Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cohomology ring of infinite complex projective space

Statement

Assume AC. Identify CP∞=Gr⁡1(C∞), the space of complex lines in C∞, and let u=e(γR)∈H2(CP∞;Z) be the class of the tautological complex line. Then H2k(CP∞;Z)=Z⋅uk,H2k+1(CP∞;Z)=0(k≥0), so H∗(CP∞;Z)=Z[u] is a polynomial ring; and Hk(CP∞;Z) is free of rank one for even k and zero for odd k, in particular finitely generated in every degree.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed, exactly as inherited from the cellular comparison (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

The Schubert cells of Gr⁡n(FN) are the open cells e(a)≅Fd(a) of complex dimension d(a)=∑i(ai−i) and real dimension 2d(a); for n=1 and N≥1 the symbols are the integers a1=1,…,N, giving one cell in each real dimension 2k, 0≤k≤N−1 (Schubert cells in real and complex Grassmannians).

[F2]

The Schubert strata form finite CW structures on the Gr⁡n(FN), their inclusions are cellular subcomplex inclusions, and their union is a CW structure on Gr⁡n(F∞) in which every finite subcomplex lies in a finite stage (Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure).

[F3]

Cellular cochains compute singular cohomology with local coefficients; with the trivial local system and coefficients in a commutative ring this is ordinary singular cohomology, and the cellular cochain group in degree k is the dual of the free cellular chain group on the k-cells (Cellular cochains compute cohomology with local coefficients, Cellular homology, Singular cohomology with coefficients).

[F4]

Cellular chains compute singular homology (Cellular homology computes singular homology).

[F5]

For each N one has H∗(CPN;Z)=Z[x]/(xN+1) with x=e(γR) and the standard inclusions pulling x back to x (Integral cohomology ring of complex projective space).

[F6]

The tautological complex line on Gr⁡1(C∞) restricts along every finite-stage inclusion to the finite tautological line. Its underlying real rank-two bundle has the complex orientation, and its Euler class is natural under these orientation-preserving pullbacks (Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles, The complex orientation of the underlying real bundle, Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class, Naturality, orientation sign, and Whitney product for Euler classes).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: AC and the identification CP∞=Gr⁡1(C∞).

1.1F1F2

Cell structure: by [F1] with n=1 the finite Grassmannians CPN=Gr⁡1(CN+1) have exactly one cell in each real dimension 0,2,…,2N, and by [F2] their union CP∞ is a CW complex with exactly one cell in each even dimension and none in odd dimensions.

2.1F3F4step 1.1

The cellular complex: by [F3] the cellular cochain complex of CP∞ with Z coefficients has C2k=Z and C2k+1=0 for all k≥0; in particular every differential of the complex is zero, so H2k(CP∞;Z)=Z and H2k+1(CP∞;Z)=0. By [F4] the cellular chain complex likewise gives H2k(CP∞;Z)=Z, H2k+1=0, hence freeness and finite generation in each degree.

3.1F3F5F6step 1.1step 2.1

Generators: by [F6], naturality of the Euler class identifies the restriction of u=e(γR) along CPk↪CP∞ with the finite-stage class x. By [F5], H∗(CPk;Z)=Z[x]/(xk+1) and xk generates H2k. Hence the restriction of uk is xk≠0, so uk≠0 in the infinite cyclic group H2k(CP∞;Z) of step 2.1. Moreover the cellular restriction to the 2k-skeleton sends the degree-2k cellular coordinate isomorphically to the sole degree-2k cell, so this nonzero restriction has coefficient ±1; thus uk is a generator.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1

Ring structure: the multiplication is generated by u in degree two, and by step 3.1 each power uk is a generator of the infinite cyclic group H2k; therefore H∗(CP∞;Z)=Z[u] as a graded ring, which with step 2.1 gives the full assertion.

5.1A1F3step 4.1∎

Boundary cases. For k=0 the statement reads H0=Z, the class u0=1 being a generator; the empty space does not occur, and the coefficient ring Z is nonzero. The degrees are unbounded above, but each degree is a single cyclic group, so no finiteness in dimension is asserted. The trivial line u=0 occurs only over the empty base, which is excluded. AC enters only through [A1].

Source notes

Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, section 3.2 and Example 4.42 (printed pp. 221-222), computes the integral cohomology of CPn and its stabilization: one cell in each even dimension, so the cohomology is Z[u] with u of degree two. The proof above uses the cellular comparison and the finite-stage ring identification, avoiding any infinite Kunneth or limit argument.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources