Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Single-mode squeeze statistics

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For one mode with ℏ>0, let Ω be the vacuum and define the unitary dilation on L2(R) by [Usf](x)=e−s/2f(e−sx),s∈R. Then Us∗aUs=cosh⁡(s)a+sinh⁡(s)a∗ on the transported Schwartz core. The squeezed vacuum UsΩ has mean number sinh⁡2(s) and quadrature means zero and variances Var⁡(Q)=ℏ2e2s,Var⁡(P)=ℏ2e−2s. Its covariance determinant is ℏ2/4. The implementer orientation is the pullback convention displayed here; replacing s by −s interchanges the two variances.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, one finite oscillator mode, ℏ>0, vacuum Ω, and real s.

[A1]

AC supplies the Countable Choice and finite-mode assumptions of the cited suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). The mode count is one, ℏ>0, s∈R, and Us is the dilation displayed in the Example.

[F1]

The Fock–Schrödinger unitary sends Ω to the normalized ground Hermite function g0(x)=π−1/4e−x2/2 and, on the finite Hermite span, identifies a=(Q+iP)/2ℏ, with Q=ℏx and P=−iℏ ∂x (Finite-mode Fock to Schrödinger identification, Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data).

[F2]

On the finite Hermite span, a∗a=(Q2+P2)/(2ℏ)−I/2, and the vacuum satisfies aΩ=0 (Creation contraction bounds, Finite-mode Fock to Schrödinger identification).

[F3]

The imported 2π-frequency Gaussian transform gives, for A>0 and B∈R, ∫Re−Ax2+iBx dx=πAe−B2/(4A) by setting t=A/π and ξ=−B/(2π); polynomial factors times a positive Gaussian are integrable (Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization). Integration by parts on finite intervals is available, and xme−Ax2→0 as ∣x∣→∞ by exponential domination (Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines, The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞).

[F4]

If T:U→V is a C1 diffeomorphism between open subsets of R, then Lebesgue substitution applies to every L1 integrand; in particular it applies to T(x)=e−sx and ∣f∣2 (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

[F5]

The closed one-mode Fock annihilation and creation operators are the closures of their finite-particle restrictions and are mutual adjoints (Closed adjoint sector domains). Under the unitary in [F1], the closed weighted ladders have domains ∑n≥0n∣cn∣2<∞ and ∑n≥0(n+1)∣cn∣2<∞, respectively, for cn=⟨f,gn⟩. Their actions are af=∑m≥0m+1cm+1gm and a∗f=∑m≥1mcm−1gm, and a∗a=N on D(N)={f:∑n≥0n2∣cn∣2<∞} (Closed ladder domains).

Verification

1.1A1F1F2F3F5algebra

Work in Schrödinger coordinates via [F1], with inner product linear in the first argument. Put bf=(xf+f′)/2 and b†f=(xf−f′)/2 for f∈S(R); both expressions again lie in S. For cn=⟨f,gn⟩, integration by parts gives ⟨bf,gm⟩=⟨f,b†gm⟩=m+1cm+1 and ⟨b†f,gm⟩=mcm−1 for m≥1, with the latter coefficient zero for m=0. The boundary terms vanish since f and each Hermite function are Schwartz. Completeness and Parseval in [F1] give ∑n≥0n∣cn∣2=∥bf∥2<∞ and ∑n≥0(n+1)∣cn∣2=∥b†f∥2<∞. Therefore [F5] identifies the actual closed Fock operators with a=b and a∗=b† on every Schwartz vector, not only on finite Hermite sums. Since bf is Schwartz, f∈D(a∗a)=D(N), and direct differentiation gives a∗af=b†bf=(x2f−f′′−f)/2=((Q2+P2)/(2ℏ)−I/2)f. Thus the ladder, adjoint and number identities needed below all hold on the transported Schwartz domain.

2.1A1F1F4step 1.1algebra

Apply [F4] to the diffeomorphism x↦e−sx and ∣f∣2∈L1: ∫R∣e−s/2f(e−sx)∣2dx=∫R∣f(y)∣2dy, and U−s is its inverse, so Us is unitary. For Schwartz f, direct substitution and the chain rule give Us∗QUsf=esQf,Us∗PUsf=e−sPf. Using a=(Q+iP)/2ℏ and a∗=(Q−iP)/2ℏ, this becomes Us∗aUs=es+e−s2a+es−e−s2a∗=cosh⁡(s)a+sinh⁡(s)a∗. The dilation maps Schwartz space onto itself, so all identities hold on the stated common core and the associated Weyl covariance extends everywhere by unitarity.

3.1F1F3step 2.1algebra

The ground function g0(x)=π−1/4e−x2/2 is even, so its position mean is zero; its derivative is odd, so its momentum mean is zero. By [F3] with A=1,B=0, ∫e−x2dx=π. On [−R,R], the finite-interval integration-by-parts supplier in [F3] gives ∫−RRx2e−x2dx=[−x2e−x2]−RR+12∫−RRe−x2dx. The boundary term tends to zero by [F3], so ∫x2∣g0(x)∣2dx=π−1/2(π/2)=1/2. Also g0′=−xg0 gives both vacuum variances ℏ/2. Moreover ⟨QΩ,PΩ⟩=−iℏ/2, so the real symmetrized cross covariance is zero. For ψs=UsΩ, the unitary conjugation formulas in step 2.1 give ⟨Q⟩ψs=es⟨Q⟩Ω=0,⟨Q2⟩ψs=e2sℏ/2, and likewise ⟨P⟩ψs=0 and ⟨P2⟩ψs=e−2sℏ/2. The cross form is unchanged because the two scale factors multiply to one, so it remains zero. Therefore the covariance determinant is the product of the two variances, ℏ2/4.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

Since Us maps Schwartz space to itself, ψs is in the domain of the number form. By step 1.1 and step 3.1, ⟨a∗a⟩ψs=⟨Q2+P2⟩ψs2ℏ−12=e2s+e−2s−24=sinh⁡2(s). This is the model's finite one-mode number expectation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources