Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A radial bounded potential: rotational and parity symmetry and conservation of the rotation generators

Physical scope

A model example for the massive spin-s model with a bounded measurable potential that is radial almost everywhere: every spatial rotation is a symmetry, the rotation action is a strongly continuous unitary symmetry group, the coordinate-rotation generators are conserved sharp observables in J s, and the parity action is a symmetry with a conserved parity law. The item is conditional on the bounded radial class; it asserts no eigenvalue, bound-state or degeneracy claim, no Coulomb or other unbounded radial model, and no empirical result.

Example

Adopt the postulates P1, P2, P4, P5 and P6 in the readings of The massive spin-s particle model of the framework: state space, operators, units and frame readings, Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework, Assigned energy observable, unitary flow and the two pictures of autonomous evolution and Symmetries of the declared dynamics, unitary symmetry groups and conserved sharp observables for a declared particle of mass parameter m>0 and spin label s, with state space Hs=L2(R3;Cr), r=2s+1, componentwise operators Qj,Pk, rotation action U(R) and coordinate-rotation generators Li (The spatial rotation action on the component-valued wave-function space, Coordinate-rotation generators on the Schwartz classes and their commutators); assume the Axiom of Choice, the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain). Let v:[0,∞)→R be bounded and measurable, and let V:R3→R be real, bounded and measurable with V(x)=v(∣x∣)for almost every x∈R3, a radial potential almost everywhere (if V is the composition x↦v(∣x∣) everywhere, this holds with empty exceptional set). Let HV=12m∑k=13Pk2+MV,D(HV)=W2,2(R3;Cr), be the bounded-potential energy operator. Then:

(a) for every R∈SO(3) one has V(R−1x)=V(x) for almost every x, and V(−x)=V(x) for almost every x;

(b) every U(R) is a symmetry of HV, the map R↦U(R) is a strongly continuous unitary symmetry group of the declared dynamics, and each generator Li is a conserved observable: for every preparation ρ, Borel B⊆R and t, μρ(t)Li(B)=μρ(0)Li(B), with conserved mean and second moment for unit vectors in D(Li) and time-zero values ⟨Liψ,ψ⟩, ∥Liψ∥2, in the unit J s of the model's action (Dimensions, SI unit conventions and quantity types of the framework);

(c) the parity action Π is a symmetry of HV, and its outcome law in every preparation is time-independent;

(d) Scope. The example is conditional on the postulates and the bounded radial class; it computes no eigenvalue, no bound state, no degeneracy and no radial solution, and the boundedness of v excludes the Coulomb potential and other unbounded radial models, which require their own self-adjointness and spectral analysis. No claim is made that any particular physical potential is radial, and no empirical result is recorded.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The postulates P1, P2, P4, P5, P6 in the stated readings; the Axioms of Choice, Countable Choice and Dependent Choice; the state space Hs; the operators Qj,Pk; the rotation action U and generators Li; a bounded measurable v and a real bounded measurable V with V=v(∣⋅∣) almost everywhere; the operator HV; a preparation ρ; a unit vector ψ; a Borel set B; R∈SO(3); i∈{1,2,3} and t∈R.

[F1]

Model reading. HV is self-adjoint with domain W2,2(R3;Cr); the rotation action U(R) is unitary with U(R)W2,2=W2,2 and strongly continuous in R; the coordinate subgroups Ui(t)=U(Ri(t)) have self-adjoint Stone generators Li (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators clause (c), The spatial rotation action on the component-valued wave-function space clauses (a),(b), Coordinate-rotation generators on the Schwartz classes and their commutators clauses (a),(b), Symmetries of the declared dynamics, unitary symmetry groups and conserved sharp observables).

[F2]

Orthogonality. For R∈SO(3) one has RTR=I and RT=R−1 (The orthogonal group O(3) and the rotation group SO(3), SO(3) is a subgroup of the general linear group, with R−1=RT); the Euclidean inner product satisfies ⟨Rx,Rx⟩=⟨x,RTRx⟩=⟨x,x⟩ and ∣x∣2=⟨x,x⟩ (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn).

[F3]

Almost everywhere and orthogonal images. A property holds almost everywhere when its exceptional set is contained in a measurable null set (Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure); finite unions of null sets are null, since Lebesgue measure is a measure (Assuming countable choice, L(Rn) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λn is a complete measure extending elementary volume). For an invertible linear T and measurable E the image T[E] is measurable with λ(T[E])=∣det⁡T∣ λ(E); in particular for R∈SO(3) one has det⁡R=1 and λ(R[E])=λ(E), so orthogonal images of null sets are null (A linear map T of Rn sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with λn(T[E])=∣det⁡T∣ λn(E) when T is invertible and T[E] Lebesgue null when it is not clause 1, The orthogonal group O(3) and the rotation group SO(3)).

[F4]

Invariance theorem. If VR=V almost everywhere for every R∈SO(3), then every U(R) is a symmetry, R↦U(R) is a strongly continuous unitary symmetry group, and each Li is conserved with the law and moment statements displayed in (b); if additionally VP=V almost everywhere, then Π is a symmetry and its outcome law is time-independent (Rotational and parity invariance of bounded-potential models: symmetries and conservation of angular momentum and parity laws clauses (a)-(c)).

[F5]

Outcome laws. For an assigned sharp observable A one has μρA(B)=tr⁡(ρEA(B)) (Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework clause (b), The state space of the framework: preparations, pure rays and density operators).

Verification

Proof technique: direct; verify the almost-everywhere rotational and parity invariance of the radial class from orthogonality of the rotation matrices, and instantiate the rotational-and-parity invariance theorem.

Given: The data of the example and [F1]-[F5].

1.1F2F3givenalgebra

[Almost-everywhere rotational invariance] Let N be a measurable null set with V(x)=v(∣x∣) for every x∉N. Fix R∈SO(3) and let x∉N∪R[N]. By [F2], ∣R−1x∣2=⟨R−1x,R−1x⟩=⟨x,(R−1)TR−1x⟩=⟨x,x⟩=∣x∣2, using (R−1)T=(RT)−1=R, so ∣R−1x∣=∣x∣ and R−1x∉N; hence V(R−1x)=v(∣R−1x∣)=v(∣x∣)=V(x). By [F3] the set R[N] is null, so the exceptional set of the identity V(R−1x)=V(x) is null; therefore V(R−1x)=V(x) almost everywhere. For parity, let x∉N∪(−N); then −x∉N and V(−x)=v(∣−x∣)=v(∣x∣)=V(x) because ∣−x∣=∣x∣, and N∪(−N) is null by [F3], so V(−x)=V(x) almost everywhere. This proves (a).

2.1step 1.1F4F5given

[Instantiation] By step 1.1 the hypotheses VR=V almost everywhere for every R∈SO(3) and VP=V almost everywhere of [F4] hold; applying [F4] gives that every U(R) is a symmetry, that R↦U(R) is a strongly continuous unitary symmetry group, that each Li is conserved with the displayed law and moment statements read through [F5], and that Π is a symmetry with a time-independent outcome law. This proves (b) and (c).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1given∎

[Assembly and scope] Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove (a)-(c) from the model reading [F1]; clause (d) records the bounded radial class, the exclusion of Coulomb and other unbounded radial models and the absence of eigenvalue, bound-state, apparatus and empirical claims.

Remarks

  • What makes the example work. Only two ingredients are used: the radial identity V(x)=v(∣x∣) almost everywhere and the orthogonality of rotations through ∣R−1x∣=∣x∣; the boundedness of v keeps the model inside the bounded-potential class of the page, whose self-adjointness and conservation results are already established.
  • What an angular-momentum conservation law is here. The conserved object is the outcome law of the assigned generator observable Li (with its moments where they exist); no classical angular-momentum vector, no definite value and no measured spectral line is asserted.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources