Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smoothness and transformation of the inverse-metric components

Statement

Let (M,g,N) be a time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold and let gp−1 and gab be the inverse metric and its chart components as in The inverse metric, musical isomorphisms and index raising. Then:

  1. For every smooth chart (U,x) the component functions gab:U→R are C∞ on U.
  2. For overlapping smooth charts (U,x), (V,y) the components satisfy the contravariant transformation law

g′ab(u)=∑c,d=03∂ya∂xc(x(u)) ∂yb∂xd(x(u)) gcd(x(u)),u∈y(U∩V),

where every component evaluated at a coordinate tuple is its coordinate representative, as in Smooth covariant 2-tensor fields on a smooth manifold, x(u) denotes (x∘y−1)(u), and ∂ya/∂xc are the entries of D(y∘x−1).

  1. Consequently the pointwise bilinear forms gp−1 on Tp∗M are presented by component functions that are smooth in every chart and glue by the contravariant law; the inverse metric is a well-defined smooth component family determined by g alone.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold (M,g,N) and smooth charts (U,x), (V,y) with U∩V≠∅.

[L1]

In a chart, gab(q) are the entries of the inverse matrix of (gab(q)), so that gacgcb=δab, and gab are C∞ on U with det⁡(gab(q))≠0 for every q (The inverse metric, musical isomorphisms and index raising, Smooth covariant 2-tensor fields on a smooth manifold).

[L2]

If the entries of a square matrix-valued map A:U→M4(R) on an open set are Cr and det⁡A never vanishes, then the entries of A−1 are Cr; for an invertible matrix A−1=det⁡(A)−1adj⁡(A) (Matrix inversion preserves Ck regularity where the determinant is nonzero, If det⁡(A) is a unit, then A−1=det⁡(A)−1adj⁡(A)).

[L3]

For overlapping smooth charts, the covariant components of a smooth covariant 2-tensor field satisfy gab′(y)=∑c,d∂xc∂ya(y)∂xd∂yb(y)gcd(x(y)), where the entries are those of D(x∘y−1)(y) (Chart independence and the transformation law of a smooth covariant 2-tensor field).

[L4]

For composable totally differentiable maps, D(g∘f)=Dg∘Df (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)); the identity map is totally differentiable with D(id⁡)=I, since the identity is a linear map satisfying the defining limit (The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(∥h∥2) remainder).

[L5]

Overlapping smooth charts have smooth transition maps x∘y−1 and y∘x−1, whose total derivatives are computed from the coordinate functions (Smoothly compatible charts and the smoothness of Euclidean transition maps).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2given

Let (U,x) be a smooth chart. By [L1] the component functions gab are C∞ on U and det⁡(gab(q))≠0 for every q∈U, because gq is nondegenerate; hence the coordinate representative z↦(gab(x−1(z))) on the open Euclidean set x(U) is C∞ with nowhere-vanishing determinant, and by [L2] the entries of its inverse at each q, namely gab(q) by [L1], are C∞ on U.

1.2L3algebra

Let p∈U∩V and put y0:=y(p). Write J:=D(x∘y−1)(y0) for the Jacobian of the transition with entries Jca=∂xc∂ya(y0), so that by [L3] the covariant components are related by the matrix equation G′(y0)=JTG(x(p))J with G=(gcd), G′=(gab′).

1.3L4L5algebra

The transition y∘x−1 is smooth by [L5] and (y∘x−1)∘(x∘y−1)=id⁡ on y(U∩V); applying [L4] at y0 gives D(y∘x−1)(x(p))∘D(x∘y−1)(y0)=D(id⁡)(y0)=I, so J is invertible with inverse the matrix of entries ∂ya∂xc(x(p)).

2.1step 1.2step 1.3algebra

Inverting the matrix equation of step 1.2 and using step 1.3 gives G′(y0)−1=J−1G(x(p))−1J−T, that is g′ab(y0)=∑c,d∂ya∂xc(x(p))∂yb∂xd(x(p))gcd(x(p)), which is the contravariant transformation law of claim 2.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1given∎

The chart (U,x) in step 1.1 was arbitrary, so claim 1 holds in every chart, and step 2.1 holds for every pair of overlapping charts, so claim 2 holds as well. Since the functions gab were defined from the pointwise bilinear form gq−1 by evaluation on the dual coordinate covectors, and the two claims show that the resulting component functions are smooth and related by the contravariant law in all charts, the inverse metric is a well-defined smooth component family determined by g alone, which is claim 3.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources