Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Trace-class bounded-observable response — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The projected oscillator transition is a bounded operator on an infinite-dimensional Gibbs system and satisfies the stated commutator graph-domain condition. The two-level example computes its finite-time Kubo response exactly and shows persistent oscillation; neither example reports measurements or implies thermal relaxation.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Projected oscillator transition response

Example

Let H=ℓ2(N0) with standard orthonormal basis (en)n≥0. Fix ω>0 in s−1 and ℏ>0 in J s. Define the diagonal Hamiltonian Hen=ℏω(n+12)en,D(H)={c∈ℓ2:∑n≥0(n+12)2∣cn∣2<∞}. For real b0≠0 in the chosen observable unit, define the bounded transition observable B=b0(∣e0⟩⟨e1∣+∣e1⟩⟨e0∣) and set A=B. Let β>0 in J−1, q=e−βℏω, and Δ=ℏω. On a finite interval [0,T] with T>0 in s, drive with a constant real field h(t)=h0 and dimensionless ϵ∈R, where h0B has unit J. This is a bounded projection between the first two oscillator levels, not the unbounded oscillator position.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The diagonal operator and domain, ω>0, ℏ>0, β>0, b0≠0, and the finite control interval and field above.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: the trace-Gibbs supplier uses full Choice for its unbounded spectral calculus.

[F1]

Self-adjoint trace-Gibbs normalization and form-energy optimization: if H is self-adjoint and e−sH is trace class on an open positive interval, then its Gibbs matrix is a faithful normal density.

[F2]

Bounded-commutator graph-domain Schrödinger response: for bounded self-adjoint B preserving D(H) with bounded extension of [H,B], the interaction propagator preserves the graph domain, solves the strong Schrödinger equation, and the bounded-observable response formula holds.

Verification

technique · diagonal spectral calculation followed by the graph-domain response theorem

Given: [A1], [F1], [F2], and the oscillator/control data in the Example.

1.1givenconstructalgebra

Finite-support sequences are dense in ℓ2, so D(H) is dense. The diagonal real operator is symmetric. If y∈D(H∗), testing the adjoint relation against each en forces (H∗y)n=ℏω(n+12)yn; this vector belongs to ℓ2 exactly when ∑n(n+12)2∣yn∣2<∞. Thus D(H∗)=D(H) and H∗=H.

2.1givenA1F1step 1.1algebra

The Gibbs eigenvalues are (1−q)qn, since ∑n≥0e−βℏω(n+1/2)=e−βℏω/2/(1−q); hence Zβ=e−βℏω/2/(1−q) is finite for every β>0 and [F1] applies. The Gibbs matrix is positive trace one and commutes with U(t) because both are functions of H. The operator B has norm ∣b0∣; its image lies in span⁡{e0,e1}⊂D(H), so it maps D(H) into itself. Its commutator C=[H,B] is the finite-rank bounded operator Ce0=Δb0e1, Ce1=−Δb0e0, Cen=0 for n≥2.

3.1givenF2step 2.1algebra

Since B only connects e0 and e1, the unperturbed expectation Tr⁡(σβαt(B)) is zero. Direct multiplication of the two nonzero matrix blocks gives Tr⁡(σβ[αt(B),B])=−2ib02(1−q)2sin⁡(ωt), so RBB(t)=2b02(1−q)2sin⁡(ωt)/ℏ. The constant-field convolution in [F2] is therefore ϵh0∫0tRBB(u) du=2ϵh0b02(1−q)2Δ(1−cos⁡(ωt)). Here CT=2∣h0∣∣b0∣T/ℏ; the response theorem also bounds the omitted term by ∣b0∣(∣ϵ∣CT)2e∣ϵ∣CT/2.

4.1givenstep 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

The two-dimensional space V=span⁡{e0,e1} and its orthogonal complement are invariant under the constant controlled Hamiltonian. Put d=Δ/2>0, g=ϵh0b0, and R=(d2+g2)1/2>0. On V, let X=(0110) and Z=diag⁡(1,−1). Then H−ϵh0B=ΔI−dZ−gX and (dZ+gX)2=R2I. Its exact propagator on this block is therefore e−itΔ/ℏ[cos⁡(Rt/ℏ)I+isin⁡(Rt/ℏ)(dZ+gX)/R]. The initial diagonal block has entries p0=1−q and p1=(1−q)q, with p0−p1=(1−q)2; the complementary levels contribute zero to the expectation of B. Multiplying these two-by-two matrices gives the exact expectation Tr⁡(ρϵ(t)B)=b0gd(1−q)2R2(1−cos⁡(2Rt/ℏ)). For ϵ=0 this is zero, and its first derivative at ϵ=0 is the coefficient computed in step 3.1. The formula holds on every stated finite control interval. For the consistent extension using the same constant control for all t≥0, it is nonconstant and periodic whenever ϵh0b0≠0, so the exact expectation has no infinite-time limit; this conclusion follows from the exact block formula, not from extrapolating the finite-time remainder. This concerns the bounded projected transition observable, not oscillator position or an empirical measurement.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Exactly computed two-level Kubo response

Example

Let H=C2, Δ>0 in J, and ℏ>0 in J s; put ω=Δ/ℏ. Set X=(0110),Y=(0−ii0),Z=(100−1),H=Δ2Z. Take A=B=X (dimensionless), β>0 in J−1, and a finite interval [0,T] with T>0 in s. Use dimensionless ϵ∈R and a constant real control h(t)=h0 such that h0X has unit J. Write σ=e−βH/Tr⁡(e−βH) and x=βΔ/2; the initial Gibbs matrix is fixed while the control acts.

energyE¡=¡¢=2E+=¢=2X;~!=¢

The horizontal lines denote the two eigenvalues of H; the arrows mark the off-diagonal matrix elements of X and their Bohr frequency ω=Δ/ℏ. The drawing encodes the finite transition structure only; all response claims below follow from the explicit matrix calculation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The matrices, Δ>0, ℏ>0, β>0, and real constant h0.

[F1]

Finite-time Kubo formula with norm remainder: the fixed-Gibbs finite-time response uses RXX(t)=iℏTr⁡(σ[αt(X),X]) and has the stated quadratic remainder.

[F2]

Finite spectral balance and distributional fluctuation response: the equilibrium correlation has a positive atomic spectral measure, detailed balance, and the stated zero-frequency qualification.

[F3]

Duhamel derivative and finite Kubo–Mori response: differentiating a finite noncommuting Gibbs family gives the Kubo–Mori covariance; it equals β times the ordinary variance only in the commuting case.

Verification

technique · multiply the Pauli matrices, then apply the finite response and static-derivative suppliers

Given: [F1]–[F3] and the two-level data above.

1.1givenconstructalgebra

Direct multiplication gives X2=Y2=Z2=I, YX=−iZ, and [Z,X]=2iY. The Gibbs matrix is σ=(I−tanh⁡(x)Z)/2, so Tr⁡(σZ)=−tanh⁡(x) and Tr⁡(σX)=0.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1algebra

Conjugation by e−itH/ℏ yields αt(X)=Xcos⁡(ωt)−Ysin⁡(ωt). Hence CXX(t)=Tr⁡(σαt(X)X)=cos⁡(ωt)−itanh⁡(x)sin⁡(ωt) and RXX(t)=2tanh⁡(x)sin⁡(ωt)/ℏ. The spectral measure has its two transition atoms at ±ω and satisfies SXX(−ω)=e−βΔSXX(ω), in agreement with [F2].

2.2givenF3step 1.1algebra

For comparison, the static Gibbs family for H(h)=H−hX has Z(h)=2cosh⁡(β(Δ/2)2+h2). By [F3], ∂hlog⁡Z(h)=βTr⁡(σhX), so Tr⁡(σhX)=h(Δ/2)2+h2tanh⁡ ⁣(β(Δ/2)2+h2) and ∂hTr⁡(σhX)∣h=0=2Δtanh⁡(x). Since Var⁡σ(X)=1 and tanh⁡(x)<x for x>0 (the derivative of x−tanh⁡x is tanh⁡2x>0), this static susceptibility is strictly below βVar⁡σ(X)=β. Thus the noncommuting Gibbs derivative is not replaced by β times ordinary variance.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

Integrating the kernel for constant h0 gives δ⟨X(t)⟩=2ϵh0Δtanh⁡(x)(1−cos⁡(ωt))+rϵ(t), with ∣rϵ(t)∣≤(∣ϵ∣CT)2e∣ϵ∣CT/2 and CT=2∣h0∣T/ℏ, because ∥X∥=1.

4.1givenstep 3.1step 2.2∎

When ϵh0≠0, the leading response oscillates without a long-time limit; the finite-time theorem does not imply relaxation to the static Gibbs derivative. This is an exact model calculation, not an observation.

Sources