Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalized clutching data for bundles over X×S²

Statement

Assume AC and let X be compact Hausdorff. Every complex vector bundle on X×S2 is represented, after adding a trivial bundle if necessary, by data [E,f]: two copies of pr⁡X∗E on X×D2 glued along X×S1 by a bundle automorphism f, normalized by f(x,1)=id⁡Ex. For a fixed bundle, different choices of normalized hemisphere trivializations give homotopic normalized clutching maps. Homotopies through normalized automorphisms give isomorphic stabilized bundles.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a compact Hausdorff space X, and a finite-rank complex bundle V on X×S2.

[F1]

Under AC, bundle pullback is invariant under homotopy (Homotopy invariance of vector-bundle pullback).

[F2]

The fixed clutching definition supplies the upper-to-lower convention (Clutching construction for bundles over a suspension). Applying the transition-cocycle construction in local charts of E, also with an interval parameter, glues two copies of pr⁡X∗E by an equatorial bundle automorphism and turns a homotopy of such automorphisms into a bundle over the parameter cylinder (Vector bundles are glued from transition cocycles).

[F3]

Under AC, finite complements and common trivial stabilization are available (Finite-rank complement theorem over compact Hausdorff bases, Equality in K⁰ is stable isomorphism over compact bases).

[A1]

AC is used through [F1] and [F3].

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2A1

Let D+2 and D−2 be the closed hemispheres. Each inclusion X×{0}↪X×D±2 is a homotopy inverse to projection. By [F1], there are bundles E± on X and isomorphisms V∣X×D±2≅pr⁡X∗E±. In these trivializations, V is obtained by an equatorial isomorphism f(x,z):(E+)x→(E−)x.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

At z=1, f(x,1) is an isomorphism E+→E−. Identify E− with E=E+ by f(x,1)−1. In the fixed coefficient convention the transition becomes f(x,1)−1f(x,z), which equals the identity at z=1. Thus V=[E,f] with normalized f.

3.1F2step 2.1construct

If h± and h±′ are two normalized hemisphere trivializations of the same bundle, their ratios are maps g±:X×D±2→Aut⁡(E) with g±(x,1)=I. The straight contraction of each disk to 1 fixes 1, so composing g± with it gives homotopies to the identity through maps still equal to I at 1. Applying these changing gauges to the equatorial transition gives a homotopy between the two normalized clutching maps.

4.1F3A1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

For a virtual class, [F3] complements its negative bundle into a finite trivial bundle and then applies steps 1.1–3.1 to the resulting actual bundle; this is the optional stabilization in the statement.

5.1F1F2A1step 2.1step 4.1∎

A normalized homotopy ft glues, by [F2], a bundle on X×S2×I. Its endpoint restrictions are isomorphic by [F1]. The normalization keeps the chosen common bundle and basepoint frame fixed, and adding trivial summands before the homotopy gives the same conclusion for stabilized data.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources