Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Endpoint trace bound and decay of H1 functions

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let u∗ denote the continuous absolutely continuous representative of a class in H1 supplied by Absolutely continuous representative of an L2 function with L2 weak derivative, and write ∥u∥=∥u∥L2 and ∥u′∥=∥u′∥L2 for the norms of One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals on the interval under consideration.

(a) Bounded-interval trace bound. Let L>0 and u∈H1(0,L). Then ∣u∗(x)∣≤L−1/2∥u∥L2(0,L)+L1/2∥u′∥L2(0,L)for every x∈[0,L]. More generally, for 0≤c<d≤L and x∈[c,d], ∣u∗(x)∣≤(d−c)−1/2∥u∥L2(c,d)+(d−c)1/2∥u′∥L2(c,d).

(b) Half-line. Let u∈H1(0,∞), with representative u∗ defined on [0,∞) by gluing the representatives on (0,n). Then ∣u∗(x)∣≤∥u∥L2(x,x+1)+∥u′∥L2(x,x+1)(x≥0),sup⁡x≥0∣u∗(x)∣≤∥u∥L2(0,∞)+∥u′∥L2(0,∞), and u∗(x)→0 as x→∞.

(c) Real line and vanishing boundary products. Let u,v∈H1(R) with continuous representatives u∗,v∗. Then u∗,v∗ are bounded and uniformly continuous with ∣u∗(x)−u∗(y)∣≤∣x−y∣ ∥u′∥L2(R),sup⁡R∣u∗∣≤∥u∥L2(R)+∥u′∥L2(R), u∗(x)→0 and v∗(x)→0 as ∣x∣→∞, and consequently lim⁡∣x∣→∞u∗(x)v∗(x)‾=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the spaces H1 of One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals; the absolutely continuous representative theorem Absolutely continuous representative of an L2 function with L2 weak derivative and its estimate ∣u∗(x)−u∗(y)∣≤∣x−y∣∥u′∥L2.

[F1]

For a bounded interval (c,d) and u∈H1(c,d), the unique absolutely continuous representative u∗ on [c,d] satisfies u∗(x)−u∗(y)=∫yxu′ and ∣u∗(x)−u∗(y)∣≤∣x−y∣∥u′∥L2(c,d) (Absolutely continuous representative of an L2 function with L2 weak derivative).

[F2]

On a finite-measure set, ∫E∣f∣≤∥f∥L2μ(E)1/2 (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).

[F3]

The indefinite integral of an integrable function is countably additive over disjoint measurable sets: for pairwise disjoint measurable En and integrable f, ∫⋃nEnf=∑n∫Enf (The indefinite integral of an integrable function is countably additive on measurable sets).

Proof

1.1F1F2algebra

[Bounded-interval trace bound] Let u∈H1(0,L) and fix x∈[0,L]. By [F1] applied on (0,L) (and on (c,d) for the local form), for every y∈[0,L] ∣u∗(x)∣≤∣u∗(y)∣+∣∫yxu′∣≤∣u∗(y)∣+∥u′∥L2(0,L)L1/2, using [F2] for the last estimate. Integrating this inequality in y over (0,L) and using [F2] again, L ∣u∗(x)∣≤∫0L∣u∗∣+L3/2∥u′∥≤L1/2∥u∥+L3/2∥u′∥, so ∣u∗(x)∣≤L−1/2∥u∥+L1/2∥u′∥. Replacing (0,L) by any subinterval (c,d) with x∈[c,d] gives the local form by the same computation. This is (a).

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

[Half-line pointwise and supremum bounds] Let u∈H1(0,∞). For every n the class lies in H1(0,n), and the representatives on overlapping intervals agree by uniqueness in [F1], so they glue to a continuous representative u∗ on [0,∞). Step 1.1 on the interval (x,x+1), x≥0, gives ∣u∗(x)∣≤∥u∥L2(x,x+1)+∥u′∥L2(x,x+1). Enlarging each interval to (0,∞) and using ∥u∥L2(x,x+1)≤∥u∥L2(0,∞) and likewise for u′ gives sup⁡x≥0∣u∗(x)∣≤∥u∥L2(0,∞)+∥u′∥L2(0,∞).

3.1step 2.1F1F3givenalgebra

[Decay] We show lim⁡x→∞u∗(x)=0. First suppose ∥u′∥L2(0,∞)=:M>0 and assume for contradiction that there are xn→∞ with ∣u∗(xn)∣≥ε for some ε>0. Put δ:=min⁡{1,(ε/(2M))2}>0; by [F1], for t∈[xn,xn+δ] ∣u∗(t)∣≥∣u∗(xn)∣−∣t−xn∣ M≥ε−δM≥ε/2. Passing to a subsequence, assume xn+1≥xn+δ for all n; then the half-open intervals En:=[xn,xn+δ) are pairwise disjoint, have measure δ, and satisfy ∣u∗∣2≥ε2/4 throughout. By [F3], ∫0∞∣u∣2≥∫⋃nEn∣u∣2=∑n∫En∣u∣2≥∑nε24δ=+∞, contradicting u∈L2(0,∞). If M=0, then [F1] gives ∣u∗(x)−u∗(y)∣≤0, so u∗ is a constant whose L2 norm over the half-line is finite only if that constant is 0. Thus u∗(x)→0.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

[Real line] For u∈H1(R) restrict to (0,∞) and (−∞,0); the representatives glue at 0 by uniqueness of the continuous representative. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give the sup bound and uniform continuity, and step 3.1 applied to both half-lines gives u∗(x)→0 as x→±∞. For u,v∈H1(R) the elementary bound ∣u∗v∗‾∣≤12(∣u∗∣2+∣v∗∣2) and u∗(x)→0, v∗(x)→0 give u∗(x)v∗(x)‾→0 as ∣x∣→∞. This is (c).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources