Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Formal nonrelativistic limit of the repulsive Coulomb scattering angle

Physical scope

Formal c-to-infinity limit of exact model formulas at fixed rest mass, Coulomb coupling, Newtonian kinetic energy, and impact parameter. It is not a measured comparison or empirical validation.

Example

Fix m,κ,K,b>0 and let c→∞ with Wc=mc2+K and Jc=bAc, where Ac=(Wc2−m2c4)/c2. For sufficiently large c, Jc>κ/c because Jc2−κ2/c2→2mKb2>0.

  1. The relativistic scattering angle tends to the nonrelativistic repulsive Coulomb angle:

    θc⟶2arctan⁡(κ2Kb).

    This agrees with Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and Δ=π/2−arctan⁡(κ/(2Eb)) at kinetic energy K and impact parameter b.

  2. The limit compares ideal mathematical model formulas while holding the indicated parameters fixed; it supplies no experimental evidence for either model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Fixed m,κ,K,b>0, the adopted fixed-source SI Coulomb action model with qQ>0, the flat massive-particle momentum postulate, ACω for the canonical tangent-bundle smooth structure, the relativistic branch formula, and the exact nonrelativistic repulsive Coulomb scattering formula.

[A1]

Assume exactly countable choice ACω for the canonical tangent-bundle smooth structure, as required by the action-variation and local-IVP suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[A2]

In the flat specialization adopt the massive-particle momentum postulate used by the physical scattering theorem (Adopted massive-particle momentum, observer measurement and isolated-collision conservation).

[F1]

For W>mc2 and J>κ/c, the mathematical branch proposition and conditional physical theorem give θ=π−2(J/C)arctan⁡(CA/d) (Exact repulsive relativistic Coulomb scattering branch, Exact repulsive relativistic Coulomb scattering in the fixed-source test-body model).

[F2]

The nonrelativistic repulsive Coulomb angle for energy K>0 and impact parameter b>0 is 2arctan⁡(κ/(2Kb)) (Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and Δ=π/2−arctan⁡(κ/(2Eb))).

[F3]

For y>0, arctan⁡y+arctan⁡(1/y)=π/2 (Reciprocal positive arguments of the principal inverse tangent); the principal inverse tangent is continuous (The principal inverse tangent arctan⁡:R→(−π/2,π/2)).

Verification

technique · take limits of the three dimensionless factors in the exact relativistic formula and use the positive-argument tangent identity
1.1givenA1A2F1F3algebra

With Wc=mc2+K, Ac=2mK+K2c2,dc=Wcκc2=mκ+Kκc2,Cc=Jc2−κ2c2=2mKb2+K2b2−κ2c2. Thus Jc/Cc→1 and CcAc/dc→2Kb/κ. By [F3] and continuity, [F1] gives θc→π−2arctan⁡(2Kb/κ). Apply [F3] with y=2Kb/κ>0 to rewrite this limit as 2arctan⁡(κ/(2Kb)). This limit retains [A1] and [A2] only when it is read through the physical model theorem.

2.1step 1.1F2given∎

The final expression is exactly [F2]. The agreement is a formal limit with fixed model parameters, not a measured result or validation of the model assumptions.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources