How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Covariant phase space and boundary ambiguities — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Covariant phase space and boundary ambiguities
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hamiltonian Mechanics and Completely Integrable Systems
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Singular Chains and Singular Homology
- Singular Cochains Mayer Vietoris and Smooth Singular Comparison
- Singular Cohomology and Coefficient Theorems
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Symplectic Manifolds, Moser Stability, and Darboux–Weinstein Theory
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The de Rham Theorem and Degree
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Volumes of Elementary Solids and Solids of Revolution
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
Scalar-field potential and Cauchy-data pairing
Example
Let with quotient map , and let . The one-forms on are the forms descended from the translation-invariant coordinate one-forms on ; denote their dual descended coordinate vector fields. For , spatial derivatives mean derivatives of its -periodic lift to . Define Give the orientation and flat metric , and write . The constant-time cut has orientation , equal to contraction of with .
Distinguish this geometric cut from its representing chain. Let be the inclusion , with image . In positive affine coordinates on the standard simplex, put with orientation . For each permutation , put and for , where is the standard basis of . Define Here is a finite smooth singular three-chain in . For a smooth map , its chain pushforward means composition of each simplex: . The representing chain in is Every simplex has the stated domain orientation and coefficient . The affine images are the six ordered-coordinate regions of the cube. Adjacent regions have identical ordered face maps and opposite signed face coefficients; on the exterior, opposite cube faces have matching ordered face maps after , again with opposite coefficients. Thus . By saying that represents the oriented cut , we mean precisely that for every smooth three-form on , The right side integrates the coefficient relative to . This equality follows by summing the six simplex pullbacks with their orientation coefficients, as checked in step 3.1; it invokes only this explicit cube decomposition. Restrictions of fields and forms below are to the geometric cut , whereas boundary and chain-integration operations use .
For one-forms, define the Hodge map by and extend it linearly with smooth coefficients. Let , let be a fixed real parameter, and take All objects here are mathematical; no physical units or empirical interpretation are assigned. Let satisfy and define the smooth two-parameter field family on . At the base solution is ; the commuting parameter variations are and . The chosen potential and current are On the oriented finite smooth singular cycle defined above, the integrated form is The integral on the right is over the fundamental cube for the descended three-form. The initial-data pair used here is . Write ; then Define its canonical momentum density by Thus the displayed form is the canonical pairing of the variations of .
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The flat oriented product spacetime, the real scalar , the parameter , the displayed Lagrangian and Hodge map, and a smooth two-parameter family of field variations.
The chosen current ordering is , and . Covariant presymplectic current
If the Euler form vanishes and both variations solve the linearized equations, then . On-shell closure and finite-region symplectic flux
A change , changes the integrated form only by the corresponding integral over . Potential ambiguity changes the current by a corner term
A reduced symplectic phase space is asserted only after a smooth solution space and smooth quotient satisfying the stated hypotheses are supplied. Admissible presymplectic reduction and Hamiltonian generators
The exterior derivative obeys the degree-one graded product rule. The exterior derivative is a graded derivation
In coordinates, . The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative
The wedge product of forms is the pointwise wedge of their alternating covariant tensors. The wedge product of differential forms
Verification
Given: As in [F1]–[F4]. The base field is when the on-shell closure clause is used; the displayed variations satisfy the linearized equation.
In coordinates, , so . The graded product rule [F5] and the displayed Hodge map give , and [F6] gives . Therefore , so the selected potential is .
Apply the two commuting parameter derivatives to . The terms containing cancel, leaving . This is [F1]'s current in the chosen sign order.
At , the Euler equation is . The linearized variations obey the same equation, so [F2] gives . Since , [F3] shows that a potential ambiguity does not change the integrated pairing on this cut.
On a constant- cut, the pullbacks satisfy for every smooth . Step 2.1 therefore gives . The affine map for has Jacobian determinant and image . Hence the six regions partition the cube up to common faces, and the coefficient orients each simplex positively relative to . A common interior face is obtained by swapping adjacent entries of ; deleting the distinct intermediate vertex gives the same ordered face map, while the permutation coefficient changes sign, so these boundary terms cancel as singular chains. On opposite exterior faces, the remaining coordinate-order triangles have identical ordered vertex maps after translation by , hence after applying ; their induced boundary orientations are opposite, so they cancel as well. Thus , and integration over this chain equals integration of the descended form over , giving the displayed formula.
The coordinate density gives . Substitution into step 3.1 yields , the canonical Cauchy-data pairing.
Step 4.1 computes the integrated two-form but does not prove the global smooth solution-space or quotient hypotheses in [F4]. Thus this example asserts the Cauchy pairing for the displayed model and cut only; it claims no general symplectic reduction.
Closed bulk current with nonzero boundary flux
Example
Let with coordinates , orientation , and flat metric . For one-forms use Here the massless wave equation means . Let and , and define the smooth field family on . Both solve the massless wave equation, so at is a solution and , are commuting variations solving that same equation. Use the massless scalar Lagrangian , with selected potential and current . For and , put and . Let with orientation . For each permutation , define vertices where is the standard basis in the ordered coordinates . Define the 24 affine simplex maps and their oriented sum by Each map has domain orientation ; the coefficient orients it relative to .
For , let and . With oriented by , define, for , where , , and , and put Each is oriented by . Define the side chain by , with the signed simplex-face multiplicities inherited from the boundary of . The coordinate-order boundary calculation shows that is supported on the six side faces of the box, each with outward-normal-first orientation from ; their oriented volume forms are at , at , at , at , at , and at . Then the bulk current is closed on the box, and by definition of , , but The oriented side flux is , so the finite-region balance is . The box is compact; the example uses no asymptotic region or falloff premise.
Example references
Diagram conventions
The following is the – projection of the four-dimensional box; the directions are suppressed. It shows the two constant-time cuts and the faces and . Boundary orientations are induced from by the outward-normal-first convention.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The flat oriented spacetime, the massless scalar Lagrangian, the smooth two-parameter family , the box simplex maps , the cut chains , and the oriented side chain defined in the Example.
and each solve .
The current has Iyer–Wald ordering and . Covariant presymplectic current
On a solution with linearized variations, and for a finite chain with . On-shell closure and finite-region symplectic flux
A change in changes the integrated current by its exact corner term on . Potential ambiguity changes the current by a corner term
A reduced symplectic space requires a supplied smooth quotient of the null distribution with a descended closed nondegenerate form. Admissible presymplectic reduction and Hamiltonian generators
The exterior derivative obeys the degree-one graded product rule. The exterior derivative is a graded derivation
In coordinates, . The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative
The wedge product of forms is the pointwise wedge of their alternating covariant tensors. The wedge product of differential forms
Verification
Given: As in [A1] and [F1]–[F4], with the box simplex maps, cut chains, and side chain defined in the Example.
The scalar-current formula from the chosen decomposition is . Substitution of the displayed variations and Hodge map gives By [F6], differentiating the first term gives ; differentiating the second gives . The graded product rule [F5] justifies the coefficient differentiations. Thus , agreeing with [F2].
Set for . In these coordinates, the affine simplex has ordered vertices . Its determinant is , so the coefficient gives the box orientation. Its image is ; these 24 sectors cover the box with disjoint interiors. Two sectors adjacent by swapping entries share a face obtained by deleting their different intermediate vertices; the ordered face maps agree while their permutation coefficients are opposite, so every internal boundary term cancels. On , time is first in the permutation, and the remaining boundary simplices are exactly with positive coefficient. On , time is last; the permutation sign is reversed relative to the spatial order, so the boundary chain is . The other exterior facets are the six side faces and form . Outward-normal-first contraction of the volume form with their coordinate normals gives the six orientations listed in the Example. Hence .
On a cut with orientation , Therefore .
At , the outward-normal-first boundary orientation is , while ; the oriented flux is . At the pullback is zero because the coefficient vanishes. The and faces have zero pullback because each term in contains respectively or . Hence the total oriented side flux is , verifying [F2].
For each cut, [F3] identifies any potential-induced change with an integral over its boundary; the explicit calculation is for the fixed potential in the Statement and makes no claim that a boundary counterterm vanishes on these cuts.
The nonzero difference in step 2.1 shows that this bulk-closed current does not define a cut-independent integrated form without a boundary-flux condition. The example supplies no quotient or descended symplectic form beyond the hypotheses in [F4].
Sources
- Daniel Harlow and Jie-qiang Wu, Covariant phase space with boundaries, §3.2, Two-derivative scalar field
- Geoffrey Compère and Adrien Fiorucci, Advanced Lectures on General Relativity, §1.3.1
- Vivek Iyer and Robert M. Wald, Some Properties of Noether Charge and a Proposal for Dynamical Black Hole Entropy, §3
- Daniel Harlow and Jie-qiang Wu, Covariant phase space with boundaries, §§2.2–2.4