Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Integral cohomology ring of complex projective space

Statement

Assume AC. For every N≥0 identify CPN=Gr⁡1(CN+1), the space of complex lines in CN+1, and let γ be the tautological complex line with x=e(γR)∈H2(CPN;Z) its Euler class in the complex orientation. Then, as a graded ring, H∗(CPN;Z)=Z[x]/(xN+1), the class x generating each even degree and the odd groups vanishing; for 0≤m≤N the standard inclusion CPm↪CPN, induced by Cm+1⊆CN+1, pulls x back to x.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed, exactly as inherited from the Gysin and coefficient suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

For an algebraically closed field k one has Pkn=(kn+1∖{0})/k× with classes [a0:⋯:an]; for k=C this is the space of complex lines in Cn+1 with its standard topology.

[F2]

Gr⁡1(CN+1) is the space of complex lines with the quotient topology, its tautological bundle is γ, and the standard inclusions Cm+1⊆CN+1 induce compatible inclusions of Grassmannians with compatible tautological bundles (Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles).

[F3]

The projective bundle and its tautological line: P(E) is the quotient of the nonzero vectors by fiberwise scaling, its tautological line has fiber the represented line, and x=e((γE)R) in the complex orientation, the class being natural under pullback (Complex projective bundle and tautological complex line, Naturality, orientation sign, and Whitney product for Euler classes).

[F4]

The unit sphere bundle of a rank-two oriented real bundle: for the complex line γ the sphere bundle S(γR) consists of the pairs (ℓ,v) with ℓ∈CPN and v∈ℓ of unit length, so the map (ℓ,v)↦v is a homeomorphism onto the unit sphere S2N+1⊆CN+1 (Complex projective bundle and tautological complex line).

[F5]

For an R-oriented numerable rank-2 bundle there is a natural Gysin long exact sequence ⋯→Hi−2(B)→ ⌣eHi(B)→p∗Hi(S(ξ))→∂Hi−1(B)→ ⌣eHi+1(B)→⋯ (Gysin long exact sequence of an oriented sphere bundle).

[F6]

The homology of spheres is H0(Sm;Z)=Z=Hm(Sm;Z) for m≥1 and zero otherwise, with supplied positive generators (Homology of spheres).

[F7]

For a free chain complex over the PID Z and coefficient group G, the universal-coefficient sequence is 0→Ext⁡1(Hn−1,G)→Hn→Hom⁡(Hn,G)→0; also H0 of a path-connected space is Z (The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID, Singular cohomology with coefficients).

[F8]

The Schubert cells give a finite CW structure on CPN=Gr⁡1(CN+1) (Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure). Its symbols are a=1,…,N+1, and the cell for a has complex dimension a−1, hence real dimension 2(a−1) (Schubert cells in real and complex Grassmannians). Thus there is one cell in each dimension 0,2,…,2N and no other cells. With no adjacent-dimensional cells, every cellular differential is zero, so cellular and singular homology are Z in precisely those degrees and zero otherwise (A CW complex with no cells in adjacent dimensions has zero cellular boundary, Cellular homology computes singular homology).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: AC, N≥0, and the identification CPN=Gr⁡1(CN+1).

1.1F1F2F3

Identification: by [F1] and [F2] the projective space of CN+1 is the space of complex lines with the tautological bundle γ, and by [F3] the projective bundle of the trivial rank-(N+1) bundle over a point is the same space with the same tautological line; hence x=e(γR) is the page's class for CPN.

1.2F4F6F7

The sphere bundle: by [F4] the pair (ℓ,v) with v a unit vector in the line ℓ determines v and is determined by it, so S(γR)≅S2N+1; by [F6] and [F7] its integral cohomology is Z in degrees 0 and 2N+1 and vanishes in all other positive degrees.

2.1F5F7F8step 1.2algebra

Apply [F7] to the free homology groups in [F8]. It gives H2k(CPN;Z)≅Z for 0≤k≤N and zero cohomology in every other degree, in particular in degrees 2N+1 and 2N+2. The Gysin sequence [F5] of the rank-two oriented bundle γR reads ⋯→Hi−2(CPN)→⌣xHi(CPN)→p∗Hi(S2N+1)→⋯. For 2≤i≤2N, step 1.2 makes the middle sphere group zero, as well as the sphere group immediately preceding Hi−2; exactness therefore makes ⌣x an isomorphism. Starting from H0=Z, these isomorphisms show that xk generates H2k for every 0≤k≤N. The independently established vanishing H2N+2=0 gives xN+1=0 without any circular appeal to the Gysin sequence.

2.2F2F3step 1.1

Inclusion compatibility: the inclusion Cm+1⊆CN+1 carries the tautological line of CPm to the restriction of the tautological line of CPN by [F2], so naturality of the Euler class [F3] gives xm=ι∗xN.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2

Ring structure: by step 2.1 the group H2k is the infinite cyclic group generated by xk for 0≤k≤N, all other groups vanish, and xN+1=0. The product satisfies xa⋅xb=xa+b, so every class is represented uniquely by a polynomial of degree at most N and the graded ring is Z[x]/(xN+1). With step 2.2 this is the assertion.

4.1A1F5step 1.2step 2.1∎

Boundary cases. For N=0 the projective space is a point, x=0 and the ring is Z[x]/(x)=Z, as required; the sphere S1 has the stated cohomology by step 1.2. For N=1 the computation gives H∗(S2)=Z[x]/(x2), the standard result. The coefficient ring Z is nonzero and the Gysin sequence is used only in degrees ≤2N+2, all of which lie in the range controlled by step 1.2. AC enters only through [A1].

Source notes

Hatcher, section 3.1, printed pp. 77-82, obtains the ring of CPN from the Gysin sequence of the circle bundle S2N+1→CPN; the proof above follows that route, using the sphere cohomology from the universal-coefficient theorem and avoiding any dependence on the projective bundle theorem or on an examples-page computation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources