How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Scalar-field potential and Cauchy-data pairing
Example
Let with quotient map , and let . The one-forms on are the forms descended from the translation-invariant coordinate one-forms on ; denote their dual descended coordinate vector fields. For , spatial derivatives mean derivatives of its -periodic lift to . Define Give the orientation and flat metric , and write . The constant-time cut has orientation , equal to contraction of with .
Distinguish this geometric cut from its representing chain. Let be the inclusion , with image . In positive affine coordinates on the standard simplex, put with orientation . For each permutation , put and for , where is the standard basis of . Define Here is a finite smooth singular three-chain in . For a smooth map , its chain pushforward means composition of each simplex: . The representing chain in is Every simplex has the stated domain orientation and coefficient . The affine images are the six ordered-coordinate regions of the cube. Adjacent regions have identical ordered face maps and opposite signed face coefficients; on the exterior, opposite cube faces have matching ordered face maps after , again with opposite coefficients. Thus . By saying that represents the oriented cut , we mean precisely that for every smooth three-form on , The right side integrates the coefficient relative to . This equality follows by summing the six simplex pullbacks with their orientation coefficients, as checked in step 3.1; it invokes only this explicit cube decomposition. Restrictions of fields and forms below are to the geometric cut , whereas boundary and chain-integration operations use .
For one-forms, define the Hodge map by and extend it linearly with smooth coefficients. Let , let be a fixed real parameter, and take All objects here are mathematical; no physical units or empirical interpretation are assigned. Let satisfy and define the smooth two-parameter field family on . At the base solution is ; the commuting parameter variations are and . The chosen potential and current are On the oriented finite smooth singular cycle defined above, the integrated form is The integral on the right is over the fundamental cube for the descended three-form. The initial-data pair used here is . Write ; then Define its canonical momentum density by Thus the displayed form is the canonical pairing of the variations of .
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The flat oriented product spacetime, the real scalar , the parameter , the displayed Lagrangian and Hodge map, and a smooth two-parameter family of field variations.
The chosen current ordering is , and . Covariant presymplectic current
If the Euler form vanishes and both variations solve the linearized equations, then . On-shell closure and finite-region symplectic flux
A change , changes the integrated form only by the corresponding integral over . Potential ambiguity changes the current by a corner term
A reduced symplectic phase space is asserted only after a smooth solution space and smooth quotient satisfying the stated hypotheses are supplied. Admissible presymplectic reduction and Hamiltonian generators
The exterior derivative obeys the degree-one graded product rule. The exterior derivative is a graded derivation
In coordinates, . The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative
The wedge product of forms is the pointwise wedge of their alternating covariant tensors. The wedge product of differential forms
Verification
Given: As in [F1]–[F4]. The base field is when the on-shell closure clause is used; the displayed variations satisfy the linearized equation.
In coordinates, , so . The graded product rule [F5] and the displayed Hodge map give , and [F6] gives . Therefore , so the selected potential is .
Apply the two commuting parameter derivatives to . The terms containing cancel, leaving . This is [F1]'s current in the chosen sign order.
At , the Euler equation is . The linearized variations obey the same equation, so [F2] gives . Since , [F3] shows that a potential ambiguity does not change the integrated pairing on this cut.
On a constant- cut, the pullbacks satisfy for every smooth . Step 2.1 therefore gives . The affine map for has Jacobian determinant and image . Hence the six regions partition the cube up to common faces, and the coefficient orients each simplex positively relative to . A common interior face is obtained by swapping adjacent entries of ; deleting the distinct intermediate vertex gives the same ordered face map, while the permutation coefficient changes sign, so these boundary terms cancel as singular chains. On opposite exterior faces, the remaining coordinate-order triangles have identical ordered vertex maps after translation by , hence after applying ; their induced boundary orientations are opposite, so they cancel as well. Thus , and integration over this chain equals integration of the descended form over , giving the displayed formula.
The coordinate density gives . Substitution into step 3.1 yields , the canonical Cauchy-data pairing.
Step 4.1 computes the integrated two-form but does not prove the global smooth solution-space or quotient hypotheses in [F4]. Thus this example asserts the Cauchy pairing for the displayed model and cut only; it claims no general symplectic reduction.
Depends on
Covariant presymplectic current
On-shell closure and finite-region symplectic flux
Potential ambiguity changes the current by a corner term
Admissible presymplectic reduction and Hamiltonian generators
The wedge product of differential forms
The exterior derivative is a graded derivation
The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Daniel Harlow and Jie-qiang Wu, Covariant phase space with boundaries, §3.2, Two-derivative scalar field
- Geoffrey Compère and Adrien Fiorucci, Advanced Lectures on General Relativity, §1.3.1
- Vivek Iyer and Robert M. Wald, Some Properties of Noether Charge and a Proposal for Dynamical Black Hole Entropy, §3