Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The weighted degree one del Pezzo and double plane K3 ladder

Statement

Assume AC. Let Y be a smooth weighted sextic

z^2+y^3+f4(x0,x1,x2)y+f6(x0,x1,x2)=0

in P(1,1,1,2,3), with the displayed square/cube coefficients nonzero (scaled to one), and put A=OY(1). Then A is an ample line bundle, A3=1, KY=−2A, Pic(Y)=ZA, H1(Y,OY)=H2(Y,OY)=0, and Y is simply connected. The complete spaces H0(Y,2A) and H0(Y,3A) have respectively the coordinate bases of quadratic monomials in x together with y, and cubic monomials in x, xi y together with z. In particular |2A| and |3A| are globally generated.

A general S in |2A| has equation y=q2(x), and is the smooth double plane

z^2+g6(x0,x1,x2)=0,
g6=q2^3+f4 q2+f6.

It is a K3 surface in the full sense: KS=OS, H1(S,OS)=0 and π1(S)=0. H=A∣S is primitive, ample, basepoint free and H2=2, and H0(S,4H) consists of quartics in x together with z times linear forms. A general such quartic section is a smooth curve in |4H|. No assertion Pic(S)=ZH is made here; that is the separate double-plane Noether–Lefschetz input.

These conclusions supply the actual smooth weighted ladder for the X4,6 family after choosing its two degree-two equations as general weighted linear-coordinate eliminations. No classification of all del Pezzo threefolds or all weighted Calabi–Yau models is a premise.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth weighted equation and the full square/cube terms in the Statement.

[F1]

Ample divisor relative handles and primitive integral restriction supplies its locally proved ample-complement Morse statement: for a smooth ample divisor in a smooth projective n-fold the pair has relative handles of index at least n. In particular a smooth ordinary sextic surface in P3 is simply connected, and a smooth ordinary sextic threefold in P4 is simply connected with H2-cohomology Z generated by O(1). This supplier has no Noether–Lefschetz or weighted-geometry dependency.

[F2]

Curve-nef ample perturbations by a projective Nakai construction includes the projective numerical ampleness criterion. The proof below uses it only to descend ampleness along an explicit finite cover; it is not a Fano classification input. Bertini smoothness away from the base locus applies to the actual globally generated systems established below.

[F3]

Line-bundle cohomology on projective spaces, and on the stated weighted projective space, is computed below by the ordinary alternating localization Cech complex, with its monomial contraction. The local Jacobian formula for a cyclic branched cover is used below. Algebraic/analytic cohomology, integral topology and Picard groups are compared explicitly in F4; no constant-sheaf comparison with field coefficients is applied to Z. Full AC is inherited. The Axiom of Choice.

[F4]

Projective threefold coherent comparison and holomorphic bundle algebraization supplies exact tensor analytification, coherent cohomology comparison and full faithfulness ONLY for the actual smooth projective THREEFOLDS T and Y below. Both are connected, hence irreducible because they are smooth; T is connected by its computed H0(O)=C, and Y is its quotient. Weighted projective space is projective via a common-weight Veronese embedding, so Y is projective independently of the later proof of ampleness of A. No GAGA theorem for the ambient P4 is invoked. For the SURFACE i:S−>Y, a closed embedding, the comparison is transported as follows. A coherent OS−module F has coherent exact pushforward i∗F, by the local identification of modules over A/I with A-modules annihilated by I. The same identification analytically gives (i∗F)an=ian∗(Fan): tensoring the module by OYan factors through OYan/IOYan=OSan. Closed pushforward is exact by its stalks and sends flasque resolutions to flasque resolutions, since sections on U are sections on U intersect S. Therefore Hq(S,F)=Hq(Y,i∗F), likewise analytically, and threefold GAGA on Y gives the canonical comparison on S. This is used for OS and OS(4H), not a direct invocation of threefold GAGA on a surface.

For any one of these compact smooth complex spaces X, the local exact Dolbeault resolution of OX follows from The local Dolbeault lemma on nested polydiscs, including degree zero where the kernel consists of holomorphic functions. Its smooth-form sheaves are modules over real smooth functions, hence acyclic by Sheaves of smooth-function modules are cohomologically acyclic. Apply The acyclic-resolution theorem for right derived functors with global sections and the injective-resolution datum supplied by AC. Thus H1(X,OX) is the quotient of globally closed smooth (0,1)-forms by global dbar of smooth functions. If this group vanishes, holomorphic Pic(X) injects into topological Pic(X). Indeed a topologically trivial holomorphic line has a global nonzero smooth frame s: start with its continuous frame and approximate its local coefficients uniformly by smooth coefficients on a finite trivializing cover, then sum with a smooth partition of unity; compactness gives a positive minimum norm, so a sufficiently close approximation remains nonzero. In local holomorphic frames ei write s=fiei. The forms α=fi(−1)dbarfi agree on overlaps because the transition functions are holomorphic, and dbar α=0. Write α=dbar f globally using H1(O)=0. Then exp(-f)s is a nowhere-zero holomorphic section, proving the asserted injectivity. For the algebraic line bundles on T and Y, full faithfulness of their exact GAGA equivalence algebraizes this trivialization and its inverse, so algebraic Pic also injects into topological Pic. Only injectivity is needed, not surjectivity of holomorphic Pic onto integral cohomology.

The topological target is SINGULAR integral H2-cohomology: The first Chern class classifies complex line bundles identifies numerable topological complex lines with H2(X;Z), naturally for tensor product and pullback. Here X is compact smooth, hence paracompact Hausdorff with finite CW homotopy type (the handle models of F1 also give the needed CW type); all its line bundles are numerable. For torsion-freeness use The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID with R=Z, G=Z and the free integral singular-chain complex: if H1(X;Z)=0 it identifies H2(X;Z) with Hom(H2(X;Z),Z), which is torsion-free. No field-coefficient sheaf comparison, holomorphic exponential surjectivity or GAGA on a fourfold is assumed.

Proof

1.1F3givenconstruct

The C-star action on the affine cone over Y has no nontrivial stabilizer away from the origin. If some xi is nonzero this is immediate. If all xi vanish, the equation z2+y3=0 has y,z both nonzero, so a stabilizer satisfies λ2=λ3=1 and is trivial. Thus OY(1) is an actual line bundle, including at the unique point with x=0. There is exactly one such weighted point: normalize y=1, and the two square roots for z are interchanged by the remaining scaling λ=−1. Denote it by p. Both y and z are nonzero there.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

We compute the low-degree sections without assuming projective normality of Y. In weighted projective space cover by its five coordinate nonvanishing opens and use the homogeneous localization Cech complex. For every exponent monomial of fixed weighted degree, its allowed Cech intersections are exactly those index sets containing all its negative-exponent variables. Inserting a fixed variable outside that negative set contracts the intermediate Cech degrees. Only the all-nonnegative monomials in degree zero and the all-negative monomials in top degree remain. Therefore all intermediate Hq(O(k)), 0<q<4, vanish; H0 is exactly the weighted homogeneous polynomial piece. Apply the multiplication sequence by the nonzero degree-six equation to obtain H0(Y,kA)=Rk for k=1,2,3, where R is the weighted coordinate quotient. This gives exactly the stated bases. At x not all zero the x monomials generate 2A and 3A; at p, y generates 2A and z generates 3A. Thus both systems are globally generated, not merely generically generated.

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1construct

Choose general sections s2=y+q2(x) and s3=z+l1(x)y+q3(x). The conditions that the y and z coefficients are nonzero are open in their complete section spaces, so these are general members of |2A| and |3A| after rescaling. Bertini gives smooth divisors D2,D3 meeting transversely. They avoid p, by step1.1. Form the degree-six finite flat root cover f:T−>Y by adjoining sections v,u of f∗A satisfying v2=s2 and u3=s3. Algebraically its rank-six algebra is the tensor product of O plus A(−1), with multiplication specified by s2, and O plus A(−1) plus A(−2), with multiplication specified by s3. The group is mu2 times mu3. Locally near D2,D3 the equations are v2=t2,u3=t3 in transverse coordinates; hence the cover is smooth. Away from these divisors it is etale.

4.1F1F3F4step 2.1step 3.1constructalgebra

In coordinates (x0,x1,x2,v,u), eliminate y=v2−q2(x) and z=u3−l1(x)(v2−q2(x))−q3(x). The defining equation becomes an ordinary homogeneous sextic in P4. This is exactly the preceding root cover, not an auxiliary component: the coordinate map is defined everywhere, since x=v=u=0 is impossible, and on every chart xi nonzero the two descriptions are the same affine root equations. At x=0, both v and u are nonzero, and the same root equations in either projective unit chart identify the neighborhoods. Thus T is a smooth ordinary sextic threefold, with f∗A=OT(1). Conversely its mu2 times mu3 invariants are precisely x,y,z with the original weighted equation, so its quotient is Y. The ordinary homogeneous hypersurface Cech sequence gives H1(T,OT)=H2(T,OT)=0 and H0(T,OT)=C. By [F1], π1(T)=0 and H2(T,Z)=Zc1(OT(1)). F4 identifies algebraic H1(T,OT)=0 with analytic H1 and injects Pic(T) into integral H2(T;Z). Its image contains the primitive generator c1(OT(1)), so Pic(T)=ZOT(1). This uses the integral restriction statement of F1 on T inside P4 and the usual integral generator of H2(P4;Z); it does not use GAGA on P4.

5.1F3step 3.1step 4.1algebra

We give the needed fundamental-group quotient argument. If a finite group acts on a connected simply connected complex manifold, any loop in its quotient can be perturbed off the branch strata of real codimension at least two and lifted to a path from t to g t. A path from t to a fixed point of a subgroup element h, followed by the reverse h-translate, projects to a null loop with endpoint monodromy h; in the local branched coordinate it is a meridian which contracts through that branch point. Multiplying by such null loops for stabilizer generators changes any endpoint monodromy by those generators. Here mu2 fixes v=0, and mu3 fixes u=0; both divisors are nonempty (at a fixed nonzero x, the defining quadratic or cubic in the remaining weighted variable has a complex root). Those two subgroups generate the whole group. Hence every loop can be changed by null loops to have a CLOSED lift in T. Contract that lift in T and project. This proves π1(Y)=0, without importing a theorem on fundamental groups of Fano varieties or quotient spaces. The same argument below applies to the degree-three cover of a double plane.

6.1F1F2F3F4step 4.1step 5.1algebra

Finite-group averaging splits OY as the invariant direct summand of f∗OT, so H1(Y,OY)=H2(Y,OY)=0 by step4.1. By F4 the algebraic vanishing implies analytic H1(Y,OY)=0, and Pic(Y) injects into H2(Y;Z). The latter group is torsion-free: π1(Y)=0 gives H1(Y;Z)=0 by abelianization, so the integral universal-coefficient exact sequence of F4 identifies H2 with Hom(H2(Y;Z),Z). In particular Pic(Y) is torsion-free; no surjectivity Pic(Y)−>H2(Y;Z) is required. Pullback Pic(Y)−>Pic(T) has torsion kernel, since the norm of f∗B is B6: take the determinant of the rank-six projection-formula identity f∗(f∗B)=f∗OT tensor B and divide by det⁡(f∗OT). Thus the pullback is injective. Its image in Z contains the generator because f∗A=OT(1), so Pic(Y)=ZA. The same finite map gives 6 A3=OT(1)3=6, whence A3=1. For every integral subvariety V of Y, the finite preimage and projection formula make A(dim⁡V)V positive since f∗A is ample. The numerical criterion [F2] gives ampleness of A.

7.1F3step 3.1step 4.1step 6.1algebra

The canonical bundle is computed by the same cover, rather than a named weighted adjunction formula. An ordinary sextic in P4 has KT=OT(1), as the local residue/Jacobian formula for one degree-six equation gives KP4 tensor O(6)=O(1). In the local root coordinates v2=t2,u3=t3 the Jacobian factor is v u2 up to a nonzero constant. Hence KT=f∗KY+Rv+2Ru. Each of Rv,Ru is the divisor of a section of f∗A, so f∗(KY+2A)=OT. Injectivity of pullback from step6.1 gives KY=−2A.

8.1F2F3F4step 2.1step 6.1step 7.1algebra

A general member of |2A| has equation y=q2(x), by the computed complete section space. Substitution gives S={z2+g6(x)=0} in P(1,1,1,3). It is smooth by Bertini, and none of its points has x=0; thus it is the finite double cover π:S−>P2 with branch the sextic g6=0. The latter is smooth because its singular points would, by the displayed equation and Jacobian criterion, give singular points of S at z=0. The algebra is π∗OS=OP2 plus OP2(−3). The local double-cover Jacobian gives KS=π∗(KP2+O(3))=OS. The projective-space Cech calculation gives algebraic H1(S,OS)=0, H0(S,OS)=C and H2(S,OS)=C. The closed-embedding comparison in F4 gives the same analytic groups on S, so the K3 condition uses the actual surface analytic H1, not an unproved surface GAGA input.

9.1F1F3step 5.1step 8.1algebra

To prove the full K3 fundamental-group condition, take the ordinary sextic surface T′={b6+g6(x0,x1,x2)=0} in P3. It is smooth: a singular point would have b=0 and all derivatives of g6 zero on the branch plane, contrary to smoothness of the branch sextic. The map z=b3 identifies S=T′/mu3, with fixed nonempty divisor b=0. By [F1] the ordinary sextic surface T' is simply connected. The path-lifting and fixed-point meridian argument of step5.1 therefore makes S simply connected as well. This proves the full K3 assertion; it is not inferred merely from KS trivial and H1(OS)=0.

10.1F2F3F4step 8.1step 9.1algebra∎

H=A∣S=π∗OP2(1) is ample and globally generated, with H2=degree(π)=2. It is primitive: if H=kB for an integral line bundle with k≥2, the integer B2 would satisfy 2=k2B2, impossible. The double-cover algebra computes H0(S,4H)=H0(P2,O(4)) plus z H0(P2,O(1)). These are algebraic sections, and the closed-embedding comparison in F4 for OS(4H) identifies them with the full analytic section space as well. Its complete system is globally generated, so a general member is a smooth curve by Bertini. Restriction of weighted degree-four polynomials supplies every one of these sections: it contains all quartics in x and all xi z; the eliminated degree-two coordinates simply become quadratic polynomials in x. Thus a general weighted degree-four equation cuts exactly the claimed general curve in |4H|. All incidences and branch transversality conditions are nonempty open conditions in the stated equation/section parameter spaces. This proves the needed weighted ladder while leaving its separate very-general Picard assertion to the Noether–Lefschetz supplier.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources