Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

M2 Smooth Curve Protected Dirac Model

Physical scope

Pure mathematical conditional statement/example; no physical membrane realization asserted.

Example

Let C be a compact connected smooth Riemann surface of genus g, let L→C be a Hermitian holomorphic line bundle, and let T→C be a holomorphic line bundle with a supplied Hermitian metric and a specified holomorphic isomorphism T⊗2≅KC. Supply a compatible Riemannian metric on C and use the induced L2 metric on V:=L⊗T. On the Hilbert space L2(C,Ω0,∗(C,V))=L2(C,Ω0,0(C,V)⊕Ω0,1(C,V)), take the Sobolev H1 domain and define Q=2ρ (∂ˉV+∂ˉV∗),ρ∈R>0. The Z2 grading is even degree zero and odd degree one. For an odd Fredholm operator R, define its even-to-odd index by ind⁡(R+):=dim⁡ker⁡R+−dim⁡coker⁡R+. With this grading, Q is a self-adjoint odd elliptic operator and ind⁡(Qeven→odd)=deg⁡L. Here the degree of a holomorphic line bundle is the degree of the divisor of any nonzero meromorphic section; the proof shows this is well-defined. All data are mathematical inputs. The construction does not identify this operator with a physical membrane sector.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC; the compact connected curve C, the Hermitian holomorphic lines L,T, an isomorphism T⊗2≅KC, compatible metrics, and ρ>0.

[F1]

The Axiom of Choice: full AC is the foundational assumption used by the divisor Riemann–Roch and meromorphic-section interfaces.

[F2]

Divisors, principal divisors and canonical divisors on a Riemann surface: on a compact connected curve, every principal divisor has degree zero and canonical divisors of nonzero meromorphic differentials are linearly equivalent.

[F3]

Holomorphic line bundles and meromorphic sections on a Riemann surface: the divisor of a nonzero meromorphic section is defined by its local orders; quotients of two such sections are meromorphic functions.

[F4]

The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor: O(D+D′)≅O(D)⊗O(D′), and O((η))≅KC for a nonzero meromorphic differential η.

[F5]

Every holomorphic line bundle on a compact Riemann surface has a meromorphic section: every holomorphic line bundle on a compact connected Riemann surface has a nonzero meromorphic section; the supplier assumes full AC.

[F6]

The Riemann-Roch theorem on a compact Riemann surface: for each divisor D, ℓ(D)−h0(KC⊗O(D)∗)=deg⁡D+1−g; the supplier proves existence of a nonzero meromorphic differential and full AC is among its hypotheses.

[F7]

Cech--Dolbeault comparison for holomorphic line bundles on a compact Riemann surface: for a holomorphic line V, H1(C,O(V))≅C∞(Ω0,1(V))/∂ˉVC∞(V), and H0(C,O(V)) is the holomorphic-section space. This comparison alone does not identify the Hilbert cokernel.

[F8]

Hermitian metric and L2 pairing on a compact Riemann surface: the supplied compatible metrics define the L2 Hilbert spaces and the formal adjoint ∂ˉV∗.

[F9]

The maximal Dolbeault operator and its Hilbert adjoint on a compact Riemann surface: the maximal Dolbeault operator is closed and densely defined, its adjoint is closed and dense, and ker⁡Dˉ∗=(ran⁡Dˉ)⊥.

[F10]

Finite-chart symbol calculus and equivariant Fredholm realizations: first-order elliptic operators have Fredholm Sobolev realizations on compact manifolds; its parametrix proof gives Pu∈Hs⇒u∈Hs+1 for an order-one elliptic P and distribution u.

[F11]

Range criterion for self-adjointness: a densely defined symmetric operator R is self-adjoint if both ran⁡(R+i) and ran⁡(R−i) equal the Hilbert space.

[F12]

Elliptic regularity for Dolbeault harmonic forms: the graph domain of Dˉ⊕Dˉ∗ is the first Sobolev space; harmonic forms and the orthogonal projection to them are smooth; every smooth form in the range of Dˉ has a smooth preimage.

[F13]

AC implies DC implies countable choice: full AC implies DC and countable choice, which supply the weaker foundational hypotheses used by [F11].

Verification

1.1F1F2F3F5algebra

Choose nonzero meromorphic sections sL,sT by [F5], using the stated full AC [F1], and write DL=(sL), DT=(sT). If sL′ is another nonzero meromorphic section, sL′/sL is a nonzero meromorphic function and DL′−DL=(sL′/sL); [F2] gives deg⁡DL′=deg⁡DL. The same argument applies to T, so both line-bundle degrees in the statement are well-defined. Local orders add under tensor products, hence sL⊗sT has divisor DL+DT, and deg⁡V=deg⁡L+deg⁡T.

1.2F8F9F10F12given

In the even/odd splitting, the unscaled operator is R=(0Dˉ∗Dˉ0), where Dˉ is the maximal L2 Dolbeault operator on V. By [F12] the common graph domain of Dˉ and Dˉ∗ is H1, dense in the total L2 space. Integration by parts in the definition of Dˉ∗ [F8, F9] makes R symmetric there. Its principal symbol at a nonzero cotangent vector is the off-diagonal matrix formed from the symbol of ∂ˉV and its adjoint. On a complex curve that scalar symbol is nonzero for every nonzero real cotangent vector, so the matrix is invertible. Thus R is elliptic; [F10] gives its Fredholm H1→L2 realization and elliptic regularity.

2.1F4F5F6step 1.1algebra

Let η be a nonzero meromorphic differential supplied by [F6] and put DK=(η). Apply [F6] first to D=0, using ℓ(0)=1, to obtain h0(KC)=g; apply it next to D=DK, using O(DK)≅KC, to obtain g−1=deg⁡DK+1−g. Thus deg⁡KC=deg⁡DK=2g−2. The isomorphism T⊗2≅KC sends the tensor square of sT to a meromorphic section of KC with divisor 2DT. Therefore 2deg⁡T=deg⁡KC=2g−2, so deg⁡T=g−1.

2.2F10F11F13step 1.2algebra

For either sign, R±i has zero kernel: if (R±i)u=0, symmetry gives 0=⟨(R±i)u,u⟩, whose imaginary part is ±∥u∥2. If v∈L2 is orthogonal to the range of R±i, testing against smooth sections gives the distributional equation (R∓i)v=0. By [F10] this elliptic order-one equation puts v in H1, after which symmetry gives v=0. The Fredholm realization R±i:H1→L2 from [F10] has closed range; its orthogonal complement is zero, so it is onto. The range criterion [F11] proves that R is self-adjoint. The countable-choice hypothesis of [F11] follows from full AC by [F13]. Multiplication by 2ρ>0 preserves symmetry, self-adjointness and the domain, so Q=2ρR is self-adjoint and odd.

3.1F4F5F6F7F9F10F12step 1.1step 2.1∎

The even-to-odd block of Q is the positive scalar 2ρDˉ, so its kernel is ker⁡Dˉ, and its cokernel is ker⁡Dˉ∗: the range is closed by the Fredholm realization [F10], and [F9] identifies its orthogonal complement. The kernel/cokernel are finite-dimensional, and [F12] makes every element of ker⁡Dˉ∗ smooth. Thus every L2 cokernel class has a smooth representative. Conversely, if a smooth (0,1)-form is in ran⁡Dˉ, [F12] gives it a smooth preimage. Inclusion of smooth forms therefore induces an isomorphism from the smooth Dolbeault quotient to the Hilbert quotient. By [F7], the dimensions are h0(C,V) and h1(C,V). Apply [F6] to a divisor DV representing V, supplied by [F5]; the divisor line-bundle identification [F4] gives h0(C,V)−h1(C,V)=deg⁡DV+1−g=deg⁡V+1−g. By steps 1.1 and 2.1, this equals deg⁡L+(g−1)+1−g=deg⁡L, proving the index formula.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources