Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nonzero null plane-wave solution of the pure SU(2) model

Physical scope

An exact smooth source-free classical solution of the adopted pure SU(2) model on the trivial bundle over Minkowski spacetime. It is a mathematical model solution, not an observed field or claim about nature.

Example

Specialize the adopted model to the trivial bundle P=R1,3×SU(2) with its canonical section. Let q=x0−x3, choose a length ℓ>0 and a nonzero constant b with unit m−1, and set A=T3bsin⁡(q/ℓ) dx1. Its curvature is F=T3(b/ℓ)cos⁡(q/ℓ)(dx0−dx3)∧dx1, which is not identically zero. With orientation dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3 and metric η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), this connection satisfies DA(∗ηF)=0 and κ(F∧∗ηF)=0. It is therefore a stationary source-free solution of the adopted classical model; no uniqueness, quantum, or empirical claim is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The trivial-bundle specialization of the adopted pure SU(2) model, b≠0, and ℓ>0.

[F1]

Classical pure SU(2) Yang–Mills model: the metric is diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), the orientation is dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3, and the action density uses the positive invariant form κ.

[F2]

Compactness and normalized invariant form for SU(2): T3∈su(2) and κ(T3,T3)=1.

[F3]
[F4]

Source-free Euler–Lagrange equation for the classical SU(2) Yang–Mills action: within the adopted model, the source-free equation DA(∗ηF)=0 is equivalent to stationarity under all smooth compactly supported connection variations.

[A1]

Classical pure SU(2) Yang–Mills model: the local action density is −κ(F∧∗ηF)/(2gYM2).

Verification

1.1F1F2F3algebra

Write q=x0−x3. Since the coefficient depends only on q, dA=T3(b/ℓ)cos⁡(q/ℓ)(dx0−dx3)∧dx1. The bracket term vanishes because [T3,T3]=0, so this is F; it is not identically zero because b≠0; if b=0, both the potential and curvature vanish.

2.1A1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

The Lorentzian Hodge operator for the stated orientation gives ∗η((dx0−dx3)∧dx1)=−(dx0−dx3)∧dx2. Hence ∗ηF=−T3(b/ℓ)cos⁡(q/ℓ)(dx0−dx3)∧dx2. Its exterior derivative vanishes because differentiating its coefficient contributes a factor (dx0−dx3) already present in the wedge product; the covariant bracket term also vanishes because both Lie-algebra factors are T3. Thus DA(∗ηF)=0. The same repeated null one-form gives F∧∗ηF=0, so the action density vanishes.

3.1F1F4step 1.1step 2.1∎

By [F4] and step 2.1, the connection is stationary under every admissible compactly supported variation. The curvature is nonzero by step 1.1, so this is a nontrivial classical solution with zero Lorentzian quadratic density.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources