Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth and Sobolev configuration and reduced gauge spaces

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Fix an integer N≥2. Write Mat⁡N(C) for the complex N×N matrices, U∗=U‾T for conjugate transpose, and IN for the identity matrix. Define the special unitary matrix group

SU(N):={U∈Mat⁡N(C):U∗U=IN, det⁡U=1},

with matrix multiplication and the following real embedded smooth structure. Identify Mat⁡N(C) with R2N2 by the real and imaginary matrix entries, and let Herm⁡N={H:H∗=H} have its induced real vector-space structure. Equip U(N)={U:U∗U=IN} with the embedded regular-level-set structure at IN of the smooth map F:GL⁡N(C)→Herm⁡N, F(U)=U∗U, where GL⁡N(C)={U:det⁡U≠0}. Equip S1={z∈C:∣z∣=1} with its embedded circle structure and SU(N) with the embedded regular-level-set structure at 1 of det⁡:U(N)→S1. These are the embedded structures in the stated real matrix space. Its real Lie algebra is su(N):={X∈Mat⁡N(C):X∗=−X, tr⁡X=0} with bracket [X,Y]=XY−YX. The standard unitary representation is the map ρ:SU(N)→U(CN,h) defined by ρ(U)v=Uv, where h(v,w)=∑j=1Nvj‾wj and U(CN,h) consists of the complex-linear maps preserving h. Conjugation is Ad⁡Uz=UzU−1 for either z∈SU(N) or z∈su(N).

Let M be a compact, connected, oriented, boundaryless smooth manifold of dimension d∈{3,4} with a smooth Riemannian metric, and fix a smooth right principal SU(N)-bundle π:P→M, a smooth connection A0, and a point pm∈P over xm∈M. Use the representation ρ and the invariant positive inner product ⟨X,Y⟩=−tr⁡(XY) on su(N). Define the adjoint vector bundle ad⁡P=P×Ad⁡su(N) and the adjoint group bundle Ad⁡P=P×Ad⁡SU(N) with associated-bundle relation [pg,z]=[p,Ad⁡gz].

Choose one finite smooth bundle atlas of local sections (Uα,sα) whose coordinate images are bounded balls, and a subordinate partition of unity with each cutoff compactly supported in its chart. On an overlap write sβ=sαgαβ for its smooth transition map gαβ:Uα∩Uβ→SU(N). Local representatives of an adjoint section ξ and an adjoint group section u are defined by ξ(x)=[sα(x),ξα(x)] and u(x)=[sα(x),uα(x)]. They obey the transition rules ξβ=Ad⁡gαβ−1ξα and uβ=gαβ−1uαgαβ.

For each integer k>d/2+1, define Hk(T∗M⊗ad⁡P) and Hk+1(ad⁡P) by completion of smooth sections in the resulting finite-atlas norms, using weak derivatives of their local coefficients. Define Hk+1(Ad⁡P) as the corresponding completion of smooth group-bundle sections, represented locally by matrix-valued Hk+1 maps satisfying the stated transition rule. After localization by the partition of unity and extension by zero to the coordinate balls, the higher-order Sobolev embedding gives unique continuous representatives (indeed C1); the group-valued representatives take values in the closed subgroup SU(N) everywhere. This embedding is the point-evaluation convention used below. If p∈P lies over x and p=sα(x)h, define u(p):=h−1uα(x)h. The transition rule makes this independent of the chosen local section, and u(x)=[p,u(p)]. In particular, if pm=sα(xm)hαm, then u(pm)=hαm−1uα(xm)hαm is the value in the pm-trivialization. The map u~:P→P defined by u~(p):=p u(p) is a C1 bundle automorphism over id⁡M, with inverse u−1~; it is smooth when u is smooth. Conversely, if Φ:P→P is a C1 bundle automorphism over id⁡M commuting with the right SU(N) action, write Φ(p)=p gp for the unique gp∈SU(N). Equivariance gives gph=h−1gph, so u(x):=[p,gp] for p∈Px is a well-defined C1 adjoint-group section. These assignments are inverse; in the smooth case they identify smooth sections with the smooth gauge group defined by principal-bundle automorphisms.

Define the affine configuration space Ak:=A0+Hk(T∗M⊗ad⁡P) and the set Gk+1:=Hk+1(Ad⁡P) of Sobolev gauge sections. Its based subset is Gk+1,m:={u∈Gk+1:u(pm)=e}, equivalently the sections whose associated bundle automorphism fixes pm. Let ZN={zIN:zN=1} be the center of SU(N), viewed as constant gauge sections. Indeed, if Z=(zij) is central and D=diag⁡(t1,…,tN)∈SU(N), then (tj−ti)zij=0. For each i≠j one can choose such a diagonal matrix with ti≠tj, so Z is diagonal. Commuting with the determinant-one unitary rotation whose block on the (i,j) coordinates is (cos⁡tsin⁡t−sin⁡tcos⁡t) for t∉πZ forces the ith and jth diagonal entries equal. Hence Z=zIN; determinant one gives zN=1, and conversely every such scalar is central. Write Gˉk+1 for the set of ZN-cosets with quotient topology and multiplication [u][v]=[uv], well-defined since ZN is central.

Specify its Hilbert Lie structure as follows, using the Hilbert Lie structure on Gk+1 established by the calculus lemma. Let q:Gk+1→Gˉk+1 be the coset projection. Since ZN is finite and the group is Hausdorff, choose an identity chart neighborhood V with V−1V∩ZN={e}, by continuity of (v,w)↦v−1w at (e,e). The map q is open because q−1(q(O))=⋃z∈ZNOz for every open O. Consequently q∣uV:uV→q(uV) is a homeomorphism for each u, and transport the translated Hilbert charts through these maps. On an overlap, two lifts differ locally by multiplication by a fixed element of the discrete group ZN, so chart changes are smooth. Distinct cosets have disjoint open neighborhoods: if v−1w∉ZN, continuity and finiteness give neighborhoods Ov,Ow with Ov−1Ow∩ZN=∅, and their images under q are disjoint. Thus the quotient is Hausdorff. Its countable base descends from that of the Sobolev section space by the open map q. Multiplication and inversion are smooth in these charts because they lift locally to the corresponding smooth operations on Gk+1. This defines a Hilbert Lie group with the stated quotient topology, and q is a local diffeomorphism.

Let A∞:=A0+Ω1(M,ad⁡P) and let G∞:=Γ∞(Ad⁡P) be the group of smooth adjoint-group sections under pointwise multiplication, identified above with the smooth gauge group. Give it the C∞ section topology generated by all finite-atlas derivative seminorms. Define Gˉ∞:=G∞/ZN. For a connection form ω, write Aα=sα∗ω for its local form. The right-principal convention gives Aβ=gαβ−1Aαgαβ+gαβ−1dgαβ. The right gauge action is locally Aαu:=uα−1Aαuα+uα−1duα. For smooth u, this is the pullback by u~: for X∈TxM, d(u~∘sα)xX=d(Ruα(x))sα(x) dsα(X)+(uα−1duα(X))P(sα(x)uα(x)), and the connection equivariance and vertical reproduction identities give the displayed formula. For Sobolev u, the calculus lemma verifies that the local forms patch under the stated transition rules and define a smooth action on the Sobolev spaces above. For an adjoint section ξ, set dAξ:=dξ+[A,ξ] using the degree-one Lie-algebra-valued-form bracket. In local coordinates and an orthonormal adjoint frame, define the formal adjoint on an adjoint-valued one-form a by (dA∗a)=−gij(∇iLCaj+[Ai,aj]), where ∇LC differentiates the covector index. This is the L2 adjoint for the Riemannian volume and stated fiber metric; its local coefficient formula defines a distribution at Sobolev regularity.

For A∈Ak, parallel transport of its C1 connection form around piecewise smooth loops based at pm defines a subgroup Hol⁡pm(A)⊆SU(N). Call A irreducible when this subgroup leaves no nonzero proper complex subspace of CN invariant; changing the chosen frame conjugates the subgroup and leaves this condition unchanged. Write Ak∗ and A∞∗ for the irreducible loci. Once the calculus lemma verifies the group action, define orbit equivalence by A∼B exactly when B=Au for some gauge section u; all resulting quotients carry the quotient topology, whose open sets are those with open inverse image under the orbit projection.

Definition references

Embedded unitary and special-unitary matrix groups and their Lie algebras

Walpuski, Sobolev connections and gauge transformations

Williams, the Sobolev gauge action

Specified compact gauge group, bundle, and representation data

Right-action principal connection convention

Associated covariant derivative

Lie-algebra-valued form bracket convention

Gauge transformations as bundle automorphisms

Smooth principal connection

Orbit equivalence relation and quotient set

Gauge action preserves principal connections

Formal adjoint convention

Full Axiom of Choice

Continuous representatives and point evaluation for the Sobolev sections

Well-defined Sobolev gauge group and action ↗

[SU(N) gauge-data and Lie algebra](Non-Abelian gauge data and bundle sectors)

[Principal connection form convention](Principal connection 1-form from a horizontal distribution)

[Associated covariant derivative](Covariant derivative on an associated representation bundle)

[Lie-algebra-valued form bracket](Graded bracket of Lie-algebra-valued differential forms)

[Smooth principal-bundle gauge group](Gauge group of a smooth principal bundle)

[Principal connection and curvature](Principal connections and vertical curvature)

[Axiom of Choice](The Axiom of Choice)

[Equivalence relation](Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set A/∼)

[Gauge transformations on principal connections](Gauge transformations act on principal connections and carry curvature)

[Formal adjoints of differential operators](Formal adjoints of differential operators on metric vector bundles)

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources