Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Integer components of the based S3 gauge group

Example

Take the trivial principal SU(2) bundle over the oriented sphere S3, fix a point and a frame over it, and identify SU(2) with the unit quaternions S3. Use G∞ and G‾∞ from the configuration definition, with based smooth subgroup G∞,m; for brevity put Gm:=G∞,m. For every integer k, a based map uk:S3→S3 of degree k defines a based smooth gauge transformation after relative smoothing. These transformations represent distinct components of the based gauge group, so π0(Gm)≅π3(S3)≅Z. The full smooth gauge group has the same component set, and quotienting by the two-element center can merge at most two components; both the full and reduced smooth groups therefore have infinitely many path components. This example is specific to the trivial SU(2) bundle over S3 and does not establish the S4 statement or an arbitrary-rank claim.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The trivial bundle over the oriented S3, the chosen evaluation frame, and the based maps uk in the Example. The actual configuration carrier exists, but its current hash-bound Step 1 record is ready according to loadStep1Record and step1Decision; this is authoring readiness, not independent approval.

[F1]

The based gauge-group components in the trivial or nontrivial bundle sector are π0(Gm)≅π3(SU(2)) for the S3 case. Based gauge-group homotopy via hemisphere clutching

[F2]

Unit quaternions identify SU(2) with S3, and degree classifies based self-maps of S3. Low special-unitary homotopy inputs, Based sphere maps are classified by degree

[F3]

The full and reduced gauge groups have infinitely many components in the r=3 case; the finite quotient acts on components with orbits of size at most 2. Nontrivial homotopy of reduced sphere gauge groups

[F4]

The actual configuration definition fixes the smooth gauge group G∞ with finite-atlas C∞ section topology, its based subgroup, and the quotient G‾∞=G∞/ZN, along with the bundle, frame, and right-action conventions. Its carrier was inspected in full, but its current hash-bound Step 1 record is ready according to loadStep1Record and step1Decision; this is authoring readiness, not independent approval. Smooth and Sobolev configuration and reduced gauge spaces

[F5]

Smooth and continuous based gauge sections have the same sphere/disk parameter homotopy classes. Parametric smoothing of gauge sections

[F6]

Paths lift to a covering once their initial lift is fixed. Existence and uniqueness of path lifts through a covering map

[A1]

Degree is normalized by the standard orientations on source and target S3; the component comparison for the center quotient uses the covering-space topology fixed in [F3].

Verification

1.1A1F1F2F5construct

By [F2], each integer k is represented by a based map uk:S3→SU(2) of degree k. The standard degree representative may be chosen smooth by a relative smooth approximation; [F5] then identifies its class with one in the smooth based section topology. Distinct integers give distinct elements of π3(SU(2)) by degree classification, so [F1] proves that the based gauge group has components indexed by Z.

2.1F1F2F3F4F6algebra∎

The evaluation fibration has connected base SU(2) and π1(SU(2))=0 by [F2, F3]. Its component LES therefore identifies π0(Gm) with π0(G), so the full group also has infinitely many components. The quotient by Z2 is a two-sheeted covering; [F6] shows its components are the orbits of the two-element deck action on the components upstairs. Each orbit has at most two members, so an infinite component set remains infinite after quotient; this instance is also the r=3,N=2 case of [F3].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources