Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An explicit sinusoidal TT plane wave: harmonic gauge, linearized vacuum equations, curvature components and detector strain

Physical scope

Conditional computation in the classical gravitational framework: the explicit TT plane-wave metric family g(lambda) = eta + lambda h of the flat model with sinusoidal profiles, its harmonic-gauge and linearized-vacuum properties, its first-order curvature components, and the finite path-length strain function of the ideal two-body detector of the companion definition at equal inertial-chart time. The exact-vacuum residual clause is for the zero-source, Lambda = 0 branch. Clause 3 is a model statement about that ideal detector; the example asserts no measurement, no apparatus, no noise model, and no numerical amplitude, frequency or strain of any real wave.

Example

Use the SI length coordinates x0=ct,x1,x2,x3 of SI unit and coordinate conventions of the classical gravitational framework. Fix dimensionless real amplitudes a,b and a positive wave-number parameter ω with units m−1. The phase coordinate u=x0−x3 has units m, so ωu is dimensionless. At a fixed spatial point the model angular frequency is c∣ω∣ in s−1. Put

A+(u):=acos⁡(ωu),A×(u):=bsin⁡(ωu),u=x0−x3,

and let h be the TT planar perturbation of Plane-wave perturbations of the flat linearization: planar profiles, wave covectors, amplitudes, TT form and the linearized field equations clause (b) with these amplitudes: h11=A+, h22=−A+, h12=h21=A× and all other components zero. Let M:=max⁡{∣a∣,∣b∣} and choose ∣λ∣<1/(2M) when M>0. Then:

  1. h is traceless and in harmonic gauge, □hab=0, and Gab(1)(h)=0: the perturbation solves the linearized vacuum equations; the metric g(λ)=η+λh is a smooth Lorentzian metric of signature (−,+,+,+) with time orientation ∂0, and in the zero-source, Λ=0 branch, for every nonempty compact K and length scale L, the exact vacuum residual is bounded by a constant times λ2 whenever ∣λ∣BK(h)≤1/16; since the profiles are smooth, this holds for sufficiently small ∣λ∣ on each fixed compact set.
  2. The first-order curvature components are R0101(1)=12aω2cos⁡(ωu),R0102(1)=12bω2sin⁡(ωu),R0202(1)=−12aω2cos⁡(ωu), and R0i0j(1)=0 whenever i=3 or j=3.
  3. At a point where u=0 the curvature values are R0101(1)=12aω2 and R0102(1)=0. For the ideal detector of The linearized-wave approximation regime and an ideal two-body detector with a prescribed finite arm path, the arm along e1 has strain 1+λacos⁡(ωu)−1, which equals 1+λa−1 at u=0; the arm along (e1+e2)/2 has strain 1+λbsin⁡(ωu)−1 as a function of general u, whose value at u=0 is 0.

All three clauses are conditional statements of the model: clause 3 is the strain function of the ideal detector defined in The linearized-wave approximation regime and an ideal two-body detector with a prescribed finite arm path evaluated on the stated family; no observation, apparatus or statistical statement is made, and no numerical amplitude, frequency or strain of a real wave is asserted.

Verification

Given: The flat model with SI length coordinates, dimensionless a,b,λ, positive ω in m−1, and the profiles A+(u)=acos⁡(ωu), A×(u)=bsin⁡(ωu), the perturbation h above, the amplitude parameter λ and the metric g(λ)=η+λh.

[L1] The derivatives are ∂0cos⁡(ωu)=−ωsin⁡(ωu), ∂0sin⁡(ωu)=ωcos⁡(ωu), ∂3cos⁡(ωu)=ωsin⁡(ωu), ∂3sin⁡(ωu)=−ωcos⁡(ωu). For f(x)=cos⁡(ωu(x)) or f(x)=sin⁡(ωu(x)), differentiating once more gives ∂02f=∂32f=−ω2f and ∂12f=∂22f=0, so □f=−∂02f+∂32f=+ω2f−ω2f=0 (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c), The derivative f′(c)=lim⁡x→cf(x)−f(c)x−c of f:A→R at a point c∈A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set, Flat linearized perturbations: families, trace reversal, gauge transformation and harmonic gauge clause (c), The phase coordinate u = x^0 - x^3 is null and profile functions are flat-harmonic and constant along its transport curves clause (b)).

[L2] For a TT planar perturbation with bounded profiles the perturbation is in harmonic gauge with Gab(1)(h)=0 and, when M>0, the metric η+λh is Lorentzian for ∣λ∣<1/(2M); when M=0, h=0 and the metric is η for every λ (TT plane waves with arbitrary bounded profiles solve the linearized vacuum equations, are in harmonic gauge, and give Lorentzian small-amplitude metrics with a quadratic Einstein-tensor residual clauses (a)-(b), Plane-wave perturbations of the flat linearization: planar profiles, wave covectors, amplitudes, TT form and the linearized field equations clause (b)). In the zero-source, Λ=0 branch, for each nonempty compact K and L>0 the vacuum field-law residual is O(λ2) whenever ∣λ∣BK(h)≤1/16 (Linearized field equations as the first-order consequence of the adopted field law, with the harmonic-gauge wave reduction and the quadratic residual control clause (d)).

[L3] For a TT planar perturbation, R0i0j(1)=−12Fij′′ with F11′′=A+′′, F22′′=−A+′′, F12′′=A×′′ and Fi3′′=0; the finite arm length and strain are the path integrals of clause (c) of The linearized-wave approximation regime and an ideal two-body detector with a prescribed finite arm path, which reduce to 1+λaδ(s,0)−1 when δ3=0 makes the profile constant along the arm (First-order curvature of the flat linearization and of TT plane waves, its gauge invariance and its contraction to the linearized Ricci tensor clause (c), The linearized-wave approximation regime and an ideal two-body detector with a prescribed finite arm path clause (c), Rational powers ar of a positive base).

[L4] The profiles are bounded because ∣sin⁡z∣≤1 and ∣cos⁡z∣≤1 for all real z (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine).

1.1L1L2L4algebra

(Second derivatives.) Differentiating twice in x0 with [L1], A+′′(u)=−ω2acos⁡(ωu) and A×′′(u)=−ω2bsin⁡(ωu). Hence h has smooth bounded profiles with bound M, and clause 1 is [L2].

2.1L3step 1.1algebra

(Curvature components.) By [L3], R0101(1)=−12F11′′=−12A+′′=12aω2cos⁡(ωu), R0102(1)=−12F12′′=−12A×′′=12bω2sin⁡(ωu) and R0202(1)=−12F22′′=12A+′′=−12aω2cos⁡(ωu); the vanishing for i=3 or j=3 is part of the same clause. This proves clause 2.

3.1L3step 1.1algebra∎

(Curvature and general-phase strain.) At u=0, cos⁡0=1 and sin⁡0=0, so the displayed curvature values are 12aω2 and 0. For δ=∣δ∣e1, δ3=0, the profile is constant along the arm and a(s,q)=A+(u)=acos⁡(ωu), so the exact strain is 1+λacos⁡(ωu)−1 and at u=0 equals 1+λa−1. For δ=∣δ∣(e1+e2)/2, again δ3=0 and a(s,q)=(h11+2h12+h22)/(2)=A×(u)=bsin⁡(ωu), so its strain is 1+λbsin⁡(ωu)−1, which is 0 at u=0. This proves clause 3.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources