How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projected oscillator transition response
Example
Let with standard orthonormal basis . Fix in s and in J s. Define the diagonal Hamiltonian For real in the chosen observable unit, define the bounded transition observable and set . Let in J, , and . On a finite interval with in s, drive with a constant real field and dimensionless , where has unit J. This is a bounded projection between the first two oscillator levels, not the unbounded oscillator position.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The diagonal operator and domain, , , , , and the finite control interval and field above.
The Axiom of Choice: the trace-Gibbs supplier uses full Choice for its unbounded spectral calculus.
Self-adjoint trace-Gibbs normalization and form-energy optimization: if is self-adjoint and is trace class on an open positive interval, then its Gibbs matrix is a faithful normal density.
Bounded-commutator graph-domain Schrödinger response: for bounded self-adjoint preserving with bounded extension of , the interaction propagator preserves the graph domain, solves the strong Schrödinger equation, and the bounded-observable response formula holds.
Verification
Given: [A1], [F1], [F2], and the oscillator/control data in the Example.
Finite-support sequences are dense in , so is dense. The diagonal real operator is symmetric. If , testing the adjoint relation against each forces ; this vector belongs to exactly when . Thus and .
The Gibbs eigenvalues are , since ; hence is finite for every and [F1] applies. The Gibbs matrix is positive trace one and commutes with because both are functions of . The operator has norm ; its image lies in , so it maps into itself. Its commutator is the finite-rank bounded operator , , for .
Since only connects and , the unperturbed expectation is zero. Direct multiplication of the two nonzero matrix blocks gives , so . The constant-field convolution in [F2] is therefore Here ; the response theorem also bounds the omitted term by .
The two-dimensional space and its orthogonal complement are invariant under the constant controlled Hamiltonian. Put , , and . On , let and . Then and . Its exact propagator on this block is therefore . The initial diagonal block has entries and , with ; the complementary levels contribute zero to the expectation of . Multiplying these two-by-two matrices gives the exact expectation For this is zero, and its first derivative at is the coefficient computed in step 3.1. The formula holds on every stated finite control interval. For the consistent extension using the same constant control for all , it is nonconstant and periodic whenever , so the exact expectation has no infinite-time limit; this conclusion follows from the exact block formula, not from extrapolating the finite-time remainder. This concerns the bounded projected transition observable, not oscillator position or an empirical measurement.