Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Covariant phase space and boundary ambiguities — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Scalar-field potential and Cauchy-data pairing

Example

Let T3:=R3/Z3 with quotient map q:R3→T3, and let M:=Rt×T3. The one-forms dx,dy,dz on T3 are the forms descended from the translation-invariant coordinate one-forms on R3; ∂x,∂y,∂z denote their dual descended coordinate vector fields. For f∈C∞(M,R), spatial derivatives mean derivatives of its Z3-periodic lift to Rt×R3. Define ∇f:=(∂xf,∂yf,∂zf),∣∇f∣2:=(∂xf)2+(∂yf)2+(∂zf)2,Δf:=∂x2f+∂y2f+∂z2f. Give M the orientation dt∧dx∧dy∧dz and flat metric g=−dt2+dx2+dy2+dz2, and write vol=dt∧dx∧dy∧dz. The constant-time cut Σt={t}×T3 has orientation dx∧dy∧dz, equal to contraction of vol with ∂t.

Distinguish this geometric cut from its representing chain. Let it:T3→M be the inclusion it(p)=(t,p), with image Σt. In positive affine coordinates on the standard simplex, put T3:={r∈R3:rj≥0, r1+r2+r3≤1} with orientation dr1∧dr2∧dr3. For each permutation ρ∈S3, put v0ρ=0 and vjρ:=∑k=1jeρ(k) for 1≤j≤3, where e1,e2,e3 is the standard basis of R3. Define aρ(r):=∑j=13rjvjρ,Q:=∑ρ∈S3sgn⁡(ρ) aρ. Here Q is a finite smooth singular three-chain in R3. For a smooth map f, its chain pushforward means composition of each simplex: f#(∑jcjσj):=∑jcj(f∘σj). The representing chain in M is Ct:=(it∘q)#Q=∑ρ∈S3sgn⁡(ρ) τt,ρ,τt,ρ:=it∘q∘aρ. Every simplex has the stated domain orientation and coefficient sgn⁡(ρ). The affine images are the six ordered-coordinate regions of the cube. Adjacent regions have identical ordered face maps and opposite signed face coefficients; on the exterior, opposite cube faces have matching ordered face maps after q, again with opposite coefficients. Thus ∂Ct=0. By saying that Ct represents the oriented cut Σt, we mean precisely that for every smooth three-form α on M, ∫Ctα=∫[0,1]3(it∘q)∗α. The right side integrates the coefficient relative to dx∧dy∧dz. This equality follows by summing the six simplex pullbacks with their orientation coefficients, as checked in step 3.1; it invokes only this explicit cube decomposition. Restrictions of fields and forms below are to the geometric cut Σt, whereas boundary and chain-integration operations use Ct.

For one-forms, define the Hodge map by ∗dt=−dx∧dy∧dz,∗dx=−dt∧dy∧dz,∗dy=dt∧dx∧dz,∗dz=−dt∧dx∧dy, and extend it linearly with smooth coefficients. Let ψ∈C∞(M,R), let μ≥0 be a fixed real parameter, and take L=−12dψ∧∗dψ−12μ2ψ2vol. All objects here are mathematical; no physical units or empirical interpretation are assigned. Let u1,u2∈C∞(M,R) satisfy (−∂t2+Δ−μ2)ui=0(i=1,2), and define the smooth two-parameter field family ψa,b:=au1+bu2 on P=R2. At (a,b)=(0,0) the base solution is ψ=0; the commuting parameter variations are δ1ψ:=∂aψa,b=u1 and δ2ψ:=∂bψa,b=u2. The chosen potential and current are θ(ψ;δψ)=−δψ∗dψ,ω(δ1,δ2)=δ2ψ∗dδ1ψ−δ1ψ∗dδ2ψ. On the oriented finite smooth singular cycle Ct defined above, the integrated form is ΩCt(δ1,δ2)=∫[0,1]3(δ1ψ ∂tδ2ψ−δ2ψ ∂tδ1ψ) dx dy dz. The integral on the right is over the fundamental cube for the descended three-form. The initial-data pair used here is (ψ∣Σt,∂tψ∣Σt). Write L=Lcoord vol; then Lcoord=12(∂tψ)2−12∣∇ψ∣2−12μ2ψ2. Define its canonical momentum density by π:=∂Lcoord∂(∂tψ)=∂tψ. Thus the displayed form is the canonical pairing of the variations of (ψ∣Σt,π∣Σt).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The flat oriented product spacetime, the real scalar ψ, the parameter μ≥0, the displayed Lagrangian and Hodge map, and a smooth two-parameter family of field variations.

[F1]

The chosen current ordering is ω(δ1,δ2)=δ2θ(δ1)−δ1θ(δ2), and ΩΣ=∫Σω. Covariant presymplectic current

[F2]

If the Euler form vanishes and both variations solve the linearized equations, then dMω=0. On-shell closure and finite-region symplectic flux

[F3]

A change L↦L+dMμ, θ↦θ+δμ+dMY changes the integrated form only by the corresponding integral over ∂Σ. Potential ambiguity changes the current by a corner term

[F4]

A reduced symplectic phase space is asserted only after a smooth solution space and smooth quotient satisfying the stated hypotheses are supplied. Admissible presymplectic reduction and Hamiltonian generators

[F5]

The exterior derivative obeys the degree-one graded product rule. The exterior derivative is a graded derivation

[F6]

In coordinates, d(∑IfI dxI)=∑IdfI∧dxI. The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative

[F7]

The wedge product of forms is the pointwise wedge of their alternating covariant tensors. The wedge product of differential forms

Verification

Given: As in [F1]–[F4]. The base field is ψ=0 when the on-shell closure clause is used; the displayed variations satisfy the linearized equation.

1.1givenF5F6F7algebra

In coordinates, L=(12ψt2−12∣∇ψ∣2−12μ2ψ2)vol, so δL=(ψtδψt−∇ψ⋅∇δψ−μ2ψδψ)vol. The graded product rule [F5] and the displayed Hodge map give dM(δψ∗dψ)=dδψ∧∗dψ+δψ dM∗dMψ, and [F6] gives dM∗dMψ=(−ψtt+Δψ)vol. Therefore δL=δψ(−ψtt+Δψ−μ2ψ)vol−dM(δψ∗dψ), so the selected potential is θ=−δψ∗dψ.

2.1givenF1algebrastep 1.1

Apply the two commuting parameter derivatives to θ. The terms containing δ1δ2ψ cancel, leaving δ2θ(δ1)−δ1θ(δ2)=δ2ψ∗dMδ1ψ−δ1ψ∗dMδ2ψ. This is [F1]'s current in the chosen sign order.

2.2givenF2F3step 1.1

At ψ=0, the Euler equation is −ψtt+Δψ−μ2ψ=0. The linearized variations obey the same equation, so [F2] gives dMω=0. Since ∂Ct=0, [F3] shows that a potential ambiguity does not change the integrated pairing on this cut.

3.1step 2.1algebra

On a constant-t cut, the pullbacks satisfy (∗df)∣Σt=−(∂tf) dx∧dy∧dz for every smooth f. Step 2.1 therefore gives ω∣Σt=(δ1ψ ∂tδ2ψ−δ2ψ ∂tδ1ψ) dx∧dy∧dz. The affine map for ρ has Jacobian determinant sgn⁡(ρ) and image 1≥xρ(1)≥xρ(2)≥xρ(3)≥0. Hence the six regions partition the cube up to common faces, and the coefficient sgn⁡(ρ) orients each simplex positively relative to dx∧dy∧dz. A common interior face is obtained by swapping adjacent entries of ρ; deleting the distinct intermediate vertex gives the same ordered face map, while the permutation coefficient changes sign, so these boundary terms cancel as singular chains. On opposite exterior faces, the remaining coordinate-order triangles have identical ordered vertex maps after translation by ei, hence after applying q; their induced boundary orientations are opposite, so they cancel as well. Thus ∂Ct=0, and integration over this chain equals integration of the descended form over [0,1]3, giving the displayed formula.

4.1givenstep 3.1algebra

The coordinate density gives π=∂Lcoord/∂ψt=ψt. Substitution into step 3.1 yields ΩCt(δ1,δ2)=∫(δ1ψ δ2π−δ2ψ δ1π), the canonical Cauchy-data pairing.

5.1F4step 4.1∎

Step 4.1 computes the integrated two-form but does not prove the global smooth solution-space or quotient hypotheses in [F4]. Thus this example asserts the Cauchy pairing for the displayed model and cut only; it claims no general symplectic reduction.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Closed bulk current with nonzero boundary flux

Example

Let M=R4 with coordinates (X1,X2,X3,X4)=(t,x,y,z), orientation dt∧dx∧dy∧dz, and flat metric −dt2+dx2+dy2+dz2. For one-forms use ∗dt=−dx∧dy∧dz,∗dx=−dt∧dy∧dz,∗dy=dt∧dx∧dz,∗dz=−dt∧dx∧dy. Here the massless wave equation means (−∂t2+∂x2+∂y2+∂z2)u=0. Let u1:=t2+x2 and u2:=t, and define the smooth field family ψa,b:=au1+bu2 on P=R2. Both u1,u2 solve the massless wave equation, so ψ=0 at (a,b)=(0,0) is a solution and δ1ψ:=∂aψa,b=u1, δ2ψ:=∂bψa,b=u2 are commuting variations solving that same equation. Use the massless scalar Lagrangian L=−12dψ∧∗dψ, with selected potential θ(ψ;δψ)=−δψ∗dψ and current ω(δ1,δ2)=δ2ψ∗dδ1ψ−δ1ψ∗dδ2ψ. For 0<t1<t2 and L>0, put a0=(t1,0,0,0) and (ℓ1,ℓ2,ℓ3,ℓ4)=(t2−t1,L,1,1). Let T4:={r∈R4:rj≥0, ∑j=14rj≤1} with orientation dr1∧dr2∧dr3∧dr4. For each permutation ρ∈S4, define vertices v0ρ:=a0,vjρ:=a0+∑k=1jℓρ(k)eρ(k)(1≤j≤4), where e1,e2,e3,e4 is the standard basis in the ordered coordinates (t,x,y,z). Define the 24 affine simplex maps and their oriented sum by σρ(r):=v0ρ+∑j=14rj(vjρ−v0ρ),C:=∑ρ∈S4sgn⁡(ρ) σρ. Each map has domain orientation dr1∧dr2∧dr3∧dr4; the coefficient sgn⁡(ρ) orients it relative to dt∧dx∧dy∧dz.

For t∈{t1,t2}, let bt=(t,0,0,0) and (m1,m2,m3)=(L,1,1). With T3:={r∈R3:rj≥0, ∑j=13rj≤1} oriented by dr1∧dr2∧dr3, define, for ρ∈S3, w0t,ρ:=bt,wjt,ρ:=bt+∑k=1jmρ(k)e^ρ(k)(1≤j≤3), where e^1=e2, e^2=e3, and e^3=e4, and put σt,ρ(r):=w0t,ρ+∑j=13rj(wjt,ρ−w0t,ρ),Σt:=∑ρ∈S3sgn⁡(ρ) σt,ρ. Each Σt is oriented by dx∧dy∧dz. Define the side chain by B:=∂C−Σt2+Σt1, with the signed simplex-face multiplicities inherited from the boundary of C. The coordinate-order boundary calculation shows that B is supported on the six side faces of the box, each with outward-normal-first orientation from dt∧dx∧dy∧dz; their oriented volume forms are +dt∧dy∧dz at x=0, −dt∧dy∧dz at x=L, −dt∧dx∧dz at y=0, +dt∧dx∧dz at y=1, +dt∧dx∧dy at z=0, and −dt∧dx∧dy at z=1. Then the bulk current is closed on the box, and by definition of B, ∂C=Σt2−Σt1+B, but ΩΣt2−ΩΣt1=−L(t22−t12)≠0. The oriented side flux is L(t22−t12), so the finite-region balance is ΩΣt2−ΩΣt1=−∫Bω. The box is compact; the example uses no asymptotic region or falloff premise.

Diagram conventions

The following is the t–x projection of the four-dimensional box; the y,z directions are suppressed. It shows the two constant-time cuts and the faces x=0 and x=L. Boundary orientations are induced from dt∧dx∧dy∧dz by the outward-normal-first convention.

tx§t1§t2x=0x=LC

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The flat oriented spacetime, the massless scalar Lagrangian, the smooth two-parameter family ψa,b, the box simplex maps σρ, the cut chains Σt, and the oriented side chain B defined in the Example.

[A1]

δ1ψ=t2+x2 and δ2ψ=t each solve −∂t2δψ+∂x2δψ+∂y2δψ+∂z2δψ=0.

[F1]

The current has Iyer–Wald ordering and ΩΣ=∫Σω. Covariant presymplectic current

[F2]

On a solution with linearized variations, dMω=0 and ΩΣ2−ΩΣ1=−∫Bω for a finite chain C with ∂C=Σ2−Σ1+B. On-shell closure and finite-region symplectic flux

[F3]

A change in θ changes the integrated current by its exact corner term on ∂Σ. Potential ambiguity changes the current by a corner term

[F4]

A reduced symplectic space requires a supplied smooth quotient of the null distribution with a descended closed nondegenerate form. Admissible presymplectic reduction and Hamiltonian generators

[F5]

The exterior derivative obeys the degree-one graded product rule. The exterior derivative is a graded derivation

[F6]

In coordinates, d(∑IfI dxI)=∑IdfI∧dxI. The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative

[F7]

The wedge product of forms is the pointwise wedge of their alternating covariant tensors. The wedge product of differential forms

Verification

Given: As in [A1] and [F1]–[F4], with the box simplex maps, cut chains, and side chain defined in the Example.

1.1A1F1F2F5F6F7algebra

The scalar-current formula from the chosen decomposition is ω=δ2ψ∗dδ1ψ−δ1ψ∗dδ2ψ. Substitution of the displayed variations and Hodge map gives ω=(x2−t2) dx∧dy∧dz−2tx dt∧dy∧dz. By [F6], differentiating the first term gives −2t dt∧dx∧dy∧dz; differentiating the second gives +2t dt∧dx∧dy∧dz. The graded product rule [F5] justifies the coefficient differentiations. Thus dMω=0, agreeing with [F2].

1.2givenconstructalgebra

Set si=(Xi−(a0)i)/ℓi for 1≤i≤4. In these coordinates, the affine simplex σρ has ordered vertices 0,eρ(1),eρ(1)+eρ(2),…,eρ(1)+⋯+eρ(4). Its determinant is sgn⁡(ρ)ℓ1ℓ2ℓ3ℓ4, so the coefficient sgn⁡(ρ) gives the box orientation. Its image is 1≥sρ(1)≥⋯≥sρ(4)≥0; these 24 sectors cover the box with disjoint interiors. Two sectors adjacent by swapping entries ρ(k),ρ(k+1) share a face obtained by deleting their different intermediate vertices; the ordered face maps agree while their permutation coefficients are opposite, so every internal boundary term cancels. On s1=1, time is first in the permutation, and the remaining boundary simplices are exactly Σt2 with positive coefficient. On s1=0, time is last; the permutation sign is reversed relative to the spatial order, so the boundary chain is −Σt1. The other exterior facets are the six side faces and form B. Outward-normal-first contraction of the volume form with their coordinate normals gives the six orientations listed in the Example. Hence ∂C=Σt2−Σt1+B.

2.1A1F1algebrastep 1.1

On a cut with orientation dx∧dy∧dz, ΩΣt=∫0L∫01∫01(x2−t2) dy dz dx=L33−Lt2. Therefore ΩΣt2−ΩΣt1=−L(t22−t12).

3.1A1F1F2step 1.2step 2.1

At x=L, the outward-normal-first boundary orientation is −dt∧dy∧dz, while ω∣x=L=−2tL dt∧dy∧dz; the oriented flux is L(t22−t12). At x=0 the pullback is zero because the coefficient 2tx vanishes. The y and z faces have zero pullback because each term in ω contains respectively dy or dz. Hence the total oriented side flux is ∫Bω=L(t22−t12), verifying [F2].

4.1F3step 3.1

For each cut, [F3] identifies any potential-induced change with an integral over its boundary; the explicit calculation is for the fixed potential in the Statement and makes no claim that a boundary counterterm vanishes on these cuts.

5.1F4step 2.1step 3.1∎

The nonzero difference in step 2.1 shows that this bulk-closed current does not define a cut-independent integrated form without a boundary-flux condition. The example supplies no quotient or descended symplectic form beyond the hypotheses in [F4].

Sources