How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A radial bounded potential: rotational and parity symmetry and conservation of the rotation generators
A model example for the massive spin-s model with a bounded measurable potential that is radial almost everywhere: every spatial rotation is a symmetry, the rotation action is a strongly continuous unitary symmetry group, the coordinate-rotation generators are conserved sharp observables in J s, and the parity action is a symmetry with a conserved parity law. The item is conditional on the bounded radial class; it asserts no eigenvalue, bound-state or degeneracy claim, no Coulomb or other unbounded radial model, and no empirical result.
Example
Adopt the postulates P1, P2, P4, P5 and P6 in the readings of The massive spin-s particle model of the framework: state space, operators, units and frame readings, Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework, Assigned energy observable, unitary flow and the two pictures of autonomous evolution and Symmetries of the declared dynamics, unitary symmetry groups and conserved sharp observables for a declared particle of mass parameter and spin label , with state space , , componentwise operators , rotation action and coordinate-rotation generators (The spatial rotation action on the component-valued wave-function space, Coordinate-rotation generators on the Schwartz classes and their commutators); assume the Axiom of Choice, the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain). Let be bounded and measurable, and let be real, bounded and measurable with a radial potential almost everywhere (if is the composition everywhere, this holds with empty exceptional set). Let be the bounded-potential energy operator. Then:
(a) for every one has for almost every , and for almost every ;
(b) every is a symmetry of , the map is a strongly continuous unitary symmetry group of the declared dynamics, and each generator is a conserved observable: for every preparation , Borel and , with conserved mean and second moment for unit vectors in and time-zero values , , in the unit of the model's action (Dimensions, SI unit conventions and quantity types of the framework);
(c) the parity action is a symmetry of , and its outcome law in every preparation is time-independent;
(d) Scope. The example is conditional on the postulates and the bounded radial class; it computes no eigenvalue, no bound state, no degeneracy and no radial solution, and the boundedness of excludes the Coulomb potential and other unbounded radial models, which require their own self-adjointness and spectral analysis. No claim is made that any particular physical potential is radial, and no empirical result is recorded.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The postulates P1, P2, P4, P5, P6 in the stated readings; the Axioms of Choice, Countable Choice and Dependent Choice; the state space ; the operators ; the rotation action and generators ; a bounded measurable and a real bounded measurable with almost everywhere; the operator ; a preparation ; a unit vector ; a Borel set ; ; and .
Model reading. is self-adjoint with domain ; the rotation action is unitary with and strongly continuous in ; the coordinate subgroups have self-adjoint Stone generators (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators clause (c), The spatial rotation action on the component-valued wave-function space clauses (a),(b), Coordinate-rotation generators on the Schwartz classes and their commutators clauses (a),(b), Symmetries of the declared dynamics, unitary symmetry groups and conserved sharp observables).
Orthogonality. For one has and (The orthogonal group and the rotation group , is a subgroup of the general linear group, with ); the Euclidean inner product satisfies and (The Euclidean inner product on ).
Almost everywhere and orthogonal images. A property holds almost everywhere when its exceptional set is contained in a measurable null set (Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure); finite unions of null sets are null, since Lebesgue measure is a measure (Assuming countable choice, is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and is a complete measure extending elementary volume). For an invertible linear and measurable the image is measurable with ; in particular for one has and , so orthogonal images of null sets are null (A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not clause 1, The orthogonal group and the rotation group ).
Invariance theorem. If almost everywhere for every , then every is a symmetry, is a strongly continuous unitary symmetry group, and each is conserved with the law and moment statements displayed in (b); if additionally almost everywhere, then is a symmetry and its outcome law is time-independent (Rotational and parity invariance of bounded-potential models: symmetries and conservation of angular momentum and parity laws clauses (a)-(c)).
Outcome laws. For an assigned sharp observable one has (Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework clause (b), The state space of the framework: preparations, pure rays and density operators).
Verification
Proof technique: direct; verify the almost-everywhere rotational and parity invariance of the radial class from orthogonality of the rotation matrices, and instantiate the rotational-and-parity invariance theorem.
Given: The data of the example and [F1]-[F5].
[Almost-everywhere rotational invariance] Let be a measurable null set with for every . Fix and let . By [F2], , using , so and ; hence . By [F3] the set is null, so the exceptional set of the identity is null; therefore almost everywhere. For parity, let ; then and because , and is null by [F3], so almost everywhere. This proves (a).
[Instantiation] By step 1.1 the hypotheses almost everywhere for every and almost everywhere of [F4] hold; applying [F4] gives that every is a symmetry, that is a strongly continuous unitary symmetry group, that each is conserved with the displayed law and moment statements read through [F5], and that is a symmetry with a time-independent outcome law. This proves (b) and (c).
[Assembly and scope] Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove (a)-(c) from the model reading [F1]; clause (d) records the bounded radial class, the exclusion of Coulomb and other unbounded radial models and the absence of eigenvalue, bound-state, apparatus and empirical claims.
Remarks
- What makes the example work. Only two ingredients are used: the radial identity almost everywhere and the orthogonality of rotations through ; the boundedness of keeps the model inside the bounded-potential class of the page, whose self-adjointness and conservation results are already established.
- What an angular-momentum conservation law is here. The conserved object is the outcome law of the assigned generator observable (with its moments where they exist); no classical angular-momentum vector, no definite value and no measured spectral line is asserted.
Depends on
The Axiom of Choice
The orthogonal group and the rotation group
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain
The Euclidean inner product on
Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure
Assigned energy observable, unitary flow and the two pictures of autonomous evolution
Dimensions, SI unit conventions and quantity types of the framework
The massive spin-s particle model of the framework: state space, operators, units and frame readings
Assigned sharp observables and the outcome law of the framework
The state space of the framework: preparations, pure rays and density operators
Symmetries of the declared dynamics, unitary symmetry groups and conserved sharp observables
is a subgroup of the general linear group, with
Componentwise position and momentum operators on the component-valued wave-function space
Coordinate-rotation generators on the Schwartz classes and their commutators
The spatial rotation action on the component-valued wave-function space
Autonomous dynamics postulate P4: self-adjoint generators and unitary evolution
Identical-particle and spin assignments P6: permutation sectors and finite-spin representations
Kinematics and massive-particle model postulate P5: Newtonian frames and one-particle operators
Observable and probability postulate P2: self-adjoint observables, spectral probability and finite unsharp outcomes
State and composition postulate P1: Hilbert spaces, preparations and composite systems
Rotational and parity invariance of bounded-potential models: symmetries and conservation of angular momentum and parity laws
Assuming countable choice, is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and is a complete measure extending elementary volume
A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not
Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- J. Binney and D. Skinner, The Physics of Quantum Mechanics, Sections 4.1.3-4.3, printed pages 62-70 (PDF pages 70-78): the rotation operator and its generators, the commutator [J_i, S]=0 for scalar operators and the conservation laws of symmetric Hamiltonians; PDF page = printed page + 8
- D. Tong, Quantum Mechanics (author-hosted lecture set), Section 4.1.1, printed pages 96-99 (PDF pages 99-102): the angular momentum commutation relations, with the angular momentum operators as the generators of rotations
- B. Zwiebach, MIT 8.05 Quantum Physics II (Fall 2013), Chapter 9 'Angular Momentum', Section 1.3, printed pages 9-11 (PDF pages 9-11): central potentials and the commutativity of the angular momentum operators with the Hamiltonian (equation (1.70))