How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Formal nonrelativistic limit of the repulsive Coulomb scattering angle
Formal c-to-infinity limit of exact model formulas at fixed rest mass, Coulomb coupling, Newtonian kinetic energy, and impact parameter. It is not a measured comparison or empirical validation.
Example
Fix and let with and , where . For sufficiently large , because .
-
The relativistic scattering angle tends to the nonrelativistic repulsive Coulomb angle:
This agrees with Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and at kinetic energy and impact parameter .
-
The limit compares ideal mathematical model formulas while holding the indicated parameters fixed; it supplies no experimental evidence for either model.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Fixed , the adopted fixed-source SI Coulomb action model with , the flat massive-particle momentum postulate, for the canonical tangent-bundle smooth structure, the relativistic branch formula, and the exact nonrelativistic repulsive Coulomb scattering formula.
Assume exactly countable choice for the canonical tangent-bundle smooth structure, as required by the action-variation and local-IVP suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
In the flat specialization adopt the massive-particle momentum postulate used by the physical scattering theorem (Adopted massive-particle momentum, observer measurement and isolated-collision conservation).
For and , the mathematical branch proposition and conditional physical theorem give (Exact repulsive relativistic Coulomb scattering branch, Exact repulsive relativistic Coulomb scattering in the fixed-source test-body model).
The nonrelativistic repulsive Coulomb angle for energy and impact parameter is (Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and ).
For , (Reciprocal positive arguments of the principal inverse tangent); the principal inverse tangent is continuous (The principal inverse tangent ).
Verification
With , Thus and . By [F3] and continuity, [F1] gives . Apply [F3] with to rewrite this limit as . This limit retains [A1] and [A2] only when it is read through the physical model theorem.
The final expression is exactly [F2]. The agreement is a formal limit with fixed model parameters, not a measured result or validation of the model assumptions.
Depends on
Exact repulsive relativistic Coulomb scattering in the fixed-source test-body model
Exact repulsive relativistic Coulomb scattering branch
Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and
Reciprocal positive arguments of the principal inverse tangent
The principal inverse tangent
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Adopted massive-particle momentum, observer measurement and isolated-collision conservation