How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A continuous symmetric coefficient orthogonal to every compactly supported variation vanishes
Statement
Let be a smooth four-manifold, let be a smooth symmetric nondegenerate covariant -tensor field on (Smooth covariant 2-tensor fields on a smooth manifold), and let be any smooth chart, with indices . Write , let be the inverse matrix of , and define the strictly positive chart weight on . These are local matrix constructions; no signature, time orientation or orientation is assumed. A continuous covariant tensor field means a family of bilinear forms whose chart components are continuous; smooth means that they are . For a covector or vector field the same regularity convention applies to its components in the coordinate dual basis or coordinate basis, respectively. Let be a continuous symmetric covariant -tensor field on . Suppose that for every smooth symmetric covariant -tensor field on whose support is a compact subset of ,
where are the components of raised with the inverse metric and the integral is the ordinary Riemann integral of the continuous compactly supported function in the chart coordinates (The lower and upper Darboux integrals over a nondegenerate rectangle in ). Then on . Moreover, if is a continuous covector field on with for every smooth vector field on whose support is a compact subset of , then on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth four-manifold , a smooth symmetric nondegenerate covariant -tensor field , a chart with metric density , and a continuous symmetric field on with the stated orthogonality property.
In each chart is smooth: the adjugate formula writes each entry as a polynomial in the smooth divided by the nowhere-zero determinant (If is a unit, then ). Matrix multiplication gives . Thus raising and lowering are inverse operations preserving symmetry, smoothness and support. Also is smooth and positive, since the determinant is smooth, nowhere zero and has constant sign near each point.
Components prescribed smoothly with compact support inside one chart extend by zero to a smooth field on . For a covariant -tensor this follows from the smooth Jacobian transformation law of Chart independence and the transformation law of a smooth covariant 2-tensor field on overlaps; outside its closed support it is zero on a neighborhood. For vectors and covectors the same assertion follows from the coordinate-basis change and its dual: all transition coefficients are smooth (Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts). Compact support in the chart ensures smoothness at points outside the chart as well.
For there is a smooth function with on the closed ball of radius about and support in the open ball of radius ; after translating and rescaling the chart coordinates this gives, about every point , nonnegative smooth bumps supported in any prescribed coordinate ball contained in and equal to near (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls).
A continuous compactly supported function on a chart image is extended by zero to and integrated on a nondegenerate closed rectangle containing its support in its interior. The extension is continuous, hence integrable by Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in is Riemann integrable. The integral does not depend on this rectangle: extending a grid to a larger rectangle adds only zero cells, and a common containing rectangle compares any two choices. If this function is nonnegative and positive at a point, continuity gives a smaller closed rectangle and on which it is at least . A grid containing the endpoints of has lower sum at least ; the integral is at least this sum by The lower and upper Darboux integrals over a nondegenerate rectangle in , Lower and upper Darboux sums over a grid partition in , and Grid partitions of a rectangle in , their cells, refinements and mesh. A negative value is treated by changing sign.
Proof
(Nonvanishing coefficient at a point.) Suppose for contradiction that for some . Since the symmetric bilinear form is nonzero, there are with . Write , at and put , a symmetric matrix with . Replacing by if necessary, the continuous function on satisfies ; fix such an .
(A bump test field.) By continuity, on a coordinate ball . Choose with the closed coordinate ball of radius about contained in the positive region and let be the bump of [L3], equal to on the closed ball of radius and supported in the open ball of radius . Define the chart components and lower them, ; these are smooth, symmetric and supported in the compact coordinate ball of radius , so by [L2] they define a smooth symmetric tensor field on with support compact in .
(Contradiction.) For this , is continuous and nonnegative with a strictly positive value at (there , and ), so its integral over is strictly positive by [L4], contradicting the hypothesis that the integral vanishes for every such . Hence no point with exists and on , as claimed.
(Covector version.) Let be a continuous covector field with the stated property and suppose . Choose with (replacing by if necessary); by continuity (with read in the chart components) is strictly positive on a coordinate ball about . Taking the bump of [L3] equal to near and supported in a smaller ball, the chart components , extended by zero, define a smooth compactly supported vector field by [L2] applied slotwise, and by [L4], contradicting the hypothesis. Hence on ; together with step 3.1 this proves both assertions.
Remarks
-
Local form. The lemma is stated in one chart because that is the form in which the compact variation argument is applied; a global version follows by applying it on each chart of a cover, and no choice beyond finitely many charts per point is used.
-
Why compact support is needed. The bump localizes the test variation about the point where the coefficient is nonzero; without compact support inside the boundary of the chart would contribute and the conclusion could fail.
Depends on
Chart independence and the transformation law of a smooth covariant 2-tensor field
If is a unit, then
Smooth covariant 2-tensor fields on a smooth manifold
Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts
A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in is Riemann integrable
The lower and upper Darboux integrals over a nondegenerate rectangle in
Lower and upper Darboux sums over a grid partition in
Grid partitions of a rectangle in , their cells, refinements and mesh
Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- S. M. Chong and W. Kendall, 'the fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations' argument: a continuous function orthogonal to every compactly supported smooth test function vanishes; see also the bump construction used by S. M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1 (1997), the variation of the Einstein-Hilbert action (4.66)-(4.68): arbitrary variations force the coefficient to vanish, printed p. 117 (PDF p. 124)
- H. S. Reall, Part III General Relativity (Cambridge, October 12, 2022 revision), sections 9.2-9.3 (9.23)-(9.29): a compactly supported metric variation localized about any point and the resulting field equation, printed pp. 113-116 (PDF pp. 114-117)