∑l>N,m∣alm∣2→0. Apply this to g=f, so QNf=SN.

1.2givenF1F4F5F6algebra

For the general L2 uniqueness, let v be a smooth harmonic function on the unit ball with sup⁡r<1∥v(r ⋅)∥2<∞ and L2 boundary limit f. For 0<s<1 the published Dirichlet theorem [F4] applied on Bs(0) to the continuous data v(s ⋅) gives, for 0<r<s, v(rn)=∫S21−(r/s)24π∣(r/s)n−n′∣3v(sn′)dΩ(n′), the scaled form of the radius-s Poisson kernel; expanding this kernel with the addition theorem and integrating against v(s ⋅) [F1, F6] gives v(rn)=∑l,m(r/s)lvlm(s)Ylm(n) with vlm(s)=∫S2v(sn′)Ylm(n′)dΩ(n′).

2.1step 1.1F1F2algebra

Each rlYlm(n) is the homogeneous harmonic polynomial of degree l representing Ylm, evaluated at x=rn [F1], so the partial sums PN(x)=∑l≤N,mflmrlYlm(n) are harmonic polynomials; by the addition theorem [F1] and finite counting-measure Cauchy-Schwarz [F2], first on N<l≤M and then letting M→∞ using step 1.1, the absolute tail on ∣x∣≤r0<1 is bounded by ∥f−SN∥2(∑l>Nr02l2l+14π)1/2≤C(r0)∥f−SN∥2, which tends to 0 by step 1.1; hence the series converges uniformly on every closed smaller ball and defines a continuous function u there.

3.1step 1.1F1F2F6algebra

Uniform convergence on the fixed sphere from step 2.1 implies L2 convergence there, so Cauchy-Schwarz [F2] identifies the coefficients of u(r ⋅) as rlflm. Parseval from step 1.1 applied to u(r ⋅) and u(r ⋅)−f gives ∥u(r ⋅)∥22=∑l,mr2l∣flm∣2≤∥f∥22 and ∥u(r ⋅)−f∥22=∑l,m(1−rl)2∣flm∣2; since 0≤(1−rl)2≤4 and (1−rl)2→0 for each (l,m) as r↑1, dominated convergence [F6] on the countable coefficient family with the summable bound 4∑∣flm∣2 gives u(r ⋅)→f in L2(S2) as r↑1.

3.2step 2.1F3F6algebra

For x∈Br1 with r1<r0<1 and 0<ρ<r0−r1, the harmonic estimate [F3] applied to the harmonic differences PN−PM gives ∣Dα(PN−PM)(x)∣≤C3,αρ−3−∣α∣∫Bρ(x)∣PN−PM∣, and the L2 bound inherited from the uniform tail of step 2.1 makes this tend to 0 uniformly on Br1; hence every derivative series converges uniformly on each closed smaller ball, and the FTC [F6] identifies the derivatives of the limit: u∈C∞(B1) and Δu=lim⁡NΔPN=0, so u is harmonic on the unit ball.

3.3step 2.1F1F5F6algebra

Inserting flm=∫S2f(n′)Ylm(n′)dΩ(n′) and the addition theorem [F1] into the partial sums gives PN(rn)=∫S2[∑l≤N2l+14πrlPl(n⋅n′)]f(n′)dΩ(n′); for r≤r0<1 the zonal series converges absolutely and uniformly by [F5], and letting N→∞ with the linearity and dominated-convergence rules [F6] identifies u(rn)=∫S2Kr(n,n′)f(n′)dΩ(n′) with Kr(n,n′)=14π∑l(2l+1)rlPl(n⋅n′).

4.1step 1.1step 1.2step 3.1F1F2algebra

The norm-convergent expansion proved in step 1.1, applied to v(r ⋅), gives v(rn)=∑l,mvlm(r)Ylm(n); comparing with step 1.2 and using orthonormality yields vlm(r)=(r/s)lvlm(s) for all 0<r<s<1, and letting s↑1 with Cauchy-Schwarz [F2], ∣vlm(s)−flm∣=∣∫(v(sn′)−f(n′))Ylm(n′)dΩ∣≤∥v(s ⋅)−f∥2→0, so vlm(r)=rlflm for every degree and every 0<r<1.

4.2step 3.3F1F5F6algebra

Applying the operator 1+2r∂r to the generating function of [F5] - legitimate inside ∣r∣<1 by termwise differentiation [F5] - gives ∑l(2l+1)rlPl(z)=1−r2(1−2rz+r2)3/2; since 1−2r(n⋅n′)+r2=∣rn−n′∣2, the kernel is Kr(n,n′)=1−r24π∣rn−n′∣3, positive with numerator 1−r2>0 and positive denominator; integrating over n′ leaves only the constant l=0 harmonic in the zonal expansion, so ∫S2Kr(n,n′)dΩ(n′)=1.

5.1step 4.2F4F6algebra

For continuous f, uniform continuity of f on the compact sphere and the concentration of the normalised kernel [F4] give sup⁡n∣u(rn)−f(n)∣≤∫Kr(n,n′)∣f(n′)−f(n)∣dΩ(n′)→0 as r↑1: near n′=n the integrand is small by continuity and the kernel mass is one, while the complement carries vanishing kernel mass because on a fixed complement ∣n−n′∣≥δ>0, for r>1−δ/2 one has ∣rn−n′∣≥δ/2 by the triangle inequality; its kernel mass is bounded by (1−r2)(δ/2)−3 and tends to zero.

6.1step 4.2step 5.1F4algebra

For continuous f the Poisson integral of [F4] on the unit ball is exactly the integral representation of step 4.2, so the published ball Dirichlet theorem [F4] shows that u extends continuously to the closed ball with boundary value f and is the unique C2∩C(B1‾) harmonic function with that trace; the formula of the Statement is the kernel of step 4.2.

7.1step 3.2step 3.1step 6.1step 4.1F1F2algebra∎

Hence v(r ⋅) and u(r ⋅) have the same complete orthonormal expansion on every sphere r<1, so they agree in L2 there and, being continuous on each sphere, agree pointwise; equality at the centre follows by continuity, so v=u on the unit ball. This proves the interior convergence and harmonicity, the L2 boundary limit, the kernel formula for continuous data with its continuous extension, and L2-boundary uniqueness, with Countable Choice used only through the cited harmonic, L2 and Poisson interfaces.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources