Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Adopted simple shear production

Physical scope

Pointwise simple-shear state of the adopted three-dimensional LES closure. This is an exact model calculation, not a measured flow or a solution- existence claim.

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice for the normalized periodic-torus convention. Let I⊂R be an open time interval measured in seconds, L>0 m, 0<ℓ<L/2, and TL3=(R/LZ)3. All spacetime fields below use the ordered domain TL3×I and evaluation (x,t); for a time-indexed spatial field q, write q(x,t):=(q(t))(x). Let u∈C1(I;C∞(TL3;R3)) be a periodic divergence-free velocity field measured in m s−1. Let K:R3→[0,∞) be smooth, dimensionless, supported in a compact subset of B1(0), and satisfy ∫R3K(s) ds=1. Define

Gℓ(r)=∑n∈Z3ℓ−3K ⁣(r+Lnℓ),u‾ℓ(x,t)=∫TL3Gℓ(r)u(x−r,t) dr,

where dx is volume measure on a period cell. Thus u‾ℓ:TL3×I→R3 is the resolved velocity field, with position in metres and velocity in m s−1. The periodic filter commutes with spatial derivatives, so u‾ℓ is divergence-free. Let k,νt∈C1(TL3×I;[0,∞)) be prescribed specific unresolved kinetic-energy and kinematic eddy-viscosity fields, measured in m2 s−2 and m2 s−1, respectively. Use (∇u‾ℓ)ij=∂ju‾ℓ,i, let I3 be the 3×3 identity matrix, and define A:B=∑i,j=13AijBij and ∣A∣F2=A:A for real 3×3 matrices. Define

Dℓ=12(∇u‾ℓ+(∇u‾ℓ)T).

For the adopted closure, define the modeled specific stress and transfer by τℓmodel=2kI3/3−2νtDℓ and Πℓmodel=−τℓmodel:∇u‾ℓ. At a point (x0,t0)∈TL3×I, suppose the velocity gradient is

∇u‾ℓ(x0,t0)=(0S0000000),

where S∈R is the local shear rate in s−1. Put k0=k(x0,t0) and ν0=νt(x0,t0). Then the modeled transfer at (x0,t0) is ν0S2 m2 s−3. This is a pointwise calculation in the adopted closure model; it asserts no measured value, finite-time evolution, or sign for exact filtered transfer.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the stated smooth periodic divergence-free velocity and filter, the prescribed nonnegative model fields, and the pointwise gradient with S∈R in s−1.

[A1]

Adopted closure formula from Isotropic eddy viscosity and unresolved energy model: τℓmodel=2kI3/3−2νtDℓ and Πℓmodel=−τℓmodel:∇u‾ℓ.

[A2]

Countable Choice is carried by the referenced periodic-filter model: every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Positive periodic convolution filter and subfilter stress: the positive smooth periodized convolution filter has a nonnegative unit-mass kernel and is defined by the displayed formula.

[F2]

Normalization, periodization, and derivative commutation for the positive fluid filter: this fixed periodic filter commutes with spatial derivatives, so filtering a divergence-free velocity gives a divergence-free resolved velocity.

Verification

1.1A2F1F2givenalgebra

The normalized filter is well defined and preserves the given zero divergence by [A2], [F1], and [F2]. Symmetrizing the given gradient gives Dℓ(x0,t0)=(0S/20S/200000). Therefore ∣Dℓ(x0,t0)∣F2=(S/2)2+(S/2)2=S2/2.

2.1A1A2step 1.1algebra∎

The gradient in the statement has zero trace, so I3:∇u‾ℓ=0. Its symmetric part in step 1.1 satisfies Dℓ:∇u‾ℓ=∣Dℓ∣F2=S2/2. Applying [A1] at (x0,t0) therefore gives Πℓmodel=−(2k0/3)(0)+2ν0(S2/2)=ν0S2≥0. Since [ν0S2]=(m2 s−1)(s−2)=m2 s−3, the units agree; if S=0 or ν0=0, the value is exactly zero. This is an exact model calculation, not an observation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels