Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fixed-resolution tie-breaking to one log canonical place

Statement

Let X be either (i) smooth integral projective complex, or (ii) a normal integral projective Gorenstein terminal complex threefold with isolated singularities. In (ii), terminal means KX is Cartier and every exceptional prime on a smooth resolution has positive integral coefficient in KY−μ∗KX. Let A be ample Cartier and G0 an effective rational divisor numerically equivalent to γA. Assume (X,G0) is lc and has exactly one reduced irreducible non-klt centre W, with codim W≥2. In (i), let μ:Y→X be a projective log resolution obtained by finitely many blowups in smooth centres. In (ii), fix an actual smooth projective log resolution with an effective exceptional rational divisor T∗ whose negative is μ-ample; this is an explicit model hypothesis and does not cover an arbitrary small resolution. Require the full exceptional divisor SNC together with the total transform of G0 in both cases. Write

K_Y+B_0=μ^*(K_X+G_0).

For every prescribed ε>0, there are an effective rational divisor G1≡γ1A with |γ_1−γ|<ε and a log pullback on the SAME Y of the form

K_Y+E+F=μ^*(K_X+G_1),

where E is a single smooth exceptional prime divisor dominating W, every coefficient of F is strictly below one, E∉Supp F, and the total support is SNC. The pair (X,G1) is lc and E is its only lc place, not only its only coefficient-one divisor on this model. Negative coefficients of F are exceptional.

Assume the Axiom of Choice through the supplied projective-geometric interfaces. No nonnegative horizontal boundary after restricting F to E is included in this conclusion.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The initial lc pair and unique reduced non-klt centre, and the specified smooth-centre blowup model or normal-terminal model with supplied exceptional ample divisor, are exact hypotheses. Choice is inherited through ordinary projective ampleness and Bertini.

[F1]

The exact suppliers are Isolated lc-centre SNC vanishing and polynomial nonvanishing, Bertini smoothness away from the base locus, Serre global-generation criterion for ampleness, High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme, Relative ampleness over an arbitrary base, A normal Noetherian domain is the intersection of its height-one localizations, The Axiom of Choice. The initial centre-only isolation is separate. This lemma constructs the stronger place-level perturbation by an independently variable finite exceptional ample cone. The final discrepancy inequality is derived from local differentials, not an imported valuation-extraction theorem.

Proof

Given: Exactly the Statement data.

1.1givenA1F1algebra

Write KY−μ∗KX=∑ kj Ej for the exceptional primes. In the smooth branch each kj is a nonnegative integer: a smooth-centre blowup of codimension c has Jacobian factor of order c−1, and the composition adds pullbacks of these effective exceptional divisors. In the normal terminal branch each kj is a positive integer by the stated Cartier-terminal discrepancy hypothesis.

2.1givenA1F1step 1.1algebra

There is a positive rational exceptional divisor T0, supported on every exceptional prime, with mμ∗A−T0 ample for some m. In the smooth branch the finite blowup construction is explicit. A single blowup has its tautological relatively ample O(−Enew). If a positive exceptional T has relatively ample negative for a previous stage, at the next blowup take a sufficiently large integral multiple of its pullback plus the new exceptional divisor. Its negative is relatively ample over the original base: the negative new exceptional is ample over the previous stage, and tensoring it with a sufficiently high pullback of the previously relatively ample negative gives a projective embedding over the original base. This is the ordinary relative Segre/Serre construction for two projective embeddings. All coefficients remain positive. Induct over the finite blowup sequence.

3.1givenA1F1step 2.1algebra

For some positive integer m, mμ∗A−T0 is ample on Y: a relatively ample line bundle tensored with a sufficiently high pullback of an ample line bundle is ample, by a relative projective embedding followed by Segre and Serre twisting. In the normal terminal branch first apply this to the SUPPLIED T∗; if any exceptional coefficients vanish, add sufficiently small positive rational coefficients on those primes, preserving the resulting absolute ample divisor by the finite cone argument below. This gives the claimed positive T0 on the actual model without assuming a smooth-base blowup factorization there.

4.1givenA1F1step 3.1algebra

The coefficients of T0 can be varied independently in a rational neighbourhood while keeping positivity and mμ^*A−T ample. Here is a finite algebraic ample-cone argument. Put H=mμ∗A−T0. For each of the finitely many Cartier primes Ej, choose qj such that qjH+Ej and qjH−Ej are ample. Such qj exist by ample twisting. Then H+Σ δ_j Ej is a positive rational combination of H and those finitely many ample divisors whenever Σ qj∣δj∣<1; hence is ample. Shrink further to retain positive coefficients of T=T0−∑δjEj.

5.1givenA1F1step 4.1algebra

Let E1,...,Es be the coefficient-one prime divisors of B0. They are all exceptional and map to W: a nonexceptional coefficient-one divisor would give a divisorial non-klt centre, contrary to codim W≥2 and uniqueness of W. At such a divisor the order of μ∗G0 is ki+1.

6.1givenA1F1step 5.1algebra

Choose a rational T inside the preceding positive ample neighbourhood so that the numbers ρi=Ti/(ki+1), i=1,...,s,

7.1givenA1F1step 6.1algebra

are pairwise distinct. There are finitely many forbidden affine hyperplanes Ti/(ki+1)=Tj/(kj+1); none contains the open coefficient neighbourhood because those coefficients vary independently. Rational points are dense, so such a positive rational choice exists. Let i0 be the unique index with maximal ρ_i.

8.1givenA1F1step 7.1algebra

Take a sufficiently divisible N so that NT and N(mμ^*A−T) are Cartier and the latter is very ample. Choose a general smooth member HY of |N(mμ^*A−T)| meeting the existing SNC divisor normally and containing none of its components. Bertini applied to that complete very ample system gives exactly this finite collection of transversality conditions.

9.1givenA1F1step 8.1algebra

Multiplying its defining section by the canonical section of NT gives a section of μ∗OX(NmA). Since μ∗OY=OX by normality of X, this descends uniquely to a section of OX(NmA). Let D be its effective divisor. Its ACTUAL pullback is μ∗D=NT+HY.

10.1givenA1F1step 9.1algebra

Thus on the fixed resolution the orders of D at the original Ei are exactly NTi, and no unrecorded resolution or new original coefficient-one divisors are introduced.

11.1givenA1F1step 10.1algebra

For rational τ>0 put cτ=1/(1+τNρi0), Gτ=cτ(G0+τD).

12.1givenA1F1step 11.1algebra

The coefficient of Ei in its log pullback is bi(τ)=cτ(ki+1+τNTi)−ki.

13.1givenA1F1step 12.1algebra

It equals one exactly for i=i0, and is strictly below one for the other original coefficient-one divisors, because their ρ_i are smaller. Every original coefficient below one remains below one for all sufficiently small τ by continuity and the finite number of components. The new free member HY has coefficient cττ<1 for sufficiently small τ. Its intersections with the existing boundary are normal crossing by construction. Every coefficient on the fixed SNC model is therefore at most one, with equality on exactly E=Ei0. Negative coefficients can occur only on exceptional divisors, since the strict transform of the effective downstairs Gτ is effective.

14.1givenA1F1step 13.1algebra

The numerical coefficient is γτ=cτ(γ+τNm),

15.1givenA1F1step 14.1algebra

and tends to γ as τ tends to zero. Choose a positive rational τ sufficiently small for all preceding strict inequalities and |γ_τ−γ|<ε. Set G1=Gτ and let F be its log boundary with E removed. This gives exactly the Statement form, with E mapping to the original W. No one-sided inequality γ_1≤γ is asserted.

16.1givenA1F1step 15.1algebra

There is a direct differential calculation for every divisorial valuation v, avoiding an assumption about how it is extracted by boundary-compatible blowups. At the generic point of its centre on smooth Y, take regular parameters x1,...,xc for that centre, adapted to the SNC boundary components containing it, and complete them by parameters along the centre. On a smooth model carrying v, write xi=taiui with ai=v(xi)>0 and ui a unit along the valuation divisor. Expanding the pulled-back top differential shows its order is at least ∑ai−1: at most one differentiated factor can supply the dt term reducing the total order by one. Therefore the log discrepancy satisfies AY(v)≥∑ai.

17.1givenA1F1step 16.1algebra∎

Assign coefficient bi to a parameter defining a boundary component and coefficient zero to the remaining centre parameters. The log discrepancy for the pair is at least ∑(1−bi)ai. If v is exceptional over Y, its centre has codimension at least two. At most one bi is one, and every other bi is strictly below one, so this sum is strictly positive. For a prime divisor already on Y, only E has coefficient one. Thus E is the sole lc place of (X,G1), with no hidden additional place above this model.

Remarks

The perturbation can raise γ slightly. In the fourfold index-two surface-centre case the nonvanishing construction only needs a=2−γ1>0, so choose ε<2−γ, which is possible when the original γ≤1. No projective klt replacement is introduced.

For an index-one threefold curve centre, the subadjoint relation with effective discriminant and nef moduli gives 2g(W)−2≤(γ_1−1)deg(A|W). Because W is fixed before the perturbation, choose ε so small that (γ_1−1)deg(A|W)<2. The integer even number on the left is then less than 2, forcing g(W)≤1. Curve RR gives h⁰(W,A)>0. This retains the γ=1 endpoint even if tie-breaking slightly increases γ; it does not falsely reuse a statement requiring γ_1≤1.

Separate horizontal-positivity extraction supplier

The construction above does NOT prove that every horizontal coefficient of F|E over W is nonnegative. A negative coefficient on an exceptional divisor meeting E can restrict to a horizontal divisor, even though the downstairs G1 is effective. Its exclusion cannot be inferred from SNC, uniqueness of E, residue pushforward or the inequality coeff F<1.

The companion curvette-extraction-and-effective-different.md now constructs the smooth transverse surface extraction, normalized curvette graph contraction, Q-Cartier index, cyclic-cover normality and effective different, including actual projective transverse surfaces. Those additional steps are not asserted by this unique-place lemma. Matching to the weighted rational marked model remains separately owned. This component supplies the exact unique-place perturbation and arbitrary numerical closeness used before that construction.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources