Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonsingular velocity Hessian is equivalent to invertibility of the Legendre derivative, hence gives a local C^1 inverse

Statement

Let L:J×U×Rn→R be a fibre-full time-dependent Lagrangian chart of class C2 with Legendre map FL (The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity). Then:

  1. FL is C1 and at every (t,q,v) its total derivative acts on (τ,δq,δv)∈R×Rn×Rn by

DFL(t,q,v)(τ,δq,δv)=(τ, δq, Lvt(t,q,v)τ+Lvq(t,q,v)δq+Lvv(t,q,v)δv);

  1. DFL(t,q,v) is invertible (Invertible Euclidean linear maps) if and only if det⁡Lvv(t,q,v)≠0; consequently FL is regular at (t,q,v) in the sense of The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity exactly when its derivative there is invertible;
  2. if Lvv(t0,q0,v0) is nonsingular, then FL is a local C1 diffeomorphism at (t0,q0,v0): there are open neighbourhoods W∋(t0,q0,v0) and W′∋FL(t0,q0,v0) such that FL∣W:W→W′ is a C1 diffeomorphism (Continuously differentiable maps, local inverses, and local diffeomorphisms).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open sets J⊆R, U⊆Rn, the C2 Lagrangian L, a point (t0,q0,v0)∈J×U×Rn, and the notation Lvt,Lvq,Lvv for the matrices of partial derivatives of Lv with respect to the three blocks (The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn, Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).

[F1]

Lv is of class C1 because L is of class C2 (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms); hence Lv is totally differentiable everywhere with derivative the linear map given by its Jacobian matrix (Lvt Lvq Lvv), and that derivative depends continuously on the point (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(∥h∥2) remainder).

[F2]

The chain rule for total derivatives (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)) computes derivatives of composites; the derivative of the identity-like map (t,q,v)↦(t,q) is the projection (τ,δq,δv)↦(τ,δq), and scalar multiplication of a differentiable map by 1 is the map itself.

[F3]

The Euclidean inverse function theorem (The Euclidean inverse function theorem): a C1 map between open subsets of Rm whose derivative at a point is invertible has a local C1 inverse there, in the sense of Continuously differentiable maps, local inverses, and local diffeomorphisms, with derivative Dg(y)=Df(g(y))−1.

[F4]

Linear algebra of block maps (Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, Invertible Euclidean linear maps, Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes): a linear map L presented in blocks is injective iff its kernel is trivial, and on finite-dimensional spaces injectivity is equivalent to invertibility for endomorphisms: Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T gives full image dimension from a zero kernel, hence a bijection whose inverse is linear and two-sided.

Proof

technique · direct; compute the block derivative, reduce invertibility to invertibility of the velocity Hessian by an explicit kernel computation, and apply the inverse function theorem
1.1F1F2algebra

By [F1] the map Lv is totally differentiable, and by [F2] the Legendre map FL(t,q,v)=(t,q,Lv(t,q,v)) is totally differentiable with the displayed action on (τ,δq,δv): the first two components reproduce τ and δq, and the third is the sum of the three block contributions. This proves clause 1.

1.2F2F4algebra

Clause 2, kernel computation: for a linear map L of the displayed block form, L(τ,δq,δv)=(0,0,0) holds iff τ=0, δq=0 and Lvvδv=0. Hence L has trivial kernel iff Lvvδv=0 implies δv=0, i.e. iff Lvv has trivial kernel. By [F4] trivial kernel is equivalent to invertibility of L, and of the square matrix Lvv; and a square matrix over R is invertible if and only if its determinant is a unit of R, i.e. nonzero (A positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring is invertible if and only if its determinant is a unit). This proves clause 2.

2.1F3step 1.1step 1.2

Clause 3: assume Lvv(t0,q0,v0) nonsingular. By clause 2 the derivative DFL(t0,q0,v0) is invertible, and by clause 1 FL is C1; [F3] therefore supplies open neighbourhoods W of (t0,q0,v0) and W′ of its image such that FL∣W:W→W′ is a C1 diffeomorphism.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

The three clauses are established.

Remarks

  • The determinant criterion in clause 2 is the reason the single scalar condition det⁡Lvv≠0 carries all the local invertibility information: the first two blocks of the derivative are already the identity. No determinant of a larger block matrix is needed, because the kernel computation of step 1.2 is performed directly.

  • Invertibility of the derivative is local. It neither asserts that FL is globally injective nor that it is surjective onto the momentum fibre; those global properties are the hyperregularity hypothesis of The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources