Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Perfect fluid components in its rest frame and in a moving frame

Example

Let Tab=(ε+P)nanb+Pηab be the perfect-fluid tensor of Perfect-fluid divergence identity and its equivalence with the energy-balance and Euler equations, with n future unit. In an inertial frame in which n=e0 (fluid at rest) the components are T00=ε, T11=T22=T33=P and all other components zero. Under the passive boost along x1 with parameter β, ∣β∣<1, γ=(1−β2)−1/2, the primed components become T′00=γ2(ε+P)−P,T′01=T′10=−γ2(ε+P)β,T′11=γ2(ε+P)β2+P,T′22=T′33=P, all remaining components zero, and the observer contraction Tab(e0′)a(e0′)b=T′00 differs from ε by (γ2−1)(ε+P).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Rank-two component law T′ab=ΛacΛbdTcd under the inertial transition. (Transformation of tensor, covector, derivative and current components under affine Lorentz maps,(iii))

[F2]

Observer decomposition: for a continuous symmetric field T and future unit observer n the contraction ε=Tabnanb is the energy density component of the unique observer decomposition, and in an adapted frame with n=e0 it equals T00. (Observer decomposition of a symmetric stress-energy tensor)

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

Rest-frame components. With n=e0, na=δ0a and η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1): T00=(ε+P)(n0)2+Pη00=(ε+P)−P=ε; Tii=(ε+P)(ni)2+Pηii=0+P=P for i=1,2,3; and T0i=(ε+P)n0ni+Pη0i=0.

2.1F2step 1.1

Observer contraction in the rest frame. By [F2] applied to the observer e0 the contraction is ε=Tab(e0)a(e0)b=T00, consistent with step 1.1.

2.2F1step 1.1

Boosted components. The boost matrix has Λ00=Λ11=γ, Λ01=Λ10=−γβ and preserves the other two spatial directions. Substituting the rest-frame components of step 1.1 into [F1] and summing the nonzero terms gives T′00=γ2ε+γ2β2P=γ2(ε+P)−P, T′01=γ(−γβ)ε+(−γβ)γP=−γ2(ε+P)β, T′11=γ2β2ε+γ2P=γ2(ε+P)β2+P, T′22=T′33=P, T′23=0 and T′02=T′03=T′12=T′13=0.

3.1F2step 2.2given

The boosted observer contraction. Because the passive boost B(β) is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map (The passive boost is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map with inverse B(-beta)), the primed basis is an orthonormal future-oriented frame, so the vector e0′ with primed components e0′a=δ0a is future unit; by [F2] its energy contraction is ε′:=Tab(e0′)a(e0′)b=T′00=γ2(ε+P)−P, so ε′−ε=(γ2−1)(ε+P): this difference vanishes exactly when β=0 (i.e. γ=1) or ε+P=0, and ε′≥ε whenever ε+P≥0; no positivity of ε+P is assumed. The transverse diagonal components remain P.

4.1step 2.2step 3.1∎

The computation uses the observer decomposition to identify the numerical contraction T′00 as the energy density of the boosted observer; it asserts no equation of state, no positivity of ε or P and no measurement.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources