Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cauchy–Riemann similarity and unique continuation under countable choice

Statement

Assume countable choice and write D=∂s+i∂t=2∂zˉ on a connected open set Ω⊂C. Let B∈Lloc∞(Ω;End⁡R(Cm)), and let v∈Wloc1,p(Ω;Cm), for some p>2, solve Dv+Bv=0 weakly. Use its continuous representative. Near every point z0 there are a continuous invertible complex matrix P, belonging locally to W1,q for every finite q>2, and a holomorphic vector function h with v=Ph. One may normalize P(z0)=I.

Consequently either v is identically zero, or all its zeros are isolated and have finite order: at a zero z0 there are an integer k≥1 and constants c,C,r>0 with c∣z−z0∣k≤∣v(z)∣≤C∣z−z0∣k(0<∣z−z0∣<r). In particular vanishing on an open set, or vanishing to infinite order at one point, forces global vanishing. The same conclusions hold for vs+J(s,t)vt+Av=0 when J is a smooth family of real complex structures and A is locally bounded; the local factor is then an invertible real matrix rather than necessarily a complex matrix.

If two smooth maps solve the same equation us+J(s,t,u)ut=0 for a smooth almost complex family on a smooth target and have matching infinite jets at one interior point, they agree everywhere on their connected common source. Agreement on an open set suffices. This assertion concerns parametrized maps and actual linear equations; it does not infer moduli transversality or an injective-point theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The weak solution, locally bounded coefficient, indicated regularity, and the smooth geometric data when that version is asserted.

[F1]

Plancherel theorem gives the L2 Fourier isometry under countable choice. The Mihlin–Hörmander Fourier multiplier theorem gives Lq boundedness, agreeing with the L2 multiplier action, of smooth homogeneous degree-zero symbols with bounded derivatives on the unit circle, for 1<q<∞.

[F2]

Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in Wk,p(Rn) supplies cutoff and mollifier approximations. Planar Sobolev continuity estimates under Countable Choice gives continuous locally bounded representatives of W1,p functions for p>2.

[F3]

Weyl's lemma for the Laplacian makes every distributional harmonic function smooth under countable choice. The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus supplies complete complex Fourier series on circles under that same axiom.

Proof

1.1givenconstructalgebra

Define K(z)=1/(πz) as a locally integrable kernel. Its distributional derivative is ∂zˉK=δ0. Here is a direct sign and normalization check, requiring no stronger-choice Stokes theorem. For a compactly supported smooth test ψ, use z=reiθ and ∂zˉ=eiθ(∂r+ir−1∂θ)/2. Then −∫K∂zˉψ dA=−12π∫02π∫0∞(ψr+ir−1ψθ) dr dθ=ψ(0). The angular term integrates to zero by periodicity; it is integrable near zero because ψθ=O(r). For bounded f supported in a disk of radius r, set Tf=K∗f. On that disk, ∥Tf∥∞≤4r∥f∥∞ by enclosing the translated integration region in the radius-2r disk and integrating 1/(π∣z∣). This map is continuous even for measurable f: cut the kernel inside a small radius, whose integral norm is arbitrarily small, and use uniform continuity of the remaining nonsingular translated kernel on bounded sets. Distributional convolution gives ∂zˉTf=f.

2.1F1F2step 1.1constructalgebra

We prove the actual Sobolev regularity of this transform. For smooth compactly supported f, Hj=∂jTf=K∗(∂jf) is continuous, bounded on compact sets, and O(∣z∣−2) at infinity. The last bound follows by subtracting K(z)∫∂jf=0 and the estimate ∣K(z−ζ)−K(z)∣≤C∣ζ∣/∣z∣2 outside twice the support radius. Thus Hj∈L2. The distributional identity DHj=2∂jf, Fourier differentiation and [F1] give H^j(ξ)=2iξjiξs−ξtf^(ξ)a.e. with Fourier convention ∂j^=2πiξj. This follows first against Schwartz tests by integration by parts and then in L2; the denominator is nonzero except at the measure-zero origin, so there is no unsupported point-mass term in this L2 identity. Each displayed symbol is smooth homogeneous of degree zero with its first two derivatives bounded on the unit circle. Therefore [F1] gives ∥∇Tf∥q≤Cq∥f∥q for every 1<q<∞. For bounded compactly supported f, use mollified compact approximants from [F2], converging simultaneously in L2 and any fixed Lq, q>2. Their transforms converge uniformly on compact sets: Hölder bounds the kernel there in Lq′, because q′<2. Their derivatives converge in Lq by the multiplier estimate. Hence Tf∈Wloc1,q with the same weak derivative formulas. This holds for every finite q>2 and for matrix entries as well.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1constructalgebra

Work on a small closed disk about z0 where ∥B∥∞ is bounded. Define a measurable complex-linear matrix C(z)=−(B(z)v(z))v(z)∗2∣v(z)∣2 when v(z)≠0, and zero otherwise. It satisfies Cv=−Bv/2 everywhere almost surely and ∥C∥≤∥B∥/2. Thus ∂zˉv=Cv. Extend C by zero off this disk. On continuous complex matrix functions on its closure use T(P)=I+T(CP). step 1.1 makes its contraction constant at most 4r∥C∥∞. Shrink r to make this less than 1/4. Iterating from I is an explicit uniformly Cauchy sequence: successive differences have geometric bounds. Its continuous limit P satisfies P=I+T(CP), with ∥P−I∥<1/3, hence is pointwise invertible by its finite-matrix Neumann series. step 2.1 proves P∈Wloc1,q for every finite q>2 and ∂zˉP=CP. No measurable choice of matrix extensions has occurred: the formula for C is specified also at the zeros.

4.1F2F3step 3.1constructalgebra

The inverse matrix belongs to the same local Sobolev spaces. Indeed P−1=∑n≥0(I−P)n converges uniformly, and its differentiated terms have Lq norms bounded by n(1/3)n−1∥dP∥q on compact subsets. Thus the series converges in W1,q and proves d(P−1)=−P−1(dP)P−1. The weak product rule follows by the mollifier approximation and the bounded continuous factors; the same argument or [F2] gives h=P−1v∈Wloc1,p. Since P is complex linear, the ordinary matrix product rule for ∂zˉ gives ∂zˉh=−P−1CP P−1v+P−1Cv=0. Thus Δh=4∂z∂zˉh=0 distributionally. By [F3] it is smooth, and its now classical Cauchy–Riemann equation makes it holomorphic. Replacing P by PP(z0)−1 and h by P(z0)h gives the stated normalization without changing the factorization.

5.1F3step 4.1constructalgebra

We detail finite order without a stronger-choice complex-analysis supplier. For a smooth holomorphic scalar component h on a round disk, its circle Fourier coefficients an(r) satisfy an′(r)=nan(r)/r, by its polar Cauchy–Riemann equation and integration by parts in the angle. Hence an(r)=cnrn. Boundedness near the center forces every negative coefficient to vanish. At a fixed smaller radius R, ∣an(R)∣≤sup⁡∣z∣=R∣h∣, so ∑n≥0cnzn converges uniformly on any still smaller disk by a geometric series. Circle Fourier completeness in [F3] identifies it with h there. Apply this componentwise. Either all vector coefficients vanish, or their least nonzero index k exists and h(z0+z)=zk(a+O(z)),a≠0. The continuous invertible factor from step 4.1 and its locally bounded inverse give the two-sided norm bound stated for v. At a zero the index is positive. In particular zeros of a nonzero local solution are isolated, and no such solution can vanish to infinite order. The set of points near which v is identically zero is open and also closed in the connected source: at a limit point of that set the local factorization has accumulating zeros, so its holomorphic factor cannot have a finite-order isolated zero and must be identically zero. This proves the global alternative and continuation assertion.

6.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1constructalgebra

For the variable principal structure, choose fixed real coordinates making J(z0)=i and set Φ(z)=(I−J(z)i)/2. At z0 it is the identity, hence is smoothly invertible nearby, and JΦ=(J+i)/2=Φi. Substitution v=Φw reduces vs+Jvt+Av=0 to Dw+Φ−1(Φs+JΦt+AΦ)w=0. The new zeroth-order matrix is locally bounded, so steps3.1–5.1 apply and give a real invertible continuous combined factor for v. Fixed complex coordinates exist by choosing a finite real complex basis; no infinite basis or extra axiom is involved.

7.1step 5.1step 6.1constructalgebra∎

Finally take two smooth solutions u1,u2 with equal value at an interior point and use a convex target coordinate ball near that value. Their coordinate difference w=u1−u2 satisfies ws+J(s,t,u1)wt+A(s,t)w=0, where A(s,t)a=(∫01dxJ(s,t,u2+λw)[a] dλ)(u2)t. This identity follows by subtracting the two actual equations; its coefficients are smooth and bounded on a smaller source disk. The variable-principal result therefore applies. Equal infinite jets give infinite-order zero of w and force equality locally. If the two maps agree on an open set, the same local argument propagates equality to its closure, and connectedness gives global equality. In the infinite-jet case first obtain that nonempty equality neighborhood and propagate it. All constructions used explicit kernels, Fourier bounds with the stated CC suppliers, geometric iteration and finite-dimensional formulas. This completes the similarity and unique-continuation assertions.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources