Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Electrostatic multipoles — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Two worked configurations of the source-moment calculus on the companion page em-electrostatic-multipoles.

The first is a finite quadrupole configuration: four stationary point charges +q at ±ae1 and −q at ±ae2 have vanishing total charge and dipole moment, vanishing odd Cartesian moments, and the exact traceless quadrupole diag⁡(6qa2,−6qa2,0), which is therefore independent of the reference point (Four stationary point charges with vanishing total charge and dipole moment and traceless quadrupole diag(6qa^2,-6qa^2,0)). The computation is a finite source-moment identity; no field, energy or self-energy is claimed.

The second is the ideal physical dipole of two opposite stationary point charges ±q at ±d/2 (Exact two-charge dipole potential, its moments and the explicit far-field remainder): its exact potential is the sum of the two point-charge potentials, its distributional equations hold by linearity of distributional differentiation, its moments are Q=0, p=qd with vanishing even Cartesian moments and vanishing traceless quadrupole at the symmetric origin, and its far-field difference from the ideal-dipole potential is bounded directly by 8∣q∣a2/(πε0r3) for r≥∣d∣. The singular source is treated through the point-source distributional identities; the density expansion theorem is explicitly not applied to it, and no self-energy or dynamical claim is made.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Four stationary point charges with vanishing total charge and dipole moment and traceless quadrupole diag(6qa^2,-6qa^2,0)

Physical scope

A finite source-moment computation for four stationary point charges in a named inertial frame: vanishing total charge and dipole moment, vanishing odd Cartesian moments, and the exact traceless quadrupole diag⁡(6qa2,−6qa2,0). No field, force, self-energy, dynamics, stability or empirical claim is made.

Example

Let q∈R and a>0, let (e1,e2,e3) be the δ-orthonormal positively oriented basis of the laboratory frame (Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields, The Euclidean spatial structure and cross product of an inertial frame), and consider the four stationary point charges of Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution (c): +q at ae1, +q at −ae1, −q at ae2, −q at −ae2. Then:

(a) Q=0 and p=0; more generally every odd Cartesian moment vanishes, Mi1…i2k+1=0 for every k≥0 and all indices, because the configuration is invariant under the central reflection x↦−x with the charges preserved;

(b) the degree-2 Cartesian moment is Mij=2qa2(δi1δj1−δi2δj2), i.e. diag⁡(2qa2,−2qa2,0) in the frame basis, and its trace vanishes;

(c) the traceless quadrupole is Qij=6qa2(δi1δj1−δi2δj2)=diag⁡(6qa2,−6qa2,0) and ∑iQii=0; since Q=p=0, it is independent of the reference point by the origin-shift theorem (Origin shift of the source moments: Q, the dipole p - Qb, the Cartesian expansion and the traceless quadrupole (d));

(d) [Scope] this is a finite source-moment computation for prescribed stationary point charges. No field, force, energy (in particular no claim that the self-energy of the point charges is finite), dynamics, stability or empirical content is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Let q∈R, a>0, and let (e1,e2,e3) be the δ-orthonormal positively oriented basis of the laboratory frame; the four stationary point charges are +q at ae1, +q at −ae1, −q at ae2, −q at −ae2, as in the finite system of stationary point charges of Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution (c).

[F1]

For a finite system of stationary point charges the moments are Q=∑kqk, p=∑kqkxk, Mi1…il=∑kqkxk,i1⋯xk,il and Qij=∑kqk(3xk,ixk,j−∣xk∣2δij), finite sums with ∑iQii=0 computed without Choice (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution).

[F2]

The basis (e1,e2,e3) is δ-orthonormal and positively oriented, and the vector product and the inner product are those of the frame's positive spatial three-space; in particular δ(er,es)=δrs (The Euclidean spatial structure and cross product of an inertial frame).

[F3]

The frame basis is expressed in the laboratory chart with Euclidean norm ∣w∣2=δ(w,w) and coordinates w=∑iwiei (Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn).

[F4]

∑iQii=0 for the finite system, and if Q=0 and p=0 then the traceless quadrupole is independent of the reference point: Qij(b)=Qij for every b (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution, Origin shift of the source moments: Q, the dipole p - Qb, the Cartesian expansion and the traceless quadrupole).

[F5]

Finite sums may be reindexed over a bijection of their index set and expanded by distributivity (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3F5

Compute the total charge and the dipole moment by inserting the four points into the finite sums of [F1]: Q=q+q+(−q)+(−q)=0, and p=q(ae1)+q(−ae1)+(−q)(ae2)+(−q)(−ae2)=qa(e1−e1)+(−q)a(e2−e2)=0, using linearity and the coordinate expansions of [F2], [F3] and [F5].

2.1step 1.1F1F5

Show that every odd Cartesian moment vanishes. The configuration is invariant under the central reflection x↦−x: the charge +q at ±ae1 is carried to the charge +q at ∓ae1, and the charge −q at ±ae2 to the charge −q at ∓ae2, so pairing each point with its image and reindexing the finite sum [F5] gives Mi1…i2k+1=∑j=14qj∏r=12k+1xj,ir=∑j=14qj(−xj,i1)⋯(−xj,i2k+1)=−∑j=14qj∏rxj,ir=−Mi1…i2k+1, hence Mi1…i2k+1=0; the case k=0 is the vanishing dipole p=0; total charge Q=0 was computed separately in step 1.1.

3.1step 2.1F1F2F5

Compute the degree-two Cartesian moment. By [F1] and the coordinates of [F2], Mij=q(ae1)i(ae1)j+q(−ae1)i(−ae1)j−q(ae2)i(ae2)j−q(−ae2)i(−ae2)j=qa2e1ie1j+qa2e1ie1j−qa2e2ie2j−qa2e2ie2j=2qa2(δi1δj1−δi2δj2), which is diag⁡(2qa2,−2qa2,0) in the frame basis and has vanishing trace 2qa2(1−1)=0.

4.1step 3.1F1F2F3F4F6

Compute the traceless quadrupole. With [F1], Qij=∑kqk(3xk,ixk,j−∣xk∣2δij)=3Mij−δij∑kqk∣xk∣2; each of the four points has ∣xk∣=a because ∣±aer∣2=a2δ(er,er)=a2 by [F2], [F3] and [F6], so ∑kqk∣xk∣2=a2(q+q−q−q)=0 and Qij=3Mij=6qa2(δi1δj1−δi2δj2), whose trace is 6qa2(1−1)=0, in agreement with the general tracelessness of [F4].

5.1step 4.1F4∎

Record the reference-point behaviour and the scope. Since Q=p=0 by steps 1.1 and 2.1, clause (d) of the origin-shift theorem [F4] gives Qij(b)=Qij for every reference point b, so the value diag⁡(6qa2,−6qa2,0) is independent of the reference point; no field, force, energy or self-energy of the point charges is computed or claimed, and the computation is a finite source-moment identity for the prescribed stationary charges.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Exact two-charge dipole potential, its moments and the explicit far-field remainder

Physical scope

The exact potential of two ideal stationary point charges of opposite sign, its distributional equations, its source moments (Q=0, p=qd, vanishing traceless quadrupole) and an explicit far-field remainder bound of order a2/r3 about the ideal-dipole potential. The source is singular; no self-energy, self-force, dynamics, bound-state, stability or empirical claim is made.

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), inherited from the cited distribution and Lebesgue interfaces (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let q∈R and d∈R3∖{0}, put a:=∣d∣/2, and let the source be the two stationary point charges +q at d/2 and −q at −d/2 (charge parameters in coulombs and the constant ε0 of Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values), with fixed-time reading qδd/2−qδ−d/2 (The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading (e), Dirac delta and its derivatives). Define, with arbitrary values at the two points,

φ(x):=q4πε0∣x−d/2∣−q4πε0∣x+d/2∣(x∉{d/2,−d/2}).

Then:

(a) [Exact potential and equations] φ is locally integrable on R3 and of class C∞ on R3∖{d/2,−d/2}; with E:=−∇φ on that set (The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields), the pair (E,0) satisfies the distributional pure electrostatic equations

div⁡E=q δd/2−q δ−d/2ε0,curl⁡E=0in D′(R3)

of the fixed-time dictionary of The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading (e) (The localized Newtonian potential and the ideal point-charge Coulomb field (d) for each point charge, added by linearity of distributional differentiation: Distribution, Distributional derivative, Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Locally integrable functions embed in distributions, Test function space d of an open set, Distributional differentiation is continuous and commutes);

(b) [Moments] in the finite-sum branch of Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution (c) about the chart origin of Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields, Q=0, p=qd, every even Cartesian moment vanishes, Mi1…i2k+1=2q (d/2)i1⋯(d/2)i2k+1 for every k≥0, and the traceless quadrupole vanishes, Qij=0;

(c) [Exact far-field comparison] for every x with r:=∣x∣≥2a=∣d∣, the exact difference obeys the expansion form of Uniform Coulomb dipole expansion of a compactly supported charge density with an explicit remainder with the point-pair total variation in place of ∥ρ∥1:

φ(x)=p⋅x4πε0r3+R(x),∣R(x)∣≤16 a2 (∣q∣+∣q∣)4πε0r3=8∣q∣a2πε0r3;

(d) [Comparison with the compact-density theorem] the hypothesis of Uniform Coulomb dipole expansion of a compactly supported charge density with an explicit remainder is an L1 density; for q≠0 the point pair has no such density, while for q=0 its source is the zero density. In either case the proof below computes the two kernels directly; the identity and bound of (c) are proved directly for the two kernels by the twice-fundamental-theorem computation used in that theorem's remainder, and the leading term, the a2 decay and the appearance of the total variation agree with the compact-density expansion;

(e) [Scope] the potential and the distributional equations are stated for the idealised singular source; no self-energy, self-force, dynamics, bound-state, stability or empirical claim is made for the pair. The quadrupole in (b) is computed about the specified symmetric origin; at a general reference point b its value is −3(bipj+bjpi)+2(b⋅p)δij, since Q=0 and Qij=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω; let q∈R, d∈R3∖{0}, a=∣d∣/2, and let +q at d/2 and −q at −d/2 be the two stationary point charges with fixed-time reading qδd/2−qδ−d/2; let φ be the displayed function with arbitrary values at the two points.

[F1]

For a point charge q∈R at x0 with φq(x)=q4πε0∣x−x0∣ and Eq(x)=q(x−x0)4πε0∣x−x0∣3 off x0, the potential is locally integrable, the field is locally integrable and C∞ off x0 with Eq=−∇φq, and −ΔTφq=qε0δx0, div⁡Eq=qε0δx0 and curl⁡Eq=0 in D′(R3) (The localized Newtonian potential and the ideal point-charge Coulomb field).

[F2]

For a finite system of stationary point charges the moments are finite sums Q=∑kqk, p=∑kqkxk, Mi1…il=∑kqkxk,i1⋯xk,il, Qij=∑kqk(3xk,ixk,j−∣xk∣2δij), hence Qij=3Mij−δij∑kqk∣xk∣2, computed without Choice (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution).

[F3]

A stationary point charge at x0 with charge parameter q is the point source of the weak-source definition with constant trajectory z≡x0, whose fixed-time reading is the spatial point source qδx0 (The static and pure electrostatic regimes and their fixed-time reading).

[F4]

Distributional differentiation is linear: the distributional derivative of a finite sum of regular distributions is the sum of the derivatives (Distributional differentiation is continuous and commutes, Distributional derivative).

[F5]

δx0(ψ)=ψ(x0), and the point-source pairings are those of the Dirac distribution (Dirac delta and its derivatives).

[F6]

If Q=0, then the traceless quadrupole about a reference point b is Qij(b)=Qij−3(bipj+bjpi)+2(b⋅p)δij (Origin shift of the source moments: Q, the dipole p - Qb, the Cartesian expansion and the traceless quadrupole).

[F7]
[F9]

If N is a norm on a real vector space V, then ∣N(u)−N(w)∣≤N(u−w) for all u,w∈V; and B‾a(0)={y:∣y∣≤a} (The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for n≥1 every norm N on Rn satisfies N(x)≤C∥x∥1 and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for d2, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

[F10]

The maps involved are computed with the smooth Euclidean calculus of component maps (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).

[F11]

∣∫f dλ3∣≤∫∣f∣ dλ3, and for measurable 0≤u≤w one has ∫u dλ3≤∫w dλ3; a finite continuous Riemann integral is bounded by the sup of its integrand times the length of the interval (The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, If f≤g on [a,b] and both are integrable then ∫abf≤∫abg; and m(b−a)≤∫abf≤M(b−a)).

[F12]

If two locally integrable functions agree a.e., their regular distributions agree, since every compactly supported test gives integrable products with the same a.e. class (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree).

[F13]
[F14]
[F17]

Under Countable Choice there are smooth bumps bz,h with 0≤bz,h≤1, equal to one on B‾h(z) and supported in B2h(z) (Compactly supported scaled Euclidean bumps).

[F18]

If measurable vj→0 a.e. and ∣vj∣≤G with G∈L1, then ∫vj→0 (Dominated convergence).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F3F4F5F12F15F16given

Prove (a). Each summand is the point-charge object of [F1] with x0=±d/2 and charge ±q; each is locally integrable and C∞ off its pole, so the sum φ is locally integrable and C∞ off {d/2,−d/2}, with E=−∇φ=E+q+E−q there. The regular distribution of a locally integrable function is unaffected by changing it on the two-point null set [F12], and distributional differentiation is linear [F4], so adding the two identities of [F1] in D′(R3) and using [F5] gives div⁡E=(qδd/2−qδ−d/2)/ε0 and curl⁡E=0; the dictionary identifying this spatial equation with the fixed-time reading of the source is [F3], and E is the field object defined in The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields. The chart, its origin and the constant ε0 are those of [F15], and the distributional and Lebesgue readings used here carry the declared Countable Choice and measure interface of [F16].

2.1step 1.1F2F13F14

Prove the moment and quadrupole clauses of (b). Insert the two points into the finite sums of [F2]: Q=q+(−q)=0 and p=q(d/2)+(−q)(−d/2)=qd; for every l≥1, Mi1…il=q∏r=1l(d/2)ir+(−q)∏r=1l(−d/2)ir=q(1−(−1)l)∏r=1l(d/2)ir, which vanishes for even l and equals 2q∏r=1l(d/2)ir for odd l, in particular Mi1…i2k+1=2q(d/2)i1⋯(d/2)i2k+1 and Mij=0. Each point has ∣xk∣=∣±d/2∣=12∣d∣=a by the norm formula of [F13], and ∑kqk∣xk∣2=a2(q+(−q))=0, so the second formula of [F2] gives Qij=3Mij−δij∑kqk∣xk∣2=0; the identities used only finite distributivity [F14].

3.1step 2.1F6F13algebra

Prove the reference-point clause of (e). With Q=0 the transformation of [F6] reads Qij(b)=Qij−3(bipj+bjpi)+2(b⋅p)δij, and substituting Qij=0 and p=qd from step 2.1 gives Qij(b)=−3(bipj+bjpi)+2(b⋅p)δij, which vanishes at b=0. If q≠0, then p=qd≠0; a vanishing shifted quadrupole contracted with pj gives −3∣p∣2bi−(b⋅p)pi=0, and its inner product with p gives −4∣p∣2(b⋅p)=0, whence b=0. If q=0 then all moments and the off-pole potential vanish, and the invariance special case Q=p=0 holds.

4.1step 3.1F7F8F9F10F11F13

Establish the far-field identity and bound, proving (c). Fix y∈{d/2,−d/2} and x with r=∣x∣≥2a, and put hy(s):=∣x−sy∣−1 for s∈[0,1]. For all such s the reverse triangle inequality gives ∣x−sy∣≥r−s∣y∣≥r−a≥r/2>0 [F9], so hy is C∞ on [0,1] with hy(0)=1/r; the chain rule and the derivative of the power map give hy′(s)=(x−sy)⋅y∣x−sy∣3 and hy′′(s)=−∣y∣2∣x−sy∣3+3((x−sy)⋅y)2∣x−sy∣5, so ∣hy′′(s)∣≤4∣y∣2∣x−sy∣3≤32∣y∣2r3 by [F13] [F8, F10]. The function s↦(1−s)hy′(s)+hy(s) has derivative (1−s)hy′′(s), so [F7] gives hy(1)−hy(0)−hy′(0)=∫01(1−t)hy′′(t) dt, whose modulus is at most 32∣y∣2r3⋅12=16∣y∣2r3 by the Riemann monotonicity in [F11] applied to −C(1−t)≤(1−t)hy′′(t)≤C(1−t) with C=32∣y∣2/r3, and ∫01(1−t)dt=1/2 from [F7] applied to t−t2/2; hence hy(1)=1r+x⋅yr3+Ry(x) with ∣Ry(x)∣≤16∣y∣2r3=16a2r3.

5.1step 4.1F13algebra

Substitute the two kernels into φ, completing (c). Since ∣y∣=a for both points and q+(−q)=0 for the constant terms and q(d/2)⋅x+(−q)(−d/2)⋅x=q d⋅x=p⋅x for the linear terms, step 4.1 gives φ(x)=q4πε0(hd/2(1)−h−d/2(1))=p⋅x4πε0r3+R(x) with R=q4πε0(Rd/2(x)−R−d/2(x)), so ∣R(x)∣≤∣q∣(16a2+16a2)4πε0r3=32∣q∣a24πε0r3=8∣q∣a2πε0r3.

6.1step 5.1F1F6F17F18∎

Draw the comparison (d) and the scope (e). The theorem of Uniform Coulomb dipole expansion of a compactly supported charge density with an explicit remainder assumes an L1 density. For q≠0 the pair cannot be represented by even a locally integrable density: take bumps ψj of [F17], centred at d/2, with radii decreasing to zero and all supports excluding −d/2. Their source pairings equal q, whereas for any g∈Lloc1 the integrals ∫gψj tend to zero by dominated convergence [F18], using ∣g∣ on one fixed compact ball as majorant and the a.e. limit ψj→0. This is a contradiction. For q=0 the source and off-pole potential are zero and the zero density satisfies the density hypothesis; the identity and bound just proved for the two kernels are the direct twice-fundamental-theorem computation of step 4.1, and substituting the total variation 2∣q∣ into that theorem's remainder bound 16a2∥ρ∥1/(4πε0r3) would give exactly 8∣q∣a2πε0r3, in agreement with step 5.1; no self-energy, self-force, dynamics, bound-state, stability or empirical assertion is made for the singular pair, and for q≠0 the quadrupole vanishes exactly at the symmetric origin, while for q=0 it vanishes at every reference point, by step 3.1, which is (e).

Sources