Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact repulsive relativistic Coulomb scattering branch

Physical scope

Exact mathematical scattering result for the defined one-body Hamiltonian phase system on a noncolliding repulsive branch. It asserts no electromagnetic derivation, recoil, radiation, measurement, or empirical applicability.

Statement

Consider the phase system of Repulsive relativistic Coulomb Hamiltonian phase system with m,c,κ>0. Let a trajectory have conserved energy W>mc2 and angular-momentum magnitude J:=∣x×p∣>κ/c. Define

A:=W2−m2c4c2>0,d:=Wκc2>0,C:=J2−κ2c2>0.

Then its squared radial momentum is

pr2=Q(u):=A−2du−Cu2,u:=1/r.

There is a unique positive simple root

u∗:=d2+CA−dC,0<u∗<W−mc2κ.

Every trajectory through the turning data r∗=1/u∗, pr=0, and ∣x×p∣=J has a unique maximal extension defined for all system times t∈R, in the extension sense of Repulsive relativistic Coulomb Hamiltonian phase system. This extension has one noncollision periapsis and is asymptotically incoming and outgoing. Its impact parameter, defined as the limiting perpendicular distance of either asymptote from the force center, is

b=JA>0.

If Δ is the positive azimuthal change from either asymptote to periapsis, then

Δ=JCarctan⁡(CAd),θ:=π−2Δ∈(0,π),

where θ is the angle between the incoming and outgoing asymptotic velocity vectors. This formula is for the repulsive branch J>κ/c; it does not cover J≤κ/c.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The phase system on D, fixed m,c,κ>0, a trajectory with H=W>mc2 and ∣J∣>κ/c, and the Euclidean norm and cross product of R3.

[F1]

The system equations are x˙=c2p/E(p) and p˙=κx/r3, with H=E(p)+κ/r, pr=x⋅p/r, and J=x×p (Repulsive relativistic Coulomb Hamiltonian phase system).

[F2]

A smooth vector field has a unique local solution through each initial state, and a solution staying in a compact subset of its open domain near a finite endpoint extends past that endpoint (Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems, Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it).

[F6]

lim⁡z→0sin⁡z/z=1 (The sine-to-angle limit at the origin).

Proof

technique · conserve the Hamiltonian and angular momentum, factor the radial polynomial, construct the global branch by ODE continuation, and integrate the exact polar equation
1.1givenF1algebra

Along any solution of [F1], H˙=∇xH⋅x˙+∇pH⋅p˙=∇xH⋅∇pH−∇pH⋅∇xH=0, and J˙=x˙×p+x×p˙=0 because x˙ is parallel to p and p˙ is parallel to x. Thus W and J are constant. With u=1/r, the energy relation gives E=W−κu, so c2∣p∣2=(W−κu)2−m2c4, and ∣p∣2=pr2+J2/r2. Rearranging yields pr2=A−2du−Cu2=Q(u).

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra

Since Q(0)=A>0 and Q((W−mc2)/κ)=−J2((W−mc2)/κ)2<0, continuity gives a positive root below (W−mc2)/κ. The other root is negative because the product of the roots is −A/C<0, so the positive root is unique. The quadratic formula gives the displayed u∗; Q′(u∗)=−2(d+Cu∗)<0, hence the root is simple. At this root E=W−κu∗>mc2, so the momentum is real and the point lies in D.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F2F5algebra

At any turning state choose orthonormal axes e1=x/r∗ and e2=p/∣p∣, and translate its time to 0; then x=r∗e1 and p=(J/r∗)e2. The root equation in 2.1 gives H(x,p)=W, and the smooth field in [F1] satisfies [F2], giving a local solution. By [F2], all solutions through this full initial state agree on their overlapping intervals; their union is a solution on the union interval, is locally a solution near every interior point, and is the unique maximal extension. Its interval is open, since local existence at an included finite endpoint would extend it. Every trajectory through the state is a restriction of this extension by uniqueness. Along it, direct differentiation gives p˙r=c2J2/(Er3)+κ/r2>0 everywhere, so [F5] makes pr strictly increasing with its unique zero at 0; consequently r decreases before the turn and increases after it. On every allowed state 0<u≤u∗<(W−mc2)/κ, hence r≥r∗ and mc2<E=W−κu<W, which gives ∣p∣<A. Also ∣x˙∣<c, so near any finite interval endpoint x remains bounded and ∣x∣≥r∗; together with the momentum bound this gives compact containment in D. Applying [F2] at a finite right endpoint, or to the reversed-time field at a finite left endpoint, would properly extend the maximal solution, a contradiction. Its interval is therefore R. Each monotone radial tail must be unbounded: if it had a finite limit greater than r∗, then Q(1/r) and E would give ∣r˙∣ a positive lower bound, contradicting that finite limit. Thus r→∞ on both tails and r˙=c2pr/E→±c2A/W, so r grows linearly there. Then ∣p˙∣=κ/r2 is integrable, and p converges to incoming and outgoing limits of magnitude A. Since the tangential momentum has magnitude J/r→0, the limiting momenta point along the limiting radial directions, giving the two asymptotic velocity directions.

3.2step 1.1step 2.1F1F3F4algebra

Orient the orbital plane so its polar angle increases with J=∣x×p∣. Then φ˙=c2J/(Er2) and r˙=c2pr/E, so ∣dφ/du∣=J/Q(u) and the half-angle is Δ=∫0u∗J du/A−2du−Cu2. Completing the square gives Q=(d2+CA)/C−C(u+d/C)2. With y=(Cu+d)/d2+CA, the root relation in 2.1 makes the endpoints d/d2+CA and 1, and the integral becomes (J/C)∫dy/1−y2=(J/C)[arcsin⁡y]d/d2+CA1. Put α=arctan⁡(CA/d)∈(0,π/2). Since tan⁡α=CA/d, the Pythagorean identity and positivity of sine and cosine in [F3] give cos⁡α=d/d2+CA; the quarter-turn identity then gives arcsin⁡(d/d2+CA)=π/2−α because both angles lie in [0,π/2]. The evaluated integral is therefore Δ=(J/C)arctan⁡(CA/d).

4.1step 3.2F3algebra

Put α=κ/(cJ)∈(0,1), q=1−α2∈(0,1), and β=1−m2c4/W2∈(0,1). If a=arcsin⁡q, then [F3] gives a∈(0,π/2), sin⁡a=q, and cos⁡a=1−q2>0; hence tan⁡a=q/1−q2 and the principal inverse identity gives a=arctan⁡(q/1−q2). The formula from 3.2 becomes Δ=q−1arctan⁡(βq/1−q2); since 0<β<1 and arctan⁡ is strictly increasing, 0<Δ<arcsin⁡(q)/q.

5.1step 4.1F3F5algebra

Define g(x)=sin⁡x−2x/π on [0,π/2]. By [F3], g(0)=g(π/2)=0 and g′′(x)=−sin⁡x≤0. Since g′ is differentiable and g′′≤0, [F5] makes g′ nonincreasing. For any 0<x<π/2, [F5] applied to g on [0,x] and [x,π/2] gives g(x)/x=g′(ξ1) and −g(x)/(π/2−x)=g′(ξ2) for some 0<ξ1<x<ξ2<π/2. Thus g(x)/x≥−g(x)/(π/2−x); multiplying by the positive x(π/2−x) yields g(x)≥0. Taking x=arcsin⁡q gives arcsin⁡q≤πq/2, hence step 4.1 gives Δ<π/2.

6.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1F6algebra

On either asymptotic tail, ∣dφ/dr∣=J/(r2Q(1/r))∼J/(Ar2). For every 0<ϵ<1, the definition of this limit bounds the integrand between (1−ϵ)J/(Ar2) and (1+ϵ)J/(Ar2) for all sufficiently large radii; integration from r to infinity gives the angular gap δ(r)∼J/(Ar). Step 3.1's asymptotic momentum and [F6] now give rsin⁡δ(r)→J/A, the limiting perpendicular distance of each asymptotic line from the force center; this is b. The incoming momentum points opposite its limiting radial direction and the outgoing momentum along its own, so their angular separation is θ=π−2Δ∈(0,π) by step 5.1.

7.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1given∎

The unique noncollision turning branch, impact parameter and exact deflection angle follow from steps 1.1–6.1 under the stated hypotheses W>mc2 and J>κ/c. This proves the selected C>0 branch, without asserting that J>κ/c is necessary for a positive turning root.

Remarks

  • The potential is repulsive because κ>0; the formula is not an attractive Coulomb capture result.
  • The exact angular scattering formula does not provide a closed time-parametrized orbit. A two-body treatment, recoil, radiation reaction, and finite-source effects are outside this phase system.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources