Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Flat metric components in a spherical coordinate chart

Example

Let (M,A) be the flat Lorentzian four-manifold of The constant Minkowski metric as a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian manifold, with global identity chart x=(x0,x1,x2,x3). Let

W:=R×(0,∞)×(0,π)×(0,2π)⊆R4,Φ(u)=(u0, u1sin⁡u2cos⁡u3, u1sin⁡u2sin⁡u3, u1cos⁡u2),

written u=(t,r,ϑ,φ). Then Φ:W→R4 is a smooth injection with det⁡DΦ(u)=r2sin⁡ϑ≠0 on W; its image Φ(W) is open, and y:=Φ−1:Φ(W)→W is a smooth chart on M whose transition with the identity chart is Φ. In this chart the components of A are

Aab′=diag⁡ ⁣(−1, 1, r2, r2sin⁡2ϑ)ab,

so A00′=−1, A11′=1, A22′=r2, A33′=r2sin⁡2ϑ and the off-diagonal components vanish. In particular the component functions are smooth on W, det⁡(Aab′)=−r4sin⁡2ϑ<0 on W, and the diagonal signs exhibit inertia (3,1,0); the metric is Lorentzian as read in the spherical chart, and the components are non-constant although the same metric has constant components in the identity chart.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The flat metric A of The constant Minkowski metric as a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian manifold, with components Acd=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1)cd in the identity chart x on R4, the domain W and the map Φ displayed above.

[L1]

The component functions of A in two overlapping smooth charts are related by Aab′(u)=∑c,d∂xc∂ya(u)∂xd∂yb(u)Acd(x(u)), and a family of bilinear forms is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field once its components are smooth in the charts of one atlas (Chart independence and the transformation law of a smooth covariant 2-tensor field, Smooth covariant 2-tensor fields on a smooth manifold).

[L2]

In ZF, if f:U→Rn is smooth on an open set and Df(a) is invertible, then f restricts to a diffeomorphism from a neighbourhood of a onto an open neighbourhood of f(a) (Choice-free smooth inverse function theorem in Euclidean space).

[L3]

R4 with the identity chart is a smooth four-manifold, and open subsets carry the standard restricted smooth structure (Euclidean spaces and Euclidean open subsets as smooth manifolds); smooth charts of a smooth structure have smooth transition maps in both directions (Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model).

[L4]

Sine and cosine satisfy sin⁡′=cos⁡ and cos⁡′=−sin⁡, hence are C∞ by repeated differentiation (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine); their finite products and composites are smooth (Ck Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition). Cosine is strictly decreasing on [0,π] (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine), so its derivative is nonpositive there by taking limits of difference quotients. Thus sin⁡ϑ≥0 on (0,π); since its zeros are exactly the integer multiples of π (The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi), sin⁡ϑ>0 there. Also sin⁡2z+cos⁡2z=1 (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine), and z↦(cos⁡z,sin⁡z) is injective on [0,2π) (t↦(cos⁡t,sin⁡t) is a bijection from [0,2π) onto the real unit circle).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL4algebra

Φ is smooth on the open set W as a tuple of polynomials and trigonometric functions, and its differential has the matrix with rows obtained by differentiating the four coordinate functions; a direct computation of the 4×4 determinant gives det⁡DΦ(u)=r2sin⁡ϑ, which is nonzero on W because r>0 and 0<ϑ<π.

1.2givenL4algebra

Φ is injective on W: if Φ(u)=Φ(u′), then (u1)2=(Φ(u)1)2+(Φ(u)2)2+(Φ(u)3)2=(u′1)2, so u1=u′1>0; then u1cos⁡u2=Φ(u)3=u1cos⁡u′2 gives cos⁡u2=cos⁡u′2 with u2,u′2∈(0,π), hence u2=u′2; then sin⁡u2>0 and the pair of first two spatial components gives (cos⁡u3,sin⁡u3)=(cos⁡u′3,sin⁡u′3) with u3,u′3∈(0,2π), hence u3=u′3; finally u0=u′0 from the first component.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L2L3

Let z∈Φ(W) and take a single u∈W with Φ(u)=z. Step 1.1 and [L2] supply open neighbourhoods u∈O⊆W and z∈V=Φ(O) on which Φ∣O has a smooth inverse. In particular z∈V⊆Φ(W); since every image point has such an open neighbourhood, Φ(W) is open. By step 1.2, the inverse on this one V equals the unique set-theoretic inverse y=Φ−1 restricted to V. Consequently y is smooth near each image point, hence smooth on Φ(W), without selecting neighbourhoods simultaneously. It and its smooth inverse Φ form a homeomorphism with smooth transitions to the identity chart, so [L3] gives the asserted smooth chart.

3.1step 2.1L1L4algebra

Apply the transformation law [L1] with the chart y and x(u):=Φ(u), so that ∂xc∂ya(u)=DΦ(u)ca. The first column of DΦ is (1,0,0,0), so Aa0′=A0a′=−1 for a=0 and 0 for a≠0. The remaining columns are the partial derivatives of (rsin⁡ϑcos⁡φ, rsin⁡ϑsin⁡φ, rcos⁡ϑ) with respect to r,ϑ,φ, whose squared Euclidean norms are 1, r2 and r2sin⁡2ϑ, and whose pairwise Euclidean inner products are 0; since Acd=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) and the spatial indices carry the positive signs, the transformation law gives A11′=1, A22′=r2, A33′=r2sin⁡2ϑ and Aab′=0 for the remaining off-diagonal pairs.

4.1step 3.1L1L4given∎

The component functions of step 3.1 are smooth on W, so by [L1] the transformed family is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field on Φ(W); its component matrix has determinant −r4sin⁡2ϑ≠0 on W and diagonal entries of both signs, with exactly one negative entry, so the form has inertia (3,1,0) and the chart expression defines a Lorentzian metric on this chart domain. This shows that a chart change without a change of the field produces non-constant components and that the Lorentzian character is preserved by the transformation law of [L1].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources