How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dirac gauge covariance, action and conserved current
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and use the conventions of Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions. Let be open, let each be a smooth real potential component, and let be a smooth commuting spinor. The real gauge parameter is a smooth , and all fields, derivatives and compactly supported smooth variations below are on this same (including ). Use the symmetrized classical density For compactly supported smooth variations, its spinor Euler equation is and its adjoint. The density is invariant under the gauge transformation in Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions. On solutions, In SI variables the corresponding Hamiltonian density has the sign convention These are conditional variational identities for smooth commuting classical fields. They assert no global existence theorem for the coupled field equations, no quantum current product, and no empirical measurement.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the charged conventions in Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions; smooth commuting fields on the common open region ; compactly supported variations in ; and the free Dirac variation interface.
The normalized conventions give , , , and divided by . Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions
For smooth commuting spinors, compact variations of the free density give the Euler equation through the displayed first variation; the supplier fixes . Classical free action variations and normalization
The fixed representation has , for Hermitian Pauli matrices , , , and . Dirac Clifford matrices and energy projections
The explicit block matrices of Dirac Clifford matrices and energy projections give , , , and ; the last identity is checked by block multiplication in proof step 1.2.
Assume Countable Choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The potential, spinor and real gauge parameter are smooth on the same open , and every variation has compact support in .
Every open ball contains a nonnegative compactly supported smooth bump positive on a smaller ball. A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
Proof
Given: [A1], [F1], [F2], [A2], [A3], and the displayed charged density.
Under and , the chain rule gives ; the conjugate equation gives . The two phases cancel in each term of , so the density is gauge invariant. The explicit Countable Choice assumption is [A2].
From [F2], is Hermitian and squares to ; each Pauli matrix is Hermitian, so , and the block formulas give . Therefore , while for , This proves [F3] from the exact matrix definitions. Now vary along a compactly supported complex and along . Expanding the four kinetic terms and integrating the terms containing or by parts gives For example, and ; compact support removes both boundary terms. The resulting variation is where the equality uses from [F3]. If , continuity and openness of give a ball contained in where ; choose a bump from [F4] there and take . Since , this gives , contradicting stationarity. Thus stationarity is equivalent to pointwise, and taking the adjoint gives . This is the charged version of the compact-variation identity in [F1]; the additional terms are smooth multiplication terms.
Contract the first equation in step 1.2 on the left by and the adjoint equation on the right by . Subtracting cancels the equal mass terms and gives The parenthesis equals because the and contributions cancel. Since and is constant, .
From [A1], , so and ; also and . With and [F2], multiply the equation in step 1.2 by and then by . Collecting the time derivative gives This verifies the stated minimal-coupling signs.