Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dirac gauge covariance, action and conserved current

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and use the conventions of Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions. Let U⊆R4 be open, let each aa:U→R be a smooth real potential component, and let ψ:U→C4 be a smooth commuting spinor. The real gauge parameter is a smooth α:U→R, and all fields, derivatives and compactly supported smooth variations below are on this same U (including U=R4). Use the symmetrized classical density LD=i2{ψˉγaDaψ−(Daψˉ)γaψ}−μψˉψ,Daψˉ=∂aψˉ+igaaψˉ. For compactly supported smooth variations, its spinor Euler equation is (iγaDa−μ)ψ=0 and its adjoint. The density is invariant under the gauge transformation in Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions. On solutions, ∂aja=0,ja=gψˉγaψ. In SI variables the corresponding Hamiltonian density has the sign convention ψ† ⁣[c α⋅(−iℏ∇−qA)+βmc2+qϕ]ψ. These are conditional variational identities for smooth commuting classical fields. They assert no global existence theorem for the coupled field equations, no quantum current product, and no empirical measurement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the charged conventions in Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions; smooth commuting fields on the common open region U; compactly supported variations in U; and the free Dirac variation interface.

[A1]

The normalized conventions give Da=∂a−igaa, μ=mc/ℏ, g=qμ0c/ℏ, and Aa=(−ϕ/c,A) divided by μ0ℏc. Charged gauge data and SI-natural conventions

[F1]

For smooth commuting spinors, compact variations of the free density give the Euler equation (iγa∂a−μ)ψ=0 through the displayed first variation; the supplier fixes (γa)†β=βγa. Classical free action variations and normalization

[F2]

The fixed representation has β=diag⁡(I2,−I2), αj=(0σjσj0) for Hermitian Pauli matrices σj, γ0=β, γj=βαj, and ψˉ=ψ†β. Dirac Clifford matrices and energy projections

[F3]

The explicit block matrices of Dirac Clifford matrices and energy projections give β†=β, β2=I4, αj†=αj, and (γa)†β=βγa; the last identity is checked by block multiplication in proof step 1.2.

[A2]
[A3]

The potential, spinor and real gauge parameter are smooth on the same open U⊆R4, and every variation has compact support in U.

[F4]

Every open ball contains a nonnegative compactly supported smooth bump positive on a smaller ball. A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls

Proof

Given: [A1], [F1], [F2], [A2], [A3], and the displayed charged density.

1.1A1A2A3givenalgebra

Under a↦a+∂α and ψ↦eigαψ, the chain rule gives Da′ψ′=eigαDaψ; the conjugate equation gives Da′ψˉ′=e−igαDaψˉ. The two phases cancel in each term of LD, so the density is gauge invariant. The explicit Countable Choice assumption is [A2].

1.2A1A2A3F1F3F4givenalgebra

From [F2], β=diag⁡(I2,−I2) is Hermitian and squares to I4; each Pauli matrix is Hermitian, so αj†=αj, and the block formulas give αjβ=−βαj. Therefore (γ0)†β=β2=I4=βγ0, while for j=1,2,3, (γj)†β=(βαj)†β=αjβ†β=αj=β2αj=βγj. This proves [F3] from the exact matrix definitions. Now vary ψ along a compactly supported complex χ and ψˉ along χˉ. Expanding the four kinetic terms and integrating the terms containing Daχ or Daχˉ by parts gives δSD=2Re⁡∫Uχ†βRD d4x,RD=(iγaDa−μ)ψ. For example, ∫ψˉγaDaχ=−∫(Daψˉ)γaχ and −∫(Daχˉ)γaψ=∫χˉγaDaψ; compact support removes both boundary terms. The resulting variation is i∫(χˉγaDaψ−(Daψˉ)γaχ)d4x−μ∫(χˉψ+ψˉχ)d4x=∫(χˉRD+χˉRD‾)d4x, where the equality uses (γa)†β=βγa from [F3]. If RD(x0)≠0, continuity and openness of U give a ball contained in U where ∣RD∣>0; choose a bump ρ from [F4] there and take χ=ρβRD. Since β†β=I4, this gives δSD=2∫ρ∣RD∣2d4x>0, contradicting stationarity. Thus stationarity is equivalent to RD=0 pointwise, and taking the adjoint gives −i(Daψˉ)γa−μψˉ=0. This is the charged version of the compact-variation identity in [F1]; the additional aa terms are smooth multiplication terms.

2.1step 1.2F2givenalgebra

Contract the first equation in step 1.2 on the left by ψˉ and the adjoint equation on the right by ψ. Subtracting cancels the equal mass terms and gives i(ψˉγaDaψ+(Daψˉ)γaψ)=0. The parenthesis equals ∂a(ψˉγaψ) because the +igaaψˉ and −igaaψ contributions cancel. Since i≠0 and g is constant, ∂aja=0.

3.1A1F2step 1.2givenalgebra∎

From [A1], g/S0=q/ℏ, so gaj=qAj/ℏ and ga0=−qϕ/(ℏc); also x0=ct and μ=mc/ℏ. With γ0=β and γj=βαj [F2], multiply the equation in step 1.2 by β and then by ℏc. Collecting the time derivative gives iℏ∂tψ=[cα⋅(−iℏ∇−qA)+βmc2+qϕ]ψ. This verifies the stated minimal-coupling signs.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources