Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The centered second difference differs from the second derivative by at most Ma2/12 when ∣u′′′′∣≤M

Statement

Let J⊆R be a nonempty open interval (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), let u:J→R be of class C4 (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms), let x∈J and a>0 satisfy [x−a,x+a]⊆J, and put

M:=sup⁡s∈[x−a,x+a]∣u′′′′(s)∣<+∞.

Then

∣u(x+a)−2u(x)+u(x−a)a2−u′′(x)∣≤M a212.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open interval J, the C4 function u, the point x∈J and a>0 with [x−a,x+a]⊆J, and the bound M.

[F3]

(Second-order integral remainder.) If φ∈C2 on an interval containing [0,a], then φ(a)=φ(0)+φ′(0)a+∫0a(a−s)φ′′(s) ds. By the product rule, dds((a−s)φ′(s))=−φ′(s)+(a−s)φ′′(s); integrating this identity with [F1] and rearranging gives the displayed formula.

Proof

technique · direct; apply the second-order integral remainder to two affine scans of $u$ and bound the double remainder
1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

Fix s∈[0,a] and apply [F3] to φ+(r):=u(x+r) on [0,s]: since φ+′′(r)=u′′(x+r) and φ+′(0)=u′(x), u(x+s)=u(x)+u′(x)s+∫0s(s−r)u′′(x+r) dr. Applying [F3] to φ−(r):=u(x−r) on [0,s], with φ−′′(r)=u′′(x−r), u(x−s)=u(x)−u′(x)s+∫0s(s−r)u′′(x−r) dr.

2.1step 1.1F1F3algebra

Add the two identities of step 1.1 with s=a and subtract 2u(x): u(x+a)−2u(x)+u(x−a)=∫0a(a−s)(u′′(x+s)+u′′(x−s))ds. Apply [F3] once more to the C2 function r↦ψ(r):=u′′(x+r)+u′′(x−r) on [0,s], whose value and first derivative at 0 are ψ(0)=2u′′(x) and ψ′(0)=0: u′′(x+s)+u′′(x−s)=2u′′(x)+∫0s(s−r)(ψ′′(r))dr=2u′′(x)+∫0s(s−r)(u′′′′(x+r)+u′′′′(x−r))dr.

3.1step 2.1F1F2algebra∎

Substitute step 2.1 into step 2.1's first identity to obtain u(x+a)−2u(x)+u(x−a)−a2u′′(x)=∫0a(a−s)∫0s(s−r)(u′′′′(x+r)+u′′′′(x−r))dr ds. Bounding the inner integral by 2Ms2/2=Ms2 via [F2] and [F1] (monotone bounds for the Riemann integral), and then ∫0a(a−s)Ms2ds=Ma4/12, gives ∣u(x+a)−2u(x)+u(x−a)−a2u′′(x)∣≤Ma412. Dividing by a2>0 proves the statement.

Remarks

  • The constant 1/12 is sharp for the class C4 with a uniform fourth-derivative bound: the estimate is an equality for a quartic profile u(x)=x4/24 with u′′′′=1 after comparing the two required bounds, and the factor arises solely from ∫0a(a−s)s2ds. The lemma states only the upper bound.

  • Only derivatives up to order four on the closed interval [x−a,x+a] are used; the function need not be periodic and no boundary conditions enter.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources