Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

SU(2) one-plaquette matrix average at strong coupling

Statement

Assume ACω and use the finite SU(2) Wilson plaquette measure for β>0: μ2 is the pushforward of normalized round area σ3/(2π2) on S3 under the displayed matrix-coordinate map x↦U(x), and τ(U)=12Tr⁡2(U). Put

I0(β):=∫SU(2)eβτ(U)dμ2(U),I1(β):=∫SU(2)τ(U)eβτ(U)dμ2(U),λ(β):=I1(β)/I0(β).

Then μ2 is a normalized bi-invariant Borel probability, I0(β)>0, 0<λ(β)<1, and the defining-representation matrix expectation is

∫SU(2)U dνβ(U)=λ(β)I2.

As β↓0, λ(β)=β/4+O(β3). The parameter β and the one-plaquette expectation are dimensionless.

Statement references

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, β>0, the defining representation of SU(2), and the explicit round measure and weight.

[A1]

ACω is inherited through the supplied Lie-algebra and Lie-group constructions; this proof uses no further choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Finite SU(2) Wilson plaquette measure: SU(2) is the matrix set {U:U∗U=I2,det⁡U=1}, τ(U)=12Tr⁡2(U)=x0, and μ2 is the pushforward of normalized round surface measure σ3/(2π2) on S3; explicitly, for every Borel A⊆SU(2), μ2(A)=(2π2)−1σ3({x∈S3:U(x)∈A}). The same definition states the spherical-coordinate density that step 2.1 establishes locally before using.

[F2]

Unitary and special unitary Lie groups: SU(2) with this matrix set and multiplication is a finite-dimensional real Lie group.

[F4]

Here σ3 means Euclidean surface area on the coordinate sphere, normalized by its total area; the chart-area measure is the cone-defined polar surface measure, and orthogonal transformations preserve it. In a smooth parametrization its density is the square root of the Gram determinant of the coordinate tangent vectors. The polar surface set function on the unit sphere Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure

[F5]

The coordinate integrands are continuous and bounded on finite-measure coordinate domains; therefore their absolute integrals are finite. The finite product-coordinate integrations obey Tonelli for nonnegative functions and Fubini for L1 functions. Measure space and integral Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product Fubini's theorem for L1 functions on a sigma-finite product

[F6]

Writing X(a,b)=(ab−bˉaˉ), matrix multiplication satisfies X(c,d)X(a,b)=X(ca−dbˉ, cb+daˉ) and X(a,b)X(c,d)=X(ac−bdˉ, ad+bcˉ). Thus left and right multiplication preserve this real four-dimensional matrix subspace and are real-linear in the coordinates of S3.

[F7]

Under ACω, every Borel measure finite on compact sets on a second-countable locally compact Hausdorff space is regular (inner regular on open sets and outer regular on Borel sets). Locally finite Borel measures on second-countable LCH spaces are regular

Proof

technique · direct coordinate integration
1.1A1F1F2F3algebra

In M2(C)≅R8, the equations U∗U=I2 and det⁡U=1 define a closed set, and U∗U=I2 implies ∥U∥F2=Tr⁡(U∗U)=2, so the set is bounded. By [F3] it is compact; [F2] gives the stated smooth Lie-group structure. It is noncommutative: A=diag⁡(i,−i) and B=(01−10) lie in SU(2), while AB=−BA and AB≠0. The set-theoretic premise inherited by the lattice definitions is ACω [A1].

2.1A1F1F2F4F6F7step 1.1algebra

The coordinate map Ξ:S3→SU(2), x↦U(x), is a bijection. Indeed, for U=(abcd)∈SU(2), U−1=U∗=(aˉcˉbˉdˉ) while the adjugate formula gives U−1=(d−b−ca), so d=aˉ and c=−bˉ; unitarity gives ∣a∣2+∣b∣2=1. Writing a=x0+ix3 and b=x2+ix1 recovers a unique x∈S3, and direct multiplication shows every such x gives an element of SU(2). The map and its inverse are smooth coordinate maps. For round measure, use x=q(θ,φ,ψ)=(cos⁡θ,sin⁡θsin⁡φcos⁡ψ,sin⁡θsin⁡φsin⁡ψ,sin⁡θcos⁡φ) on 0<θ,φ<π, 0<ψ<2π. Its three coordinate tangent vectors are pairwise orthogonal with squared lengths 1, sin⁡2θ, and sin⁡2θsin⁡2φ, so the induced surface-area density is sin⁡2θsin⁡φ dθ dφ dψ. The chart boundary is a finite union of lower-dimensional smooth pieces and has zero three-dimensional surface area. Integration gives total area (∫0πsin⁡2θ dθ)(∫0πsin⁡φ dφ)(∫02πdψ)=2π2. Normalizing therefore gives dμ2=(2/π)sin⁡2θ dθ dω2 with dω2=(1/(4π))sin⁡φ dφ dψ, exactly the density stated in [F1], and total mass one. For V∈SU(2), the maps x↦Ξ−1(VΞ(x)) and x↦Ξ−1(Ξ(x)V) are real-linear by [F6] and preserve ∣x∣, since ∥Ξ(x)∥F2=2∣x∣2 and left and right multiplication by a unitary matrix preserve Frobenius norm. Their restrictions to S3 are orthogonal transformations, which preserve round measure. The pushforward formula [F1] defines a Borel probability. The compact matrix subspace SU(2)⊂R8 is Hausdorff and locally compact, and its intersections with Euclidean balls of rational centers and positive rational radii form a countable base. Since μ2 has total mass one it is finite on compact sets; [F7] under [A1] therefore makes it inner regular on open sets and outer regular on Borel sets. Thus μ2 is a finite Radon probability, and the left and right invariance already proved make it bi-invariant in the declared supplier convention.

3.1F1F5step 2.1algebra

In the coordinates established in step 2.1, τ(U)=cos⁡θ. Because μ2 is a probability and −β≤βτ(U)≤β, the continuous factor eβτ is bounded between e−β and eβ; hence e−β≤I0(β)≤eβ and I0(β) is finite and positive. The density zβ−1eβτ therefore defines the probability νβ [F5]. The angular vector n∈S2 has mean zero by the measure-preserving symmetry n↦−n. The coordinate integrands are continuous and bounded on the finite product-coordinate probability domain, so they are L1 by [F5]; Fubini separates the angular and radial integrals. The matrix coordinates then give ∫Ueβτ(U)dμ2(U)=I1(β)I2, proving ∫U dνβ(U)=λ(β)I2.

4.1F1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

The transformation U↦−U corresponds to the orthogonal map x↦−x, so it preserves μ2 and sends τ to −τ. Consequently I1(β)=∫τ(U)sinh⁡(βτ(U))dμ2(U)>0 for β>0: the integrand is nonnegative everywhere and strictly positive on, for example, the coordinate region 0<θ<π/3, which has positive measure by the density in step 2.1. Also I0−I1=∫(1−τ(U))eβτ(U)dμ2(U)>0, since τ≤1 and equality holds only at the identity matrix, whose singleton has zero round measure by the coordinate density. Thus 0<λ<1.

5.1F1F5step 2.1algebra∎

The measure from step 2.1 is invariant under every orthogonal transformation of R4. Coordinate sign changes give ∫x0dμ2=0 and permutation symmetry makes all four squared-coordinate integrals equal; integrating ∑j=03xj2=1 therefore gives ∫x02dμ2=1/4. Taylor's formula for eβx0 has a remainder uniform for ∣x0∣≤1 on a neighborhood of β=0; its integrals are finite because μ2 is a probability. Odd moments vanish under x0↦−x0. Thus I0(β)=1+β2/8+O(β4) and I1(β)=β/4+O(β3), so division gives λ(β)=β/4+O(β3).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources