Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Explicit circular-orbit data of the Schwarzschild exterior at the ISCO radius 3s and the photon-sphere radius 3s/2

Example

Let (M,g,N) be the Schwarzschild exterior datum with Schwarzschild radius s>0, f(r)=1−s/r (The Schwarzschild exterior model datum: domain, metric, mass parameter and time orientation), with the circular-orbit data of Circular timelike geodesics, their radial-potential stability threshold, and the photon sphere at r = 3s/2 and the radial potential Wℓ(r)=f(r)(c2+ℓ2/r2) of Conserved quantities and equatorial radial reduction of timelike geodesics of the Schwarzschild exterior model clause (c). Then the following exact evaluations hold.

In every Vℓ′′ evaluation below, differentiate with ℓ fixed as a constant and substitute the circular-orbit value only after differentiation.

  1. The innermost stable circular orbit at r0=3s. With ℓ2=c2sr022r0−3s one has ℓ2=3c2s2, e2=89c2 and e=223c, and the second derivative of Vℓ=12Wℓ vanishes: Vℓ′′(3s)=c2s(3s−3s)(3s)3(6s−3s)=0. The circular angular velocity at this radius satisfies (dφdt)2=GNm∗(3s)3=c254s2.
  2. The photon sphere at r0=3s2. For ℓ≠0, with e0=∣ℓ∣f(r0)r0=2∣ℓ∣33 s one has f(3s2)=13 and (dφdt)2=c2f(r0)r02=4c227s2; the null potential Wℓn(r)=f(r)ℓ2/r2 has (Wℓn)′(3s2)=0 and (Wℓn)′′(3s2)=−32ℓ281s4<0.
  3. A stable comparison radius. At r0=4s one has ℓ2=c2s⋅16s28s−3s=165c2s2 and Vℓ′′(4s)=c2s(4s−3s)(4s)3(8s−3s)=c2320s2>0, a strict local minimum: the two threshold values 3s/2 (existence) and 3s (stability) separate the unstable circular orbits 3s2<r0<3s from the stable ones r0>3s.
  4. Blow-up at the existence threshold. As r0↓3s2 the required angular momentum diverges, ℓ2=c2sr022r0−3s→+∞, so there is no finite angular momentum at the limiting radius; for r0≤3s2 no circular timelike geodesic exists (Circular timelike geodesics, their radial-potential stability threshold, and the photon sphere at r = 3s/2 clause (b)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exterior datum with s>0, and the function f=1−s/r, the potential Wℓ(r)=f(r)(c2+ℓ2/r2), its half Vℓ, and the null potential Wℓn(r)=f(r)ℓ2/r2, with ℓ≠0 in the photon-sphere clause.

[L1]

For r0>3s2 the equatorial circular timelike geodesic constructed in Circular timelike geodesics, their radial-potential stability threshold, and the photon sphere at r = 3s/2 clause (a) has ℓ2=c2sr022r0−3s, e=c(r0−s)2r0(2r0−3s), and its angular velocity satisfies (dφdt)2=GNm∗r03; conversely every future timelike geodesic with r≡r0 constant on an interval of positive length has r0>3s2, and if equatorial it has this ℓ2 (that supplier's clause (b), The Schwarzschild exterior model datum: domain, metric, mass parameter and time orientation).

[L2]

Differentiating at fixed ℓ and then imposing ℓ2=c2sr2/(2r−3s) gives the circular stability value Vℓ′′(r)=c2s(r−3s)r3(2r−3s) for r>3s2 (Circular timelike geodesics, their radial-potential stability threshold, and the photon sphere at r = 3s/2 clause (c), Conserved quantities and equatorial radial reduction of timelike geodesics of the Schwarzschild exterior model clause (c)).

[L3]

For ℓ≠0, the null circular orbit at r0=3s2 has e0=∣ℓ∣f(r0)r0, angular velocity (dφdx0)2=f(r0)r02, and the null potential satisfies (Wℓn)′(3s2)=0, (Wℓn)′′(3s2)=−32ℓ281s4 (Circular timelike geodesics, their radial-potential stability threshold, and the photon sphere at r = 3s/2 clause (d)).

Proof

technique · direct; substitute the two threshold radii into the conserved-quantity and potential formulas of the cited lemma, and evaluate with the exact identities $f(3s)=2/3$, $f(3s/2)=1/3$
1.1L1L2L4algebra

(ISCO data at 3s.) By [L4] and [L1], at r0=3s the denominator is 2r0−3s=3s, so ℓ2=c2s⋅9s23s=3c2s2. Then c2+ℓ2/r02=c2+3c2s29s2=c2+c23=43c2, so e2=f(3s)⋅43c2=23⋅43c2=89c2 and e=223c>0. The angular velocity is (dφdt)2=GNm∗(3s)3=sc2/227s3=c254s2. By [L2], Vℓ′′(3s)=c2s⋅0(3s)3⋅3s=0. This is clause 1.

1.2L3L4algebra

(Photon-sphere data at 3s/2.) By [L4], f(3s2)=13, so e0=∣ℓ∣1/33s/2=2∣ℓ∣33 s; the angular velocity satisfies (dφdx0)2=f(3s/2)(3s/2)2=1/39s2/4=427s2, hence (dφdt)2=c2⋅427s2. The two potential identities are those of [L3] evaluated at the stated radius. This is clause 2.

1.3L1L2L4algebra

(Stable comparison radius 4s.) At r0=4s the denominator is 2r0−3s=5s, so ℓ2=c2s⋅16s25s=165c2s2; by [L2], Vℓ′′(4s)=c2s(4s−3s)(4s)3⋅5s=c2s264s3⋅5s=c2320s2>0, a strict local minimum of Vℓ at the circular-orbit radius. Combined with clause 1, the sign of Vℓ′′ changes at r=3s, separating the strict local maxima on 3s2<r0<3s from the strict local minima on r0>3s; this is clause 3.

2.1L1L4algebra∎

(Threshold divergence.) For r0>3s2 the denominator 2r0−3s is positive with 2r0−3s→0+ as r0↓3s2, while the numerator c2sr02→c2s⋅9s24>0; hence ℓ2→+∞. By the converse clause of [L1], no future timelike geodesic in any angular orientation has r≡r0 constant on an interval of positive length for s<r0≤3s2, since that would force r0>3s2. This is clause 4.

Remarks

  • What the example computes. The quantities 3c2s2, 22c/3, c2/(54s2), 4c2/(27s2) and c2/(320s2) are exact evaluations of the cited formulas at the stated radii; the factor 22/3 in e/c is irrational. The longitude velocities and angular momenta refer to the constructed equatorial curves. The example reports no orbit of any observed body and no measurement, and the word "stable" refers only to the sign of the second derivative of the stated effective potential of the restricted model.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources