Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strongly continuous scalar one-particle Poincare action

Statement

Assume Countable Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). Use the proper orthochronous Poincare group G=R4⋊SO+(1,3) in the coordinates of Scalar future mass shell, invariant measure and test restriction. Give SO+(1,3) the matrix subspace topology from M4(R) and G the product topology on R4×SO+(1,3), with the group law below. A unitary representation of this topological group is a homomorphism into the unitary operators on Hμ; it is strongly continuous when each orbit map g↦Uμ(g)h is norm-continuous for h∈Hμ. For g=(a,Λ)∈G, define fg(x)=f(Λ−1(x−a)),[Uμ(g)h](p)=eip∘ah(Λ−1p). Then fg∈S(R4), Uμ(g) is a well-defined unitary on Hμ, g↦Uμ(g) is a strongly continuous representation, and Kμfg=Uμ(g)Kμf(f∈S(R4)). The group product convention is (a,Λ)(b,Γ)=(a+Λb,ΛΓ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the scalar shell phase and test restriction, the invariant shell measure, and the proper orthochronous Minkowski action.

[A1]
[F1]

The shell phase p∘x=−η(p,x) is Lorentz invariant and the test restriction is F+f on the shell. Scalar future mass shell, invariant measure and test restriction

[F2]

The shell measure is locally finite, sigma-finite, and Lorentz invariant. Local finiteness and Lorentz invariance of the scalar shell measure

[F3]

Cc∞(R3∖{0}) is contained in the shell restriction range in the massless chart and is dense there; the massive Cc∞(R3) chart functions are also in the range and dense. Density of Schwartz test restrictions in the scalar shell space

[F4]

Kμ maps every Schwartz test continuously into Hμ. Continuity and Klein–Gordon annihilation of scalar shell restriction

[F7]

A C1 diffeomorphism between open Euclidean sets satisfies change of variables for nonnegative measurable functions under Countable Choice. A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions

[F8]

Dominated convergence applies to an integrable majorant. Dominated convergence

Proof

1.1A1F6givenalgebra

The affine pullback fg(x)=f(Λ−1(x−a)) preserves Schwartz space. Repeated chain rule [F6] expresses each derivative as a finite linear combination of derivatives of f at Λ−1(x−a). Also 1+∣x∣≤C(1+∣Λ−1(x−a)∣) for a finite constant C depending on a,Λ. Thus every polynomially weighted derivative remains bounded by the corresponding finite sum of Schwartz seminorms.

1.2A1F1F2F5givenalgebra

Multiplication by eip∘a preserves the Hμ norm. Composition with Λ−1 also preserves that norm by [F2]; it preserves null-equivalence classes for the same reason. Therefore Uμ(g) is a well-defined isometry. Its inverse is the corresponding formula for g−1, so it is unitary. Direct substitution and Lorentz invariance of p∘x give Uμ(a,Λ)Uμ(b,Γ)=Uμ(a+Λb,ΛΓ).

2.1A1F1F4F5F7step 1.2givenconstruct

In the Fourier integral for Kμfg, change variables x=a+Λy; [F5] gives ∣det⁡Λ∣=1 and [F7] justifies the change of variables. The integrand is absolutely integrable because f is Schwartz; apply [F7] to the positive and negative parts of its real and imaginary components to obtain this change of variables for the complex integral. Lorentz invariance of the phase then gives Kμfg(p)=eip∘aKμf(Λ−1p). Both sides belong to Hμ by [F4], so this equality is also equality of Hilbert-space vectors. This is the action formula used in step 1.2.

3.1A1F2F3F8step 1.2givenalgebra∎

Let h∈Cc∞ in the shell chart, with support away from the massless apex. If g→g0 in the Poincare group, Uμ(g)h converges pointwise to Uμ(g0)h. In a compact neighborhood of g0, the supports lie in one compact chart subset C away from the apex; νμ(C)<∞ by [F2]. The squared pointwise difference is bounded by 4∥h∥∞21C, so [F8] gives norm continuity for this dense family. Density follows from [F3]. For arbitrary v∈Hμ, choose such h with ∥v−h∥<ϵ; unitarity gives ∥Uμ(g)v−Uμ(g0)v∥≤2ϵ+∥Uμ(g)h−Uμ(g0)h∥. First take g→g0 and then ϵ↓0. This proves strong continuity on all of Hμ.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources