Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A smooth Weierstrass surface with a type II cusp fiber

Example

Let B=PC1, L=OP1(2)=KB−1, f=0, and g=u12−v12∈H0(B,L6), where [u:v] are homogeneous coordinates. Let p:W→B be the weighted projective bundle with coordinate weights (2,3,1) and twists x∈OW(2)⊗p∗L2, y∈OW(3)⊗p∗L3, and z∈OW(1). Let Y⊂W be the hypersurface y2=x3+gz6, and set π=p∣Y:Y→B. Then Y is a smooth connected projective surface; π is proper (separated, of finite type, and universally closed), flat (each local ring OY,y is flat over OB,π(y)), and surjective, and it has the regular section s:B→Y given by the distinguished point [1:1:0]. Let η be the generic point of B and set Yηˉ:=Y×BSpec⁡C(B)‾. This geometric generic fiber is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve with dim⁡C(B)‾H1(Yηˉ,OYηˉ)=1, so π is a genus-one fibration with section. Its exactly twelve singular fibers lie over the simple zeros of g; each is an irreducible reduced curve with normalization PC1 and one singular point whose local analytic equation is Y2=X3. Thus each is type II under the preceding classification convention, where type II means an irreducible rational fiber with one ordinary cusp. The smooth total surface contains these singular fibers without being singular itself.

Example references

Weierstrass model over a line bundle

The term elliptic surface with section uses Elliptic fibration with a section: the projection is proper, flat and surjective, has a regular section, and has smooth geometrically integral genus-one geometric generic fiber as defined in Flat genus-one fibration.

Kodaira classification in the relatively minimal elliptic-surface case

Facts & Assumptions

Given: B=PC1, L=O(2), and the Weierstrass coefficients f=0, g=u12−v12.

[A1]

Full AC is The Axiom of Choice, inherited from the projective and local-flatness suppliers.

[F1]

The equation is a section of OW(6)⊗p∗L6 and the model has the distinguished section z=0 (Weierstrass model over a line bundle).

[F2]

The weighted-projective ambient is smooth along the hypersurface: on z≠0 the weight-one coordinate gives a smooth chart; on z=0, the equation forces x,y≠0, whose weighted stabilizer is trivial. The relative Jacobian criterion detects smoothness of the hypersurface by a nonzero gradient (Jacobian rank detects regularity at closed points). The smooth locus is open (The smooth locus is open); if the nonsmooth locus were nonempty, its intersection with an affine chart would give a proper ideal contained in a maximal ideal (In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal), and the residue field of that closed point would be C (Over an algebraically closed field, maximal ideals of an affine algebra are kernels of points). Thus checking the complex points in step 2.1 suffices.

[F3]

The local flatness criterion applies to a finite module over a Noetherian local algebra: if reduction modulo a proper ideal is flat over the quotient base and the multiplication map from that ideal tensored with the module is injective, then the module is flat over the base (Local flatness criterion for a module finite over a larger Noetherian local algebra).

[F4]

For a smooth geometrically integral plane cubic C⊂Pk2 over any algebraically closed field k of characteristic zero, adjunction gives ωC≅OC (Adjunction for smooth plane curves). Since H0(C,OC)=k (Functions on a proper curve), Serre duality gives dim⁡kH1(C,OC)=dim⁡kH0(C,ωC)=1 (Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety). Thus C is a smooth proper geometrically integral genus-one curve in the sense of Flat genus-one fibration.

[F5]

The preceding classification defines type II as an irreducible rational fiber with one ordinary cusp, locally v2=u3 (Kodaira classification in the relatively minimal elliptic-surface case). This is a geometric type label; the separate valuation-table derivation is not used in this example.

[F6]

For each a∈k, where k is any algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, the weighted-projective cubic Ca⊂P(2,3,1) given by y2=x3+az6 is isomorphic to the plane cubic Y2Z=X3+aZ3 by [x:y:z]↦[xz:y:z3]. The map has no base point on Ca. The opens D+(z),D+(y) cover Ca, as do D+(Z),D+(Y) on the plane cubic. On D+(z) it is the coordinate isomorphism (x/z2,y/z3)=(X/Z,Y/Z). On D+(y), set y=1; the residual μ3 acts by (x,z)↦(λ2x,λz). Its invariant ring is generated by u=xz, v=z3, and w=x3, with relation u3=vw; imposing w+av2=1 gives v=u3+av3, exactly the plane-cubic chart Y=1. These chart maps agree on their overlap, proving the isomorphism.

[F7]

A finite-type smooth complex scheme is regular (Regular equals smooth over a perfect field); its regular local rings are domains (Regular local rings are unique factorization domains). Thus distinct irreducible components of Y are disjoint; since Y is noetherian, its connected components are its finitely many irreducible components.

Verification

technique · check properness, flatness, smoothness of the total surface, and the local singularity of each fiber
1.1F1givenalgebra

The weighted projective bundle is projective over B, and the hypersurface is closed in it, so π is projective and therefore proper. The coordinate z=0 defines the distinguished section. Since g=u12−v12 is a degree-twelve section of O(12)=L6, the equation is globally well-defined in the line-bundle twists of [F1]. The polynomial u12−v12 has twelve distinct roots on P1, none at [1:0], because its affine roots are the twelve distinct twelfth roots of unity and its derivative 12u11 is nonzero at each.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

On the chart z≠0, use local coordinates x=X/z2, y=Y/z3 and a base parameter t. The equation is F=y2−x3−g(t)=0. A singular point of the total hypersurface would satisfy F=0, 2y=0, −3x2=0, and −g′(t)=0, hence x=y=0, g(t)=g′(t)=0, contradicting the simple-root property in step 1.1. At z=0 the equation forces x,y≠0; the stabilizer is trivial since λ2=λ3=1 implies λ=1, and the derivative in the y direction is 2y≠0. Thus the total hypersurface is smooth by [F2].

2.2F2F4F6step 1.1algebra

By [F6], each fiber over t∈B is isomorphic to the plane cubic Y2Z=X3+g(t)Z3. For a=g(t)≠0, the partial derivatives −3X2,2YZ,Y2−3aZ2 have no common zero on this cubic, so it is smooth. It is geometrically integral by a direct factorization test. Over the algebraic closure K=C‾, the polynomial X3+a has three distinct roots because a≠0 and its derivative 3X2 has no common root with it. If a reduced fraction r=p/q∈K(X) had r2=X3+a, then at any root α the multiplicity of X−α in r2 would be 2(ord⁡αp−ord⁡αq), an even integer, whereas its multiplicity in X3+a is one. Thus X3+a is not a square, so the quadratic Y2−(X3+a) is irreducible in K(X)[Y]. A factorization in K[X,Y] would give one there; a factor depending only on X would divide the leading coefficient 1, so no such nonunit factor exists. A homogeneous factor of its projective closure that dehomogenizes to a constant would be a power of Z, but Z does not divide Y2Z−X3−aZ3. Thus there is no extra component at infinity, and the plane cubic is geometrically integral. It is genus one by [F4]. For a=0, the affine equation Y2=X3 is irreducible because X3 is not a square in C(X); its only singular point is (0,0), with local equation Y2−X3=0, an ordinary cusp, and the point at infinity is smooth. Thus exactly the twelve simple zeros in step 1.1 give integral cuspidal fibers.

3.1F7step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2algebra

The smooth projective total surface Y is connected. By [F7], each connected component is an irreducible projective surface. Properness makes its image in B closed; irreducibility of the component makes that image irreducible, so it is either a point or all of B. It cannot be a point because a surface cannot lie in a one-dimensional fiber. Thus every component surjects onto B. If there were at least two components, every fiber would be a disjoint union of nonempty closed intersections with these components, contradicting the connectedness of the integral fibers from step 2.2.

4.1A1F3step 2.1step 3.1algebra

The morphism is flat. At a point y over a closed point t0∈B, let R=OB,t0, a discrete valuation ring with parameter s=t−t0, let S be the corresponding Noetherian local ring of the smooth ambient space, and let M=OY,y, a finite S-module. The fiber module M/sM is a vector space over R/(s) and is flat. The total space is smooth, so M is a regular local domain. By step 3.1, Y is integral and π is dominant; hence the pullback of s is nonzero in the function field of Y and remains nonzero in every local ring M. Therefore multiplication by s is injective, equivalently (s)⊗RM→M is injective. Applying [F3] with I=(s) proves M flat over R at every such point. Over the generic point of B, the base local ring is a field, so flatness is automatic. Thus π is flat.

5.1F1F4F5F6step 1.1step 2.2step 4.1∎

The section and flat proper family make this a genus-one fibration with section: over K=C(B)‾, [F6] identifies the geometric generic fiber with the plane cubic Y2Z=X3+gZ3. Here g≠0. The derivative and nonsquare arguments of step 2.2 apply over this algebraically closed characteristic-zero field: X3+g has distinct roots, and the odd order at each root prevents it from being a square in K(X). Thus the geometric generic fiber is smooth, proper and geometrically integral; [F4], applied over K, gives dim⁡KH1=1. Thus the definitions Flat genus-one fibration and Elliptic fibration with a section apply. No fiber is multiple: each smooth fiber is integral and each singular fiber is an irreducible reduced cusp, so its fiber divisor has multiplicity one. There is no reducible fiber component, hence no smooth rational vertical (−1)-curve; the surface is relatively minimal. At a simple zero t0 of g, the analytic coordinate s=g(t) is valid because g′(t0)≠0, and the transverse local equation is exactly y2=x3+s. The fiber at s=0 is the irreducible cusp from step 2.2, so [F5] identifies it as Kodaira type II. This also confirms the standard valuation row (ord⁡f,ord⁡g,ord⁡Δ)=(≥1,1,2) for f=0, g=s, and Δ=27s2.

Remarks

This example separates singular fiber geometry from total-space singularity: the type II fiber has a cusp, while its total Weierstrass surface is smooth. No physical interpretation of the fiber is asserted.

At every singular point the example itself supplies the local equation y2=x3+s. Its type-II label uses the geometric convention in [F5]; it requires no general local-model existence argument or separate valuation-table derivation in the Kodaira carrier.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources