Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact raw ADHM block, real monad and stereographic ASD projection

Statement

Assume AC. Let V=Ck and W=CN, N≥1, k≥0, with their standard Hermitian products. Let Bi∈End⁡C(V), I:W→V, and J:V→W. Define the raw moment maps

μC=[B1,B2]+IJ,μR=[B1,B1†]+[B2,B2†]+II†−J†J,

and assume μC=0. Put K=V⊕V⊕W. For z=(z1,z2)∈C2 put

az=(B1−z1,B2−z2,J)T,bz=(−B2†+zˉ2,B1†−zˉ1,I†)T,Dz=(bz†az†).

Then

DzDz†=(bz†bzμCμC†az†az),bz†bz−az†az=μR.

The maps bz† are onto for every z exactly when the datum is stable; the maps az are injective for every z exactly when it is costable. Consequently, when both moments vanish, regularity is equivalent to Dz being onto for every z. On this locus fz=az†az=bz†bz is positive definite and

Pz=1−Dz†diag⁡(fz−1,fz−1)Dz

is the smooth orthogonal projection onto a rank-N bundle over R4. The projection connection ∇=P d is unitary and satisfies F+=0 for the positive stereographic orientation dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3, where z1=x0+ix1, z2=x2+ix3.

In homogeneous coordinates [λ1:λ2:μ1:μ2] on P3, put A=B1λ1−B2†λ2−μ1, C=B2λ1+B1†λ2−μ2 and

α=(A,C,Jλ1+I†λ2)T,β=(−C,A,Iλ1−J†λ2).

The polynomial identity is βα=λ12μC+λ1λ2μR−λ22μC†. With σ(λ1,λ2,μ1,μ2)=(−λˉ2,λˉ1,−μˉ2,μˉ1), one has β(v)=α(σv)†. The real line over z is μ1=z1λ1−zˉ2λ2, μ2=z2λ1+zˉ1λ2; the line at infinity is λ1=λ2=0. For regular zero-moment data these maps form a holomorphic bundle monad, trivial on each real line, with middle cohomology on the line over z canonically ker⁡Dz. Its framing at infinity is W. The torus acts on the homogeneous coordinates by (λ1,t1t2λ2,t1μ1,t2μ2) and on the raw data by (t1B1,t2B2,Ih−1,t1t2hJ); the monad isomorphism has source, middle and target factors (t1t2)−1, diag⁡(t2−1,t1−1,h) and 1, respectively. It preserves the framing representation W with weights eα−1.

This proves a forward raw block construction. It does not assert that every real Ward monad has this normal form, that its inverse extraction is unique, or that the connection extends with charge k; those global correspondence and charge assertions require their separate proofs.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact raw equation, Hermitian spaces, polynomial maps and coordinate conventions in the Statement.

[F1]

The raw moment maps, stable word span, costability and gauge/framing action have their stated finite-dimensional meanings. ADHM linear data, stability, costability and FI levels

[F2]

A constant-rank smooth bundle map has smooth kernel and image subbundles. Constant-rank kernels and images of bundle maps over one base are subbundles

[F3]

The curvature of a connection is its square, and in a frame is dω+ω∧ω. Curvature of a vector-bundle connection

[F4]

Commuting complex matrices on a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space have a common eigenvector: choose an eigenspace of the first, which is invariant under the second, and then an eigenvector of its restriction. The same applies to dual matrices. The complex numbers are algebraically closed

[F5]

The explicit positive stereographic, twistor and real-structure convention is that of the local definition. AC is inherited through the bundle supplier. Zero-FI regular ADHM and framed twistor data, The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: The data of the Statement.

1.1F1algebra

Matrix multiplication gives bz†az=(−B2+z2)(B1−z1)+(B1−z1)(B2−z2)+IJ=μC. Taking adjoints gives the other off-diagonal entry of DD†. Subtracting az†az from bz†bz cancels every scalar and linear-in-z term and leaves [B1,B1†]+[B2,B2†]+II†−J†J=μR. This proves both identities with their exact signs.

2.1F1F4step 1.1algebra

Failure of surjectivity of bz†=(−B2+z2,B1−z1,I) gives a nonzero covector ℓ with ℓBi=ziℓ and ℓI=0, contradicting the stable spanning set. Conversely, if the stable word span S is proper, the induced pair on V/S commutes since [B1,B2]=−IJ has image in S. Its dual has a common eigenvector by [F4], and the resulting covector annihilates I and both rows at the corresponding z, so surjectivity fails there. A kernel vector of az is a common eigenvector of Bi in ker⁡J and contradicts costability. Conversely, on any nonzero common invariant S⊂ker⁡J, the pair commutes by the complex equation and has a common eigenvector by [F4], producing such a kernel. This proves both equivalences.

2.2F1F5step 1.1algebra

Expanding [A,C]+(Iλ1−J†λ2)(Jλ1+I†λ2) gives the stated polynomial with coefficients μC,μR,−μC†. Substitution of σv in α, followed by adjoint, gives exactly (−C,A,Iλ1−J†λ2)=β(v). On a real line the same substitution gives α=azλ1+bzλ2 and β=bz†λ1−az†λ2. The scalar-coordinate matrix (λ1−λˉ2λ2λˉ1) is invertible whenever (λ1,λ2)≠0. Solving the two displayed incidence equations similarly recovers a unique z from each point with λ≠0; their real-linear coefficient matrix has determinant (∣λ1∣2+∣λ2∣2)2. The points with λ=0 form L∞. Thus these lines cover P3.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

At zero real moment, step 1.1 gives DD†=diag⁡(f,f) with f=a†a=b†b. Regularity makes f positive definite by injectivity of a, and hence makes D onto. Conversely, surjectivity of D makes both diagonal blocks positive definite; a is injective and b† onto, so step 2.1 gives regularity. Direct multiplication shows P†=P, P2=P, DP=0, and P is the identity on ker⁡D. Inversion of positive matrices is smooth, so [F2] gives the rank-N smooth kernel bundle. Projection of the trivial Hermitian connection is a metric connection because for kernel sections s,t, d⟨s,t⟩=⟨Pds,t⟩+⟨s,Pdt⟩.

4.1F3F5step 3.1algebra

Differentiate DP=0 and its adjoint to obtain dP P=−D†(DD†)−1dD P and P dP=−P dD†(DD†)−1D. Thus [F3] gives F=P dP∧dP P=P dD†diag⁡(f−1,f−1)∧dD P. Its nonzero differential blocks are dD=(dz2−dz1−dzˉ1−dzˉ2). The resulting two-form blocks are multiples of dz1∧dzˉ1−dz2∧dzˉ2, 2dz1∧dzˉ2 and 2dz2∧dzˉ1, with coefficient f−1; the W blocks vanish. Expanding in real coordinates shows that these forms are complex linear combinations of dx0∧dx1−dx2∧dx3, dx0∧dx2+dx1∧dx3 and dx0∧dx3−dx1∧dx2. Each has Hodge star minus itself for the positive Euclidean orientation. Multiplication by the degree-zero matrices P preserves this property, so F+=0.

4.2F2step 3.1step 2.2algebra

For regular zero-moment data the maps az,bz have orthogonal images and equal positive Gram matrix fz. Therefore azλ1+bzλ2 is injective for every nonzero λ, since its squared norm on v is (∣λ1∣2+∣λ2∣2)⟨v,fzv⟩. The identity with σ makes β surjective as well. At L∞, α=(−μ1,−μ2,0)T and β=(μ2,−μ1,0) have the same properties. A nonzero maximal minor locally solves each kernel and image equation by holomorphic matrix inversion, so their kernels, images and middle quotient have holomorphic local frames. Hence the middle cohomology is a holomorphic bundle. On a finite real line, split K=im⁡az⊕im⁡bz⊕ker⁡Dz. Using az,bz to identify the first two summands with V⊕V, and multiplying the target by fz−1, the first two summands form V copies of the Euler complex O(−1)→(λ1,λ2)O2→(−λ2,λ1)O(1), whose middle cohomology is zero. The remaining summand is the constant ker⁡Dz, proving the canonical linewise identification. The identical Euler calculation at infinity leaves W with its standard framing.

5.1F1F5step 2.2step 4.2algebra∎

Under the stated simultaneous torus transformation, A and C acquire factors t1,t2 and the third component of α acquires t1t2h. Dividing the resulting middle map by t1t2 gives UK=diag⁡(t2−1,t1−1,h), with source factor (t1t2)−1 and target factor 1; direct substitution verifies both chain squares. At infinity the Euler blocks cancel and the induced framing action is precisely h. This projective torus action preserves the real-line incidence and commutes with σ projectively. In the chart λ1=1,λ2=0, the holomorphic coordinates are (λ2,μ1,μ2) with (μ1,μ2)=(z1,z2), so vertical complex orientation followed by the positive stereographic orientation is the complex orientation of P3. For k=0, D is the unique map to the zero space, P=1W, and all formulas reduce to the framed trivial bundle. No inverse normal-form theorem or global charge calculation was used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources