How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact raw ADHM block, real monad and stereographic ASD projection
Statement
Assume AC. Let and , , , with their standard Hermitian products. Let , , and . Define the raw moment maps
and assume . Put . For put
Then
The maps are onto for every exactly when the datum is stable; the maps are injective for every exactly when it is costable. Consequently, when both moments vanish, regularity is equivalent to being onto for every . On this locus is positive definite and
is the smooth orthogonal projection onto a rank- bundle over . The projection connection is unitary and satisfies for the positive stereographic orientation , where , .
In homogeneous coordinates on , put , and
The polynomial identity is . With , one has . The real line over is , ; the line at infinity is . For regular zero-moment data these maps form a holomorphic bundle monad, trivial on each real line, with middle cohomology on the line over canonically . Its framing at infinity is . The torus acts on the homogeneous coordinates by and on the raw data by ; the monad isomorphism has source, middle and target factors , and , respectively. It preserves the framing representation with weights .
This proves a forward raw block construction. It does not assert that every real Ward monad has this normal form, that its inverse extraction is unique, or that the connection extends with charge ; those global correspondence and charge assertions require their separate proofs.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The exact raw equation, Hermitian spaces, polynomial maps and coordinate conventions in the Statement.
The raw moment maps, stable word span, costability and gauge/framing action have their stated finite-dimensional meanings. ADHM linear data, stability, costability and FI levels
A constant-rank smooth bundle map has smooth kernel and image subbundles. Constant-rank kernels and images of bundle maps over one base are subbundles
The curvature of a connection is its square, and in a frame is . Curvature of a vector-bundle connection
Commuting complex matrices on a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space have a common eigenvector: choose an eigenspace of the first, which is invariant under the second, and then an eigenvector of its restriction. The same applies to dual matrices. The complex numbers are algebraically closed
The explicit positive stereographic, twistor and real-structure convention is that of the local definition. AC is inherited through the bundle supplier. Zero-FI regular ADHM and framed twistor data, The Axiom of Choice
Proof
Given: The data of the Statement.
Matrix multiplication gives . Taking adjoints gives the other off-diagonal entry of . Subtracting from cancels every scalar and linear-in- term and leaves . This proves both identities with their exact signs.
Failure of surjectivity of gives a nonzero covector with and , contradicting the stable spanning set. Conversely, if the stable word span is proper, the induced pair on commutes since has image in . Its dual has a common eigenvector by [F4], and the resulting covector annihilates and both rows at the corresponding , so surjectivity fails there. A kernel vector of is a common eigenvector of in and contradicts costability. Conversely, on any nonzero common invariant , the pair commutes by the complex equation and has a common eigenvector by [F4], producing such a kernel. This proves both equivalences.
Expanding gives the stated polynomial with coefficients . Substitution of in , followed by adjoint, gives exactly . On a real line the same substitution gives and . The scalar-coordinate matrix is invertible whenever . Solving the two displayed incidence equations similarly recovers a unique from each point with ; their real-linear coefficient matrix has determinant . The points with form . Thus these lines cover .
At zero real moment, step 1.1 gives with . Regularity makes positive definite by injectivity of , and hence makes onto. Conversely, surjectivity of makes both diagonal blocks positive definite; is injective and onto, so step 2.1 gives regularity. Direct multiplication shows , , , and is the identity on . Inversion of positive matrices is smooth, so [F2] gives the rank- smooth kernel bundle. Projection of the trivial Hermitian connection is a metric connection because for kernel sections , .
Differentiate and its adjoint to obtain and . Thus [F3] gives . Its nonzero differential blocks are . The resulting two-form blocks are multiples of , and , with coefficient ; the blocks vanish. Expanding in real coordinates shows that these forms are complex linear combinations of , and . Each has Hodge star minus itself for the positive Euclidean orientation. Multiplication by the degree-zero matrices preserves this property, so .
For regular zero-moment data the maps have orthogonal images and equal positive Gram matrix . Therefore is injective for every nonzero , since its squared norm on is . The identity with makes surjective as well. At , and have the same properties. A nonzero maximal minor locally solves each kernel and image equation by holomorphic matrix inversion, so their kernels, images and middle quotient have holomorphic local frames. Hence the middle cohomology is a holomorphic bundle. On a finite real line, split . Using to identify the first two summands with , and multiplying the target by , the first two summands form copies of the Euler complex , whose middle cohomology is zero. The remaining summand is the constant , proving the canonical linewise identification. The identical Euler calculation at infinity leaves with its standard framing.
Under the stated simultaneous torus transformation, and acquire factors and the third component of acquires . Dividing the resulting middle map by gives , with source factor and target factor ; direct substitution verifies both chain squares. At infinity the Euler blocks cancel and the induced framing action is precisely . This projective torus action preserves the real-line incidence and commutes with projectively. In the chart , the holomorphic coordinates are with , so vertical complex orientation followed by the positive stereographic orientation is the complex orientation of . For , is the unique map to the zero space, , and all formulas reduce to the framed trivial bundle. No inverse normal-form theorem or global charge calculation was used.